|
m →Report date May 7, 2010 14:50 (UTC): Archive
|
No edit summary
|
||
Line 33:
The original complaint came from Chris Bennett, who has been repeatedly warned against foul - mouthed editing by a succession of administrators. His complaint against me was that I refused to discuss before editing and he persuaded an administrator (without giving me a chance to defend myself) that he was right. The issue on the table was that in the Signification of Terms section of Justinian's law code the various successive paragraphs do not develop a single legal argument. In fact the Digest entries are arranged first according to author, then according to volume number of his work, then according to page number in the particular volume. Bennett was pushing the ridiculous notion that because one paragraph discusses the intercalary '''day''' in the Julian calendar a subsequent paragraph discussing the intercalary '''month''' in the Republican calendar must necessarily relate to the same thing, although intervening paragraphs, which could only relate to the Republican calendar, used identical phrasing. Instead of coming to the debating table he applied for page protection.
When the matter came up again a few weeks ago he again refused debate and succeeded in getting an administrator to block. His pals are [redacted] (the prosecutor here, who uses an alias) who was described as "
Bennett cleared me to resume editing a few days ago but because I didn't toe the party line went back to the administrators and got another block. [redacted] is now claiming that an edit I made to Gregorian calendar is grounds for an indefinite block. No reason is given for the claim that what I say is "unlikely" to be true. The Catholic Church has not claimed it is untrue, only [redacted]. Is he an expert on canon law or just a "drive - by" expert on canon law? He practises as a notary, and lawyers are very good at hiding the fact that they know very little about the subjects they claim to be expert on. [[Special:Contributions/217.169.37.146|217.169.37.146]] ([[User talk:217.169.37.146|talk]]) 10:39, 10 March 2010 (UTC)
| |||