Talk:Rim Tim Tagi Dim/GA1

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Nascar9919 (talk · contribs) 21:50, 13 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nominator: Nascar9919 (talk · contribs) 21:50, 13 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: ImStevan (talk · contribs) 14:25, 21 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

I think this article could receive good article status

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a(prose, spelling, and grammar):  b(MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  

     Comment: At certain points in the article, the terms "grand final" and "final" are used a lot in succession

• @ImStevan: Done? Let me know if this works for you. Cheers, mate! Nascar9919 (he/him • t • c) 14:50, 21 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

1. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.

   a(reference section):  b(inline citations to reliable sources):  c(OR):  d(copyvio and plagiarism):  

     Comment: Passed Earwig with flying colors (10.7% match)

2. It is broad in its coverage.

   a(major aspects):  b(focused):  

3. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:  

4. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:  

     Comment:No comments here, passes based on the article history

5. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a(images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):  b(appropriate use with suitable captions):  

6. Overall:

   Pass/Fail: