 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
The current consensus seems to be that including primary sources on the Wikipedia is not a good idea, as the free editing that is so useful in other contexts is a very bad thing for them. Discuss the article here, and put links to the actual content elsewhere. See:Wikipedia:Don't include copies of primary sources --Robert Merkel 02:05 Jan 10, 2003 (UTC)
sorry. It is one of a number of txts passed by dail eireann. I've had a number of emails asking me to put it on, as people were curious about it. should i remove it or leave it? JTD 02:10 Jan 10, 2003 (UTC)
It should probably be moved to Project Sourceberg. --Camembert
I'd welcome a short article on what this message was intended to achieve, or what its context was. DJ Clayworth 19:28, 30 Sep 2003 (UTC)
I've moved the actual text to Wikisource. Angela. 00:36, Mar 24, 2004 (UTC)
The use of "sadly" makes this article blatantly guilty of POV...! 86.138.137.123 17:24, 11 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Message to the Free Nations of the World. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:08, 26 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
