Home  

Random  

Nearby  



Log in  



Settings  



Donate  



About Wikipedia  

Disclaimers  



Wikipedia





Cynthisa


Joined 13 July 2010
 


User page  

Talk  



Watch  

View history  

Contributions  

Edit  


 

Languages  

What links here  

User logs  

View user groups  

Permanent link  

Page information  

Edit full page  

Download QR code  






This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)at03:58, 24 September 2019 (September 2019 GOCE Newsletter: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
(diff)  Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision  (diff)


Latest comment: 4 years ago by MediaWiki message delivery in topic September 2019 GOCE Newsletter
 


Hello, Cynthisa! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! —EncMstr (talk) 04:27, 13 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Getting started

Getting help

Policies and guidelines


The community


Writing articles

Miscellaneous

A kitten for you!

 

Ping pong ball kittens are the best!

Cynthisa (talk) 19:36, 27 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

My newby screed

The tough thing about getting started in Wikipedia is that you must deal with two separate issues:

(1) The actual writing or editing of the article you've chosen. And,

(2) All of the webpage coding necessary for the online viewing and use of the article.

Further compounding the issue seems to be that many Wikipedians seem to have a programing or similar computer background that makes them comfortable with such coding. As such, I think they oft-times do not realize how much "programmer-speak" they use in their explanations. Though not deliberate, of course, this ends up creating unintentional barriers for non-programmer types like myself. I am an extremely experienced technical writer, but have zero programming/coding skills. (Well, discounting that BASIC class I took back in 1982 in seventh grade!) However, my ability to "just jump in" to contributing to Wikipedia has been greatly hindered by this "programmers' bias." When I look at pages of tasks needing to be done, it's hard to tell how to interact with them. (Example; I cleaned up an article on Uday Sahay from one of the old to-do lists, but then wasn't sure how - or where - to make note of that fact.) When I wind up on links to a (supposedly) "how-to" article, they again tend to be filled with coding assumptions that I am just too inexperienced to follow.

The end result is that half the time I end up clicking from link to link to link in the "Help" sections trying to find what I need to know (usually a stupid procedural question, like fixing citations or whatever). I waste a half hour doing that and then lose interest (or patience!) with the task I'd originally set out to do. Or my workbreak is over and I'm out of time. Or, I become so confused by all the help info that I lose the will to just go ahead and "boldly" make the edit anyways!

I'm writing this to share my perspective -- having just recently taken a Wikipedian poll trying to delve into the issue of declining Wikipedia participation. From my current vantage point, I'd have to say it seems a little like Wikipedia is turning into the IRS. Started off small and straight forward, but over time evolved into an impenetrable behemoth. At least, that's how it seems to me right now. But, hopefully my interest in contributing to Wikipedia will outlast my patience and I will eventually find my way into the flow of things. (I hope so 'cuz Wikipedia rocks!)

Sincerely, Cynthisa (talk) 07:59, 2 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

GOCE drive

Hello Cynthisa. Thanks for helping out with the GOCE January drive. Unfortunately, Uday Sahay doesn't qualify for the drive, because your copy edit was done in December and only the removal of the tag was in January. Unfortunately, I have to remove this one and adjust your count. I'll be tagging Claudio Schifano for quick deletion, since it contains extensive copyright violation of Schifano's facebook page, but it won't be removed from your tally as you did do the copy edit. For future reference, the way to mark the need for a citation is not to place <sup>[Needs citation]</sup> directly in the article, but to use the {{Citation needed}} tag, thus: {{Citation needed|date=January 2012}}. This gets it automatically superscripted and also placed in a category of articles needing citations. Best wishes, Simon. --Stfg (talk) 10:22, 5 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Just putting myself right about Schifano: I can't tag it for speedy deletion because the facebook page says it's a copy of the Wikipedia one. Talk about conflict of interest! Oh well. Also, I just read you screed above. If I can ever help with anything like that, please do visit my talk page and say so. Best, --Stfg (talk) 10:38, 5 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi Stfg, Oops! Sorry about the Uday miscount - I've been trying to do a "little something" each day, but got those around the start of the year mixed up a bit. Also, if I'm at home, I'm editing on an iPad2 (really NOT a good fit, but I can do it in bed w/o waking spouse!!!)

As to Schifano, that's cool. I find myself somehow drawn towards these foreign "vanity" pages...not sure why. Perhaps because I worked with (and copyedited for) so many non-native speakers during my medical research asst. days...! I'll try to avoid them from now on, however, since copyediting them is probably like polishing the rails on the Titanic....

I'm chuffed that someone actually read my "proto-screed"!!! I'm sloooowly getting the hang of markup, but find I inevitably type everything by hand b/c I don't (yet) understand templates, etc. But, thanks a bunch for the tip on the proper: {{Citation needed}} tag. I'm trying to tread carefully (I hate thinking I'm making more work for others - rather than fixing something!), but am definitely of the "just jump right in" mentality.

However, since you're the first (named) person to actually make contact me, perhaps you can help me with two (well, a few) questions (or pass me to someone with patience - lol!)? THANKS A MILLION!!! -- Cynthisa (talk) 20:06, 5 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi again. I love the "polishing the rails on the Titanic" comment -- it often does feel exactly like that. You definitely aren't "making more work for others" if you're wanting to jump in and help. We need people to do that, and we especially need people who know how to write English -- not everyone around here does. The usual advice is to be bold, as there will always be someone around to fix accidents. (If there isn't, it can't be a very interesting article anyway, eh? :)) By the way, in my younger days I actually was a computer programmer, and when I first came to WP, I was still horribly confused, especially by templates!
I've had a first try at your questions below and will look for something about citations for you tomorrow. Please don't hesitate to come back with more questions any time. I'll keep this page watchlisted for a while. Also, would you mind if I take a look at your future edits for a week or two to see if there are any other things like the Citation-needed trick that would be worth mentioning? I won't if you prefer me not to -- I know how irritating it can be to have someone breathing down your neck -- but if you're happy, I can. Best regards, Simon. --Stfg (talk) 22:08, 5 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

A few newby questions

  1. Is it ok to "merely" copyedit an article? (By that I mean, fix grammar, syntax, formatting, etc. only). And, if I do that to an article that is "bad" in other ways, would I call it "complete" my list of Guild work? (Because I'm done with it?) Or, do I only mark as complete those articles that are completely fixed and free of all editing needs of any sort?
    Yes, absolutely OK. Copy editing is all we promise to do. If we manage to check citations here or there, add wikilinks or remove unsuitable ones, etc, then that's a bonus, but it's not a duty. --Stfg (talk) 21:52, 5 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
  2. Am I correct in thinking that only work on articles marked as needing copyediting or other "help" should be included on/counted towards one's monthly Guild list?
    Anything tagged for copy edit, either individually or as part of multiple issues, will count, but not things that are tagged for other reasons (e.g. missing references and others you often see). You also count any that you take on from our general requests page and/or our potential featured articles requests page, whether they are tagged inside the article or not. (I think it might be wise to delay taking on requests for articles aiming at GAN or FAC until you are more comfortable with templates and familiar with the key ones you're likely to need). --Stfg (talk) 21:52, 5 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
  3. Also, is there a subset (or way to search out) articles that "only" need grammatical copyediting, and not the more substantial rewrites (e.g., missing, new or better citations, notability decisions, link verifications, etc.)? I'd love to be able to find "quickies" that I can knock out on my short breaks at work. It seems like the Guild's lists are mainly the "hard cases"!  ;-)
    When you expand the lists to show a list of months, the oldest months, especially those that are down to single- or double-figure numbers, are likely to contain the vanity articles and the "hard cases", which we'd all prefer to avoid. The most recent months are likely to contain a higher proportion of articles that are destined for the waste paper basket / garbage can in the sky, so it's probably best to wait to those get weeded out before looking at these months. In the middle, you can usually manage to spot potentially interesting titles, and then use the page size utility to discover which ones are of the size you want. --Stfg (talk) 21:52, 5 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
  4. Should I be removing those "needs copyediting" (or whatever's applicable) comments from the article tops after I do/fix the item? (I assume, yes.) Should I also be removing the item from any Guild lists? (I assume only if the article is completely finished and all editorial comments have been resolved).
    Yes, please do remove any tags you've dealt with. By "Guild lists" do you mean the month-by-month lists you see when you click "show" on the box near the top of the drive page? If so, you don't need to (and actually cannot) remove articles from them manually. Removing the tag in the article automatically removes them. --Stfg (talk) 21:52, 5 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
  5. Lastly: I'm still horrible at referencing/citing properly in Wiki markup. Can you recommend some good Wiki articles for my futher edification?
    Let me take notice of this one and see if I can find anything helpful. --Stfg (talk) 21:52, 5 January 2012 (UTC)Reply
    The best introduction for how to do the markup may be Wikipedia:Citing sources, especially section 3 on Inline Citations. There is also something called Help: Wikipedia: The Missing Manual, which has a Chapter 2 called "Documenting your Sources", but it's a bit out of date and, I find, not so easy to follow. Finally, there are the {{Cite web}}, {{Cite book}}, {{Cite journal}} and {{Cite news}} templates, for which there's a quick reference guide. You can use these by writing them out longhand, or there are various tools which let you put the values into a form and generate the template call when you click a button. I use Wikipedia:refToolbar 2.0 and fill in any extra values manually afterwards - usually none are needed. --Stfg (talk) 15:03, 6 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

GOCE drive instructions clarified?

Hi Cynthisa, long time no see :) Did I manage to provide enough clarification in the drive instructions? It's difficult to provide an actual link because the relevant subsection in unique to each editor and each drive. Regards, Simon. --Stfg (talk) 09:57, 14 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

 

Hello! Cynthisa, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us!

I, and the rest of the hosts, would be more than happy to answer any questions you have! SarahStierch (talk) 05:18, 9 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

THANK YOU!

Thank you for the message on my talk page. I really do like weapons, and I appreciate the message. thank you! DEIDRA C. (talk) 20:42, 22 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

A kitten for you!

 

Thank you for the message on my talk page. I'll be sure to check that out. You seem very helpful. Thank you Cynthisa!

DEIDRA C. (talk) 17:29, 23 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

WikiWomen's Collaborative

WikiWomen Unite!

 

HiCynthisa! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative.

As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by:

Feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can participate!

Can't wait to have you involved! SarahStierch (talk) 23:43, 11 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Abdominal distension, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Colon and Diaphram (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:32, 4 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Edit-a-thons at UC Riverside

The UCR Libraries are hosting three edit-a-thons focusing on their great special collections (science fiction, water resources, the Inland Empire and more) on Oct. 12, 2013, Oct. 26, 2013, and Nov. 23, 2013. Please participate if you can! Details and signup here. All are welcome, new and experienced editors alike! -- phoebe / (talk to me) 04:05, 8 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Guild of Copy Editors February 2017 News

Guild of Copy Editors February 2017 News

 


 

Hello everyone, and welcome to the February 2017 GOCE newsletter. The Guild has been busy since the last time your coordinators sent out a newsletter!

December blitz: This one-week copy-editing blitz ran from 11 through 17 December; the themes were Requests and eliminating the November 2015 backlog. Of the 14 editors who signed up, nine editors completed 29 articles. Barnstars and rollover totals are located here. Thanks to all who took part.

January drive: The January drive was a great success. We set out to remove December 2015 and January and February 2016 from our backlog (195 articles), and by 22 January we had cleared those and had to add a third month (March 2016). At the end of the month we had almost cleared out that last month as well, for a total of 180 old articles removed from the backlog! We reduced our overall backlog by 337 articles, to a low of 1,465 articles, our second-lowest month-end total ever. We also handled all of the remaining requests from December 2016. Officially, 19 editors recorded 337 copy edits (over 679,000 words).

February blitz: The one-week February blitz, focusing on the remaining March 2016 backlog and January 2017 requests, ran from 12 to 18 February. Seven editors reduced the total in those two backlog segments from 32 to 10 articles, leaving us in good shape going in to the March drive.

Coordinator elections for the first half of 2017: In December, coordinators for the first half of 2017 were elected. Jonesey95 stepped aside as lead coordinator, remaining as coordinator and allowing Miniapolis to be the lead, and Tdslk and Corinne returned as coordinators. Thanks to all who participated!

Speaking of coordinators, congratulations to Jonesey95 on their well-deserved induction into the Guild of Copy Editors Hall of Fame. The plaque reads: "For dedicated service as lead coordinator (2014, 1 July – 31 December 2015 and all of 2016) and coordinator (1 January – 30 June 2015 and 1 January – 30 June 2017); exceptional template-creation work (considerably streamlining project administration), and their emphasis on keeping the GOCE a drama-free zone."

Housekeeping note: We do not send a newsletter before every drive or blitz. To have a better chance of knowing when the next event will start, add the GOCE's message box to your watchlist.

Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators: Miniapolis, Jonesey95, Corinne and Tdslk.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:20, 20 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Guild of Copy Editors December 2017 News

Guild of Copy Editors December 2017 News

 


 

Hello copy editors! Welcome to the December 2017 GOCE newsletter, which contains nine months(!) of updates. The Guild has been busy and successful; your diligent efforts in 2017 has brought the backlog of articles requiring copy edit to below 1,000 articles for the first time. Thanks to all editors who have contributed their time and energy to help make this happen.

Our copy-editing drives (month-long backlog-reduction drives held in odd-numbered months) and blitzes (week-long themed editing in even-numbered months) have been very successful this year.

March drive: We set out to remove April, May, and June 2016 from our backlog and all February 2017 Requests (a total of 304 articles). By the end of the month, all but 22 of these articles were cleared. Officially, of the 28 who signed up, 22 editors recorded 257 copy edits (439,952 words). (These numbers do not always make sense when you compare them to the overall reduction in the backlog, because not all editors record every copy edit on the drive page.)

April blitz: This one-week copy-editing blitz ran from 16 through 22 April; the theme was Requests. Of the 15 who signed up, 9 editors completed 43 articles (81,822 words).

May drive: The goals were to remove July, August, and September 2016 from the backlog and to complete all March 2017 Requests (a total of 300 articles). By the end of the month, we had reduced our overall backlog to an all-time low of 1,388 articles. Of the 28 who signed up, 17 editors completed 187 articles (321,810 words).

June blitz: This one-week copy-editing blitz ran from 18 through 24 June; the theme was Requests. Of the 16 who signed up, 9 editors completed 28 copy edits (117,089 words).

2017 Coordinator elections: In June, coordinators for the second half of 2017 were elected. Jonesey95 moved back into the lead coordinator position, with Miniapolis stepping down to remain as coordinator; Tdslk and Corinne returned as coordinators, and Keira1996 rejoined after an extended absence. Thanks to all who participated!

July drive: We set out to remove August, September, October, and November 2016 from the backlog and to complete all May and June 2017 Requests (a total of 242 articles). The drive was an enormous success, and the target was nearly achieved within three weeks, so that December 2016 was added to the "old articles" list used as a goal for the drive. By the end of the month, only three articles from 2016 remained, and for the second drive in a row, the backlog was reduced to a new all-time low, this time to 1,363 articles. Of the 33 who signed up, 21 editors completed 337 articles (556,482 words).

August blitz: This one-week copy-editing blitz ran from 20 through 26 August; the theme was biographical articles tagged for copy editing for more than six months (47 articles). Of the 13 who signed up, 11 editors completed 38 copy edits (42,589 words).

September drive: The goals were to remove January, February, and March 2017 from the backlog and to complete all August 2017 Requests (a total of 338 articles). Of the 19 who signed up, 14 editors completed 121 copy edits (267,227 words).

October blitz: This one-week copy-editing blitz ran from 22 through 28 October; the theme was Requests. Of the 14 who signed up, 8 editors completed 20 articles (55,642 words).

November drive: We set out again to remove January, February, and March 2017 from the backlog and to complete all October 2017 Requests (a total of 207 articles). By the end of the month, these goals were reached and the backlog shrank to its lowest total ever, 997 articles, the first time it had fallen under one thousand (click on the graph above to see this amazing feat in graphical form). It was also the first time that the oldest copy-edit tag was less than eight months old. Of the 25 who signed up, 16 editors completed 159 articles (285,929 words).

2018 Coordinator elections: Voting is open for the election of coordinators for the first half of 2018. Please visit the election page to vote between now and December 31 at 23:59 (UTC). Thanks for participating!

Housekeeping note: We do not send a newsletter before (or after) every drive or blitz. To have a better chance of knowing when the next event will start, add the GOCE's message box to your watchlist.

Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators: Jonesey95, Miniapolis, Corinne, Tdslk, and Keira1996.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:04, 23 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

GOCE February 2018 news

Guild of Copy Editors February 2018 News

 


 

Welcome to the February 2018 GOCE newsletter in which you will find Guild updates since the December edition. We got to a great start for the year, holding the backlog at nine months. 100 requests were submitted in the first 6 weeks of the year and were swiftly handled with an average completion time of 9 days.

Coordinator elections: In December, coordinators for the first half of 2018 were elected. Jonesey95 remained as lead coordinator and Corrine, Miniapolis and Tdslk as assistant coordinators. Keira1996 stepped down as assistant coordinator and was replaced by Reidgreg. Thanks to all who participated!

End of year reports were prepared for 2016 and 2017, providing a detailed look at the Guild's long-term progress.

January drive: We set out to remove April, May, and June 2017 from our backlog and all December 2017 Requests (a total of 275 articles). As with previous years, the January drive was an outstanding success and by the end of the month all but 57 of these articles were cleared. Officially, of the 38 who signed up, 21 editors recorded 259 copy edits (490,256 words).

February blitz: This one-week copy-editing blitz ran from 11 through 17 February, focusing on Requests and the last articles tagged in May 2017. At the end of the week there were only 14 pending requests, with none older than 20 days. Of the 11 who signed up, 10 editors completed 35 copy edits (98,538 words).

Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators: Jonesey95, Miniapolis, Corinne, Tdslk, and Reidgreg.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:00, 25 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

June 2018 GOCE newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors June 2018 News

 


 

Welcome to the June 2018 GOCE newsletter, in which you will find Guild updates since the February edition. Progress continues to be made on the copyediting backlog, which has been reduced to 7 months and reached a new all-time low. Requests continue to be handled efficiently this year, with 272 completed by the end of May (an average completion time of 10.5 days). Fewer than 10% of these waited longer than 20 days, and the longest wait time was 29 days.

Wikipedia in general, and the Guild in particular, experienced a deep loss with the death on 20 March of Corinne. Corinne (a GOCE coordinator since 1 July 2016) was a tireless aide on the requests page, and her peerless copyediting is a part of innumerable GAs and FAs. Her good cheer, courtesy and tact are very much missed.

March drive: The goal was to remove June, July and August 2017 from our backlog and all February 2018 Requests (a total of 219 articles). This drive was an outstanding success, and by the end of the month all but eight of these articles were cleared. Of the 33 editors who signed up, 19 recorded 277 copy edits (425,758 words).

April blitz: This one-week copy-editing blitz ran from 15 through 21 April, focusing on Requests and the last eight articles tagged in August 2017. At the end of the week there were only 17 pending requests, with none older than 17 days. Of the nine editors who signed up, eight editors completed 22 copy edits (62,412 words).

May drive: We set out to remove September, October and November 2017 from our backlog and all April 2018 Requests (a total of 298 articles). There was great success this month with the backlog more than halved from 1,449 articles at the beginning of the month to a record low of 716 articles. Officially, of the 20 who signed up, 15 editors recorded 151 copy edits (248,813 words).

Coordinator elections: It's election time again. Nominations for Guild coordinators (who will serve a six-month term for the second half of 2018) have begun, and will close at 23:59 UTC on 15 June. All Wikipedia editors in good standing are eligible, and self-nominations are encouraged. Voting will take place between 00:01 UTC on 16 June and 23:59 UTC on 30 June.

June blitz: Stay tuned for this one-week copy-editing blitz, which will take place in mid-June.

Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators: Corinne, Jonesey95, Miniapolis, Reidgreg and Tdslk.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:26, 5 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

August GOCE newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors August 2018 Newsletter

 


Hello and welcome to the August 2018 GOCE newsletter. Thanks to everyone who participated in the Guild's June election; your new and returning coordinators are listed below. The next election will occur in December 2018; all Wikipedia editors in good standing may take part.

 

Our June blitz focused on Requests and articles tagged for copy edit in October 2017. Of the eleven people who signed up, eight editors recorded a total of 28 copy edits, including 3 articles of more than 10,000 words. Complete results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.

Thanks to everyone who participated in the July drive. Of the seventeen people who signed up, thirteen editors completed 194 copy edits, successfully removing all articles tagged in the last three months of 2017. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are here.

The August blitz will run for one week, from 19 to 25 August. Sign up now!

Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators, Reidgreg, Baffle gab1978, Jonesey95, Miniapolis and Tdslk.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:25, 15 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

December 2018 GOCE newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors December 2018 Newsletter

 


Hello and welcome to the December 2018 GOCE newsletter. Here is what's been happening since the August edition.

 

Thanks to everyone who participated in the August blitz (results), which focused on Requests and the oldest backlog month. Of the twenty editors who signed up, eleven editors recorded 37 copy edits.

For the September drive (results), of the twenty-three people who signed up, nineteen editors completed 294 copy edits.

Our October blitz (results) focused on Requests, geography, and food and drink articles. Of the fourteen people who signed up, eleven recorded a total of 57 copy edits.

For the November drive (results), twenty-two people signed up, and eighteen editors recorded 273 copy edits. This helped to bring the backlog to a six-month low of 825 articles.

The December blitz will run for one week, from 16 to 22 December. Sign up now!

Elections: Nominations for the Guild's coordinators for the first half of 2019 will be open from 1 to 15 December. Voting will then take place and the election will close on 31 December at 23:59 UTC. Positions for Guild coordinators, who perform the important behind-the-scenes tasks that keep our project running smoothly, are open to all Wikipedians in good standing. We welcome self-nominations, so please consider nominating yourself if you've ever thought about helping out; it's your Guild and it doesn't run itself!

Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators; Reidgreg, Baffle gab1978, Jonesey95, Miniapolis and Tdslk.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:04, 3 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

GOCE 2018 Annual Report

Guild of Copy Editors 2018 Annual Report

 


Our 2018 Annual Report is now ready for review.

Highlights:

  • Overview of Backlog-reduction progress;
  • Summary of Drives, Blitzes, and the Requests page;
  • Membership news and results of elections;
  • Annual leaderboard;
  • Plans for 2019.
– Your project coordinators: Miniapolis, Baffle gab1978, Jonesey95, Reidgreg and Tdslk.
To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.


MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:30, 31 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Apple Inc.

 

Hello Cynthisa,

You've been identified either as a previous member of the project, an active editor on Apple related pages, a bearer of Apple related userboxes, or just a hoopy frood.

WikiProject Apple Inc. has unexpectedly quit, because an error type "unknown" occured. Editors must restart it! If you are interested, read the project page and sign up as a member. There's something for everyone to do, such as welcoming, sourcing, writing, copy editing, gnoming, proofreading, or feedback — but no pressure. Do what you do, but let's coordinate and stay in touch.

See the full welcome message on the talk page, or join the new IRC channel on irc.freenode.net named #wikipedia-en-appleinc connect. Please join, speak, and idle, and someone will read and reply.

Please spread the word, and join or unsubscribe at the subscription page.

RhinosF1(chat)(status)(contribs) and Smuckola on behalf of WikiProject Apple Inc. - Delivered 15:00, 18 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

March GOCE newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors March 2019 Newsletter

 


 

Hello and welcome to the March newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since December 2018. All being well, we're planning to issue these quarterly in 2019, balancing the need to communicate widely with the avoidance of filling up talk pages. Don't forget you can unsubscribe at any time; see below.

January Drive: Thanks to everyone for the splendid work in January's Backlog Elimination Drive. We removed copyedit tags from all of the articles tagged in our original target months of June, July and August 2018, and by 24 January we ran out of articles. After adding September, we finished the month with 8 target articles remaining and 842 left in the backlog. GOCE copyeditors also completed 48 requests for copyedit in January. Of the 31 people who signed up for this drive, 24 copyedited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.

Blitz: Thanks to everyone who participated in the February Blitz. Of the 15 people who signed up, 13 copyedited at least one article. Participants claimed 32 copyedits, including 15 requests. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.

Progress report: As of 23:39, 18 March 2019 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have completed 108 requests since 1 January and the backlog stands at 851 articles.

March Drive: The month-long March drive is now underway; the target months are October and November 2018. Awards will be given to everyone who copyedits at least one article from the backlog. Sign up here!

Election reminder: It may only be March but don't forget our mid-year Election of Coordinators opens for nominations on 1 June. Coordinators normally serve a six-month term and are elected on an approval basis. Self-nominations are welcome. If you've thought of helping out at the Guild, or know of another editor who would make a good coordinator, please consider standing for election or nominating them here.

Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Miniapolis, Baffle gab1978, Jonesey95, Reidgreg and Tdslk.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:12, 19 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from https://www.worktruckonline.com/148084/air-brakes-or-hydraulic-brakes-that-is-the-question, which is not released under a compatible license. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:59, 29 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

GOCE June newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors June 2019 Newsletter

 


 

Hello and welcome to the June newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since March 2019. You can unsubscribe from our mailings at any time; see below.

Election time: Nomination of candidates in our mid-year Election of Coordinators opened on 1 June, and voting will take place from 16 June. Coordinators normally serve a six-month term and are elected on an approval basis. Self-nominations are welcome. If you've thought of helping out at the Guild, or know of another editor who would make a good coordinator, please consider standing for election or nominating them here.

June Blitz: Our June blitz will soon be upon us; it will begin at 00:01 on 16 June (UTC) and will close at 23:59 on 22 June (UTC). The themes are "nature and the environment" and all requests.

March Drive: Thanks to everyone for their work in March's Backlog Elimination Drive. We removed copyedit tags from 182 of the articles tagged in our original target months October and November 2018, and the month finished with 64 target articles remaining from November and 811 in the backlog. GOCE copyeditors also completed 22 requests for copyedit in March; the month ended with 34 requests pending. Of the 32 people who signed up for this drive, 24 copyedited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.

April Blitz: Thanks to everyone who participated in the April Blitz; the blitz ran from 14 to 20 April (UTC) inclusive and the themes were Sports and Entertainment. Of the 15 people who signed up, 13 copyedited at least one article. Participants claimed 60 copyedits. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.

Progress report: As of 04:36, 3 June 2019 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors have completed 267 requests since 1 January. The backlog of tagged articles stands at 605 articles.

May Drive: During the May Backlog Elimination Drive, Guild copy-editors removed copyedit tags from 191 of the 192 articles tagged in our original target months of November and December 2018, and January 2019 was added on 22 May. We finished the month with 81 target articles remaining and a record low of 598 articles in the backlog. GOCE copyeditors also completed 24 requests for copyedit during the May drive, and the month ended with 35 requests pending. Of the 26 people who signed up for this drive, 21 copyedited at least one article. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.

Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators Miniapolis, Baffle gab1978, Jonesey95, Reidgreg and Tdslk.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:29, 12 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

September 2019 GOCE Newsletter

Guild of Copy Editors September 2019 Newsletter

 


 

Hello and welcome to the September newsletter, a brief update of Guild activities since June 2019.

June election: Reidgreg was chosen as lead coordinator, and is being assisted by Baffle gab1978, Miniapolis, Tdslk, and first-time coordinator Twofingered Typist. Jonesey95 took a respite after serving for six years. Thanks to everyone who participated!

June Blitz: From 16 to 22 June, we copy edited articles on the themes of nature and the environment along with requests. 12 participating editors completed 35 copy edits. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.

July Drive: The year's fourth backlog-elimination drive was a great success, clearing all articles tagged in January and February, and bringing the copy-editing backlog to a low of five months and a record low of 585 articles while also completing 48 requests. Of the 30 people who signed up, 29 copyedited at least one article, a participation level last matched in May 2015. Final results and awards are listed here.

August Blitz: From 18 to 24 August, we copy edited articles tagged in March 2019 and requests. 12 participating editors completed 26 copy edits on the blitz. Final results, including barnstars awarded, are available here.

Progress report: As of 03:00, 23 September 2019 (UTC), GOCE copyeditors had processed 413 requests since 1 January. The backlog of tagged articles stood at 599 articles, close to our record month-end low of 585.

Requests page: We are experimenting with automated archiving of copy edit requests; a discussion on REQ Talk (permalinked) initiated by Bobbychan193 has resulted in Zhuyifei1999 writing a bot script for the Guild. Testing is now underway and is expected to be completed by 3 October; for this reason, no manual archiving of requests should be done until the testing period is over. We will then assess the bot's performance and discuss whether to make this arrangement permanent.

September Drive: Our current backlog-elimination drive is open until 23:59 on 30 September (UTC) and is open to all copy editors. Sign up today!

Thank you all again for your participation; we wouldn't be able to achieve what we have without you! Cheers from your GOCE coordinators, Baffle gab1978, Miniapolis, Reidgreg, Tdslk and Twofingered Typist.

To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:58, 24 September 2019 (UTC)Reply


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Cynthisa&oldid=917502742"
 



View edit history of this page.  


Languages

 



This page is not available in other languages.
 

Wikipedia


This page was last edited on 24 September 2019, at 03:58 (UTC).

This version of the page has been revised. Besides normal editing, the reason for revision may have been that this version contains factual inaccuracies, vandalism, or material not compatible with the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License.



Privacy policy

About Wikipedia

Disclaimers

Contact Wikipedia

Code of Conduct

Developers

Statistics

Cookie statement

Terms of Use

Desktop