curprev14:2614:26, 4 April 2024 Randy Schutttalkcontribs 52,385 bytes+112 Updated the Martin-Quinn graph with data for the October 2022-June 2023 term, updated the colors for the Bailey graph to make them consistent, and adjusted the text to reflect these changes.undo
curprev17:5117:51, 6 December 2023 CaldwellBCladwelltalkcontribs m52,193 bytes−1 Changed an incorrect link - the "federal court" hyperlink in the first line previously linked to the non-existing page "Federal strip club of the United States". It has now been fixed to instead link to the page "Federal judiciary of the United States".undoTag: Manual revert
curprev01:5201:52, 12 November 2023 Randy Schutttalkcontribs 52,193 bytes−458 →Partisan balance: This statement is not based on the Axios article, but on the graph of preliminary data. Before making such a sweeping statement, it is important to review the caveats about over-interpreting the graphs presented at the bottom of the "Ideological leanings over time" section. It's also best to bring new ideas to the Talk page first.undo
curprev23:2823:28, 8 November 2023 2601:4c0:8001:a660:31af:528c:fc78:48fctalk 52,738 bytes+452 The paragraph I am editing said that "As the more moderate Republican justices retired, the court has become more partisan. The Court is now divided sharply along partisan lines with justices appointed by Republican justices taking increasingly conservative positions and those appointed by Democrats taking moderate liberate positions." This line says "now" without referencing when the line itself was written. Now, in the past 5 years, this Axios graph shows recent appointees being more moderate.undo
curprev16:3416:34, 4 November 2022 Randy Schutttalkcontribs 46,351 bytes+1,078 Updated text to correspond to updated Martin-Quinn graph (updated to 2021-22 court). Also, added 2 references and moved 2 references closer to text they apply to.undo
