curprev10:3810:38, 9 July 2024 Folly Moxtalkcontribs 29,445 bytes−178 →Naval Aviator (1943–1968): we can't cite personal correspondence unavailable through any public archive, irrespective of where the scanned image of the correspondence is hosted. moving unusable reference to image box insteadundoTags: Mobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit
curprev10:0310:03, 9 July 2024 Folly Moxtalkcontribs 29,540 bytes+3,041 Restored revision 1233316631 by Wdallen49 (talk): I'm not sure if the rollback yesterday was intentional, but it rebroke all the citation formatting. restoring syntactically valid revision and will incorporate edits caught upundoTags: TwinkleUndoMobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit
curprev02:0202:02, 7 July 2024 Folly Moxtalkcontribs 28,108 bytes+180 →Career: i feel like i must be breaking some kind of rule doing this, but actually i honestly think this is ok since US government documents tend to be pd-usgovundoTags: Mobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit
curprev01:2101:21, 7 July 2024 Folly Moxtalkcontribs 26,944 bytes+373 I'm positive there's a piece of guidance somewhere in the MOS that I'm following here, but which one is left as an exercise for the readerundoTags: Mobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit
curprev01:1601:16, 7 July 2024 Folly Moxtalkcontribs 26,571 bytes+131 ok well i said i would fix these citations before i noticed they were largely inappropriate. might as well do what i can hereundoTags: Mobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit