Editing Talk:Qing dynasty

{{Talk header}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=B|vital=yes|1=
{{WikiProject China|importance=Top}}
{{WikiProject East Asia}}
{{WikiProject Central Asia|importance=high}}
{{WikiProject Former countries|}}
}}
__TOC__
{{Clear}}

{{old move|date=3 July 2024|destination=Qing China|result=not moved|link=Special:Permalink/1232414100#Requested move 3 July 2024}}

== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 31 July 2023 ==

{{edit extended-protected|Qing dynasty|answered=yes}}
Please separate this hatnote in the "History" section, to include {{tlx|For timeline}} parameter.

{{For timeline|Timeline of the Qing dynasty}}

[[Special:Contributions/2001:4451:8285:B00:9180:5873:29D0:FDF9|2001:4451:8285:B00:9180:5873:29D0:FDF9]] ([[User talk:2001:4451:8285:B00:9180:5873:29D0:FDF9|talk]]) 04:14, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

:{{Done}} <big>[[User:Yue|<span style="color:#757575; font-family:Consolas, monospace">''Yue''</span>]][[User talk:Yue|🌙]]</big> 04:28, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

== Zheltuga Republic ==

Zheltuga Republic was not a successor of the Qing dynasty. It was simply a short-lived proto-state established by some Russian and Chinese gold miners in the Amur river basin, and then crushed by the Qing forces. Source: [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/291758359_California_on_the_Amur_or_the_'Zheltuga_Republic'_in_Manchuria_1883-86] Likewise, other regimes such as the [[Taiping Heavenly Kingdom]] (as established by revolt leaders) were not considered successors of the Qing dynasty either. --[[User:Wengier|Wengier]] ([[User talk:Wengier|talk]]) 23:44, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

== Extended-protected: Overkill? ==

Am I the only one who is confused why this page is extended-protected? It doesn't seem like a controversial enough topic for the designation. Other Wikipedia pages that are arguably far more controversial; [[Mao Zedong]], [[Chinese Communist Party]], [[Xi Jinping]]; all are only semi-protected. Should this page be changed to semi-protected as well? As the topic reads I think that designating this page as extended-protected seems like a bit much. [[Special:Contributions/141.155.35.58|141.155.35.58]] ([[User talk:141.155.35.58|talk]]) 01:42, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

:The topic of this article is extremely controversial because many modern claims of sovereignty by the PRC and ROC are derived from arguments about the Qing dynasty's territoriality and suzerainty. POV pushing and sock editing were perennial problems before protection was upgraded and extended in 2021. <big>[[User:Yue|<span style="color:#757575; font-family:Consolas, monospace">''Yue''</span>]][[User talk:Yue|🌙]]</big> 05:02, 8 January 2024 (UTC)
::Like most topics relating to China on Wikipedia, it is taken over by the Wumao. Notice originally the maps on this page were actually based off real maps, meaning the extent of the Qing, which in real history never included Sakhalin etc.
::Yet over a few years the Wumao took control of this page and have been colouring in more and more of the map, that they now have Sakhalin coloured in as being part of the Qing empire (which no official map ever has this, and the history of this island is clearly known and there is no Chinese presence even when the Japanese and Russian arrive there, only some natives who are mix breeds between Jomon DNA and Siberian migrant DNA who had a bear worshipping culture). 
::But again, this is Wikipedia and it is prone to the lowest common denominator. That's why Wumao have a field day with it, they can keep editing things constantly how they want it, because they are far more numerous and desperate to keep editing things if people try to pull it back to something sensible. [[Special:Contributions/59.102.81.150|59.102.81.150]] ([[User talk:59.102.81.150|talk]]) 19:09, 26 May 2024 (UTC)

== Start of dynasty ==

As the sources given in the article (such as [https://books.google.ca/books?redir_esc=y&id=hqwHAQAAMAAJ&focus=searchwithinvolume&q=%22started+in+1644%22 this]) have already showed, historians usually date the Qing dynasty started in 1644 (at least for historiography purposes), even though Hong Taiji had proclaimed the dynasty in 1636. For example, in the book [https://www.google.com/books/edition/China_s_Last_Empire/KN7Awmzx2PAC?hl=en&gbpv=0 "China's Last Empire - the Great Qing"] (final volume of the [https://www.hup.harvard.edu/series/history-of-imperial-china "History of Imperial China"] series published by the Harvard University Press), the "Emperors and Dynasties" section clearly lists that the Qing dynasty spans from 1644-1912 in page 292, even though it does list Hong Taiji as an emperor of the Great Qing in page 291. Similarly, historians usually consider the [[Qin dynasty]] started in 221 BC, even though the Qin state itself was established much earlier than this. --[[User:Wengier|Wengier]] ([[User talk:Wengier|talk]]) 18:00, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

:The first Qin emperor ([[Qin Shihuang]]) proclaimed himself as emperor of China after 221 BC, he was already a crown king of Qin state before the complete conquest of six nations, therefore the empire of Qin began in 221 BC pursuant to his proclaimation at that year. The imperial dynasty of Qing was started in Manchuria in 1636, it did not turn to an empire only after the seize of Beijing, they were not even in the same basis. [[User:Sheherherhers|Sheherherhers]] ([[User talk:Sheherherhers|talk]]) 02:23, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

::Whether the state itself was an empire or not does not really matter, and it is simply not true that it had to be an empire in order to be called dynasty. For example, the Zhou dynasty is considered a ruling dynasty of China even if it was NEVER an empire. Clearly whether the dynasty was ruled by an emperor or king was not intended to be the deciding factor of the start year, and one can indeed argue that the Qin dynasty started in e.g. 256 BC (when it conquered the Zhou dynasty) or even earlier (such as when the Qin state itself was founded), although historians usually date the Qin dynasty started in 221 BC because it "unified" China at that time. --[[User:Wengier|Wengier]] ([[User talk:Wengier|talk]]) 15:20, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 10 April 2024 ==

{{Edit extended-protected|Qing dynasty|answered=yes}}
How come the pre-1644 history of the dynasty is almost gone and neglected from the brief lead?? 

The fact is that the Qing empire was emerged from a [[Jurchen people|Jurchen]] Khanate of [[later Jin]] established in [[Manchuria]] (including modern Northeast China and Outer Manchuria), which had been its own realm and proclaimed as an imperial dynasty much earlier before the capture of Beijing . 1644 was merely the dynasty first entered to the [[China proper|traditional Han Chinese dominions]] (入主中国 or traditionally 从龙入关), before that it had conquered several territories such as Mongol khanates in eastern [[Inner Mongolia]] and [[Joseon]] of Korea outside of Manchuria as an independent state. It's totally misinformed to just cut off the period of emergence before 1644 which is significant to remark the dynasty's origin and began it in 1644.

If this theory of Qing started its rule in 1644, how the first emperor of Qing [[Hong Taiji]] should be defined when he never entered Beijing and established his rule in China? Does the wikipedia regard the Qing dynasty between 1636 and 1644 as non-existence in history or separate nation?[[User:Sheherherhers|Sheherherhers]] ([[User talk:Sheherherhers|talk]]) 02:00, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:''' please provide [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable sources]] that support the change you want to be made.<!-- Template:EEp --> <code><nowiki>'''[[</nowiki>'''[[User:CanonNi]]'''<nowiki>]]'''</nowiki></code> ([[User talk:CanonNi|talk]]<nowiki>|</nowiki>[[Special:Contributions/CanonNi|contribs]]) 02:04, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
::Several academic soureces support my claims;
::https://www.researchgate.net/publication/314596977_China_imperial_8_Qing_or_Manchu_dynasty_period_1636-1911<br>
::https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/cambridge-history-of-inner-asia/qing-and-inner-asia-16361800/F843687E97193ED212B2CF1BDEBA3357<br>
::https://history-maps.com/story/Qing-dynasty<br>
::https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvp2n341<br>
::https://minerva-access.unimelb.edu.au/items/e0b36c1b-bc50-439b-8230-25332e98f38b [[User:Sheherherhers|Sheherherhers]] ([[User talk:Sheherherhers|talk]]) 02:13, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
:::There are also numerous sources that do not agree with your claims, and just to list a few:
:::https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373214602_Structural-demographic_analysis_of_the_Qing_Dynasty_1644-1912_collapse_in_China
:::https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/blue-frontier/emperors-of-the-qing-dynasty-16441912/BC184988B943FED9846BAF0970225A99
:::https://history-maps.com/story/Qing-dynasty/event/Revolt-of-the-Three-Feudatories
:::https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv6hp2q9
:::https://asia-archive.si.edu/learn/for-educators/teaching-china-with-the-smithsonian/explore-by-dynasty/qing-dynasty/
:::https://totallyhistory.com/qing-dynasty-1644-1911/
:::There are certainly much more to these. Also very importantly, the year 1644 is also supported by sources from Qing dynasty itself (see below), not only modern sources. --[[User:Wengier|Wengier]] ([[User talk:Wengier|talk]]) 21:32, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
:Some trimming was done for the article due to its length, and various other things were also simplified during the process. As for the year, here is a similar story: the Qin (state) conquered the Zhou dynasty in 256 BC; the Zhou dynasty was NEVER an empire, yet it is considered a dynasty of China, and historians usually date the Qin dynasty started in 221 BC. Of course one can argue that the Qin dynasty started in 256 BC (or even earlier, such as when the Qin state itself was founded), but still Wikipedia regards 221 BC as the start of the Qin dynasty according to the ''majority'' view. And for the Qing dynasty's start, the year 1644 is the ''majority'' view whereas 1636 is the ''minority'' view, both of which should be acknowledged. Regardless of the views, the first paragraph already explicitly mentions both years (1636 and 1644); they are both listed in the encyclopedia. However, the first paragraph of the article intends to be summative and brief, and indeed as you can see there is a ''too long'' tag for the article (which you seem to try to completely disregard). --[[User:Wengier|Wengier]] ([[User talk:Wengier|talk]]) 15:34, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

:Of course how Qing itself viewed such things are also ''very'' important (instead of other one-sided stories or interpretations). In the "Chinese history textbook" (中國歷史教科書) approved by the Qing court and published in 1910, [https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:NLC416-12jh005484-44578_%E4%B8%AD%E5%9C%8B%E6%AD%B7%E5%8F%B2%E6%95%99%E7%A7%91%E6%9B%B8.pdf&page=14 page 4] clearly shows that the Qin dynasty started in 221 BC, and [https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:NLC416-12jh005484-44578_%E4%B8%AD%E5%9C%8B%E6%AD%B7%E5%8F%B2%E6%95%99%E7%A7%91%E6%9B%B8.pdf&page=15 page 5] also clearly shows that the Great Qing dynasty started in 1644 AD, following the Ming dynasty that was established in 1368. These are the official dates from the Qing itself. Also, the late Qing history textbook『中國歷史教科書，原名本朝史講義』(also published in 1910) states in [https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:NLC416-14jh007845-69291_%E4%B8%AD%E5%9C%8B%E6%AD%B7%E5%8F%B2%E6%95%99%E7%A7%91%E6%9B%B8,%E5%8E%9F%E5%90%8D,%E6%9C%AC%E6%9C%9D%E5%8F%B2%E8%AC%9B%E7%BE%A9.pdf&page=15 page 1] that "The history of our [Qing] dynasty is part of the history of China, that is, the most recent history in the whole history. China was founded five thousand years ago and has the longest history in the world. And its culture is the best among all the Eastern countries in ancient times. Its territory covers almost 90% of East Asia, and its rise and fall can affect the general trend of the countries in Asia. Therefore, the scope of Chinese history actually accounts for most of the entire history of the East..." (本朝史者，中國史之一部，即全史中之最近世史。中國之建邦，遠在五千年以前，有世界最長之歷史。又有其文化為古來東洋諸國之冠。其疆域奄有東方亞細亞之什九，其興衰隆替足以牽動亞細亞列國之大勢。故中國史之範圍，實佔東洋史全體之大半). This reflects how Qing itself viewed the events, rather than how one may imagine or interpret the events by themselves. The textbook also considers the year 1644 very important, officially known as “本朝之定鼎” ([https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:NLC416-14jh007845-69291_%E4%B8%AD%E5%9C%8B%E6%AD%B7%E5%8F%B2%E6%95%99%E7%A7%91%E6%9B%B8,%E5%8E%9F%E5%90%8D,%E6%9C%AC%E6%9C%9D%E5%8F%B2%E8%AC%9B%E7%BE%A9.pdf&page=64 page 46]), considered basically the same way as earlier dynasties did when the Qing replaced the Ming dynasty, whereas the pre-1644 history is considered the history background of the dynasty. --[[User:Wengier|Wengier]] ([[User talk:Wengier|talk]]) 18:33, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

My suggested revision as follows:<br>
{{tq|The Qing dynasty , officially the Great Qing, was a Manchu-led [[conquest dynasty]] of China and the last imperial dynasty in Chinese history. The dynasty was emerged from the [[Jurchen people|Jurchen]]-led [[Later Jin (1616–1636)|Later Jin dynasty]] established in [[Manchuria]] (present-day [[Northeast China]] and [[Outer Manchuria]]). It subsequently proclaimed as an empire in Shenyang in 1636, seized control of Beijing in 1644, which is considered the start of the dynasty's rule in China. The dynasty lasted until 1912, when it was overthrown in the Xinhai Revolution...}}
:Efforts had been made to reduce the length of the article (especially the lead), considering that the article was already very long (with a "too long" tag clearly shown). Also, regardless the start year (the minority view or the majority view, 1636 or 1644), I do not think there is need for the first paragraph (which intends to be brief) to mention the pre-events (before BOTH 1636 and 1644). Instead, the Later Jin dynasty is mentioned and explained in the second paragraph, and there is no repetition needed for the first paragraph. Otherwise, we can repeat various other events in the first paragraph too, which are however not intended for the first paragraph (especially considering that editors were trying hard to reduce the article length). The point "conquest dynasty" is valid, but such dynasties do differ from each another and there is a lot more to be said as well, including how Qing considered itself (which is certainly quite important), although such things may not really fit in an article which is already very long, especially in the very beginning. --[[User:Wengier|Wengier]] ([[User talk:Wengier|talk]]) 15:34, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:'''<!-- Template:EEp --> This request has been contested by atleast 1 editor which makes it ineligible for the [[WP:ER|edit request]] process. Please continue to try and generate [[WP:CON|consensus]]. Participants are advised to review [[Wikipedia:Dispute resolution]] if they have difficulties in doing so. Please create a new request in a seperate section if an edit is desired, which is uncontested, that needs an extended-confirmed editor to implement. —[[User:Sirdog|<span style="color:#058700">'''Sirdog'''</span> ]]([[User talk:Sirdog|talk]]) 04:25, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 13 April 2024 ==

{{Edit extended-protected|Qing dynasty|answered=yes}}
Why is there very little information in this article about the structure of the government of the late Qing dynasty? 
There should be more information about:
* the early attempts to initiate [[Preparative Constitutionalism|constitutional modernisation of the government]]
* the [[Advisory Council (Qing dynasty)|Advisory Council]] and the [[1909 Chinese parliamentary election|1909 election]]
* the [[1909 Chinese provincial elections|1909 regional elections]]
* the various governmental cabinets ([[Cabinet of Prince Qing]], [[Cabinet of Yuan Shikai]], [[Government of Zhang Xun]] during the brief restoration)
* the modernisation of the [[Great Qing Legal Code]]
* the Qing constitutions such as the [[Principles of the Constitution (1908)|1908 draft]] and the [[Nineteen Articles|1911 constitution]]
* the creation of new military academies such as the [[Baoding Military Academy]]
* [[New Army]], [[Beiyang Army]], [[Imperial Chinese Navy]], [[Beiyang Fleet]]
* the establishment of modern universities such as [[Peking University]]
* potentially incorporate information on the [[Manchu Restoration|1917 restoration of the Qing]] in the article
If I am asked I can write some drafts with sources for incorporation into the article. I simply would like to have more information about these topics included in the page, as the government section seems to only describe the Qing government from the 17th to 19th centuries.
[[Special:Contributions/142.117.70.0|142.117.70.0]] ([[User talk:142.117.70.0|talk]]) 22:03, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
:[[File:Red information icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:'''<!-- Template:EEp --> If you could, please provide those drafts and present them as separate edit requests with [[WP:RS|reliable sourcing]]. Please limit how many you make, however, as if you make 10 requests for additions to the article it is likely none of them will be actioned as volunteers will feel overwhelmed and opt to not handle any of them. —[[User:Sirdog|<span style="color:#058700">'''Sirdog'''</span> ]]([[User talk:Sirdog|talk]]) 04:22, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

== Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 19 April 2024 ==

{{Edit extended-protected|Qing dynasty|answered=yes}}
{{subst:,trim|1=
<!-- State UNAMBIGUOUSLY your suggested changes below this line, preferably in a "change X to Y" format. Other editors need to know what to add or remove. Blank edit requests will be declined. -->


The 10 Great Campaigns actually started in 1747 with the first campaign of Jinchuan and the Dzungar-Qing wars ended in 1758.
<!-- Write your request ABOVE this line and do not remove the tildes and curly brackets below. -->
}} [[Special:Contributions/116.50.207.23|116.50.207.23]] ([[User talk:116.50.207.23|talk]]) 13:35, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
:[[File:Red question icon with gradient background.svg|20px|link=|alt=]] '''Not done:''' it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a [[WP:EDITXY|"change X to Y" format]] and provide a [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|reliable source]] if appropriate.<!-- Template:EEp --> —[[User:Sirdog|<span style="color:#058700">'''Sirdog'''</span> ]]([[User talk:Sirdog|talk]]) 04:20, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

== Please! Edit this template of the informations of the country in the page article "Dynasty Qing" ==
{{cot|title=An infobox with two maps}}
{{Infobox country
|image_map2 = File:Empire of the Great Qing (orthographic projection).svg
|map_caption2 = Dynasty Qing Empire in the 1900 year.
| native_name            = {{native name list|tag1=zh|name1=大清|tag2=mnc|name2={{ManchuSibeUnicode|lang=mnc|ᡩᠠᡳ᠌ᠴᡳᠩ<br />ᡤᡠᡵᡠᠨ|style=text-align:left}}}}
| conventional_long_name = Great Qing
| life_span              = 1644{{sfnp|Rowe|2009|pp=292}}<ref name="StartYear">"Ritual Music in the Court and Rulership of the Qing Dynasty (1644–1911)" (p. 136): "[1636] was the start of the Qing dynasty, although historians usually date the Qing dynasty started in 1644 when the Manchus conquered Beijing and north China."</ref>–1912
| era                    = [[History of Asia#Late modern|Late modern]]
| demonym                = [[Chinese people|Chinese]]
| ethnic_groups          = {{hlist|[[Han Chinese|Han]]|[[Hmong people|Hmong]]|[[Manchus]]|[[Mongols]]|[[Tibetans]]|[[Uyghurs]]|''[[Ethnic groups in Chinese history|others]]''}}
| event_pre              = [[History of the Qing dynasty#Hong Taiji|Proclaimed]]
| date_pre               = 1636
| event_start            = [[Transition from Ming to Qing|Transition from<br>Ming to Qing]]
| year_start             = 1644–1662
| event1                 = {{nowrap|[[Dzungar–Qing Wars|Conquest of Tibet,<br>Mongolia, Xinjiang]]}}
| date_event1            = 1687–1758
| event2                 = [[Ten Great Campaigns]]
| date_event2            = 1747–1792
| event3                 = [[First Opium War|1st Opium War]]
| date_event3            = 1839–1842
| event4                 = [[Taiping Rebellion]]
| date_event4            = 1850–1864
| event5                 = [[Second Opium War|2nd Opium War]]
| date_event5            = 1856–1860
| event6                 = {{nowrap|[[Self-Strengthening Movement|Westernization Movement]]}}
| date_event6            = 1861–1895
| event7                 = [[First Sino-Japanese War|1st Sino-Japanese War]]
| date_event7            = 1894–1895
| event8                 = [[Hundred Days' Reform|100 Days Reform]]
| date_event8            = 1898
| event9                 = [[Boxer Rebellion]]
| date_event9            = 1900–1901
| event10                = [[Late Qing reforms]]
| date_event10           = 1901–1911
| event_end              = [[Xinhai Revolution]]
| year_end               = 1911–1912
| event_post             = [[Imperial Edict of the Abdication of the Qing Emperor|End of monarchy]]
| date_post              = {{nowrap|12 February 1912}}
| p1                     = Later Jin (1616–1636){{!}}Later Jin
| p2                     = Ming dynasty
| p3                     = Dzungar Khanate
| p6                     = Kingdom of Tungning
| s1                     = Republic of China (1912–1949){{!}}Republic of China
| flag_s1                = Flag of China (1912–1928).svg
| s2                     = Bogd Khanate
| flag_s2                = 
| s3                     = Uryankhay Republic
| flag_s4                = Flag of Tibet.svg
| s4                     = Tibet (1912–1951){{!}}Tibet
| image_flag             = Flag of the Qing Dynasty (1889-1912).svg
| flag_type              = [[Flag of the Qing dynasty|Flag]] (1889–1912)
| flag_border            = no
| other_symbol           = '''Imperial seal:'''<br />{{lang|zh-Hant|大清帝國之璽}}<br />[[File:Seal of Qing dynasty.svg|85px]]
| image_map              = Qing dynasty in 1760.svg
| image_map_caption      = The Qing dynasty at its greatest extent in 1760, with modern borders shown. Claimed territory that was not under its control is shown in light green.
| anthem                 = {{ubl|{{lang|zh-hant|鞏金甌}}<br />"[[Cup of Solid Gold]]" (1911–1912){{pb}}{{center|[[File:Gǒng Jīn'ōu.ogg]]}}}}
| capital                = {{ubl|{{nowrap|[[Shenyang]] (1636–1644){{efn|{{zh|c=盛京|p=Shèngjīng|links=no}}; {{Lang-mnc|m={{ManchuSibeUnicode|lang=mnc|ᠮᡠᡴ᠋ᡩᡝᠨ}}|v=Mukden|a=Mukden}}; capital after 1625 for Later Jin, secondary capital after 1644.}}}}|{{nowrap|[[Beijing]] (1644–1912)}}{{efn|{{Lang-mnc|m={{ManchuSibeUnicode|lang=mnc|ᠪᡝᡤᡳᠩ}} |v=Beging|a=Beging}}; primary capital afterwards}}}}
| largest_city           = Beijing
| official_languages     = {{hlist|[[Manchu language|Manchu]]{{sfnp|Söderblom Saarela|2021}}|{{nowrap|[[Mandarin (late imperial lingua franca)|Mandarin Chinese]]{{sfnp|Norman|1988|pp=[https://books.google.com/books?id=wOPArZVCk-wC&q=official%20language 133–134]}}}}}}
| government_type        = [[Absolute monarchy]]{{efn|Briefly a [[constitutional monarchy]] following the onset of the Xinhai Revolution in 1911.}}
| title_leader           = [[List of emperors of the Qing dynasty|Emperor]]
| leader1                = [[Chongde Emperor]]
| year_leader1           = 1636–1643 (proclaimed in Shenyang)
| leader2                = [[Shunzhi Emperor]]
| year_leader2           = 1644–1661 (first in Beijing)
| leader3                = [[Xuantong Emperor]]
| year_leader3           = 1908–1912 (last)
| title_representative   = [[Regent]]
| representative1        = [[Dorgon]], Prince Rui
| representative2        = {{nowrap|[[Zaifeng]], Prince Chun}}
| year_representative1   = 1643–1650
| year_representative2   = 1908–1911
| deputy1                = {{nowrap|[[Yikuang]], Prince Qing}}
| deputy2                = [[Yuan Shikai]]
| year_deputy1           = 1911
| year_deputy2           = 1911–1912
| title_deputy           = [[Prime Minister of the Imperial Cabinet|Prime Minister]]
| legislature            = {{ubl|{{nowrap|[[Deliberative Council of Princes and Ministers|Deliberative Council]]<br />(1636–1733)}}{{pb}}|{{nowrap|[[Advisory Council (Qing dynasty)|Advisory Council]]<br />(1910–1912)}}}}
| religion               = {{hlist|[[Confucianism]] (official)<ref>{{citation |chapter=Living in the Chinese Cosmos: Understanding Religion in Late Imperial China (1644–1911) |publisher=Columbia University |chapter-url=http://afe.easia.columbia.edu/cosmos/prb/whatis.htm |title=What is Popular Religion |year= |access-date=15 June 2021 |archive-date=19 January 2015 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150119060922/http://afe.easia.columbia.edu/cosmos/prb/whatis.htm |url-status=live }}</ref>|[[Chinese Buddhism]]|[[Chinese folk religion]]|[[Christianity in China#17th to 18th centuries|Christianity]]|[[Taoism]]|[[Tibetan Buddhism]]|[[Hmong customs and culture#Shamanism|Hmong shamanism]]|[[Manchu shamanism]]|[[Mongolian shamanism]]|[[Sunni Islam]]|''[[Religion in China#Qing dynasty|others]]''}}
| stat_year1             = 1700
| stat_area1             = 8800000
| ref_area1              = <ref name="Taagepera1997p500">{{cite journal |last=Taagepera |first=Rein |author-link = Rein Taagepera |date=September 1997 |title=Expansion and Contraction Patterns of Large Polities: Context for Russia |url=https://escholarship.org/content/qt3cn68807/qt3cn68807.pdf |url-status = live |journal=[[International Studies Quarterly]] |volume=41 |issue=3 |page=500 |doi=10.1111/0020-8833.00053 |jstor=2600793 |archive-url = https://web.archive.org/web/20200707203055/https://escholarship.org/content/qt3cn68807/qt3cn68807.pdf |archive-date = 2020-07-07 |access-date = 2020-07-24}}</ref>
| stat_year2             = 1790
| stat_area2             = 14700000
| ref_area2              = <ref name="Taagepera1997p500" />
| stat_year3             = 1860
| stat_area3             = 13400000
| ref_area3              = <ref name="Taagepera1997p500" />
| stat_year4             = 1908
| stat_area4             = 11350000
| ref_area4              = <ref>{{Cite book |title=歷史與時事學法指導|author=王堅強, 陳家華, 王永中 |page=8|year=2018|publisher=寧波出版社|ISBN=9787552632859}}</ref>
| currency               = {{hlist|[[Qing dynasty coinage|Cash]]|[[Tael]]|[[Paper money of the Qing dynasty|Paper money]]}}
}} 
{{reflist hide}}
{{cob}}
[[User:KielYam1212|KielYam1212]] ([[User talk:KielYam1212|talk]]) 15:20, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

:It seems the substantive change is adding a second map. This is unnecessary for an infobox. [[User:Remsense|<span style="border-radius:2px 0 0 2px;padding:3px;background:#1E816F;color:#fff">'''Remsense'''</span>]][[User talk:Remsense|<span lang="zh" style="border:1px solid #1E816F;border-radius:0 2px 2px 0;padding:1px 3px;color:#000">诉</span>]] 16:50, 2 June 2024 (UTC)

== Religion  ==

How is it wrong to mention buddhism as a "Dynastic religion" or the religion "Followed by the emperors" when we see several Qing emperors following the religion? Also i see nowhere in the cited sources which specifically states confucianism is the official religion alone of Qing empire. [[User:Malik-Al-Hind|Malik-Al-Hind]] ([[User talk:Malik-Al-Hind|talk]]) 12:34, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

:It's something you're elevating to an unduly explicit position due to a particular fixation you seem to have. I think it's silly to list Confucianism as an "official religion" as well, but it at least seems sensical to mark it out from the other members of the list in that way. What you're proposing is a much more artificial distinction between Buddhism, Taoism, and other threads of spiritual and ritual practice throughout Chinese history. It does not seem your interest is rooted in actual curiosity in Chinese history, otherwise you wouldn't be so insistent in treating it like it's a contest. [[User:Remsense|<span style="border-radius:2px 0 0 2px;padding:3px;background:#1E816F;color:#fff">'''Remsense'''</span>]][[User talk:Remsense|<span lang="zh" style="border:1px solid #1E816F;border-radius:0 2px 2px 0;padding:1px 3px;color:#000">诉</span>]] 12:37, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
::I don't understand what you mean here. The cited sources nowhere claims confucianism as an official religion, Yet it is in the article, Why can't we mention buddhism as a dynastic religion or a religion followed by the emperors when so many Qing Emperors followed it?
Moreover if Confucianism wasn't the official religion, can I fix the infobox then? It will do nothing except for confusing the readers.[[User:Malik-Al-Hind|Malik-Al-Hind]] ([[User talk:Malik-Al-Hind|talk]]) 13:05, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

:{{talk quote|Why can't we mention buddhism as a dynastic religion or a religion followed by the emperors when so many Qing Emperors followed it?}}
:Why should we put it on a pedestal in this particular way? This is a novel emphasis on your part, which I'm sorry, is clearly related to your active emphases throughout your entire edit history regardless of context. It's clearly tendentious.
:Confucianism is basically a state ritual ideology, I agree with its label as "official" more than its categorization as a "religion". I don't have the energy to interrogate the best way to treat it in this infobox, but please don't touch it if you don't know what you're talking about, which you don't. [[User:Remsense|<span style="border-radius:2px 0 0 2px;padding:3px;background:#1E816F;color:#fff">'''Remsense'''</span>]][[User talk:Remsense|<span lang="zh" style="border:1px solid #1E816F;border-radius:0 2px 2px 0;padding:1px 3px;color:#000">诉</span>]] 13:11, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
::My only request is, If Confucianism was not the official religion then please kindly remove it, And if it was then please provide the sources for it. Because the cited sources says it nowhere. [[User:Malik-Al-Hind|Malik-Al-Hind]] ([[User talk:Malik-Al-Hind|talk]]) 13:14, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
:::You raise an interesting point, but the concept of "official religion" is anachronistic, though it is still useful in discussions for general readers.[[User:CWH|ch]] ([[User talk:CWH|talk]]) 23:53, 4 July 2024 (UTC)
:::I want to mention that the concept of "official religion" is not even anachronistic, at least in the late Qing period. For example, the "Elementary Chinese Geography Textbook" (蒙學中國地理教科書) published in 1905 stated the following in the beginning of Chapter 10 ("Religions"): "The state religion of our country is Confucianism, which emphasizes philosophy and is not superstitious. Therefore, the upper class people all worship Confucius and Mencius. In addition, there are two religions: Buddhism and Taoism. Those who follow Buddhism are monks, and those who follow Taoism are Taoist priests. Although there are many of them, there are still many uneducated disciples, and they are not as prosperous as Confucianism" (“我國之國教曰儒教，講求哲理，無所為迷信，故上流之人，皆崇奉孔孟。此外有佛道二教，奉佛教者為和尚，奉道教者為道士。其數雖繁，然多無學之徒，不及儒教之盛”). Clearly, the concept of "official religion" (or [[state religion]]) was already established at that time, and Confucianism was considered so in the period, rather than Buddhism or Taoism. --[[User:Wengier|Wengier]] ([[User talk:Wengier|talk]]) 17:04, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
::::This is important, yes. It makes sense that it's not listed as a religion on [[Han dynasty]] or [[Tang dynasty]], there were in-depth conversations about that, but by the Qing these frameworks had arrived. [[User:Remsense|<span style="border-radius:2px 0 0 2px;padding:3px;background:#1E816F;color:#fff">'''Remsense'''</span>]][[User talk:Remsense|<span lang="zh" style="border:1px solid #1E816F;border-radius:0 2px 2px 0;padding:1px 3px;color:#000">诉</span>]] 17:39, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
::::You make a strong point when you say "at least in the late Qing period," for this is the period when reformers wanted to turn "China" into a nation-state on the European and Japanese model and import the concept of “religion.” You quite reasonably translate 教 as "religion," but it is often better as "teaching." "Religion" is new in this period, but would be anachronistic for earlier times (though perfectly acceptable in general usage, such as the Info Box).
::::In any case, the Info Box says "Religion," not "official religion,. "Official" is another can of worms. The emperor was the only "official" who counted. So it's pushing it to say that the concept of "official religion" was "established" on the basis of one textbook.
::::Among the recent scholarship on this is Vincent Goossaert, and David A. Palmer, ''The Religious Question in Modern China'' (Chicago U Press, 2011). He has an article available online: Vincent Goossaert, " State and Religion in Modern China: Religious Policy and Scholarly Paradigms" (Taibei, 2006. Academia Sinica https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00106187/document [[User:CWH|ch]] [[User:CWH|ch]] ([[User talk:CWH|talk]]) 18:31, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
:::::Of course I needed to translate the statements as faithfully as I can, and the term 儒教 does mean Confucianism as a religion, especially considering that it is explicitly listed under the section 宗教 (religion) in the textbook. It is true that Confucianism is often thought as a teaching, and often written as 儒學 instead of 儒教 in such cases, especially in modern Chinese usage, but I need to faithfully translate the meaning as expressed in the cited textbook, even if I personally may not think Confucianism as a typical religion. And of course 蒙學中國地理教科書 was not (at all) the only textbook that listed 儒教<span class="ltr">as</span>宗教, and textbooks such as 中國地理教科書 published in 1910 also listed it under 宗教 (religion), while describing it as "孔子人倫之教，不具宗教之迷信，上流社會行之". These are simply examples, and there is no need to list all of them. I am not in a strong opinion regarding the infobox (so I have not changed the content anyway), and *instead* my point is, the concept of "official religion" is not anachronistic as you probably have thought earlier, as least in the late Qing period. Whatever the intentions of the reformers were at that time, the concept of "state religion" or "official religion" already appeared (as an *established terminology*) in that period (as clearly shown by publications during the period), so I need to point it out that you cannot really claim that such concepts were anachronistic in the whole Qing period (as your earlier comment seemed to imply). This was the main point in my previous comment. Whether Confucianism is truly a religion or not is another matter (even if I personally think that Confucianism is more a teaching than a religion). Reliable sources may also consider the nature of Confucianism differently, and may also have different opinions about when Confucianism became the official religion of China. For example, the recent book "Religious Faith of the Chinese" (published in December 2017) states in [https://www.google.com/books/edition/Religious_Faith_of_the_Chinese/8qZEDwAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&pg=PA25&printsec=frontcover Page 25] that "From Western Han dynasty to the Xinhai Revolution of 1911 that overthrew the Qing dynasty, the Confucian religion continued for more than 2000 years as the official religion of China", even though I am sure there are different views about this. But in any case, the concept of "state religion" or "official religion" cannot be said to be anachronistic during the entire period. --[[User:Wengier|Wengier]] ([[User talk:Wengier|talk]]) 20:10, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

:Another point is that information in the Infobox does not need to be referenced if there are references to it in the body of the article: [[MOS:INFOBOXREF]]. The section "Religion" has such references.[[User:CWH|ch]] ([[User talk:CWH|talk]]) 23:46, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

== Requested move 3 July 2024 ==

<div class="boilerplate mw-archivedtalk" style="background-color: #efe; margin: 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px dotted #aaa;"><!-- Template:RM top -->
:''The following is a closed discussion of a [[Wikipedia:Requested moves|requested move]]. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a [[Wikipedia:move review|move review]] after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.''

The result of the move request was: '''not moved.''' Per [[WP:SNOW]], and having the banner stick around on all these pages would be unduly disruptive. Please take some time to read [[WP:NC{{!}}our naming conventions policy]]. <small>([[Wikipedia:Requested moves/Closing instructions#Closure by a page mover|closed by non-admin page mover]])</small> [[User:Remsense|<span style="border-radius:2px 0 0 2px;padding:3px;background:#1E816F;color:#fff">'''Remsense'''</span>]][[User talk:Remsense|<span lang="zh" style="border:1px solid #1E816F;border-radius:0 2px 2px 0;padding:1px 3px;color:#000">诉</span>]] 16:39, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
----

* [[:Qing dynasty]] → {{no redirect|Qing China}}
* [[:Xia dynasty]] → {{no redirect|Xia China}}
* [[:Shang dynasty]] → {{no redirect|Shang China}}
* [[:Zhou dynasty]] → {{no redirect|Zhou China}}
* [[:Qin dynasty]] → {{no redirect|Qin China}}
* [[:Han dynasty]] → {{no redirect|Han China}}
* [[:Jin dynasty (266–420)]] → {{no redirect|Jin China}}
* [[:Sui dynasty]] → {{no redirect|Sui China}}
* [[:Tang dynasty]] → {{no redirect|Tang China}}
* [[:Ming dynasty]] → {{no redirect|Ming China}}
– Can we have the historical Chinese dynasties and polities to include the suffix "China" just as with Iran like "Qajar Iran". Many sources like the [https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/east-asia/china-and-japan-are-frenemies-says-the-china-post Straits Times] uses the name for example. Support or Oppose if this or does not conform the [[WP:PRIMARYTOPIC]]. [[User:Silence of Lambs|Silence of Lambs]] ([[User talk:Silence of Lambs|talk]]) 15:40, 3 July 2024 (UTC)

* '''Oppose''' per [[WP:COMMONNAME]]. Google Ngrams: [https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Qing+dynasty%2CXia+dynasty%2CShang+dynasty%2CZhou+dynasty%2CQin+dynasty%2CQing+China%2CXia+China%2CShang+China%2CZhou+China%2CQin+China&year_start=1900&year_end=2019&corpus=en-2019&smoothing=3] [https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=Han+dynasty%2CJin+dynasty%2CSui+dynasty%2CTang+dynasty%2CMing+dynasty%2CHan+China%2CJin+China%2CSui+China%2CTang+China%2CMing+China&year_start=1900&year_end=2019&corpus=en-2019&smoothing=3]. [[User:SilverLocust|SilverLocust]]&nbsp;[[User talk:SilverLocust|💬]] 16:21, 3 July 2024 (UTC)
<div style="padding-left: 1.6em; font-style: italic; border-top: 1px solid #a2a9b1; margin: 0.5em 0; padding-top: 0.5em">The discussion above is closed. <b style="color: #FF0000;">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.</div><!-- from [[Template:Archive bottom]] -->
</div><div style="clear:both;" class=></div>