Restored revision 1039510670 by Ballinacurra Weston (talk)
|
|||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
This is a '''list of the 43 cases reported in volume 39 (14 Pet.) of ''[[United States Reports]]''''', decided by the [[Supreme Court of the United States]] from January 1840 to March 1840.<ref>Anne Ashmore, ''DATES OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS AND ARGUMENTS'', Library, Supreme Court of the United States, 26 December 2018.</ref> |
This is a '''list of the 43 cases reported in volume 39 (14 Pet.) of ''[[United States Reports]]''''', decided by the [[Supreme Court of the United States]] from January 1840 to March 1840.<ref>Anne Ashmore, ''DATES OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS AND ARGUMENTS'', Library, Supreme Court of the United States, 26 December 2018.</ref> |
||
== Nominative reports == |
== Nominative reports == |
||
In 1874, the U.S. government created the ''United States Reports'', and retroactively numbered older privately-published [[Law report|case reports]] as part of the new series. As a result, cases appearing in volumes 1–90 of ''U.S. Reports'' have dual [[Case citation|citation forms]]; one for the volume number of ''U.S. Reports'', and one for the volume number of the reports named for the relevant reporter of decisions (these are called |
In 1874, the U.S. government created the ''United States Reports'', and retroactively numbered older privately-published [[Law report|case reports]] as part of the new series. As a result, cases appearing in volumes 1–90 of ''U.S. Reports'' have dual [[Case citation|citation forms]]; one for the volume number of ''U.S. Reports'', and one for the volume number of the reports named for the relevant reporter of decisions (these are called ”[[Nominate reports|nominative reports]]”). |
||
=== Richard Peters, Jr. === |
=== Richard Peters, Jr. === |
||
Starting with the 26th volume of ''U.S. Reports'', the [[Reporter of Decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States]] was [[Richard Peters (reporter)|Richard Peters, Jr.]] Peters was Reporter of Decisions from 1828 to 1843, covering volumes 26 through 41 of ''United States Reports'' which correspond to volumes 1 through 16 of his '' |
Starting with the 26th volume of ''U.S. Reports'', the [[Reporter of Decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States]] was [[Richard Peters (reporter)|Richard Peters, Jr.]] Peters was Reporter of Decisions from 1828 to 1843, covering volumes 26 through 41 of ''United States Reports'' which correspond to volumes 1 through 16 of his ''Peter’s Reports''. As such, the dual form of citation to, for example, ''Irvine v. Lowry'' is 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) 293 (1840). |
||
== Justices of the Supreme Court at the time of 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) == |
== Justices of the Supreme Court at the time of 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) == |
||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
{{see also|List of justices of the Supreme Court of the United States by court composition}} |
{{see also|List of justices of the Supreme Court of the United States by court composition}} |
||
{{see also|Taney Court}} |
{{see also|Taney Court}} |
||
The Supreme Court is established by [[Article Three of the United States Constitution|Article III, Section 1]] of the [[Constitution of the United States]], which says: |
The Supreme Court is established by [[Article Three of the United States Constitution|Article III, Section 1]] of the [[Constitution of the United States]], which says: ”The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court . . .”. The size of the Court is not specified; the Constitution leaves it to [[Congress of the United States|Congress]] to set the number of justices. Under the [[Judiciary Act of 1789]] Congress originally fixed the number of justices at six (one chief justice and five associate justices).<ref>{{cite web|url=https://guides.ll.georgetown.edu/supreme_court|title=Supreme Court Research Guide |access-date=7 April 2021 |publisher=Georgetown Law Library}}</ref> Since 1789 Congress has varied the size of the Court from six to [[Seventh Circuit Act of 1807|seven]], [[Eighth and Ninth Circuits Act of 1837|nine]], [[Tenth Circuit Act of 1863|ten]], and back to [[Judiciary Act of 1869|nine]] justices (always including one chief justice). When the cases in 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) were decided, the Court comprised these nine justices: |
||
{| class="wikitable sortable" |
{| class="wikitable sortable" |
||
Line 85: | Line 85: | ||
[[Bluebook]] citation style is used for case names, citations, and jurisdictions. |
[[Bluebook]] citation style is used for case names, citations, and jurisdictions. |
||
* |
* ”C.C.D.” = United States Circuit Court for the District of . . . |
||
** ''e.g.,'' |
** ''e.g.,''”C.C.D.N.J.” = United States Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey |
||
* |
* ”D.” = United States District Court for the District of . . . |
||
** ''e.g.,'' |
** ''e.g.,''”D. Mass.” = [[United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts]] |
||
* |
* ”E.” = Eastern; ”M.” = Middle; ”N.” = Northern; ”S.” = Southern; ”W.” = Western |
||
** ''e.g.,'' |
** ''e.g.,''”C.C.S.D.N.Y.” = United States Circuit Court for the Southern District of New York |
||
** ''e.g.,'' |
** ''e.g.,''”M.D. Ala.” = [[United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama]] |
||
* |
* ”Adm.” = [[Admiralty Court]] (a federal court) |
||
* |
* ”Ct. Cl.” = [[United States Court of Claims]] |
||
* |
* ”C.P.” = [[Court of Common Pleas]] (a state court) |
||
* The abbreviation of a state's name alone indicates the highest appellate court in that |
* The abbreviation of a state's name alone indicates the highest appellate court in that state’s judiciary at the time. |
||
** ''e.g.,'' |
** ''e.g.,''”Pa.” = [[Supreme Court of Pennsylvania]] |
||
** ''e.g.,'' |
** ''e.g.,''”Me.” = [[Supreme Judicial Court of Maine]] |
||
== List of cases in 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) == |
== List of cases in 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) == |
||
{| class="wikitable sortable" |
{| class="wikitable sortable" |
||
|- |
|- |
||
! scope="col" style="width: |
! scope="col" style="width: 375px;" | Case Name |
||
! scope="col" style="width: |
! scope="col" style="width: 95px;" | Page & year |
||
! scope="col" style="width: 10px;" | Opinion of the Court |
! scope="col" style="width: 10px;" | Opinion of the Court |
||
! scope="col" style="width: 100px;" | Concurring opinion(s) |
! scope="col" style="width: 100px;" | Concurring opinion(s) |
||
! scope="col" style="width: 90px;" | Dissenting opinion(s) |
! scope="col" style="width: 90px;" | Dissenting opinion(s) |
||
! scope="col" style="width: 160px;" | Lower court |
! scope="col" style="width: 160px;" | Lower court |
||
! scope="col" style="width: |
! scope="col" style="width: 250px;" | Disposition of case |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Evans v. Gee'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86115/evans-v-gee/?q=%2239%20U.S.%201%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 1 (1840)] || Catron || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.S.D. Ala.]] || dismissed |
| ''Evans v. Gee'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86115/evans-v-gee/?q=%2239%20U.S.%201%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 1 (1840)] || Catron || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.S.D. Ala.]] || dismissed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| '' |
| ''Lattimer’s Lessee v. Poteet'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86116/lessee-of-lattimer-v-poteet/?q=%2239%20U.S.%204%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 4 (1840)] || McLean || Taney || Catron || [[United States circuit court|C.C.D.N.C.]] || affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Bank of |
| ''Bank of Metropolis v. Guttschlick'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86117/bank-of-metropolis-v-guttschlick/?q=%2239%20U.S.%2019%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 19 (1840)] || Barbour || none || none || [[United States Circuit Court of the District of Columbia|C.C.D.C.]] || affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Kane v. Paul'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86118/kane-v-paul/?q=%2239%20U.S.%2033%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 33 (1840)] || Wayne || none || none || [[United States Circuit Court of the District of Columbia|C.C.D.C.]] || affirmed |
| ''Kane v. Paul'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86118/kane-v-paul/?q=%2239%20U.S.%2033%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 33 (1840)] || Wayne || none || none || [[United States Circuit Court of the District of Columbia|C.C.D.C.]] || affirmed |
||
Line 122: | Line 122: | ||
| ''Smith v. [[Chesapeake and Ohio Canal|Chesapeake & Ohio Canal Co.]]'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86120/smith-v-chesapeake-ohio-canal-co/?q=%2239%20U.S.%2045%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 45 (1840)] || McLean || none || none || [[United States Circuit Court of the District of Columbia|C.C.D.C.]] || affirmed |
| ''Smith v. [[Chesapeake and Ohio Canal|Chesapeake & Ohio Canal Co.]]'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86120/smith-v-chesapeake-ohio-canal-co/?q=%2239%20U.S.%2045%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 45 (1840)] || McLean || none || none || [[United States Circuit Court of the District of Columbia|C.C.D.C.]] || affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Mitchell v. Lenox'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86121/mitchell-v-lenox/?q=%2239%20U.S.%2049%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 49 (1840)] || Taney || none || none || [[New York Court for the Trial of Impeachments|N.Y. Ct. Tr. |
| ''Mitchell v. Lenox'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86121/mitchell-v-lenox/?q=%2239%20U.S.%2049%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 49 (1840)] || Taney || none || none || [[New York Court for the Trial of Impeachments|N.Y. Ct. Tr. Errors]] || dismissed for want of jurisdiction |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''West v. Brashear'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86122/west-v-brashear/?q=%2239%20U.S.%2051%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 51 (1840)] || Taney || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.D. Ky.]] || affirmed |
| ''West v. Brashear'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86122/west-v-brashear/?q=%2239%20U.S.%2051%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 51 (1840)] || Taney || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.D. Ky.]] || affirmed |
||
Line 128: | Line 128: | ||
| ''Commonwealth Bank v. Griffith'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86123/the-commonwealth-bank-of-kentucky-v-griffith/?q=%2239%20U.S.%2056%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 56 (1840)] || Taney || none || none || [[Supreme Court of Missouri|Mo.]] || dismissed for want of jurisdiction |
| ''Commonwealth Bank v. Griffith'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86123/the-commonwealth-bank-of-kentucky-v-griffith/?q=%2239%20U.S.%2056%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 56 (1840)] || Taney || none || none || [[Supreme Court of Missouri|Mo.]] || dismissed for want of jurisdiction |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Commercial & R.R. Bank v. Slocomb, |
| ''Commercial & R.R. Bank v. Slocomb, R. & Co.'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86124/commercial-railroad-bank-of-vicksburg-v-slocomb-richards-co/?q=%2239%20U.S.%2060%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 60 (1840)] || Barbour || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.S.D. Miss.]] || reversed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Suydam v. Broadnax'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86125/suydam-v-broadnax/?q=%2239%20U.S.%2067%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 67 (1840)] || Wayne || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.S.D. Ala.]] || [[Remand (court procedure)|remanded to divided lower court]] |
| ''Suydam v. Broadnax'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86125/suydam-v-broadnax/?q=%2239%20U.S.%2067%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 67 (1840)] || Wayne || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.S.D. Ala.]] || [[Remand (court procedure)|remanded to divided lower court]] |
||
Line 138: | Line 138: | ||
| ''Frevall v. Bache'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86128/frevall-v-bache/?q=%2239%20U.S.%2095%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 95 (1840)] || Taney || none || none || [[United States Circuit Court of the District of Columbia|C.C.D.C.]] || affirmed |
| ''Frevall v. Bache'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86128/frevall-v-bache/?q=%2239%20U.S.%2095%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 95 (1840)] || Taney || none || none || [[United States Circuit Court of the District of Columbia|C.C.D.C.]] || affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Peters v. Warren |
| ''Peters v. Warren Ins. Co.'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86129/peters-v-warren-ins-co/?q=%2239%20U.S.%2099%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 99 (1840)] || Story || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.D. Mass.]] || [[Remand (court procedure)|remanded to divided lower court]] |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Atkins v. N. & K. Dick & Co.'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86130/atkins-v-n-j-dick-co/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20114%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 114 (1840)] || Barbour || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.S.D. Miss.]] || reversed |
| ''Atkins v. N. & K. Dick & Co.'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86130/atkins-v-n-j-dick-co/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20114%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 114 (1840)] || Barbour || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.S.D. Miss.]] || reversed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Runyan v. |
| ''Runyan v. Coster’s Lessee'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86131/runyan-v-lessee-of-coster/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20122%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 122 (1840)] || Thompson || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.E.D. Pa.]] || affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Preston v. Keene'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86132/preston-v-keene/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20133%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 133 (1840)] || Barbour || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.E.D. La.]] || reversed |
| ''Preston v. Keene'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86132/preston-v-keene/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20133%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 133 (1840)] || Barbour || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.E.D. La.]] || reversed |
||
Line 148: | Line 148: | ||
| ''Bank of Alexandria v. Dyer'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86133/the-bank-of-alexandria-in-error-v-edward-and-francis-dyer-in-error/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20141%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 141 (1840)] || Taney || none || none || [[United States Circuit Court of the District of Columbia|C.C.D.C.]] || affirmed |
| ''Bank of Alexandria v. Dyer'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86133/the-bank-of-alexandria-in-error-v-edward-and-francis-dyer-in-error/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20141%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 141 (1840)] || Taney || none || none || [[United States Circuit Court of the District of Columbia|C.C.D.C.]] || affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| '' |
| ''Walden’s Lessee v. Craig’s Heirs'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86134/the-lessee-of-walden-v-craigs-heirs/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20147%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 147 (1840)] || McLean || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.D. Ky.]] || reversed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Walden v. Bodley'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86135/walden-v-bodley/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20156%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 156 (1840)] || McLean || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.D. Ky.]] || affirmed |
| ''Walden v. Bodley'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86135/walden-v-bodley/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20156%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 156 (1840)] || McLean || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.D. Ky.]] || affirmed |
||
Line 158: | Line 158: | ||
| ''Taylor v. Longworth'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86138/taylor-v-longworth/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20172%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 172 (1840)] || Story || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.D. Ohio]] || affirmed |
| ''Taylor v. Longworth'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86138/taylor-v-longworth/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20172%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 172 (1840)] || Story || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.D. Ohio]] || affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| '' |
| ''Brewer’s Lessee v. Blougher'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86139/lessee-of-brewer-v-blougher/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20178%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 178 (1840)] || Taney || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.D. Md.]] || affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Sprigg v. Bank of Mount Pleasant'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86140/sprigg-v-bank-of-mount-pleasant/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20201%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 201 (1840)] || Thompson || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.D. Ohio]] || affirmed |
| ''Sprigg v. Bank of Mount Pleasant'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86140/sprigg-v-bank-of-mount-pleasant/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20201%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 201 (1840)] || Thompson || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.D. Ohio]] || affirmed |
||
Line 164: | Line 164: | ||
| ''[[Rhode Island]] v. [[Massachusetts]]'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86141/the-state-of-rhode-island-v-the-state-of-massachusetts/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20210%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 210 (1840)] || Taney || none || McLean, Catron || [[Original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of the United States|original jurisdiction]] || plea of Mass. overruled |
| ''[[Rhode Island]] v. [[Massachusetts]]'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86141/the-state-of-rhode-island-v-the-state-of-massachusetts/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20210%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 210 (1840)] || Taney || none || McLean, Catron || [[Original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of the United States|original jurisdiction]] || plea of Mass. overruled |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''de |
| ''de Valengin’s Adm’rs v. Duffy'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86142/de-valengins-administrators-v-duffy/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20282%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 282 (1840)] || Taney || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.D. Md.]] || affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Irvine ex rel. |
| ''Irvine [[ex rel.]] Lumberman’s Bank v. Lowry'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86143/irvine-ex-rel-lumbermans-bank-at-warren-v-lowry/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20293%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 293 (1840)] || Baldwin || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.W.D. Pa.]] || [[Remand (court procedure)|remanded to divided lower court]] |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''United States v. Knight'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86144/united-states-v-knight/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20301%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 301 (1840)] || Barbour || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.D. Me.]] || affirmed |
| ''United States v. Knight'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86144/united-states-v-knight/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20301%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 301 (1840)] || Barbour || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.D. Me.]] || affirmed |
||
Line 174: | Line 174: | ||
| ''Games v. Stiles'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86146/games-v-stiles/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20322%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 322 (1840)] || McLean || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.D. Ohio]] || affirmed |
| ''Games v. Stiles'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86146/games-v-stiles/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20322%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 322 (1840)] || McLean || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.D. Ohio]] || affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''United States v. Wiggins'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86147/united-states-v-wiggins/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20334%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 334 (1840)] || Catron || none || none || Super. Ct |
| ''United States v. Wiggins'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86147/united-states-v-wiggins/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20334%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 334 (1840)] || Catron || none || none || Fla. Super. Ct. || reversed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| '' |
| ''Pollard’s Lessee v. Kibbe'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86148/lessee-of-pollards-heirs-v-kibbe/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20353%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 353 (1840)] || Thompson || McLean, Baldwin, Taney || Barbour, Catron || [[Supreme Court of Alabama|Ala.]] || reversed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''[[United States v. Wood]]'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86149/united-states-v-wood/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20430%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 430 (1840)] || Wayne || none || Thompson || [[United States circuit court|C.C.S.D.N.Y.]] || [[Remand (court procedure)|remanded to divided lower court]] |
| ''[[United States v. Wood]]'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86149/united-states-v-wood/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20430%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 430 (1840)] || Wayne || none || Thompson || [[United States circuit court|C.C.S.D.N.Y.]] || [[Remand (court procedure)|remanded to divided lower court]] |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''[[Philadelphia and Trenton Railroad|Philadelphia & |
| ''[[Philadelphia and Trenton Railroad|Philadelphia & T.R.R. Co.]] v. Stimpson'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86150/philadelphia-trenton-r-co-v-stimpson/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20448%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 448 (1840)] || Story || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.E.D. Pa.]] || affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| [[United States v. Morris (1840)|''United States v. Morris]]'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86151/united-states-v-morris/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20464%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 464 (1840)] || Taney || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.S.D.N.Y.]] || [[Remand (court procedure)|remanded to divided lower court]] |
| [[United States v. Morris (1840)|''United States v. Morris]]'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86151/united-states-v-morris/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20464%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 464 (1840)] || Taney || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.S.D.N.Y.]] || [[Remand (court procedure)|remanded to divided lower court]] |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''United States v. |
| ''United States v. Waterman’s Heirs'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86152/united-states-v-heirs-of-waterman/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20478%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 478 (1840)] || Baldwin || none || none || Fla. Super. Ct. || affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Brown & Co. v. |
| ''Brown & Co. v. M’Gran'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86153/william-james-brown-co-v-mcgran/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20479%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 479 (1840)] || Story || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.D. Ga.]] || reversed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Decatur v. Paulding'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86154/decatur-v-paulding/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20497%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 497 (1840)] || Taney || McLean, Catron || none || [[United States Circuit Court of the District of Columbia|C.C.D.C.]] || affirmed |
| ''Decatur v. Paulding'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86154/decatur-v-paulding/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20497%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 497 (1840)] || Taney || McLean, Catron || none || [[United States Circuit Court of the District of Columbia|C.C.D.C.]] || affirmed |
Supreme Court of the United States | |
---|---|
38°53′26″N 77°00′16″W / 38.89056°N 77.00444°W / 38.89056; -77.00444 | |
Established | March 4, 1789; 235 years ago (1789-03-04)[1] |
Location | Washington, D.C. |
Coordinates | 38°53′26″N 77°00′16″W / 38.89056°N 77.00444°W / 38.89056; -77.00444 |
Composition method | Presidential nomination with Senate confirmation |
Authorized by | Constitution of the United States |
Judge term length | Life tenure |
Number of positions | 9 (by statute) |
Website | supremecourt |
Chief Justice of the United States | |
Currently | John Roberts |
Since | September 29, 2005; 18 years ago (2005-09-29) |
This article is part of a series on the |
Supreme Court of the United States |
---|
The Court |
Current membership |
|
Lists of justices |
|
Court functionaries |
|
This is a list of the 43 cases reported in volume 39 (14 Pet.) of United States Reports, decided by the Supreme Court of the United States from January 1840 to March 1840.[2]
In 1874, the U.S. government created the United States Reports, and retroactively numbered older privately-published case reports as part of the new series. As a result, cases appearing in volumes 1–90 of U.S. Reports have dual citation forms; one for the volume number of U.S. Reports, and one for the volume number of the reports named for the relevant reporter of decisions (these are called ”nominative reports”).
Starting with the 26th volume of U.S. Reports, the Reporter of Decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States was Richard Peters, Jr. Peters was Reporter of Decisions from 1828 to 1843, covering volumes 26 through 41 of United States Reports which correspond to volumes 1 through 16 of his Peter’s Reports. As such, the dual form of citation to, for example, Irvine v. Lowry is 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) 293 (1840).
The Supreme Court is established by Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution of the United States, which says: ”The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court . . .”. The size of the Court is not specified; the Constitution leaves it to Congress to set the number of justices. Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 Congress originally fixed the number of justices at six (one chief justice and five associate justices).[3] Since 1789 Congress has varied the size of the Court from six to seven, nine, ten, and back to nine justices (always including one chief justice). When the cases in 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) were decided, the Court comprised these nine justices:
Portrait | Justice | Office | Home State | Succeeded | Date confirmed by the Senate (Vote) |
Tenure on Supreme Court |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Roger B. Taney | Chief Justice | Maryland | John Marshall | March 15, 1836 (29–15) |
March 28, 1836 – October 12, 1864 (Died) | |
Joseph Story |
Associate Justice | Massachusetts | William Cushing | November 18, 1811 (Acclamation) |
February 3, 1812 – September 10, 1845 (Died) | |
Smith Thompson | Associate Justice | New York | Henry Brockholst Livingston | December 9, 1823 (Acclamation) |
September 1, 1823 – December 18, 1843 (Died) | |
John McLean | Associate Justice | Ohio | Robert Trimble | March 7, 1829 (Acclamation) |
January 11, 1830 – April 4, 1861 (Died) | |
Henry Baldwin | Associate Justice | Pennsylvania | Bushrod Washington | January 6, 1830 (41–2) |
January 18, 1830 – April 21, 1844 (Died) | |
James Moore Wayne | Associate Justice | Georgia | William Johnson | January 9, 1835 (Acclamation) |
January 14, 1835 – July 5, 1867 (Died) | |
Philip P. Barbour | Associate Justice | Gabriel Duvall | March 15, 1836 (30–11) |
May 12, 1836 – February 25, 1841 (Died) | ||
John Catron | Associate Justice | Tennessee | newly-created seat | March 8, 1837 (28–15) |
May 1, 1837 – May 30, 1865 (Died) | |
John McKinley | Associate Justice | Alabama | newly-created seat | September 25, 1837 (Acclamation) |
January 9, 1838 – July 19, 1852 (Died) |
Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 the federal court structure at the time comprised District Courts, which had general trial jurisdiction; Circuit Courts, which had mixed trial and appellate (from the US District Courts) jurisdiction; and the United States Supreme Court, which had appellate jurisdiction over the federal District and Circuit courts—and for certain issues over state courts. The Supreme Court also had limited original jurisdiction (i.e., in which cases could be filed directly with the Supreme Court without first having been heard by a lower federal or state court). There were one or more federal District Courts and/or Circuit Courts in each state, territory, or other geographical region.
Bluebook citation style is used for case names, citations, and jurisdictions.
Case Name | Page & year | Opinion of the Court | Concurring opinion(s) | Dissenting opinion(s) | Lower court | Disposition of case |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Evans v. Gee | 1 (1840) | Catron | none | none | C.C.S.D. Ala. | dismissed |
Lattimer’s Lessee v. Poteet | 4 (1840) | McLean | Taney | Catron | C.C.D.N.C. | affirmed |
Bank of Metropolis v. Guttschlick | 19 (1840) | Barbour | none | none | C.C.D.C. | affirmed |
Kane v. Paul | 33 (1840) | Wayne | none | none | C.C.D.C. | affirmed |
Covington v. Comstock | 43 (1840) | McLean | none | none | C.C.D. Miss. | reversed |
Smith v. Chesapeake & Ohio Canal Co. | 45 (1840) | McLean | none | none | C.C.D.C. | affirmed |
Mitchell v. Lenox | 49 (1840) | Taney | none | none | N.Y. Ct. Tr. Errors | dismissed for want of jurisdiction |
West v. Brashear | 51 (1840) | Taney | none | none | C.C.D. Ky. | affirmed |
Commonwealth Bank v. Griffith | 56 (1840) | Taney | none | none | Mo. | dismissed for want of jurisdiction |
Commercial & R.R. Bank v. Slocomb, R. & Co. | 60 (1840) | Barbour | none | none | C.C.S.D. Miss. | reversed |
Suydam v. Broadnax | 67 (1840) | Wayne | none | none | C.C.S.D. Ala. | remanded to divided lower court |
Carr v. Duval | 77 (1840) | Catron | none | none | Ct. App. Terr. Fla. | affirmed |
Remington v. Linthicum | 84 (1840) | Taney | none | none | C.C.D.C. | affirmed |
Frevall v. Bache | 95 (1840) | Taney | none | none | C.C.D.C. | affirmed |
Peters v. Warren Ins. Co. | 99 (1840) | Story | none | none | C.C.D. Mass. | remanded to divided lower court |
Atkins v. N. & K. Dick & Co. | 114 (1840) | Barbour | none | none | C.C.S.D. Miss. | reversed |
Runyan v. Coster’s Lessee | 122 (1840) | Thompson | none | none | C.C.E.D. Pa. | affirmed |
Preston v. Keene | 133 (1840) | Barbour | none | none | C.C.E.D. La. | reversed |
Bank of Alexandria v. Dyer | 141 (1840) | Taney | none | none | C.C.D.C. | affirmed |
Walden’s Lessee v. Craig’s Heirs | 147 (1840) | McLean | none | none | C.C.D. Ky. | reversed |
Walden v. Bodley | 156 (1840) | McLean | none | none | C.C.D. Ky. | affirmed |
Edmonds v. Crenshaw | 166 (1840) | McLean | none | none | C.C.S.D. Ala. | reversed |
Keene v. Whitaker | 170 (1840) | Taney | none | none | C.C.E.D. La. | affirmed |
Taylor v. Longworth | 172 (1840) | Story | none | none | C.C.D. Ohio | affirmed |
Brewer’s Lessee v. Blougher | 178 (1840) | Taney | none | none | C.C.D. Md. | affirmed |
Sprigg v. Bank of Mount Pleasant | 201 (1840) | Thompson | none | none | C.C.D. Ohio | affirmed |
Rhode Island v. Massachusetts | 210 (1840) | Taney | none | McLean, Catron | original jurisdiction | plea of Mass. overruled |
de Valengin’s Adm’rs v. Duffy | 282 (1840) | Taney | none | none | C.C.D. Md. | affirmed |
Irvine ex rel. Lumberman’s Bank v. Lowry | 293 (1840) | Baldwin | none | none | C.C.W.D. Pa. | remanded to divided lower court |
United States v. Knight | 301 (1840) | Barbour | none | none | C.C.D. Me. | affirmed |
Fowler v. Brantly | 318 (1840) | Catron | none | none | C.C.S.D. Ala. | affirmed |
Games v. Stiles | 322 (1840) | McLean | none | none | C.C.D. Ohio | affirmed |
United States v. Wiggins | 334 (1840) | Catron | none | none | Fla. Super. Ct. | reversed |
Pollard’s Lessee v. Kibbe | 353 (1840) | Thompson | McLean, Baldwin, Taney | Barbour, Catron | Ala. | reversed |
United States v. Wood | 430 (1840) | Wayne | none | Thompson | C.C.S.D.N.Y. | remanded to divided lower court |
Philadelphia & T.R.R. Co. v. Stimpson | 448 (1840) | Story | none | none | C.C.E.D. Pa. | affirmed |
United States v. Morris | 464 (1840) | Taney | none | none | C.C.S.D.N.Y. | remanded to divided lower court |
United States v. Waterman’s Heirs | 478 (1840) | Baldwin | none | none | Fla. Super. Ct. | affirmed |
Brown & Co. v. M’Gran | 479 (1840) | Story | none | none | C.C.D. Ga. | reversed |
Decatur v. Paulding | 497 (1840) | Taney | McLean, Catron | none | C.C.D.C. | affirmed |
United States v. Stone | 524 (1840) | Taney | none | none | C.C.S.D.N.Y. | remanded to divided lower court |
United States v. Gratiot | 526 (1840) | Thompson | none | none | C.C.D. Ill. | remanded to divided lower court |
Holmes v. Jennison | 540 (1840) | Thompson | Barbour, Catron | Taney | Vt. | dismissed for want of jurisdiction |