No edit summary
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
|
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
|
||
Line 206:
:It's something ypu're elevating to an unduly explicit position due to a particular fixation you seem to have. I think it's silly to list Confucianism as an "official religion" as well, but it at least seems sensical to mark it out from the other members of the list in that way. What you're proposing is a much more artificial distinction between Buddhism, Taoism, and other threads of spiritual and ritual practice throughout Chinese history. It does not seem your interest is rooted in actual curiosity in Chinese history, otherwise you wouldn't be so insistent in treating it like it's a contest. [[User:Remsense|<span style="border-radius:2px 0 0 2px;padding:3px;background:#1E816F;color:#fff">'''Remsense'''</span>]][[User talk:Remsense|<span lang="zh" style="border:1px solid #1E816F;border-radius:0 2px 2px 0;padding:1px 3px;color:#000">诉</span>]] 12:37, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
::I don't understand what you mean here. The cited sources nowhere claims confucianism as an official religion, Yet it is in the article, Why can't we mention buddhism as a dynastic religion or a religion followed by the emperors when so many Qing Emperors followed it?
Moreover if Confucianism wasn't the official religion, can I fix the infobox then? It will do nothing except for confusing the readers.[[User:Malik-Al-Hind|Malik-Al-Hind]] ([[User talk:Malik-Al-Hind|talk]]) 13:05, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
|