|
|
|||
Line 103:
:::::::3×3 photos using TIE is a lot. We don't do that redudancy on other infoboxes. How many screens would that be? Imagine in the Philippines House of Representatives, you'd have 8 parties that had more than 1% of the vote in the FPTP election, then another infobox for the partylist election with 29 parties that won 1%. Imagine that on TIE. The article previously used TIE, with just the FPTP election, with I guess top 6 parties with make believe leaders that I made up. The partylist election was not in the infobox. That fails in so many metrics lol. The Philippines example is an extreme one though and if you have better ideas, I'm all ears. [[User:Howard the Duck|Howard the Duck]] ([[User talk:Howard the Duck|talk]]) 20:19, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
::::::::I am not saying necessarily using 3x3 with TIE. I actually said 3x2 is preferable. Cases using 3x3 are rarer, since countries in which more than 6 parties/blocs can be considered as "major" are not ''that'' common. For those cases where this may pose a issue: analyze it case-by-case. [[User:Impru20|'''<span style="color:#E65B00;">Impru</span><span style="color:#0018A8;">20</span>''']]<sup>[[User talk:Impru20|talk]]</sup> 20:43, 17 June 2024 (UTC)
:::::::::Even 3×2 is a lot. Does the MOS recommend showing three different photos on one row in such a small space? That's too much info crammed into 300px. Even if we'd ditch portraits, three columns crammed into 300px is a lot it leads to the infobox being wider. You'd think 55 entries is nuts, wait until you see infoboxes actually being wider than the space alloted for prose on some computer monitors. [[User:Howard the Duck|Howard the Duck]] ([[User talk:Howard the Duck|talk]]) 20:21, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
== Requested move at [[Talk:2024 Oregon House of Representatives election#Requested move 10 June 2024]] ==
| |||