curprev23:2023:20, 9 July 2024 Zlad!talkcontribs 130,913 bytes+187 Those social policies are always classified as left-wing and the others as right-wing. Just because the party considers itself right-wing, doesn’t mean it doesn’t support left-wing social policies. Being socially liberal directly means being socially left-wing, its a synonym.undoTags: Mobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit
curprev23:1423:14, 9 July 2024 Zlad!talkcontribs 130,726 bytes−221 Political positions doesn’t work like this. Its either completely based on left-right axis or social and fiscal left-right spectrum. Right-libertarianism is not valid therefore I changed it to simply Right-Wing. Another thing, Minarchism is a such an oddly specific descriptor that I feel like there needs to be a good third party source backing it up and not even party’s own page directly claims. Additionally, it is completely covered by Libertarianism. For ideology I decided to leave just Lib...undoTags: Mobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit
curprev22:5522:55, 9 July 2024 Zlad!talkcontribs 131,066 bytes+2 The party commonly uses the logo without the lettering and I think that is the more appropriate version. Additionally, I think the party flag should be removed as it is nothing but just the logo with the green background and reverse color scheme. But unless someone else agrees with me, I will keep it.undo
curprev22:3922:39, 9 July 2024 Zlad!talkcontribs 131,064 bytes−480 →Secularism reforms: This is a section about Secularism, therefore the party's views on the church's views on Monarchism has no place in it and I would argue no place in the entire article. Also finally simplified the section about each others mud slinging.undo
curprev12:1012:10, 9 July 2024 213.200.31.125talk 131,533 bytes+46 My arguments have not been refuted. Girchi supports all of this because of their right-libertarian ideology, which implies that one's body is one's property. Again, Girchi fully support European integration, and furthermore, they defend this position against anti-Westerners. They only oppose leftist politicians in the world, including in the EU. Check the facts.undoTags: Manual revertRevertedVisual edit
curprev11:0611:06, 9 July 2024 Zlad!talkcontribs 131,487 bytes−46 Undid revision 1233490848by213.200.31.125 (talk) I don’t care whats written on their site or what leftists believe. Party’s wikipedia page shouldn’t be their propaganda mouthpiece and it won’t be. And believe it or not, but Libertarians are generally socially liberal.undoTags: UndoRevertedMobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit
curprev10:3010:30, 9 July 2024 213.200.31.125talk 131,533 bytes+46 Secondly, Girchi supports European integration, they only believe that leftist ideas are not European but anti-European, so they are truly a pro-European party. Thirdly, it is of course " genius" to remove from the main text the description of the party that they SAY they are on their OFFICIAL website, and write their own. It seems to me that they have more of a clue themselves.undoTags: RevertedVisual edit
curprev10:2610:26, 9 July 2024 213.200.31.125talk 131,487 bytes+68 God, that's nonsense. First of all, legalizing drugs, prostitution, and abolishing compulsory military service is not a leftist idea. Girchi is a RIGHT-wing libertarian party that believes a man's body belongs to him and he can dispose of it however he wants. Therefore, you can't take him into the military against his will, you can't ban him from trading his own body, and you can't ban him from using anything. This is a libertarian idea and by that logic all libertarians are kinda leftists.undoTags: RevertedVisual edit
curprev01:1601:16, 7 July 2024 Zlad!talkcontribs 131,419 bytes+68 →Secularism reforms: I’m not sure all of the information listed here is relevant to the secularism reforms, (like the church being against Girchi’s positions) but I’ll keep it for now.undoTags: Mobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit
curprev00:2300:23, 7 July 2024 Zlad!talkcontribs 131,738 bytes−162 →Crime and judicial reform: Once again the source and the article are in conflict as the source doesn’t state that the detained people were “Girchi activists” or that the party argues that the “law gave authorities too much leverage to go against political opponents”.undoTags: Mobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit
