curprev03:0203:02, 26 March 2024 Daniel Casetalkcontribs m49,613 bytes0 Protected "Battle of Khafji": Persistent disruptive editing: per request at RFPP; going longer this time ([Edit=Require autoconfirmed or confirmed access] (expires 03:02, 26 April 2024 (UTC)) [Move=Require autoconfirmed or confirmed access] (expires 03:02, 26 April 2024 (UTC)))undo
curprev22:1622:16, 7 March 2024 Dual Freqtalkcontribs 49,613 bytes−244 3 people have reverted you on this already. take it to the article talk page and try to get a consensus. Right now there appears to be consensus to follow the templates instructions and list only the final result. you've already been blocked once for this.undoTags: UndoReverted
curprev13:1213:12, 28 February 2024 74.218.59.184talk 49,841 bytes+244 Rv It is crucial to accurately represent the sequence of events during the Battle of Khafji. By clearly stating that Iraqi forces initially captured the city on 29-30 January and Coalition forces recaptured it between 30 January and 1 February, you are providing a more precise and factual account of the battle. Clearly delineating the timeline of events helps readers understand the dynamics of the battle and the eventual outcome. This structured approach enhances the clarity and comprehension...undoTags: Manual revertRevertedMobile editMobile web edit
27 February 2024
curprev22:1222:12, 27 February 2024 Dual Freqtalkcontribs 49,597 bytes−244 rvv, per the docs at Template:Infobox military conflict. If there's an article that conflicts with the docs then change that one, don't break this one. Result is the end state, not a list of interim states. See also Battle of the Bulge which had numerous areas change hands for days and weeks, but the template displays the end result, Allied victory, as intended.undoTags: UndoReverted
curprev01:3001:30, 25 February 2024 Dual Freqtalkcontribs 49,597 bytes−244 rv, a "Result" is defined as "a consequence, effect, or outcome of something". See docs for infobox at Template:Infobox military conflict. The infobox "result" field is the end state, not a list of day by day incidents. No one is disputing what happened as that is listed in the article body as it is supposed to be.undoTags: UndoReverted
24 February 2024
curprev01:3001:30, 24 February 2024 2600:1015:b20b:fd08:ccb1:6b19:69c2:f450talk 49,841 bytes+244 It shouldnt only say '''Coalition victory''' because its a situation where one side won the beginning phase of the battle and the other side won the second phase of the battle, if you only put "Coalition victory", that implies that the coalition won the whole thing and that Iraq never captured the city.undoTags: Manual revertRevertedMobile editMobile web edit
curprev19:0719:07, 19 August 2023 88.240.249.110talk 49,214 bytes+23 Unexplained removal, please knock it off. America was involved in the fighting alongside saudi and other coalition troops.undoTags: Mobile editMobile web edit
curprev20:0220:02, 12 August 2023 88.243.196.32talk 49,182 bytes+38 Bringing back removed sourced info, most of the fighting was done by American forces and Qatar was also involved.undoTags: Mobile editMobile web edit
curprev19:3219:32, 5 August 2023 مبارك النعيميtalkcontribs 49,249 bytes−76 An amendment to the information that says that Bahrain participated in the aerial bombardment, which is inaccurate (see all the pages related to the battle, such as the book of a fighter from the desert that did not mention Bahrain) and removing the Qatari army from participating in the battleundoTags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
curprev18:1418:14, 26 July 2023 109.161.168.111talk 49,329 bytes+158 Added the Bahraini contribution to the battle with Task Force "Isa" belonging to the Bahraini Armed Forces, where Bahrain also supported using the Bahraini Airforce having 303 sorties, 181 patrolsundoTags: Visual editMobile editMobile web edit