curprev20:4120:41, 12 June 2022 SnowFiretalkcontribs 7,893 bytes+339 why on earth is one angry priest who wasn't even a member of Mingana's denomination's condemnation so important as to go in the lede?! The quote doesn't even prove that this viewpoint was particularly widely shared and is a freaking footnote. I'm not even certain it deserves to be in the article at all, but move to its own section.undo
curprev06:5406:54, 26 August 2020 Ninos2576talkcontribs 5,704 bytes−31 replaced religious identity in the first sentence with his ethnic identity. his religious identity isn't needed for the first sentence of the lead if it isn't what he was known for, especially when it is mentioned again in the last sentence of the lead anyway.undo
curprev11:4111:41, 24 February 2020 Hminganatalkcontribs 5,732 bytes−687 Information on the last paragraph was written with false information. I am disappointed as how someone would write comments like that about Alphonse Mingana.undoTags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
curprev17:0117:01, 25 October 2019 Ramsin93talkcontribs 6,410 bytes+679 Added the representation of the character of Mingana from the Patriarch of the Assyrian Church's perspective in his Homilies of Mar Narsai vol. 1.undoTags: Visual editMobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit