Home  

Random  

Nearby  



Log in  



Settings  



Donate  



About Wikipedia  

Disclaimers  



Wikipedia





Goodtimber


Joined 12 September 2008
 


User page  

Talk  



Watch  

View history  

Contributions  

Edit  


 

Languages  

What links here  

User logs  

View user groups  

Permanent link  

Page information  

Edit full page  

Download QR code  





Latest comment: 2 years ago by MediaWiki message delivery in topic ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
 


  • 2 Jupiter template
  • 3 Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates/Everglades/archive2
  • 4 Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
  • 5 Disambiguation link notification for January 24
  • 6 Next Gen Science Standards
  • 7 ArbCom elections are now open!
  • 8 Plate boundary diagrams
  • 9 ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
  • 10 Some stroopwafels for you!
  • 11 ArbCom 2017 election voter message
  • 12 Your signature
  • 13 ArbCom 2018 election voter message
  • 14 ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
  • Category discussion

    edit

    Hi, since this looks like your first discussion on a category renaming here I would recommend changing your "Keep as is" to Oppose, as you are opposing my suggested change. Thanks for your comment (even in opposition to my change idea) :) Ctjf83Talk 02:20, 17 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

    Thank you for pointing out my mismanagement of words. I was thinking in AfD-speak, not CfD-speak. —Goodtimber (walk/talk) 03:18, 17 September 2008 (UTC)Reply
    Well I guess two other users have "keep" also, although I think "oppose" is a better word. Good job on striking out your old "keep as is" comment, I forgot to tell you that!! Good work! :) Ctjf83Talk 03:42, 17 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

    Jupiter template

    edit

    I edited the "Major moons" link so that it only links to "Galilean moons" Serendipodous 14:11, 15 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

    That's what I was thinking! I'm glad I wasn't too far off base. —Goodtimber (walk/talk) 16:48, 15 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

    Wikipedia:Featured topic candidates/Everglades/archive2

    edit

    Has your oppose been resolved yet? I'd like to make a decision on the outcome soon. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 18:39, 27 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

    Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

    edit

    Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

    On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

    For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

    Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:22, 14 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

    edit

    Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Next Generation Science Standards, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CSTA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

    It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 24 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

    Next Gen Science Standards

    edit

    Glad you're looking at the Next Gen Science Standards. I'll help keep an eye on the space; working to improve articles related to the history of learning standards, including the Committee of Ten at the moment. Daveplml (talk) 18:54, 15 March 2013 (UTC)Reply

    ArbCom elections are now open!

    edit

    Hi,
    You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

    Plate boundary diagrams

    edit

    Hi, you contacted me on my [page] on Wikimedia Commons and asked to be contacted via Wikipedia about creating diagrams for divirgent and transform plate boundaries for your outside school in California. I'd be happy to try and make these, and please do keep pestering me to do so if I don't deliver. Really glad you took an interest in my illustrations - now to try and relearn how to use Inkscape ;P Domdomegg (talk) 19:33, 19 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

    Thank you new friend! —Goodtimber (walk/talk) 19:56, 19 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
    Hi I think I've done them, please check and tell me if anything should be improved (especially about the C-C constructive boundary, not sure really if it's supposed to look like that). Also if you need anything else done please do tell me. Domdomegg (talk) 14:37, 20 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

    ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

    edit

    Hello, Goodtimber. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

    The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

    If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

    Some stroopwafels for you!

    edit
      Hi, dunno if you remember me but I helped you make a worksheet on plate tectonics - it really made my day when you noticed them, just remembered it again today ;) Domdomegg (talk) 23:27, 8 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

    ArbCom 2017 election voter message

    edit

    Hello, Goodtimber. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

    The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

    If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

    Your signature

    edit

    Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors. Your signature also has a missing end tag from <font color="#006600"> not closed inside the Wikilink.

    You are encouraged to change

    —'''''[[User:Goodtimber|<font color="#006600">Goodtimber]] ('''[[Special:Contributions/Goodtimber|walk]]'''/'''[[User talk:Goodtimber|talk]]''')'''''</font> : —Goodtimber (walk/talk)

    to

    —'''''[[User:Goodtimber|<span style="color: #006600">Goodtimber</span>]] ('''[[Special:Contributions/Goodtimber|walk]]'''/'''[[User talk:Goodtimber|talk]]''')''''' : Goodtimber (walk/talk)

    Anomalocaris (talk) 02:31, 29 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

    ArbCom 2018 election voter message

    edit

    Hello, Goodtimber. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

    The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

    If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

    ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

    edit
     Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

    The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

    If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 23 November 2021 (UTC)Reply


    Add topic

    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Goodtimber&oldid=1090517969"
     



    Last edited on 29 May 2022, at 22:55  


    Languages

     



    This page is not available in other languages.
     

    Wikipedia


    This page was last edited on 29 May 2022, at 22:55 (UTC).

    Content is available under CC BY-SA 4.0 unless otherwise noted.



    Privacy policy

    About Wikipedia

    Disclaimers

    Contact Wikipedia

    Code of Conduct

    Developers

    Statistics

    Cookie statement

    Terms of Use

    Desktop