Estate of Carter v. Commissioner, 453 F.2d 61, 62 (2d Cir. 1971) was a United States income tax case decided by Judge Friendly.
Appellant taxpayer was paid by the employer of her deceased husband what he would have earned until the end of the fiscal year.
Appellant did not include the amount as income on a joint return she filed. The joint return for 1960 filed by Mrs. Carter as executrix and for herself did not report as income the payments of $60,130.84, although it did report as capital gain a payment of $52,337.68, less the deduction of $5,000 permitted by I.R.C. § 101(b)(2)(A), from the Trustees of the Salomon Bros. Profit Sharing Plan, which represented the amounts accumulated for Sydney Carter's benefit during his years of service.
The Commissioner assessed a deficiency for failure to include the former amount.
Commissioner was sustained by the United States Tax Court.
The court reversed, holding that in district courts, payments to a survivor, not specifically characterized as compensation, were consistently held to be gifts except when the corporation was dominated by the decedent's family or there was a plan for making such payments. The court held that the test that applied was that of principal motive, considering whether the gift was made to the widow, not the estate; the corporation had no obligation to make further payments to deceased; the widow had never worked for the corporation; the corporation received no economic benefit; and the deceased had been fully compensated for his services. It was error for a partner's statement that the payment was a gift to be regarded as of only slight probative value because a declaration about intention by a person with knowledge was not excludable simply because it was made after the fact.
The court was left with the definite and firm conviction that the tax court committed a mistake in finding that the payments were compensation rather than an excludable gift.
Estate of Carter v. Commissioner, 453 F.2d 61 (2d Cir. 1971)
