curprev17:0917:09, 20 January 2023 Vipztalkcontribs 16,101 bytes+57 rv: Not a duplicate to warrant removal from the article, just an identical flag, a fact which warrants documentation. There's also no reason to rearrange images weirdly like that.undoTag: Undo
curprev18:3218:32, 9 January 2023 Vipztalkcontribs 16,104 bytes+588 Undid revision 1132423024 by Savasampion (talk) Nothing to admit from my side mate. These colors were defined, documented by people much smarter than you and I and the SVG images of these flags were made accordingly. The flag, afaik, kept the same shades from 1918 throughout 2006 - standard colors did not exist yet? If you keep doing this it can be practically considered vandalism.undoTag: Undo