curprev04:3604:36, 27 June 2024 Joey1ninertalkcontribs 81,831 bytes−1,204 this is helpful and informative, but I'm just not sure it's totally necessary and is even a little excessive for this particular article. Why don't we instead update the deliveries in the infobox of the SR20's dedicated article and format it similarly to the way that the references are placed in the infobox of the SR22's article - that seems more warranted.undo
curprev04:0104:01, 27 June 2024 Noha307talkcontribs 82,992 bytes+1,156 →Aircraft: Add References to Number Built for SR20 Entry – Thanks for mentioning the reference, if the information is all in there, we need to cite them; not sure the best way to word the footnoteundo
curprev17:1017:10, 21 February 2024 MikeSmith89talkcontribs m79,848 bytes+9 I don't see an issue with adding the exact month here, given that this domain name goes back that far on Internet Archive but no sources show that the company was called it anytime before this dateundo