|
|
|||
Line 85:
::::::To be fair to Belbury, his/her first version was dreadful, relegating one of the three current names of the dish to an afterthought, but his/her second attempt was less damaging, merely reducing the prominence of the former names of the dish. I hope we can hear from [[User:Macrakis]], who added the latter to the lead, has been editing the article since 2017, and whose views would be most welcome. '''<span style="font-family:Trebuchet MS;">[[User:Tim riley|<span style="color:# 660066">Tim riley</span>]][[User talk:Tim riley|<span style="color:#848484"> talk</span>]]</span>''' 08:23, 25 June 2024 (UTC)
:::::::Is this your idea of being collegiate? My main edit here was fixing the fact that the lead illogically referred to "the two English terms" after listing four of them. You missed that in my first edit summary, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Shepherd%27s_pie&diff=prev&oldid=1230251223 falsely accused me of edit warring] when I made a more localised fix of just that error and said so in the edit summary, and are now generously describing my correction as being "less damaging" than my other "dreadful" one, apparently still failing to understand what I was doing. You're welcome that I fixed a clear error in the lead of an article that you seem very protective of but which you hadn't noticed in the six months that it was there.
:::::::[[MOS:LEADCLUTTER]] discourages overloading the very first sentence with alternate names. I don't know whether ''hachis Parmentier'' would be considered a close and common enough synonym to be mentioned here (the French Wikipedia doesn't seem to think so, with
| |||