Hi, @Nascar9919! I'll be reviewing this article as soon as possible. I don't promise to be that fast, but I will try to be as fast as possible because I know how frustrating it is to wait so long. Very recent, yes, but I see that it is very stable. Best, Santi (talk) 19:34, 13 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hello! Thank you so much for taking this on. Don't worry about rushing through this; I know this deals with a very complicated subject. Feel free to take as much time as you need. Cheers, and carpe diem! Nascar9919 (he/him • t • c) 19:37, 13 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Broc: Gotcha. How do I start that process? Sorry, just a bit confused on what I'm supposed to do. Never done this before. Cheers, and carpe diem! Nascar9919 (he/him • t • c) 23:54, 1 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
The sample of a song is not just added 'cause yes. Although its main function is to give the reader an idea about the song, there should be some emphasis during the body of the article on the part that you want to sample, and I don't see that there. Santi (talk) 19:28, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Done. I didn't add that. That was someone else. But, I left it because "hey, maybe this is important in some way!" Deleted. Cheers, and carpe diem! Nascar9919 (he/him • t • c) 19:33, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Sorry for believing that you were responsible of that. The same thing happened to me with Gelo DemonPlayer (without acting in bad faith), he was the one who put the samples of Feid's songs, and I was trying to find use for them. But well, something made me listen to "Hurricane" LOL. Santi (talk) 19:35, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hmmm, you don't understand me. I was wondering if "was" is better than "is", because I understand that the composition is already in the past, and "is" would sound a bit strange. Santi (talk) 19:50, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Ohhhh, I thought you just wanted me to change "is" to "was". I agree on that end. That's why I changed it. Cheers, and carpe diem! Nascar9919 (he/him • t • c) 19:55, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
I couldn't access ref 8 due to access denied, so I couldn't do spotcheck. The rest of the section is perfectly fine. Santi (talk) 20:39, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Oops! One moment... if there are more musical details about the song to put in the composition section, then I suggest moving ref 1 to the body of the article and adding the genre there as well. Santi (talk) 01:34, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Then, archiving in that ref is missing, and, what does a pop ballad have to do with a sentimental ballad? Sorry, I already saw the reason for the link. Santi (talk) 01:40, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
As I see in other articles, with Eurovision songs there is not much emphasis on musical structure, so I pass this section once and for all to continue with the music video. Santi (talk) 01:44, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
I noticed that you put three images portraying the songwriters. I don't know how useful are they, but I suggest keeping them until Omert33 demonstrates the usefulness of the readded sample. If it is not proven, then I will tell you how they could be presented better. Santi (talk) 23:09, 10 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Nascar9919: I return to the review after finishing "Shirt". Tell me if you agree with the changes made, or if you want the images you posted to remain (I didn't delete them, they're just hidden in the wikicode). Santi (talk) 20:20, 13 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Ok, you can delete it. It happened this way because the user insisted on the permanence of the sample in the article. Santi (talk) 20:23, 13 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
Let me run the thing thru the Archive Bot and see if that'll work. Hope that should get archiving squared away. Cheers, and carpe diem! Nascar9919 (he/him • t • c) 02:29, 4 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Pollosito: Pinging as a reminder. Do you think you could get this finished within the week? Just checking in. Thanks! Cheers, and carpe diem! Nascar9919 (he/him • t • c) 23:38, 9 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Nascar9919: The next week. Don't worry, what I'm doing is prioritizing the most urgent reviews; that is, Shirt's, since PSA was the one who first asked me to finish this week. Furthermore, during these days I was doing very stressful laps that made me tired. I'll get back to it as soon as possible, when "Shirt" ends. Santi (talk) 00:07, 10 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
I also have to add something. Omert33 added the sample again, I already sent him a message about it and from then on he didn't make a single edit. Therefore, even if I review the article, I think it should end when this problem with the sample has been resolved. Also, with "the next week" I mean the week that starts tomorrow. I clarify just in case because I know that the schedule here is different and, therefore, it could be confusing. Santi (talk) 00:11, 10 June 2024 (UTC)Reply
b(inline citations to reliable sources): 
As the reviewer has gone on wikibreak, I have followed the steps at WP:GAN/I#N4a, and returned this nomination to the queue. Cheers, and carpe diem! Nascar9919 (he/him • t • c) 02:31, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Done. I didn't add that. That was someone else. But, I left it because "hey, maybe this is important in some way!" Deleted. Cheers, and carpe diem! Nascar9919 (he/him • t • c) 19:33, 3 June 2024 (UTC)Reply