Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Nominative reports  



1.1  Richard Peters, Jr.  







2 Justices of the Supreme Court at the time of 39 U.S. (14 Pet.)  





3 Citation style  





4 List of cases in 39 U.S. (14 Pet.)  





5 Notes and references  





6 See also  





7 External links  














List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 39: Difference between revisions







Add links
 









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Cite this page
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
Wikidata item
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 




Print/export  



















Appearance
   

 





Coordinates: 38°5326N 77°0016W / 38.89056°N 77.00444°W / 38.89056; -77.00444

Help
 

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


Browse history interactively
 Previous editNext edit 
Content deleted Content added
Restored revision 1039510670 by Ballinacurra Weston (talk)
Tags: Twinkle Undo Reverted
Reverted 1 edit by TJRC (talk): Unnecessary change
Tags: Twinkle Undo Reverted
Line 22: Line 22:

This is a '''list of the 43 cases reported in volume 39 (14 Pet.) of ''[[United States Reports]]''''', decided by the [[Supreme Court of the United States]] from January 1840 to March 1840.<ref>Anne Ashmore, ''DATES OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS AND ARGUMENTS'', Library, Supreme Court of the United States, 26 December 2018.</ref>

This is a '''list of the 43 cases reported in volume 39 (14 Pet.) of ''[[United States Reports]]''''', decided by the [[Supreme Court of the United States]] from January 1840 to March 1840.<ref>Anne Ashmore, ''DATES OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS AND ARGUMENTS'', Library, Supreme Court of the United States, 26 December 2018.</ref>

== Nominative reports ==

== Nominative reports ==

In 1874, the U.S. government created the ''United States Reports'', and retroactively numbered older privately-published [[Law report|case reports]] as part of the new series. As a result, cases appearing in volumes 1–90 of ''U.S. Reports'' have dual [[Case citation|citation forms]]; one for the volume number of ''U.S. Reports'', and one for the volume number of the reports named for the relevant reporter of decisions (these are called "[[Nominate reports|nominative reports]]").

In 1874, the U.S. government created the ''United States Reports'', and retroactively numbered older privately-published [[Law report|case reports]] as part of the new series. As a result, cases appearing in volumes 1–90 of ''U.S. Reports'' have dual [[Case citation|citation forms]]; one for the volume number of ''U.S. Reports'', and one for the volume number of the reports named for the relevant reporter of decisions (these are called [[Nominate reports|nominative reports]]).

=== Richard Peters, Jr. ===

=== Richard Peters, Jr. ===

Starting with the 26th volume of ''U.S. Reports'', the [[Reporter of Decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States]] was [[Richard Peters (reporter)|Richard Peters, Jr.]] Peters was Reporter of Decisions from 1828 to 1843, covering volumes 26 through 41 of ''United States Reports'' which correspond to volumes 1 through 16 of his ''Peter's Reports''. As such, the dual form of citation to, for example, ''Irvine v. Lowry'' is 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) 293 (1840).

Starting with the 26th volume of ''U.S. Reports'', the [[Reporter of Decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States]] was [[Richard Peters (reporter)|Richard Peters, Jr.]] Peters was Reporter of Decisions from 1828 to 1843, covering volumes 26 through 41 of ''United States Reports'' which correspond to volumes 1 through 16 of his ''Peter’s Reports''. As such, the dual form of citation to, for example, ''Irvine v. Lowry'' is 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) 293 (1840).



== Justices of the Supreme Court at the time of 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) ==

== Justices of the Supreme Court at the time of 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) ==

Line 30: Line 30:

{{see also|List of justices of the Supreme Court of the United States by court composition}}

{{see also|List of justices of the Supreme Court of the United States by court composition}}

{{see also|Taney Court}}

{{see also|Taney Court}}

The Supreme Court is established by [[Article Three of the United States Constitution|Article III, Section 1]] of the [[Constitution of the United States]], which says: "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court . . .". The size of the Court is not specified; the Constitution leaves it to [[Congress of the United States|Congress]] to set the number of justices. Under the [[Judiciary Act of 1789]] Congress originally fixed the number of justices at six (one chief justice and five associate justices).<ref>{{cite web|url=https://guides.ll.georgetown.edu/supreme_court|title=Supreme Court Research Guide |access-date=7 April 2021 |publisher=Georgetown Law Library}}</ref> Since 1789 Congress has varied the size of the Court from six to [[Seventh Circuit Act of 1807|seven]], [[Eighth and Ninth Circuits Act of 1837|nine]], [[Tenth Circuit Act of 1863|ten]], and back to [[Judiciary Act of 1869|nine]] justices (always including one chief justice). When the cases in 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) were decided, the Court comprised these nine justices:

The Supreme Court is established by [[Article Three of the United States Constitution|Article III, Section 1]] of the [[Constitution of the United States]], which says: ”The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court . . .. The size of the Court is not specified; the Constitution leaves it to [[Congress of the United States|Congress]] to set the number of justices. Under the [[Judiciary Act of 1789]] Congress originally fixed the number of justices at six (one chief justice and five associate justices).<ref>{{cite web|url=https://guides.ll.georgetown.edu/supreme_court|title=Supreme Court Research Guide |access-date=7 April 2021 |publisher=Georgetown Law Library}}</ref> Since 1789 Congress has varied the size of the Court from six to [[Seventh Circuit Act of 1807|seven]], [[Eighth and Ninth Circuits Act of 1837|nine]], [[Tenth Circuit Act of 1863|ten]], and back to [[Judiciary Act of 1869|nine]] justices (always including one chief justice). When the cases in 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) were decided, the Court comprised these nine justices:



{| class="wikitable sortable"

{| class="wikitable sortable"

Line 85: Line 85:


[[Bluebook]] citation style is used for case names, citations, and jurisdictions.

[[Bluebook]] citation style is used for case names, citations, and jurisdictions.

* "C.C.D." = United States Circuit Court for the District of . . .

* ”C.C.D. = United States Circuit Court for the District of . . .

** ''e.g.,''"C.C.D.N.J." = United States Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey

** ''e.g.,''”C.C.D.N.J. = United States Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey

* "D." = United States District Court for the District of . . .

* ”D. = United States District Court for the District of . . .

** ''e.g.,''"D. Mass." = [[United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts]]

** ''e.g.,''”D. Mass. = [[United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts]]

* "E." = Eastern; "M." = Middle; "N." = Northern; "S." = Southern; "W." = Western

* ”E. = Eastern; ”M. = Middle; ”N. = Northern; ”S. = Southern; ”W. = Western

** ''e.g.,''"C.C.S.D.N.Y." = United States Circuit Court for the Southern District of New York

** ''e.g.,''”C.C.S.D.N.Y. = United States Circuit Court for the Southern District of New York

** ''e.g.,''"M.D. Ala." = [[United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama]]

** ''e.g.,''”M.D. Ala. = [[United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama]]

* "Adm." = [[Admiralty Court]] (a federal court)

* ”Adm. = [[Admiralty Court]] (a federal court)

* "Ct. Cl." = [[United States Court of Claims]]

* ”Ct. Cl. = [[United States Court of Claims]]

* "C.P." = [[Court of Common Pleas]] (a state court)

* ”C.P. = [[Court of Common Pleas]] (a state court)

* The abbreviation of a state's name alone indicates the highest appellate court in that state's judiciary at the time.

* The abbreviation of a state's name alone indicates the highest appellate court in that state’s judiciary at the time.

** ''e.g.,''"Pa." = [[Supreme Court of Pennsylvania]]

** ''e.g.,''”Pa. = [[Supreme Court of Pennsylvania]]

** ''e.g.,''"Me." = [[Supreme Judicial Court of Maine]]

** ''e.g.,''”Me. = [[Supreme Judicial Court of Maine]]



== List of cases in 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) ==

== List of cases in 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) ==

{| class="wikitable sortable"

{| class="wikitable sortable"

|-

|-

! scope="col" style="width: 400px;" | Case Name

! scope="col" style="width: 375px;" | Case Name

! scope="col" style="width: 75px;" | Page & year

! scope="col" style="width: 95px;" | Page & year

! scope="col" style="width: 10px;" | Opinion of the Court

! scope="col" style="width: 10px;" | Opinion of the Court

! scope="col" style="width: 100px;" | Concurring opinion(s)

! scope="col" style="width: 100px;" | Concurring opinion(s)

! scope="col" style="width: 90px;" | Dissenting opinion(s)

! scope="col" style="width: 90px;" | Dissenting opinion(s)

! scope="col" style="width: 160px;" | Lower court

! scope="col" style="width: 160px;" | Lower court

! scope="col" style="width: 200px;" | Disposition of case

! scope="col" style="width: 250px;" | Disposition of case

|-

|-

| ''Evans v. Gee'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86115/evans-v-gee/?q=%2239%20U.S.%201%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 1 (1840)] || Catron || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.S.D. Ala.]] || dismissed

| ''Evans v. Gee'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86115/evans-v-gee/?q=%2239%20U.S.%201%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 1 (1840)] || Catron || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.S.D. Ala.]] || dismissed

|-

|-

| ''Lattimer's Lessee v. Poteet'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86116/lessee-of-lattimer-v-poteet/?q=%2239%20U.S.%204%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 4 (1840)] || McLean || Taney || Catron || [[United States circuit court|C.C.D.N.C.]] || affirmed

| ''Lattimer’s Lessee v. Poteet'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86116/lessee-of-lattimer-v-poteet/?q=%2239%20U.S.%204%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 4 (1840)] || McLean || Taney || Catron || [[United States circuit court|C.C.D.N.C.]] || affirmed

|-

|-

| ''Bank of the Metropolis v. Guttschlick'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86117/bank-of-metropolis-v-guttschlick/?q=%2239%20U.S.%2019%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 19 (1840)] || Barbour || none || none || [[United States Circuit Court of the District of Columbia|C.C.D.C.]] || affirmed

| ''Bank of Metropolis v. Guttschlick'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86117/bank-of-metropolis-v-guttschlick/?q=%2239%20U.S.%2019%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 19 (1840)] || Barbour || none || none || [[United States Circuit Court of the District of Columbia|C.C.D.C.]] || affirmed

|-

|-

| ''Kane v. Paul'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86118/kane-v-paul/?q=%2239%20U.S.%2033%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 33 (1840)] || Wayne || none || none || [[United States Circuit Court of the District of Columbia|C.C.D.C.]] || affirmed

| ''Kane v. Paul'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86118/kane-v-paul/?q=%2239%20U.S.%2033%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 33 (1840)] || Wayne || none || none || [[United States Circuit Court of the District of Columbia|C.C.D.C.]] || affirmed

Line 122: Line 122:

| ''Smith v. [[Chesapeake and Ohio Canal|Chesapeake & Ohio Canal Co.]]'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86120/smith-v-chesapeake-ohio-canal-co/?q=%2239%20U.S.%2045%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 45 (1840)] || McLean || none || none || [[United States Circuit Court of the District of Columbia|C.C.D.C.]] || affirmed

| ''Smith v. [[Chesapeake and Ohio Canal|Chesapeake & Ohio Canal Co.]]'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86120/smith-v-chesapeake-ohio-canal-co/?q=%2239%20U.S.%2045%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 45 (1840)] || McLean || none || none || [[United States Circuit Court of the District of Columbia|C.C.D.C.]] || affirmed

|-

|-

| ''Mitchell v. Lenox'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86121/mitchell-v-lenox/?q=%2239%20U.S.%2049%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 49 (1840)] || Taney || none || none || [[New York Court for the Trial of Impeachments|N.Y. Ct. Tr. Impeachments]] || dismissed for want of jurisdiction

| ''Mitchell v. Lenox'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86121/mitchell-v-lenox/?q=%2239%20U.S.%2049%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 49 (1840)] || Taney || none || none || [[New York Court for the Trial of Impeachments|N.Y. Ct. Tr. Errors]] || dismissed for want of jurisdiction

|-

|-

| ''West v. Brashear'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86122/west-v-brashear/?q=%2239%20U.S.%2051%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 51 (1840)] || Taney || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.D. Ky.]] || affirmed

| ''West v. Brashear'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86122/west-v-brashear/?q=%2239%20U.S.%2051%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 51 (1840)] || Taney || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.D. Ky.]] || affirmed

Line 128: Line 128:

| ''Commonwealth Bank v. Griffith'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86123/the-commonwealth-bank-of-kentucky-v-griffith/?q=%2239%20U.S.%2056%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 56 (1840)] || Taney || none || none || [[Supreme Court of Missouri|Mo.]] || dismissed for want of jurisdiction

| ''Commonwealth Bank v. Griffith'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86123/the-commonwealth-bank-of-kentucky-v-griffith/?q=%2239%20U.S.%2056%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 56 (1840)] || Taney || none || none || [[Supreme Court of Missouri|Mo.]] || dismissed for want of jurisdiction

|-

|-

| ''Commercial & R.R. Bank v. Slocomb, Richards & Co.'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86124/commercial-railroad-bank-of-vicksburg-v-slocomb-richards-co/?q=%2239%20U.S.%2060%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 60 (1840)] || Barbour || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.S.D. Miss.]] || reversed

| ''Commercial & R.R. Bank v. Slocomb, R. & Co.'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86124/commercial-railroad-bank-of-vicksburg-v-slocomb-richards-co/?q=%2239%20U.S.%2060%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 60 (1840)] || Barbour || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.S.D. Miss.]] || reversed

|-

|-

| ''Suydam v. Broadnax'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86125/suydam-v-broadnax/?q=%2239%20U.S.%2067%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 67 (1840)] || Wayne || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.S.D. Ala.]] || [[Remand (court procedure)|remanded to divided lower court]]

| ''Suydam v. Broadnax'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86125/suydam-v-broadnax/?q=%2239%20U.S.%2067%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 67 (1840)] || Wayne || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.S.D. Ala.]] || [[Remand (court procedure)|remanded to divided lower court]]

Line 138: Line 138:

| ''Frevall v. Bache'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86128/frevall-v-bache/?q=%2239%20U.S.%2095%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 95 (1840)] || Taney || none || none || [[United States Circuit Court of the District of Columbia|C.C.D.C.]] || affirmed

| ''Frevall v. Bache'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86128/frevall-v-bache/?q=%2239%20U.S.%2095%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 95 (1840)] || Taney || none || none || [[United States Circuit Court of the District of Columbia|C.C.D.C.]] || affirmed

|-

|-

| ''Peters v. Warren Insurance Co.'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86129/peters-v-warren-ins-co/?q=%2239%20U.S.%2099%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 99 (1840)] || Story || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.D. Mass.]] || [[Remand (court procedure)|remanded to divided lower court]]

| ''Peters v. Warren Ins. Co.'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86129/peters-v-warren-ins-co/?q=%2239%20U.S.%2099%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 99 (1840)] || Story || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.D. Mass.]] || [[Remand (court procedure)|remanded to divided lower court]]

|-

|-

| ''Atkins v. N. & K. Dick & Co.'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86130/atkins-v-n-j-dick-co/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20114%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 114 (1840)] || Barbour || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.S.D. Miss.]] || reversed

| ''Atkins v. N. & K. Dick & Co.'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86130/atkins-v-n-j-dick-co/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20114%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 114 (1840)] || Barbour || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.S.D. Miss.]] || reversed

|-

|-

| ''Runyan v. Coster's Lessee'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86131/runyan-v-lessee-of-coster/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20122%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 122 (1840)] || Thompson || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.E.D. Pa.]] || affirmed

| ''Runyan v. Coster’s Lessee'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86131/runyan-v-lessee-of-coster/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20122%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 122 (1840)] || Thompson || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.E.D. Pa.]] || affirmed

|-

|-

| ''Preston v. Keene'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86132/preston-v-keene/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20133%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 133 (1840)] || Barbour || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.E.D. La.]] || reversed

| ''Preston v. Keene'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86132/preston-v-keene/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20133%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 133 (1840)] || Barbour || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.E.D. La.]] || reversed

Line 148: Line 148:

| ''Bank of Alexandria v. Dyer'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86133/the-bank-of-alexandria-in-error-v-edward-and-francis-dyer-in-error/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20141%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 141 (1840)] || Taney || none || none || [[United States Circuit Court of the District of Columbia|C.C.D.C.]] || affirmed

| ''Bank of Alexandria v. Dyer'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86133/the-bank-of-alexandria-in-error-v-edward-and-francis-dyer-in-error/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20141%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 141 (1840)] || Taney || none || none || [[United States Circuit Court of the District of Columbia|C.C.D.C.]] || affirmed

|-

|-

| ''Walden's Lessee v. Craig's Heirs'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86134/the-lessee-of-walden-v-craigs-heirs/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20147%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 147 (1840)] || McLean || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.D. Ky.]] || reversed

| ''Walden’s Lessee v. Craig’s Heirs'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86134/the-lessee-of-walden-v-craigs-heirs/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20147%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 147 (1840)] || McLean || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.D. Ky.]] || reversed

|-

|-

| ''Walden v. Bodley'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86135/walden-v-bodley/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20156%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 156 (1840)] || McLean || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.D. Ky.]] || affirmed

| ''Walden v. Bodley'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86135/walden-v-bodley/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20156%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 156 (1840)] || McLean || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.D. Ky.]] || affirmed

Line 158: Line 158:

| ''Taylor v. Longworth'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86138/taylor-v-longworth/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20172%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 172 (1840)] || Story || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.D. Ohio]] || affirmed

| ''Taylor v. Longworth'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86138/taylor-v-longworth/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20172%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 172 (1840)] || Story || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.D. Ohio]] || affirmed

|-

|-

| ''Brewer's Lessee v. Blougher'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86139/lessee-of-brewer-v-blougher/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20178%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 178 (1840)] || Taney || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.D. Md.]] || affirmed

| ''Brewer’s Lessee v. Blougher'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86139/lessee-of-brewer-v-blougher/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20178%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 178 (1840)] || Taney || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.D. Md.]] || affirmed

|-

|-

| ''Sprigg v. Bank of Mount Pleasant'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86140/sprigg-v-bank-of-mount-pleasant/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20201%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 201 (1840)] || Thompson || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.D. Ohio]] || affirmed

| ''Sprigg v. Bank of Mount Pleasant'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86140/sprigg-v-bank-of-mount-pleasant/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20201%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 201 (1840)] || Thompson || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.D. Ohio]] || affirmed

Line 164: Line 164:

| ''[[Rhode Island]] v. [[Massachusetts]]'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86141/the-state-of-rhode-island-v-the-state-of-massachusetts/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20210%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 210 (1840)] || Taney || none || McLean, Catron || [[Original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of the United States|original jurisdiction]] || plea of Mass. overruled

| ''[[Rhode Island]] v. [[Massachusetts]]'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86141/the-state-of-rhode-island-v-the-state-of-massachusetts/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20210%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 210 (1840)] || Taney || none || McLean, Catron || [[Original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of the United States|original jurisdiction]] || plea of Mass. overruled

|-

|-

| ''de Valengin's Adm'rs v. Duffy'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86142/de-valengins-administrators-v-duffy/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20282%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 282 (1840)] || Taney || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.D. Md.]] || affirmed

| ''de Valengin’s Adm’rs v. Duffy'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86142/de-valengins-administrators-v-duffy/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20282%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 282 (1840)] || Taney || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.D. Md.]] || affirmed

|-

|-

| ''Irvine ex rel. Lumberman's Bank v. Lowry'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86143/irvine-ex-rel-lumbermans-bank-at-warren-v-lowry/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20293%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 293 (1840)] || Baldwin || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.W.D. Pa.]] || [[Remand (court procedure)|remanded to divided lower court]]

| ''Irvine [[ex rel.]] Lumberman’s Bank v. Lowry'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86143/irvine-ex-rel-lumbermans-bank-at-warren-v-lowry/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20293%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 293 (1840)] || Baldwin || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.W.D. Pa.]] || [[Remand (court procedure)|remanded to divided lower court]]

|-

|-

| ''United States v. Knight'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86144/united-states-v-knight/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20301%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 301 (1840)] || Barbour || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.D. Me.]] || affirmed

| ''United States v. Knight'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86144/united-states-v-knight/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20301%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 301 (1840)] || Barbour || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.D. Me.]] || affirmed

Line 174: Line 174:

| ''Games v. Stiles'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86146/games-v-stiles/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20322%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 322 (1840)] || McLean || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.D. Ohio]] || affirmed

| ''Games v. Stiles'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86146/games-v-stiles/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20322%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 322 (1840)] || McLean || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.D. Ohio]] || affirmed

|-

|-

| ''United States v. Wiggins'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86147/united-states-v-wiggins/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20334%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 334 (1840)] || Catron || none || none || Super. Ct. E. Fla. || reversed

| ''United States v. Wiggins'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86147/united-states-v-wiggins/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20334%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 334 (1840)] || Catron || none || none || Fla. Super. Ct. || reversed

|-

|-

| ''Pollard's Lessee v. Kibbe'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86148/lessee-of-pollards-heirs-v-kibbe/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20353%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 353 (1840)] || Thompson || McLean, Baldwin, Taney || Barbour, Catron || [[Supreme Court of Alabama|Ala.]] || reversed

| ''Pollard’s Lessee v. Kibbe'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86148/lessee-of-pollards-heirs-v-kibbe/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20353%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 353 (1840)] || Thompson || McLean, Baldwin, Taney || Barbour, Catron || [[Supreme Court of Alabama|Ala.]] || reversed

|-

|-

| ''[[United States v. Wood]]'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86149/united-states-v-wood/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20430%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 430 (1840)] || Wayne || none || Thompson || [[United States circuit court|C.C.S.D.N.Y.]] || [[Remand (court procedure)|remanded to divided lower court]]

| ''[[United States v. Wood]]'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86149/united-states-v-wood/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20430%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 430 (1840)] || Wayne || none || Thompson || [[United States circuit court|C.C.S.D.N.Y.]] || [[Remand (court procedure)|remanded to divided lower court]]

|-

|-

| ''[[Philadelphia and Trenton Railroad|Philadelphia & Trenton R.R. Co.]] v. Stimpson'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86150/philadelphia-trenton-r-co-v-stimpson/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20448%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 448 (1840)] || Story || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.E.D. Pa.]] || affirmed

| ''[[Philadelphia and Trenton Railroad|Philadelphia & T.R.R. Co.]] v. Stimpson'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86150/philadelphia-trenton-r-co-v-stimpson/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20448%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 448 (1840)] || Story || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.E.D. Pa.]] || affirmed

|-

|-

| [[United States v. Morris (1840)|''United States v. Morris]]'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86151/united-states-v-morris/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20464%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 464 (1840)] || Taney || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.S.D.N.Y.]] || [[Remand (court procedure)|remanded to divided lower court]]

| [[United States v. Morris (1840)|''United States v. Morris]]'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86151/united-states-v-morris/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20464%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 464 (1840)] || Taney || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.S.D.N.Y.]] || [[Remand (court procedure)|remanded to divided lower court]]

|-

|-

| ''United States v. Waterman's Heirs'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86152/united-states-v-heirs-of-waterman/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20478%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 478 (1840)] || Baldwin || none || none || Super. Ct. E. Fla. || affirmed

| ''United States v. Waterman’s Heirs'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86152/united-states-v-heirs-of-waterman/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20478%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 478 (1840)] || Baldwin || none || none || Fla. Super. Ct. || affirmed

|-

|-

| ''Brown & Co. v. M'Gran'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86153/william-james-brown-co-v-mcgran/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20479%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 479 (1840)] || Story || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.D. Ga.]] || reversed

| ''Brown & Co. v. M’Gran'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86153/william-james-brown-co-v-mcgran/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20479%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 479 (1840)] || Story || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.D. Ga.]] || reversed

|-

|-

| ''Decatur v. Paulding'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86154/decatur-v-paulding/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20497%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 497 (1840)] || Taney || McLean, Catron || none || [[United States Circuit Court of the District of Columbia|C.C.D.C.]] || affirmed

| ''Decatur v. Paulding'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86154/decatur-v-paulding/?q=%2239%20U.S.%20497%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1839&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1841&court=scotus 497 (1840)] || Taney || McLean, Catron || none || [[United States Circuit Court of the District of Columbia|C.C.D.C.]] || affirmed


Revision as of 03:22, 17 November 2021

Supreme Court of the United States
Map
38°53′26N 77°00′16W / 38.89056°N 77.00444°W / 38.89056; -77.00444
EstablishedMarch 4, 1789; 235 years ago (1789-03-04)[1]
LocationWashington, D.C.
Coordinates38°53′26N 77°00′16W / 38.89056°N 77.00444°W / 38.89056; -77.00444
Composition methodPresidential nomination with Senate confirmation
Authorized byConstitution of the United States
Judge term lengthLife tenure
Number of positions9 (by statute)
Websitesupremecourt.gov
Chief Justice of the United States
CurrentlyJohn Roberts
SinceSeptember 29, 2005; 18 years ago (2005-09-29)

This is a list of the 43 cases reported in volume 39 (14 Pet.) of United States Reports, decided by the Supreme Court of the United States from January 1840 to March 1840.[2]

Nominative reports

In 1874, the U.S. government created the United States Reports, and retroactively numbered older privately-published case reports as part of the new series. As a result, cases appearing in volumes 1–90 of U.S. Reports have dual citation forms; one for the volume number of U.S. Reports, and one for the volume number of the reports named for the relevant reporter of decisions (these are called ”nominative reports”).

Richard Peters, Jr.

Starting with the 26th volume of U.S. Reports, the Reporter of Decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States was Richard Peters, Jr. Peters was Reporter of Decisions from 1828 to 1843, covering volumes 26 through 41 of United States Reports which correspond to volumes 1 through 16 of his Peter’s Reports. As such, the dual form of citation to, for example, Irvine v. Lowry is 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) 293 (1840).

Justices of the Supreme Court at the time of 39 U.S. (14 Pet.)

The Supreme Court is established by Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution of the United States, which says: ”The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court . . .”. The size of the Court is not specified; the Constitution leaves it to Congress to set the number of justices. Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 Congress originally fixed the number of justices at six (one chief justice and five associate justices).[3] Since 1789 Congress has varied the size of the Court from six to seven, nine, ten, and back to nine justices (always including one chief justice). When the cases in 39 U.S. (14 Pet.) were decided, the Court comprised these nine justices:

Portrait Justice Office Home State Succeeded Date confirmed by the Senate
(Vote)
Tenure on Supreme Court
Roger B. Taney Chief Justice Maryland John Marshall March 15, 1836
(29–15)
March 28, 1836

October 12, 1864
(Died)
Joseph Story
Associate Justice Massachusetts William Cushing November 18, 1811
(Acclamation)
February 3, 1812

September 10, 1845
(Died)
Smith Thompson Associate Justice New York Henry Brockholst Livingston December 9, 1823
(Acclamation)
September 1, 1823

December 18, 1843
(Died)
John McLean Associate Justice Ohio Robert Trimble March 7, 1829
(Acclamation)
January 11, 1830

April 4, 1861
(Died)
Henry Baldwin Associate Justice Pennsylvania Bushrod Washington January 6, 1830
(41–2)
January 18, 1830

April 21, 1844
(Died)
James Moore Wayne Associate Justice Georgia William Johnson January 9, 1835
(Acclamation)
January 14, 1835

July 5, 1867
(Died)
Philip P. Barbour Associate Justice

Virginia

Gabriel Duvall March 15, 1836
(30–11)
May 12, 1836

February 25, 1841
(Died)
John Catron Associate Justice Tennessee newly-created seat March 8, 1837
(28–15)
May 1, 1837

May 30, 1865
(Died)
John McKinley Associate Justice Alabama newly-created seat September 25, 1837
(Acclamation)
January 9, 1838

July 19, 1852
(Died)

Citation style

Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 the federal court structure at the time comprised District Courts, which had general trial jurisdiction; Circuit Courts, which had mixed trial and appellate (from the US District Courts) jurisdiction; and the United States Supreme Court, which had appellate jurisdiction over the federal District and Circuit courts—and for certain issues over state courts. The Supreme Court also had limited original jurisdiction (i.e., in which cases could be filed directly with the Supreme Court without first having been heard by a lower federal or state court). There were one or more federal District Courts and/or Circuit Courts in each state, territory, or other geographical region.

Bluebook citation style is used for case names, citations, and jurisdictions.

List of cases in 39 U.S. (14 Pet.)

Case Name Page & year Opinion of the Court Concurring opinion(s) Dissenting opinion(s) Lower court Disposition of case
Evans v. Gee 1 (1840) Catron none none C.C.S.D. Ala. dismissed
Lattimer’s Lessee v. Poteet 4 (1840) McLean Taney Catron C.C.D.N.C. affirmed
Bank of Metropolis v. Guttschlick 19 (1840) Barbour none none C.C.D.C. affirmed
Kane v. Paul 33 (1840) Wayne none none C.C.D.C. affirmed
Covington v. Comstock 43 (1840) McLean none none C.C.D. Miss. reversed
Smith v. Chesapeake & Ohio Canal Co. 45 (1840) McLean none none C.C.D.C. affirmed
Mitchell v. Lenox 49 (1840) Taney none none N.Y. Ct. Tr. Errors dismissed for want of jurisdiction
West v. Brashear 51 (1840) Taney none none C.C.D. Ky. affirmed
Commonwealth Bank v. Griffith 56 (1840) Taney none none Mo. dismissed for want of jurisdiction
Commercial & R.R. Bank v. Slocomb, R. & Co. 60 (1840) Barbour none none C.C.S.D. Miss. reversed
Suydam v. Broadnax 67 (1840) Wayne none none C.C.S.D. Ala. remanded to divided lower court
Carr v. Duval 77 (1840) Catron none none Ct. App. Terr. Fla. affirmed
Remington v. Linthicum 84 (1840) Taney none none C.C.D.C. affirmed
Frevall v. Bache 95 (1840) Taney none none C.C.D.C. affirmed
Peters v. Warren Ins. Co. 99 (1840) Story none none C.C.D. Mass. remanded to divided lower court
Atkins v. N. & K. Dick & Co. 114 (1840) Barbour none none C.C.S.D. Miss. reversed
Runyan v. Coster’s Lessee 122 (1840) Thompson none none C.C.E.D. Pa. affirmed
Preston v. Keene 133 (1840) Barbour none none C.C.E.D. La. reversed
Bank of Alexandria v. Dyer 141 (1840) Taney none none C.C.D.C. affirmed
Walden’s Lessee v. Craig’s Heirs 147 (1840) McLean none none C.C.D. Ky. reversed
Walden v. Bodley 156 (1840) McLean none none C.C.D. Ky. affirmed
Edmonds v. Crenshaw 166 (1840) McLean none none C.C.S.D. Ala. reversed
Keene v. Whitaker 170 (1840) Taney none none C.C.E.D. La. affirmed
Taylor v. Longworth 172 (1840) Story none none C.C.D. Ohio affirmed
Brewer’s Lessee v. Blougher 178 (1840) Taney none none C.C.D. Md. affirmed
Sprigg v. Bank of Mount Pleasant 201 (1840) Thompson none none C.C.D. Ohio affirmed
Rhode Island v. Massachusetts 210 (1840) Taney none McLean, Catron original jurisdiction plea of Mass. overruled
de Valengin’s Adm’rs v. Duffy 282 (1840) Taney none none C.C.D. Md. affirmed
Irvine ex rel. Lumberman’s Bank v. Lowry 293 (1840) Baldwin none none C.C.W.D. Pa. remanded to divided lower court
United States v. Knight 301 (1840) Barbour none none C.C.D. Me. affirmed
Fowler v. Brantly 318 (1840) Catron none none C.C.S.D. Ala. affirmed
Games v. Stiles 322 (1840) McLean none none C.C.D. Ohio affirmed
United States v. Wiggins 334 (1840) Catron none none Fla. Super. Ct. reversed
Pollard’s Lessee v. Kibbe 353 (1840) Thompson McLean, Baldwin, Taney Barbour, Catron Ala. reversed
United States v. Wood 430 (1840) Wayne none Thompson C.C.S.D.N.Y. remanded to divided lower court
Philadelphia & T.R.R. Co. v. Stimpson 448 (1840) Story none none C.C.E.D. Pa. affirmed
United States v. Morris 464 (1840) Taney none none C.C.S.D.N.Y. remanded to divided lower court
United States v. Waterman’s Heirs 478 (1840) Baldwin none none Fla. Super. Ct. affirmed
Brown & Co. v. M’Gran 479 (1840) Story none none C.C.D. Ga. reversed
Decatur v. Paulding 497 (1840) Taney McLean, Catron none C.C.D.C. affirmed
United States v. Stone 524 (1840) Taney none none C.C.S.D.N.Y. remanded to divided lower court
United States v. Gratiot 526 (1840) Thompson none none C.C.D. Ill. remanded to divided lower court
Holmes v. Jennison 540 (1840) Thompson Barbour, Catron Taney Vt. dismissed for want of jurisdiction

Notes and references

  1. ^ Lawson, Gary; Seidman, Guy (2001). "When Did the Constitution Become Law?". Notre Dame Law Review. 77: 1–37.
  • ^ Anne Ashmore, DATES OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS AND ARGUMENTS, Library, Supreme Court of the United States, 26 December 2018.
  • ^ "Supreme Court Research Guide". Georgetown Law Library. Retrieved April 7, 2021.
  • See also

    External links


    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_39&oldid=1055661769"

    Categories: 
    Lists of United States Supreme Court cases by volume
    1840 in United States case law
    Hidden categories: 
    Pages using gadget WikiMiniAtlas
    Articles with short description
    Short description is different from Wikidata
    Use American English from September 2020
    All Wikipedia articles written in American English
    Use mdy dates from March 2021
    Infobox mapframe without OSM relation ID on Wikidata
    Coordinates on Wikidata
    Pages using the Kartographer extension
     



    This page was last edited on 17 November 2021, at 03:22 (UTC).

    This version of the page has been revised. Besides normal editing, the reason for revision may have been that this version contains factual inaccuracies, vandalism, or material not compatible with the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License.



    Privacy policy

    About Wikipedia

    Disclaimers

    Contact Wikipedia

    Code of Conduct

    Developers

    Statistics

    Cookie statement

    Mobile view



    Wikimedia Foundation
    Powered by MediaWiki