Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Language demographics of Quebec have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:26, 15 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hi Augnablik! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! TJRC (talk) 01:57, 16 June 2022 (UTC)Reply
HiAugnablik! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.
|
HiAugnablik! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.
|
HiAugnablik! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.
|
HiAugnablik! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.
|
HiAugnablik! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.
|
HiAugnablik! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.
|
HiAugnablik! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.
|
HiAugnablik! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.
|
HiAugnablik! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.
|
HiAugnablik! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.
|
HiAugnablik! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.
|
HiAugnablik! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.
|
-- 08:34, Wednesday, April 26, 2023 (UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge
-- 08:35, Wednesday, April 26, 2023 (UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge
-- 09:02, Wednesday, April 26, 2023 (UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 11:10, 2 May 2023 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).Reply
Hi Augnabilk. Thank you for your copy editing work. Please don't continue to change "them" to "him or her", or make related pronoun changes, in our policy and guideline pages. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 05:19, 10 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hi Augnablik! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Theooolone (talk) 21:32, 10 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Hello. In a recent edit to the page Algonquin Hotel, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.
For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan, use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the first author of the article used.
In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Thank you. Greatpopcorn (talk) 07:11, 14 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
My questions are in connection with an existing article about my undergraduate school, Trinity Washington University: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trinity_Washington_University#History
I did a number of minor edits, but realized — as other editors have also observed with requests for better documentation iin the article — that quite a bit more substantive work needs to be done, updating of information and verification stated facts with citations. I don't have access to this sort of information, but as an alumna of the school, I knew I could get it.
Then I realized that perhaps just by being an alumna, this puts me in COI status, even though I've simply done minor proofreading and editing so far. I was about to write the president of the school, who I know, and ask if she could put me in touch with someone on the staff who could provide me the information. Would my alumna status be problematic?
Another related question: how does Wikipedia's preference for third-party references hold up when the article is about an organization and third parties simply wouldn't have desired facts and figures, like for instance enrollment as of 2024 and changes from earlier enrollment figures? Surely it would be okay to consult the organization directly for that sort of information, wouldn't it? Augnablik (talk) 20:42, 7 May 2024 (UTC)Reply