MintyFresh201

Hello MintyFresh201,

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Ratnahastin, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I have tagged an article that you started, FV Dudenhofen, for deletion, because there's already a page about that topic at Draft:FV_Dudenhofen. Please don't be discouraged; we appreciate your effort in creating new articles. To avoid this in the future, consider using the search function to find pages that already cover what you want to write about.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top. If the page is already deleted by the time you come across this message and you wish to retrieve the deleted material, please contact the deleting administrator.

For any further query, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Ratnahastin}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Ratnahastin (talk) 06:00, 4 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into FV Dudenhofen. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:03, 4 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at FV Dudenhofen, you may be blocked from editing. You were already warned once about copying a draft into article space without attribution to its originator. Robert McClenon (talk) 23:41, 11 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

I'm sorry, I don't understand what is going on

MintyFresh201 (talk) 23:42, 11 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Can you please clarify any mistake I may have made. MintyFresh201 (talk) 04:25, 12 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to SC Spelle-Venhaus. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris ^talk! 22:18, 5 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Okay, thanks MintyFresh201 (talk) 23:34, 5 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, SC Blau-Weiß Papenburg, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 02:00, 6 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Okay, will do.

Thanks MintyFresh201 (talk) 03:20, 6 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Palm Ridge requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the helporreference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nominationbyvisiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:34, 6 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

@MintyFresh201 and CycloneYoris: From my speedy deletion edit summary: "This could be about a place in South Africa, a Roblox game, an American football junior competition, or perhaps something quite different. I see no good reason to WP:DRAFTIFY this." MintyFresh201, I see you are new here, but could you possibly identify what this was intended to be about? Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 09:14, 6 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to FC Schüttorf 09. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hitro talk 11:07, 6 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Blau-Weiß Brühl. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hitro talk 11:08, 6 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Blau-Weiß Brühl and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thanks for your contributions to BFC Columbia 1896 Berlin. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 01:45, 7 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

I'm sorry, can you take it out of the draftspace and I can add the sources to the article.

Regards,

MintyFresh201 MintyFresh201 (talk) 01:46, 7 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Once you add sufficient sources to the article, you may submit it for review as was said or you may move it yourself. Flemmish Nietzsche (talk) 01:48, 7 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Okay, thanks, I appreciate your help MintyFresh201 (talk) 01:51, 7 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, MintyFresh201

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Football clubs in Kingston for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Yue🌙 03:11, 7 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, MintyFresh201

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username ToadetteEdit, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, BFC Columbia 1896 Berlin, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|ToadetteEdit}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Toadette^Edit! 07:26, 7 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Friedenau SC Excelsior Berlin. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 11:27, 7 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Okay, no problem, Thanks MintyFresh201 (talk) 19:25, 7 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Since much of its content is user-edited, Transfermarkt is not considered a reliable source. Please do not cite the website in articles. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:05, 7 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at TSV Kornburg, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. As I've already explained to you, Transfermarkt is not considered a reliable source. Knowingly citing an unreliable source is disruptive editing. Please don't do that again. Sir Sputnik (talk) 21:30, 7 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Alright, no problem, however, it was just the Transfermarkt link that was unreliable correct? MintyFresh201 (talk) 02:35, 8 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

See Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Links for a more detailed break of what sources are and are not considered reliable in this subject area. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:10, 8 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

However, on Transfermarkt, users must have their changes reviewed, similar to submitting a draft on Wikipedia. Therefore the information is credible as it is reviewed by trustworthy sources MintyFresh201 (talk) 22:01, 8 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to SV Victoria Seelow. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. ✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 06:34, 9 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to TSV Sasel. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ratnahastin (talk) 07:13, 9 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to SV Steinbach. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ratnahastin (talk) 07:19, 9 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to SV Grün-Weiß Brieselang. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ratnahastin (talk) 07:22, 9 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Askania Bernburg. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ratnahastin (talk) 07:23, 9 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, FSV Barleben, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 07:45, 9 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi MintyFresh201. I appreciate the intention of creating articles of notable football clubs. However, many of your articles have been moved to draftspace because they lacked sources that would indicate notability and yet, you are still creating articles like SV Victoria Seelow that have zero WP:SIGCOV and very few WP:inline citations. Please slow down and familiarise yourself with Wikipedia's WP:Notability requirements. Robby.is.on (talk) 10:53, 9 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

I just noticed that SV Victoria Seelow had also been moved to draftspace and then ten minutes later you recreated it. The correct procedure is to edit the article in draftspace and then resubmit the article.

Be aware that the three sources you added do not indicate significant coverage, which is required for notability: the first reference is the club's website, the second and third references are database entries. We would need newspaper articles or books covering the football club to demonstrate notability. Robby.is.on (talk) 14:54, 9 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Alright, I will ensure to take my time when writing articles.

Appreciate it,

MintyFresh201 (talk) 19:19, 9 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to SV Grün-Weiß Brieselang. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 20:36, 9 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Thanks for contributing to the article FSV_Barleben. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable and attributed to reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you. Sam Kuru (talk) 00:14, 10 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Note: In this edit, you added a link to 'en-academic'. In this one you added a reference to 'wikiwand'. Both very clearly note that the source of their material is Wikipedia. Additionally, please do not remove maintenace tags from articles until you've actually addressed the problem. Sam Kuru (talk) 00:14, 10 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:FV Dudenhofen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thanks for your contributions to Sporting Mertzig. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 01:35, 12 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Okay, thanks. MintyFresh201 (talk) 04:37, 12 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to SV Grohn. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it needs copyediting as some parts still talk about TSV Grolland instead of it. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 22:35, 13 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Okay, thanks

MintyFresh201 (talk) 22:41, 13 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to ESC Geestemünde. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ratnahastin (talk) 09:19, 14 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to SC Croat San Pedro. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ratnahastin (talk) 09:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Draft:SV Grohn a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into SV Grohn. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Ratnahastin (talk) 09:23, 14 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Okay, I really appreciate the clarification as I did not know how to move a page to mainspace.

Kind Regards,

MintyFresh201 (talk) 00:55, 15 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Habenhauser FV. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ratnahastin (talk) 09:25, 14 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Draft:Sporting Mertzig a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Sporting Mertzig. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Ratnahastin (talk) 11:19, 14 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to SV Merseburg 99. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ratnahastin (talk) 12:44, 14 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to SC Spelle-Venhaus. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 06:43, 15 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, SV Grün-Weiß Brieselang, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 07:20, 15 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, Friedenau SC Excelsior Berlin, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 07:21, 15 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

An article you recently created, SC Blau-Weiß Papenburg, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 07:21, 15 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

I think my prior warnings here were absolutely clear. You've added the exact same mirror again here, along with a blog source. You've also removed maintenance tags without addressing the concerns they noted. Please consider this a final warning - if you knowingly use sources that are fake again, this account will be disabled. Sam Kuru (talk) 23:58, 15 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello Sam Kuru,

I know you have added a topic on my talk page. I now understand the part where you mentioned that I "removed maintenance tags without addressing the concerns they noted." However, based on my research, the sources I use when I create articles is very much credible as far as I know. Is there anything else I need to know when creating or editing articles.

Kind Regards,

MintyFresh201 (talk) 00:14, 16 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

The material at 'en-academic.com' is an early copy of our article at Founding Clubs of the DFB. It literally starts with a "Wikipedia" in the header and ends with a credit to "Wikipedia Foundation 2010". It is a word-for-word copy of our article as it existed in 2010, along with the Wikipedia mark-up and a old broken link at the bottom. I have no idea how you could possibly evaluate that as a "very much credible" source. Never mind that I explained this to you previously; one would think that might be a clue that the source is junk. Sam Kuru (talk) 02:08, 16 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Okay, that really helps clarify things.

Thank you,

Have a blessed day!

MintyFresh201 (talk) 22:48, 16 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Friedenau SC Excelsior Berlin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 04:31, 16 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Klub Kosova Hamburg. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 23:40, 17 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi MintyFresh201. I noticed you added a box to your userpage that says "This user has pending changes reviewer rights on the English Wikipedia." You don't seem to have this right, which is a special permission given out by administrators after a request. Was this just a misunderstanding? If so, I'd suggest removing the box so as not to confuse other users. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:13, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Okay, I think this was just a misunderstanding. I apologize for any confusion I have caused.

Kind Regards,

MintyFresh201 (talk) 15:26, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

 Template:CFAfootballclub has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 08:46, 23 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Spvg Wesseling-Urfeld. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Hey man im josh (talk) 13:29, 24 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello, how are you? While I understand that this article is lacking more references, isn’t it still acceptable for the article to be considered a stub and still be allowed in mainspace?

Regards,

MintyFresh201 (talk) 00:16, 26 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Spvg Wesseling-Urfeld, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Women's football. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 31 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to SpVgg Ingelheim. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and those sources should be reliable and independent of the subject. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 20:19, 31 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

@MintyFresh201, did you submit this to yourself? What are a you trying to do here? --Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 19:56, 12 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

I'm sorry I think I made a mistake and informed myself when I moved the article to mainspace. Apologies for the confusion.

Kindly,

MintyFresh201 (talk) 21:28, 12 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Bonnyrigg Rose Ladies F.C.. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 19:54, 12 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

@MintyFresh201, you moved the article to the main space again without addressing any of the issues. You keep move warring despite my and other editor's requests to improve these articles. You are not providing any edit summaries. Combined with the notice issue above. Why are you editing like this? --Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 23:31, 12 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Sorry for the confusion. My understanding was that I had to add some more sources and could then move the article back to mainspace. --MintyFresh201 (talk) 23:32, 12 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

You are barely adding any sources that establish notability. Just because the team is mentioned somewhere does not mean that it is a reliable source for notability. I want to be generous, but you have had a litany of issues and your pattern of problematic editing continues. Your references are usually bare URLs and you often repeat them without condensing. Take a look at this talk page and the talk page of your other accounts. There is a consistent theme.

Look at the move you just made for FC Barcelona-Paris Saint-Germain F.C. Rivalry. It is problematic and I will be moving that article back to draft.

Many editors are expecting for you to make the improvements and submit the article for review through the normal AFC process.

I highly recommend you review:

• Notability
• Citing Sources
• How to develop an article
• How to create an article

I believe I will need to make an ANI report soon.

--Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 23:59, 12 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

I'm sorry, please assume good faith. I am just trying to help and contribute to Wikipedia and am not trying to violate any policy. I don't really understand what I am doing wrong. I have tried to go through all my contributions and use the CitationBot to fix the bare urls. I have tried to cite reliable sources to establish notability. Please reconsider before reporting me.

Best,

MintyFresh201 (talk) 00:20, 13 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

I appreciate that you are trying to expand Wikipedia's coverage of football and I recognize that you have made some good edits. I am trying to assume good faith, but you are not leaving much room. You have had multiple accounts, claimed user rights that you did not have, and have had ~30 articles moved to draft/nominated for deletion in just 45-ish days (+all the other ones from your other accounts). This is not normal pattern in my experience.

You say you do not understand what you are doing wrong, then I recommend you slow down and look to just improve your editing. Please read through some of the policies/guidelines I linked to above and at Wikipedia:WikiProject Football. Quality editing is better than quantity editing.

Because of this, when creating articles or attempting to move articles with drafts, I highly recommend you go through the AFC process (When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.) Stop immediately moving articles back to mainspace when other editors have moved them to the draft space, without substantial improvement.

You should not rely on CitationBot or any other bot to scan and improve your editing/referencing. Try to follow the recommended formats at Wikipedia:Citing sources.

Would you like a mentor (not me) to help you improve your editing experience? Consider finding an editor at the mentorship adoptee's areaorWikipedia:WikiProject Football that will help you with your articles. Maybe User:Perfect4th has availability if you ask.

I am leaving this issue here for the moment. --Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 01:23, 13 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Okay, I very much appreciate your help and insight. Thank you for your patience with me. I will look into the resources you have informed me about.

MintyFresh201 (talk) 15:47, 13 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to FC Barcelona-Paris Saint-Germain F.C. Rivalry. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Classicwiki (talk) If you reply here, please ping me. 00:00, 13 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to AFC Warsaw. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 05:54, 13 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for your contributions to Potros FC. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 11:07, 13 June 2024 (UTC)Reply