Multipactor effect

The multipactor effect occurs when electrons accelerated by radio-frequency (RF) fields are self-sustained in a vacuum (or near vacuum) via an electron avalanche caused by secondary electron emission.^[2] The impact of an electron to a surface can, depending on its energy and angle, release one or more secondary electrons into the vacuum. These electrons can then be accelerated by the RF fields and impact with the same or another surface. Should the impact energies, number of electrons released, and timing of the impacts be such that a sustained multiplication of the number of electrons occurs, the phenomenon can grow exponentially and may lead to operational problems of the RF system such as damage of RF components or loss or distortion of the RF signal.

The mechanism of multipactor depends on the orientation of an RF electric field with respect to the surface as well as the magnetic field and its orientation.^{[2]: 61–66} There are two types of multipactor: two-surface multipactor on metals and single-surface multipactor on metal or dielectrics.

This is a multipactor effect that occurs in the gap between metallic electrodes. Often, an RF electric field is normal to the surface. A resonance between electron flight time and RF field cycle is a mechanism for multipactor development.

The existence of multipactor is dependent on the following three conditions being met: The average number of electrons released is greater than or equal to one per incident electron (this is dependent on the secondary electron yield of the surface), and the time taken by the electron to travel from the surface from which it was released to the surface it impacts is an integer multiple of one half of the RF period, and the average secondary electron yield is greater than or equal to one.

The multipactor effect can take place on a single surface when magnetic fields are taken into account.^{[2]: 91–105 [3]} A single-surface multipactor event is also possible on a metallic surface in the presence of a crossed static magnetic field. It may also occur on a dielectric surface, where often an RF electric field is parallel to the surface. The positive charge accumulated on the dielectric surface attracts electrons back to the surface.

The conditions under which multipactor will occur in two surface multipactor can be described by a quantity called the frequency-gap product. Consider a two surface setup with the following definitions:

${\displaystyle d}$ , distance or gap between the surfaces

${\displaystyle \omega }$ , angular frequency of the RF field

${\displaystyle V_{0}}$ , peak plate-to-plate RF voltage

${\displaystyle E_{0}}$ , peak electric field between the surfaces, equal to ${\displaystyle V_{0}}$ /${\displaystyle d}$ .

The RF voltage varies sinusoidally. Consider the time at which the voltage at electrode A passes through 0 and starts to become negative. Assuming that there is at least 1 free electron near A, that electron will begin to accelerate to the right toward electrode B. It will continue to accelerate and reach a maximum velocity half a cycle later, just as the voltage at electrode B begins to become negative. If the electron(s) from electrode A strike electrode B at this time and produce additional free electrons, these new free electrons will begin to accelerate toward electrode A. The process may then repeat causing multipactor. We now find the relationship between the plate spacing, RF frequency, and RF voltage that causes the strongest multipactor resonance.

Consider a point in time at which electrons have just collided with electrode A at position -d/2. The electric field is at zero and is beginning to point to the left so that the newly freed electrons are accelerated toward the right. Newton's equation of motion of the free electrons is

${\displaystyle a($t)={\frac {F(t)}{m}}}  

${\displaystyle {\ddot {x}}($t)={\frac {qE_{0}}{m}}~\sin(\omega t)}  

The solution to this differential equation is

${\displaystyle x($t)=-{\frac {qE_{0}}{m\omega ^{2}}}\sin(\omega t)+{\frac {qE_{0}}{m\omega }}t-{\frac {d}{2}}}  

where it is assumed that when the electrons initially leave the electrode they have zero velocity. We know that resonance happens if the electrons arrive at the rightmost electrode after one half of the period of the RF field, ${\displaystyle t_{\frac {1}{2}}={\frac {\pi }{\omega }}}$ . Plugging this into our solution for ${\displaystyle x($t)}   we get

${\displaystyle x(t_{\frac {1}{2}})=-{\frac {qE_{0}}{m\omega ^{2}}}\sin(\omega t_{\frac {1}{2}})+{\frac {qE_{0}}{m\omega }}t_{\frac {1}{2}}-{\frac {d}{2}}}$ 

${\displaystyle {\frac {d}{2}}=-{\frac {qE_{0}}{m\omega ^{2}}}\sin(\omega {\frac {\pi }{\omega }})+{\frac {qE_{0}}{m\omega }}{\frac {\pi }{\omega }}-{\frac {d}{2}}}$ 

Rearranging and using the frequency ${\displaystyle f}$  instead of the angular frequency gives

${\displaystyle fd={\frac {1}{2{\sqrt {\pi }}}}{\sqrt {\frac {qV_{0}}{m}}}}$ .

The product ${\displaystyle fd}$  is called the frequency-gap product. Keep in mind that this equation is a criterion for greatest amount of resonance, but multipactor can still occur when this equation is not satisfied.

Multipacting depends on the geometry of the surface and the exact distribution of the electric and magnetic fields. There are a number of geometry-based techniques to reduce or even eliminate the multipactor effect: One is through small-scale grooves which modify the direction of the electric fields exactly at the location of the electron emission, thereby kicking some of the electrons to directions that do not support the process.^[4] Another approach is through large scale corrugations of the surface which periodically alter the time of flight of the electrons in two-point multipacting, thereby disrupting the multipactor resonance condition^[5] Then there are specific changes in the curvature of a cavity's surface that spoil the chances of the electrons to return to the point of origin^[6] or cavity-beam pipe transition surface.^[7] These various surface modifications techniques provide a powerful tool for the suppression of multipacting in various geometries.

This phenomenon was first observed by the French physicist Camille Gutton, in 1924, at Nancy.

Multipactor was identified and studied in 1934 by Philo Farnsworth, the inventor of electronic television, who attempted to take advantage of it as an amplifier. More commonly nowadays, it has become an obstacle to be avoided for normal operation of particle accelerators, vacuum electronics, radars, satellite communication devices, and so forth.

The first application of computers to investigate multipacting is from the early 1970s^[3] when it was discovered as a major SRF cavity performance limitation.

A novel form of multipactor has been proposed,^[8] and subsequently experimentally observed, in which charging of a dielectric surface considerably changes the dynamics of the multipactor discharge.

• C. Gutton, Sur la décharge électrique à fréquence très élevée, Comptes-Rendus Hebdomadaires des Séances de l'Académie des Sciences, vol.178, p.467, 1924
• Farnsworth, Philo Taylor (1934). "Television by electron image scanning". Journal of the Franklin Institute. 218 (4). Elsevier BV: 411–444. doi:10.1016/s0016-0032(34)90415-4. ISSN 0016-0032.
• J. Rodney M. Vaughan, Multipactor, IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, vol. 35, No 7, July 1988.
• Kishek, R. A.; Lau, Y. Y. (1998-01-05). "Multipactor Discharge on a Dielectric". Physical Review Letters. 80 (1). American Physical Society (APS): 193–196. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80.193. ISSN 0031-9007.
• Valfells, Agust; Kishek, R. A.; Lau, Y. Y. (1998). "Frequency response of multipactor discharge". Physics of Plasmas. 5 (1). AIP Publishing: 300–304. doi:10.1063/1.872702. hdl:2027.42/69474. ISSN 1070-664X.
• R. A. Kishek, Interaction of multipactor discharge and rf structures, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (1997)
• Lau, Y.Y.; Kishek, R.A.; Gilgenbach, R.M. (1998). "Power deposited on a dielectric by multipactor". IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science. 26 (3). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE): 290–295. doi:10.1109/27.700756. ISSN 0093-3813.
• Lau, Y.Y.; Verboncoeur, J.P.; Valfells, A. (2000). "Space-charge effects on multipactor on a dielectric". IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science. 28 (3). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE): 529–536. doi:10.1109/27.887665. ISSN 0093-3813.
• A. Valfells, Multipactor discharge: frequency response, suppression, and relation to window breakdown, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (2000)
• Anderson, R. B.; Getty, W. D.; Brake, M. L.; Lau, Y. Y.; Gilgenbach, R. M.; Valfells, A. (2001). "Multipactor experiment on a dielectric surface". Review of Scientific Instruments. 72 (7). AIP Publishing: 3095–3099. doi:10.1063/1.1380687. hdl:2027.42/71183. ISSN 0034-6748.
• R.B. Anderson, Multipactor experiment on a dielectric surface, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor (2001)
• Riyopoulos, Spilios; Chernin, David; Dialetis, Demos (1995). "Theory of electron multipactor in crossed fields". Physics of Plasmas. 2 (8). AIP Publishing: 3194–3213. doi:10.1063/1.871151. ISSN 1070-664X.

Online

• Study of the Multipactor effect in multi-carrier operation inside space microwave components^{[dead link]} Ph. Mader, J. Puech, H. Dillenbourg, Ph. Lepeltier, L. Lapierre, J. Sombrin. PDF Accessed December 2006
• Breakdown In Waveguides Due To The Multipactor Effect. H.M. Wachowski, Aerospace Corp El Segundo California, May 1964. Accessed December 2006
• Multipactor experiment on a dielectric surface R.B. Anderson, W.D. Getty, M.L. Brake, Y.Y. Lau, R.M. Gilgenbach, A. Valfells, Rev. Sci. Instrum., 72, 3095, July 2001

• Capacitively coupled plasma
• Electron avalanche
• Fusor