curprev18:1618:16, 9 June 2024 SMcCandlishtalkcontribs 117,267 bytes−17 →Apocrypha: Doesn't seem to be a proper name, judging by our article at biblical apocrypha; if we're certain it is one, then take that up over there first, and either way it should be lower-case or capitalized consistently, not veering back and forth between the two in the same material.undo
curprev04:1604:16, 18 April 2024 120.22.29.183talk 116,992 bytes−25 Corrected unfounded accusation against the KJV by changing "it is assumed" to "there is a view". I believe that by softening the language here and making it more ambiguous than an "assumption" lends to the latter end of the sentence which states there is no evidence of the claim in question. I also changed "Today the unqualified title "King James Version" usually indicates this Oxford standard text" to "Today most King James Bibles are usually representative of the Oxford standard text". This...undoTags: RevertedMobile editMobile web edit
