Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Overview  





2 Main Philosophical Contributions  



2.1  Freewill  





2.2  Space, Time and Causality  







3 Career highlights  





4 Books  





5 External links  














John Lucas (philosopher): Difference between revisions






العربية
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Nederlands
 

Edit links
 









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Cite this page
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
Wikidata item
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 




Print/export  



















Appearance
   

 





Help
 

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


Browse history interactively
 Previous editNext edit 
Content deleted Content added
→‎Freewill: added a very helpful comma, and also we didn t need that (s) there
Line 17: Line 17:

# (Freewill) Determinism <=> for any human h there exists at least one (deterministic) logical system L(h) which can completely reliably predict H's actions in all circumstances.

# (Freewill) Determinism <=> for any human h there exists at least one (deterministic) logical system L(h) which can completely reliably predict H's actions in all circumstances.

# For any logical system L a sufficiently skilled mathematical logician (equipped with a sufficently powerful computer if necssary) can constuct some statements T(L) which are true by unprovable in L.(this follows from the proof of Gödel's theorem)

# For any logical system L a sufficiently skilled mathematical logician (equipped with a sufficently powerful computer if necssary) can constuct some statements T(L) which are true by unprovable in L.(this follows from the proof of Gödel's theorem)

# If a human m is a sufficiently skillful mathematical logician (equipped with a sufficiently powerful computer if necessary)then if m is given L(m)(s)he can construct T(L(m)) and

# If a human m is a sufficiently skillful mathematical logician (equipped with a sufficiently powerful computer if necessary)then if m is given L(m), he or she can construct T(L(m)) and

# Determine that they are true which L(m) could not do.

# Determine that they are true which L(m) could not do.

# Hence L(m) does not reliably predict m's actions in all circumstances.

# Hence L(m) does not reliably predict m's actions in all circumstances.


Revision as of 21:38, 14 December 2006

John Randolph Lucas FBA (born 18 June, 1929) is a British philosopher.

Overview

As an undergraduate at Balliol College, Oxford, 1947-1950, Lucas studied first maths, then Greats (Philosophy and Ancient History), obtaining the MA in Philosophy in 1954. He spent the 1957-58 academic year at Princeton University, deepening his understanding of mathematics and logic. For 36 years, until his 1996 retirement, he was a Fellow and Tutor of Merton College, Oxford, and remains an emeritus member of the University Faculty of Philosophy. He is a Fellow of the British Academy.

Lucas is perhaps best known for his paper "Minds, Machines and Gödel," arguing that an automaton cannot represent a human mathematician. Douglas Hofstadter's Gödel, Escher, Bach includes an extensive critical discussion of Lucas's argument and the ensuing vigorous debate in the academic literature.

A prolific author with unusually diverse teaching and research interests, Lucas has written on the philosophy of mathematics, especially the implications of Gödel's incompleteness theorem, the philosophy of mind, free will and determinism, the philosophy of science with special reference to special relativity, causality, political philosophy, ethics and business ethics, and the philosophy of religion.

The son of a Church of England clergyman, Lucas describes himself as "a dyed-in-the-wool traditional Englishman." He and Morar Portal have four children, among them Edward Lucas, Eastern European editor for The Economist. Sartorially independent, he may be remembered for a cool-weather habit of wearing a tie over his sweater under a jacket.

In addition to his philosophical career, Lucas has taken a practical interest in business ethics. He helped found the Oxford Consumers' Group [1], and was its first Chairman in 1961-3, serving again in 1965.

Main Philosophical Contributions

Freewill

Lucas's argument in Minds, Machines and Gödel is one of the most interesting 20th Century ideas in philosophy. He argues that [1]:

  1. (Freewill) Determinism <=> for any human h there exists at least one (deterministic) logical system L(h) which can completely reliably predict H's actions in all circumstances.
  2. For any logical system L a sufficiently skilled mathematical logician (equipped with a sufficently powerful computer if necssary) can constuct some statements T(L) which are true by unprovable in L.(this follows from the proof of Gödel's theorem)
  3. If a human m is a sufficiently skillful mathematical logician (equipped with a sufficiently powerful computer if necessary)then if m is given L(m), he or she can construct T(L(m)) and
  4. Determine that they are true which L(m) could not do.
  5. Hence L(m) does not reliably predict m's actions in all circumstances.
  6. Hence m has freewill.
  7. But there is insufficient qualitative difference between mathematical logicians and the rest of the population for it to be plausible to believe that the former have freewill and the latter do not.

Although (as with any argument) it is possible to dispute any of these points they constitute a new contribution to a major philosophical debate that has been going on for centuries.

Space, Time and Causality

Lucas wrote several books on the philosophy of science and space-time (see below). In A treatise on time and space he introduced a transcendental derivation of the Lorenz Transformations based on Red and Blue exchanging messages (in Russian and Greek respectively) from their respective frames of reference which demonstrates how these can be derived from a minimal set of philosophical assumptions.

Career highlights

Books

Bibliography of Lucas's writings, with many available online.

External links

  1. ^ Adapted mainly from [2]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=John_Lucas_(philosopher)&oldid=94368515"

Categories: 
1929 births
Living people
English philosophers
20th century philosophers
21st century philosophers
Fellows of the British Academy
Philosophy of mathematics
Fellows of Merton College, Oxford
 



This page was last edited on 14 December 2006, at 21:38 (UTC).

This version of the page has been revised. Besides normal editing, the reason for revision may have been that this version contains factual inaccuracies, vandalism, or material not compatible with the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License.



Privacy policy

About Wikipedia

Disclaimers

Contact Wikipedia

Code of Conduct

Developers

Statistics

Cookie statement

Mobile view



Wikimedia Foundation
Powered by MediaWiki