curprev20:0120:01, 30 April 2024 2a02:c7e:3011:fc00:68ab:3511:3acb:5016talk 71,279 bytes+7,587 Undid revision 1221576696byWarrenmck (talk) That's not how Wikipedia works. You need to get a consensus before removing sourced content. You keep talking about a discussion but leave no link, nor do you back your claims of a "scholarly consensus". Clearly, there's disagreement between scholars and it's important to show both sides. Robbeets is just as reliable a source as Vovin, if not more.undoTags: UndoReverted
curprev13:5613:56, 30 April 2024 2a02:c7e:3011:fc00:68ab:3511:3acb:5016talk 71,279 bytes+7,587 Undid revision 1220312786byWarrenmck (talk) There's no consensus on the Talk page. The only thing eating up a lot of space are the many sources by Vovin, who, while dismissing Altaic, has proposed much more niche theories with far less evidence. He doesn't seem like a trustworthy figure on the subject, yet he's given a lot of space here.undoTags: UndoReverted
curprev08:5408:54, 14 November 2023 Austronesiertalkcontribs 61,905 bytes+49 Replacing preprint with a published peer-review source. Georg has been an observer and critic of all things related to Altaic/Transeurasian for decades; I can't think of a better model to follow for stating something like this in wikivoice.undo