curprev14:5414:54, 10 May 2023 2604:2d80:5d8a:5600:61d3:5a06:6a75:d4e3talk 40,436 bytes−49 The eclectic make-up of the coalition was not effectively communicated in this section as it is later in the article. For clarification, i made the following changes: Replaced “conservatives” with Democrats for two reasons: 1)Based on the source used throughout this article (Dunn), the coalition included both Republicans AND Democrats. 2) Democrats were the conservative party back then, so listing both is not only redundant, but easily misunderstood today. For consistency and clarity, either...undoTags: Mobile editMobile web editDisambiguation links added