Home  

Random  

Nearby  



Log in  



Settings  



Donate  



About Wikipedia  

Disclaimers  



Wikipedia





Talk:Qing dynasty: Difference between revisions





Article  

Talk  



Language  

Watch  

View history  

Edit  






Browse history interactively
 Previous editNext edit 
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
(7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 102:
 
== Please! Edit this template of the informations of the country in the page article "Dynasty Qing" ==
{{cot|title=An infobox with two maps}}
 
{{Infobox country
|image_map2 = File:Empire of the Great Qing (orthographic projection).svg
Line 196:
}}
{{reflist hide}}
{{cob}}
[[User:KielYam1212|KielYam1212]] ([[User talk:KielYam1212|talk]]) 15:20, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
 
Line 204 ⟶ 205:
How is it wrong to mention buddhism as a "Dynastic religion" or the religion "Followed by the emperors" when we see several Qing emperors following the religion? Also i see nowhere in the cited sources which specifically states confucianism is the official religion alone of Qing empire. [[User:Malik-Al-Hind|Malik-Al-Hind]] ([[User talk:Malik-Al-Hind|talk]]) 12:34, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
 
:It's something ypuyou're elevating to an unduly explicit position due to a particular fixation you seem to have. I think it's silly to list Confucianism as an "official religion" as well, but it at least seems sensical to mark it out from the other members of the list in that way. What you're proposing is a much more artificial distinction between Buddhism, Taoism, and other threads of spiritual and ritual practice throughout Chinese history. It does not seem your interest is rooted in actual curiosity in Chinese history, otherwise you wouldn't be so insistent in treating it like it's a contest. [[User:Remsense|<span style="border-radius:2px 0 0 2px;padding:3px;background:#1E816F;color:#fff">'''Remsense'''</span>]][[User talk:Remsense|<span lang="zh" style="border:1px solid #1E816F;border-radius:0 2px 2px 0;padding:1px 3px;color:#000">诉</span>]] 12:37, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
::I don't understand what you mean here. The cited sources nowhere claims confucianism as an official religion, Yet it is in the article, Why can't we mention buddhism as a dynastic religion or a religion followed by the emperors when so many Qing Emperors followed it?
Moreover if Confucianism wasn't the official religion, can I fix the infobox then? It will do nothing except for confusing the readers.[[User:Malik-Al-Hind|Malik-Al-Hind]] ([[User talk:Malik-Al-Hind|talk]]) 13:05, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
 
:{{talk quote|Why can't we mention buddhism as a dynastic religion or a religion followed by the emperors when so many Qing Emperors followed it?}}
:Why should we put it on a pedestal in this particular way? This is a novel emphasis on your part, which I'm sorry, is clearly related to your active emphases throughout your entire edit history regardless of context. It's clearly tendentious.
:Confucianism is basically a state ritual ideology, I agree with its label as "official" more than its categorization as a "religion". I don't have the energy to interrogate the best way to treat it in this infobox, but please don't touch it if you don't know what you're talking about, which you don't. [[User:Remsense|<span style="border-radius:2px 0 0 2px;padding:3px;background:#1E816F;color:#fff">'''Remsense'''</span>]][[User talk:Remsense|<span lang="zh" style="border:1px solid #1E816F;border-radius:0 2px 2px 0;padding:1px 3px;color:#000">诉</span>]] 13:11, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
::My only request is, If Confucianism was not the official religion then please kindly remove it, And if it was then please provide the sources for it. Because the cited sources says it nowhere. [[User:Malik-Al-Hind|Malik-Al-Hind]] ([[User talk:Malik-Al-Hind|talk]]) 13:14, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Add topic

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Qing_dynasty"
 




Languages

 



This page is not available in other languages.
 

Wikipedia




Privacy policy

About Wikipedia

Disclaimers

Contact Wikipedia

Code of Conduct

Developers

Statistics

Cookie statement

Terms of Use

Desktop