Hello, דוב, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Alfreð Finnbogason. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Mattythewhite (talk) 21:28, 24 June 2018 (UTC)Reply
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!
You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
Additionally you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.
Note that you do not have the required 500 edits, and you are therefore restricted in what discussions you may participate in regarding this contentious topic. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 03:07, 11 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Thank you for helping with Anti-Vandalism recently. Happy editing! SoyokoAnis - talk | PLEASE PING 14:24, 11 October 2023 (UTC)Reply |
Do not modify a comment I make again. nableezy - 23:55, 12 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
This is a violation of the editing restrictions. Please do not edit material related to the Arab-Israeli conflict until you are qualified to do so. nableezy - 14:08, 14 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
You also may not participate in a formal RFC on the talk page. Please read Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee/Procedures#Extended_confirmed_restriction nableezy - 14:56, 14 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Rose Prince (writer): you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 17:29, 14 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. nableezy - 15:37, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Cullen328 (talk) 18:27, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Listen, you are going to run across people that have different personal views than your own here many times over. There are a lot of people hurting and being hurt from the escalation of things in Israel and Gaza. I'm scared as hell for my sister in Jerusalem. Being where I am, I am isolated from the protests happening in the US but I hear of them, the ones where they shout things like holocaust the Jews. That hurts because I live a life of love in peace and balance with nature and my fellow humankind. I hear the good in everyone and I celebrate it. I never bring up my political views on Wikipedia because my views, admittedly somewhat progressive but not always, in article creation and editing do not matter. My fight is not with anyone on Wikipedia. NOONE is my enemy here and this is not a battleground. If you can't admit what you did because you wanted to be involved in the conversation to meet policy, because your emotions are running high, which is understandable, then how are we as a community going to move forward. This is not about assuming good faith or bad faith. If that's all you see from the chastisement you are given then I pity your time here because it is going to be difficult. I hate, deplore, what is happening. Don't be a part of that and don't bring that here, please. There is enough suffering. --ARoseWolf 19:20, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply