|
|
|||
Line 1,433:
::I opened a thread on [[Template talk:Infobox river]] regarding this. Also pinging {{ping|Remsense}} who has been separately reverting my edits. <span style='color: #FFFFFF;background-color: #FFD700;font-color: #000000;'>[[User:Shannon1|'''Shannon''']]</span> <small>[ [[User talk:Shannon1|Talk]] ]</small> 16:09, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
:::I'm merely concerned specifically with the articles I've reverted, I have no opinion on the issue at-large. [[User:Remsense|<span style="border-radius:2px 0 0 2px;padding:3px;background:#1E816F;color:#fff">'''Remsense'''</span>]][[User talk:Remsense|<span lang="zh" style="border:1px solid #1E816F;border-radius:0 2px 2px 0;padding:1px 3px;color:#000">诉</span>]] 16:16, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
::::{{ping|Remsense}} I've been on Wikipedia 15+ years and river articles have always used these watershed maps. I'm aware that policies can change but there has been no such discussion at [[WP:RIVERS]] or elsewhere. In my view, the watershed map on [[Yangtze]] for example is far more informative than the OSM map, which is essentially a better locator map. The Yangtze basin is immense, with dozens of major tributaries, and in this case the OSM map also leaves out the Jinsha that continues for more than 2000 km upstream of Sichuan. (Not because I made the watershed map, necessarily – I just noticed the reversions because of my watchlist.) <span style='color: #FFFFFF;background-color: #FFD700;font-color: #000000;'>[[User:Shannon1|'''Shannon''']]</span> <small>[ [[User talk:Shannon1|Talk]] ]</small> 16:25, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
===Voting started===
Ok, please vote for this scenario. "Both topographic and OpenStreetMaps will be repesented in Infoboxes, but it is preferred to show OpenStreetMap and hide others".
| |||