This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Marjorie Cohn article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Notability calls for individuals to have been the subject of reliable, third party sources. The first page worth of Google hits for Marjorie Cohn are her own website, and some cites, such as Huffington Post, where she has authored pieces. Additionally, the article itself offers no citations that establish notability, and I see nothing here that is covered in notability of creative people. I am adding the notability tag to this article. Bonewah (talk) 16:00, 10 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
The same can be said for the Google results of [Thomas Friedman]. This doesn't mean that Thomas Friedman shouldn't have a Wikipedia page. This isn't an argument in favor of keeping an article on Cohn - it's simply used to show that a person's first page of Google results can be a very poor factor in making the determination. Google results are highly manipulable and thus highly subjective. We should be looking at objective factors. For example, both Friedman and Cohn are widely published: Friedman is published in the New York Times on a semi-weekly basis; Cohn is frequently published by a variety of alternative news outlets. Both appear on mainstream TV "news" shows from time to time. BlackberryLaw (talk) 15:43, 23 February 2009 (UTC)Reply
I realize this discussion is stale, but for what it's worth:
Happy editing! JFHJr (㊟) 04:02, 8 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Marjorie Cohn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:36, 3 June 2017 (UTC)Reply