curprev13:2313:23, 27 January 2022 Rbngrss 2022talkcontribs 73,799 bytes−833 Hi HiLow48: Wikipedia’s “Reliable Sources” article says news media opinion pieces are not reliable sources for statement of fact. The last paragraph I deleted is entirely based on a factual claim from an opinion piece. That alone should delete it. The quoted writer is not a criminologist, legal scholar or politician: why not quote footballers? ”Wikipedia also says “age matters” and it’s 12 years old. If you still feel the paragraph merits inclusion how about we discuss it on the TALK page?undoTags: Manual revertVisual edit
curprev13:2513:25, 23 January 2022 Rbngrss 2022talkcontribs 73,799 bytes−833 I deleted the last paragraph because it is refers to an 11 year old contentious opinion piece that offers no evidence for its claim quoted in the Wikipedia article. It also makes factual statements subsequently made irrelevant/wrong by later events.~~~~undoTags: RevertedVisual edit
curprev08:0108:01, 21 January 2022 Rbngrss 2022talkcontribs 74,421 bytes+2,236 I've added data from the latest 2020-21 report by the Oz Bureau of Criminology in paragraph 3, consolidated accounts of the lower death rate of Indigenous Australians in prisons and made it into 2 paragraphsundo