Home  

Random  

Nearby  



Log in  



Settings  



Donate  



About Wikipedia  

Disclaimers  



Wikipedia





Talk:Haymarket affair: Difference between revisions





Article  

Talk  



Language  

Watch  

View history  

Edit  






Browse history interactively
 Previous editNext edit 
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
rm redundant flamebait comment
Line 417:
 
::::No one has yet reviewed the book that I can find. The sound of silence. [[User:Aecwriter|Aecwriter]] ([[User talk:Aecwriter|talk]]) 08:53, 20 February 2012 (UTC)AECwriter 04:53, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
 
===Goodbye From Repeat Benefactor===
 
Because wikipedia's editorial guidelines have degenerated into groupthink, I will not be donating $100 next year as I have donated in the past. I count on wikipedia to be a repository of the truth, no matter how inconvenient or embarassing. Read the professor's account (http://chronicle.com/article/The-Undue-Weight-of-Truth-on/130704), then stop to reflect on one of the responses to the professor's account: "I think you're right that if Wikipedia was the dominant meta-information source at the time of, say Galileo, the sheer amount of sources citing Biblical entries -- or rather more likely, citing Aristotle's Physics -- would have drowned his own claims out."
 
== Indicted for murder ==

Add topic

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Haymarket_affair"
 




Languages

 



This page is not available in other languages.
 

Wikipedia




Privacy policy

About Wikipedia

Disclaimers

Contact Wikipedia

Code of Conduct

Developers

Statistics

Cookie statement

Terms of Use

Desktop