Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Nominative reports  



1.1  Benjamin Chew Howard  







2 Justices of the Supreme Court at the time of 51 U.S. (10 How.)  





3 Notable case in 51 U.S. (10 How.)  



3.1  Strader v. Graham  







4 Citation style  





5 List of cases in 51 U.S. (10 How.)  





6 Notes and references  





7 See also  





8 External links  














List of United States Supreme Court cases, volume 51: Difference between revisions







Add links
 









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Cite this page
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
Wikidata item
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 




Print/export  



















Appearance
   

 





Coordinates: 38°5326N 77°0016W / 38.89056°N 77.00444°W / 38.89056; -77.00444

Help
 

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


Browse history interactively
 Previous editNext edit 
Content deleted Content added
Tag: Reverted
mNo edit summary
Tag: Reverted
Line 21: Line 21:

This is a '''list of the 37 cases reported in volume 51 (10 How.) of ''[[United States Reports]]''''', decided by the [[Supreme Court of the United States]] from December 1850 to May 1851.<ref>Anne Ashmore, ''DATES OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS AND ARGUMENTS'', Library, Supreme Court of the United States, 26 December 2018.</ref>

This is a '''list of the 37 cases reported in volume 51 (10 How.) of ''[[United States Reports]]''''', decided by the [[Supreme Court of the United States]] from December 1850 to May 1851.<ref>Anne Ashmore, ''DATES OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS AND ARGUMENTS'', Library, Supreme Court of the United States, 26 December 2018.</ref>

== Nominative reports ==

== Nominative reports ==

In 1874, the U.S. government created the ''United States Reports'', and retroactively numbered older privately-published [[Law report|case reports]] as part of the new series. As a result, cases appearing in volumes 1–90 of ''U.S. Reports'' have dual [[Case citation|citation forms]]; one for the volume number of ''U.S. Reports'', and one for the volume number of the reports named for the relevant reporter of decisions (these are called "[[Nominate reports|nominative reports]]").

In 1874, the U.S. government created the ''United States Reports'', and retroactively numbered older privately-published [[Law report|case reports]] as part of the new series. As a result, cases appearing in volumes 1–90 of ''U.S. Reports'' have dual [[Case citation|citation forms]]; one for the volume number of ''U.S. Reports'', and one for the volume number of the reports named for the relevant reporter of decisions (these are called [[Nominate reports|nominative reports]]).

=== Benjamin Chew Howard ===

=== Benjamin Chew Howard ===

Starting with the 42nd volume of ''U.S. Reports'', the [[Reporter of Decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States]] was [[Benjamin Chew Howard]]. Howard was Reporter of Decisions from 1843 to 1860, covering volumes 42 through 65 of ''United States Reports'' which correspond to volumes 1 through 24 of his ''Howard's Reports''. As such, the dual form of citation to, for example, ''Butler v. Pennsylvania'' is 51 U.S. (10 How.) 402 (1851).

Starting with the 42nd volume of ''U.S. Reports'', the [[Reporter of Decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States]] was [[Benjamin Chew Howard]]. Howard was Reporter of Decisions from 1843 to 1860, covering volumes 42 through 65 of ''United States Reports'' which correspond to volumes 1 through 24 of his ''Howard’s Reports''. As such, the dual form of citation to, for example, ''Butler v. Pennsylvania'' is 51 U.S. (10 How.) 402 (1851).



== Justices of the Supreme Court at the time of 51 U.S. (10 How.) ==

== Justices of the Supreme Court at the time of 51 U.S. (10 How.) ==

Line 29: Line 29:

{{see also|List of justices of the Supreme Court of the United States by court composition}}

{{see also|List of justices of the Supreme Court of the United States by court composition}}

{{see also|Taney Court}}

{{see also|Taney Court}}

The Supreme Court is established by [[Article Three of the United States Constitution|Article III, Section 1]] of the [[Constitution of the United States]], which says: "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court . . .". The size of the Court is not specified; the Constitution leaves it to [[Congress of the United States|Congress]] to set the number of justices. Under the [[Judiciary Act of 1789]] Congress originally fixed the number of justices at six (one chief justice and five associate justices).<ref>{{cite web|url=https://guides.ll.georgetown.edu/supreme_court|title=Supreme Court Research Guide |access-date=7 April 2021 |publisher=Georgetown Law Library}}</ref> Since 1789 Congress has varied the size of the Court from six to [[Seventh Circuit Act of 1807|seven]], [[Eighth and Ninth Circuits Act of 1837|nine]], [[Tenth Circuit Act of 1863|ten]], and back to [[Judiciary Act of 1869|nine]] justices (always including one chief justice). When the cases in 51 U.S. (10 How.) were decided the Court comprised these nine members:

The Supreme Court is established by [[Article Three of the United States Constitution|Article III, Section 1]] of the [[Constitution of the United States]], which says: ”The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court . . .. The size of the Court is not specified; the Constitution leaves it to [[Congress of the United States|Congress]] to set the number of justices. Under the [[Judiciary Act of 1789]] Congress originally fixed the number of justices at six (one chief justice and five associate justices).<ref>{{cite web|url=https://guides.ll.georgetown.edu/supreme_court|title=Supreme Court Research Guide |access-date=7 April 2021 |publisher=Georgetown Law Library}}</ref> Since 1789 Congress has varied the size of the Court from six to [[Seventh Circuit Act of 1807|seven]], [[Eighth and Ninth Circuits Act of 1837|nine]], [[Tenth Circuit Act of 1863|ten]], and back to [[Judiciary Act of 1869|nine]] justices (always including one chief justice). When the cases in 51 U.S. (10 How.) were decided the Court comprised these nine members:

{| class="wikitable sortable"

{| class="wikitable sortable"

|-

|-

Line 74: Line 74:

== Notable case in 51 U.S. (10 How.) ==

== Notable case in 51 U.S. (10 How.) ==

===''Strader v. Graham''===

===''Strader v. Graham''===

In ''[[Strader v. Graham]]'' [https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86595/strader-v-graham/?q=%2251%20U.S.%2082%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1850&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1852&court=scotus 51 U.S. (10 How.) 82 (1851)], the Supreme Court held that the status of three slaves who went by steamboat from the slave state of [[Kentucky]] to the free states of [[Indiana]] and [[Ohio]] depended on Kentucky law rather than on Indiana or Ohio law. The slaves later escaped to [[Canada]]. Kentucky law made steamboat operators liable for the value of any slaves escaping by the boat. Writing for the Court, Chief Justice Roger Taney accepted the conclusions of the [[Supreme Court of Kentucky]] that refused to rule on the status of the slaves unless they were parties to the lawsuit, and that Kentucky need not apply Indiana or Ohio law under which the three slaves would be considered freed.

In ''[[Strader v. Graham]]'' [https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86595/strader-v-graham/?q=%2251%20U.S.%2082%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1850&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1852&court=scotus 51 U.S. (10 How.) 82 (1851)], the Supreme Court held that the status of three slaves who went by steamboat from the slave state of [[Kentucky]] to the free states of [[Indiana]] and [[Ohio]] depended on Kentucky law rather than on Indiana or Ohio law. (The slaves, however, later escaped to [[Canada]].) Kentucky law made steamboat operators liable for the value of any slaves escaping by the boat. Writing for the Court, Chief Justice Roger Taney accepted the conclusions of the [[Supreme Court of Kentucky]] that refused to rule on the status of the slaves unless they were parties to the lawsuit, and that Kentucky need not apply Indiana or Ohio law under which the three slaves would be considered freed.



== Citation style ==

== Citation style ==

Line 103: Line 103:

! scope="col" style="width: 75px;" | Page and year

! scope="col" style="width: 75px;" | Page and year

! scope="col" style="width: 10px;" | Opinion of the Court

! scope="col" style="width: 10px;" | Opinion of the Court

! scope="col" style="width: 50px;" | Concurring opinion(s)

! scope="col" style="width: 90px;" | Concurring opinion(s)

! scope="col" style="width: 10px;" | Dissenting opinion(s)

! scope="col" style="width: 50px;" | Dissenting opinion(s)

! scope="col" style="width: 116px;" | Lower court

! scope="col" style="width: 116px;" | Lower court

! scope="col" style="width: 250px;" | Disposition of case

! scope="col" style="width: 233px;" | Disposition of case

|-

|-

| ''[[Missouri]] v. [[Iowa]]'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86591/state-of-missouri-v-state-of-iowa/?q=%2251%20U.S.%201%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1850&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1852&court=scotus 1 (1851)] || ''[[per curiam]]'' || none || none || [[Original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of the United States|original jurisdiction]] || state border decreed

| ''[[Missouri]] v. [[Iowa]]'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86591/state-of-missouri-v-state-of-iowa/?q=%2251%20U.S.%201%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1850&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1852&court=scotus 1 (1851)] || ''[[per curiam]]'' || none || none || [[Original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of the United States|original jurisdiction]] || state border decreed

Line 150: Line 150:

| ''Henderson v. [[Tennessee]]'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86610/henderson-v-state-of-tennessee/?q=%2251%20U.S.%20311%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1850&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1852&court=scotus 311 (1851)] || Taney || none || Woodbury || [[Supreme Court of Tennessee|Tenn.]] || dismissed for want of jurisdiction

| ''Henderson v. [[Tennessee]]'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86610/henderson-v-state-of-tennessee/?q=%2251%20U.S.%20311%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1850&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1852&court=scotus 311 (1851)] || Taney || none || Woodbury || [[Supreme Court of Tennessee|Tenn.]] || dismissed for want of jurisdiction

|-

|-

| ''Stimpson v. [[Northern Central Railway|Baltimore & Susquehanna R.R. Co.]]'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86611/stimpson-v-baltimore-susquehanna-r-co/?q=%2251%20U.S.%20329%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1850&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1852&court=scotus 329 (1850)] || Daniel || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.D. Md.]] || affirmed

| ''Stimpson v. [[Northern Central Railway|Baltimore & S.R.R. Co.]]'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86611/stimpson-v-baltimore-susquehanna-r-co/?q=%2251%20U.S.%20329%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1850&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1852&court=scotus 329 (1850)] || Daniel || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.D. Md.]] || affirmed

|-

|-

| ''Landes v. Brant'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86612/landes-v-brant/?q=%2251%20U.S.%20348%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1850&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1852&court=scotus 348 (1851)] || Catron || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.D. Mo.]] || affirmed

| ''Landes v. Brant'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86612/landes-v-brant/?q=%2251%20U.S.%20348%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1850&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1852&court=scotus 348 (1851)] || Catron || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.D. Mo.]] || affirmed

|-

|-

| ''Philadelphia & Wilmington R.R. Co. v. [[Maryland]]'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86613/philadelphia-and-wilmington-railroad-co-v-state-of-maryland/?q=%2251%20U.S.%20376%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1850&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1852&court=scotus 376 (1851)] || Taney || none || none || [[Maryland Court of Appeals|Md.]] || affirmed

| ''Philadelphia & W.R.R. Co. v. [[Maryland]]'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86613/philadelphia-and-wilmington-railroad-co-v-state-of-maryland/?q=%2251%20U.S.%20376%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1850&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1852&court=scotus 376 (1851)] || Taney || none || none || [[Maryland Court of Appeals|Md.]] || affirmed

|-

|-

| ''[[Northern Central Railway|Baltimore & Susquehanna R.R. Co.]] v. Nesbit'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86614/baltimore-and-susquehanna-railroad-co-v-nesbit/?q=%2251%20U.S.%20395%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1850&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1852&court=scotus 395 (1851)] || Daniel || none || none || Baltimore Cnty. Ct. || affirmed

| ''[[Northern Central Railway|Baltimore & S.R.R. Co.]] v. Nesbit'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86614/baltimore-and-susquehanna-railroad-co-v-nesbit/?q=%2251%20U.S.%20395%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1850&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1852&court=scotus 395 (1851)] || Daniel || none || none || Baltimore Cnty. Ct. || affirmed

|-

|-

| ''Butler v. [[Pennsylvania]]'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86615/butler-v-commonwealth-of-pennsylvania/?q=%2251%20U.S.%20402%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1850&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1852&court=scotus 402 (1851)] || Daniel || none || McLean || [[Supreme Court of Pennsylvania|Pa.]] || affirmed

| ''Butler v. [[Pennsylvania]]'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86615/butler-v-commonwealth-of-pennsylvania/?q=%2251%20U.S.%20402%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1850&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1852&court=scotus 402 (1851)] || Daniel || none || McLean || [[Supreme Court of Pennsylvania|Pa.]] || affirmed

|-

|-

| ''Washington, Alexandria & Georgetown Steam [[Packet boat|Packet Co.]] v. Sickles'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86616/washington-alexandria-georgetown-steam-packet-co-v-sickles/?q=%2251%20U.S.%20419%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1850&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1852&court=scotus 419 (1851)] || Grier || none || none || [[United States Circuit Court of the District of Columbia|C.C.D.C.]] || reversed

| ''Washington, A. & G’town Steam [[Packet boat|Packet Co.]] v. Sickles'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86616/washington-alexandria-georgetown-steam-packet-co-v-sickles/?q=%2251%20U.S.%20419%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1850&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1852&court=scotus 419 (1851)] || Grier || none || none || [[United States Circuit Court of the District of Columbia|C.C.D.C.]] || reversed

|-

|-

| ''[[United States v. Brooks]]'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86617/united-states-v-brooks/?q=%2251%20U.S.%20442%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1850&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1852&court=scotus 442 (1851)] || Wayne || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.D. La.]] || affirmed

| ''[[United States v. Brooks]]'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86617/united-states-v-brooks/?q=%2251%20U.S.%20442%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1850&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1852&court=scotus 442 (1851)] || Wayne || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.D. La.]] || affirmed

|-

|-

| ''Louisville Manufacturing Co. v. Welch'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86618/louisville-mfg-co-v-welch/?q=%2251%20U.S.%20461%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1850&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1852&court=scotus 461 (1851)] || Nelson || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.D. La.]] || reversed

| ''Louisville Mfg. Co. v. Welch'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86618/louisville-mfg-co-v-welch/?q=%2251%20U.S.%20461%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1850&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1852&court=scotus 461 (1851)] || Nelson || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.D. La.]] || reversed

|-

|-

| ''Gayler v. Wilder I'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86619/gayler-v-wilder/?q=%2251%20U.S.%20477%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1850&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1852&court=scotus 477 (1851)] || Taney || none || McLean || [[United States circuit court|C.C.S.D.N.Y.]] || affirmed

| ''Gayler v. Wilder I'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86619/gayler-v-wilder/?q=%2251%20U.S.%20477%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1850&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1852&court=scotus 477 (1851)] || Taney || none || McLean || [[United States circuit court|C.C.S.D.N.Y.]] || affirmed

Line 178: Line 178:

| ''Newton v. Stebbins'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86623/newton-v-stebbins/?q=%2251%20U.S.%20586%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1850&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1852&court=scotus 586 (1851)] || Nelson || none || Daniel || [[United States circuit court|C.C.S.D.N.Y.]] || affirmed

| ''Newton v. Stebbins'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86623/newton-v-stebbins/?q=%2251%20U.S.%20586%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1850&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1852&court=scotus 586 (1851)] || Nelson || none || Daniel || [[United States circuit court|C.C.S.D.N.Y.]] || affirmed

|-

|-

| ''United States v. D'Auterive'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86624/united-states-v-dauterive/?q=%2251%20U.S.%20609%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1850&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1852&court=scotus 609 (1851)] || Daniel || none || none || [[United States District Court for the District of Louisiana|D. La.]] || reversed

| ''United States v. D’Auterive'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86624/united-states-v-dauterive/?q=%2251%20U.S.%20609%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1850&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1852&court=scotus 609 (1851)] || Daniel || none || none || [[United States District Court for the District of Louisiana|D. La.]] || reversed

|-

|-

| ''Robinson v. Minor'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86625/robinson-v-minor/?q=%2251%20U.S.%20627%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1850&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1852&court=scotus 627 (1851)] || McLean || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.S.D. Miss.]] || affirmed

| ''Robinson v. Minor'' || align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/86625/robinson-v-minor/?q=%2251%20U.S.%20627%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1850&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1852&court=scotus 627 (1851)] || McLean || none || none || [[United States circuit court|C.C.S.D. Miss.]] || affirmed


Revision as of 00:46, 16 November 2021

Supreme Court of the United States
Map
38°53′26N 77°00′16W / 38.89056°N 77.00444°W / 38.89056; -77.00444
EstablishedMarch 4, 1789; 235 years ago (1789-03-04)[1]
LocationWashington, D.C.
Coordinates38°53′26N 77°00′16W / 38.89056°N 77.00444°W / 38.89056; -77.00444
Composition methodPresidential nomination with Senate confirmation
Authorized byConstitution of the United States
Judge term lengthLife tenure
Number of positions9 (by statute)
Websitesupremecourt.gov
Chief Justice of the United States
CurrentlyJohn Roberts
SinceSeptember 29, 2005; 18 years ago (2005-09-29)

This is a list of the 37 cases reported in volume 51 (10 How.) of United States Reports, decided by the Supreme Court of the United States from December 1850 to May 1851.[2]

Nominative reports

In 1874, the U.S. government created the United States Reports, and retroactively numbered older privately-published case reports as part of the new series. As a result, cases appearing in volumes 1–90 of U.S. Reports have dual citation forms; one for the volume number of U.S. Reports, and one for the volume number of the reports named for the relevant reporter of decisions (these are called ”nominative reports”).

Benjamin Chew Howard

Starting with the 42nd volume of U.S. Reports, the Reporter of Decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States was Benjamin Chew Howard. Howard was Reporter of Decisions from 1843 to 1860, covering volumes 42 through 65 of United States Reports which correspond to volumes 1 through 24 of his Howard’s Reports. As such, the dual form of citation to, for example, Butler v. Pennsylvania is 51 U.S. (10 How.) 402 (1851).

Justices of the Supreme Court at the time of 51 U.S. (10 How.)

The Supreme Court is established by Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution of the United States, which says: ”The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court . . .”. The size of the Court is not specified; the Constitution leaves it to Congress to set the number of justices. Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 Congress originally fixed the number of justices at six (one chief justice and five associate justices).[3] Since 1789 Congress has varied the size of the Court from six to seven, nine, ten, and back to nine justices (always including one chief justice). When the cases in 51 U.S. (10 How.) were decided the Court comprised these nine members:

Portrait Justice Office Home State Succeeded Date confirmed by the Senate
(Vote)
Tenure on Supreme Court
Roger B. Taney Chief Justice Maryland John Marshall March 15, 1836
(29–15)
March 28, 1836

October 12, 1864
(Died)
John McLean Associate Justice Ohio Robert Trimble March 7, 1829
(Acclamation)
January 11, 1830

April 4, 1861
(Died)
James Moore Wayne Associate Justice Georgia William Johnson January 9, 1835
(Acclamation)
January 14, 1835

July 5, 1867
(Died)
John Catron Associate Justice Tennessee newly-created seat March 8, 1837
(28–15)
May 1, 1837

May 30, 1865
(Died)
John McKinley Associate Justice Alabama newly-created seat September 25, 1837
(Acclamation)
January 9, 1838

July 19, 1852
(Died)
Peter Vivian Daniel Associate Justice Virginia Philip P. Barbour March 2, 1841
(25–5)
January 10, 1842

May 31, 1860
(Died)
Samuel Nelson Associate Justice New York Smith Thompson February 14, 1845
(Acclamation)
February 27, 1845

November 28, 1872
(Retired)
Levi Woodbury Associate Justice New Hampshire Joseph Story January 31, 1846
(Acclamation)
September 23, 1845

September 4, 1851
(Died)
Robert Cooper Grier Associate Justice Pennsylvania Henry Baldwin August 4, 1846
(Acclamation)
August 10, 1846

January 31, 1870
(Retired)

Notable case in 51 U.S. (10 How.)

Strader v. Graham

InStrader v. Graham 51 U.S. (10 How.) 82 (1851), the Supreme Court held that the status of three slaves who went by steamboat from the slave state of Kentucky to the free states of Indiana and Ohio depended on Kentucky law rather than on Indiana or Ohio law. (The slaves, however, later escaped to Canada.) Kentucky law made steamboat operators liable for the value of any slaves escaping by the boat. Writing for the Court, Chief Justice Roger Taney accepted the conclusions of the Supreme Court of Kentucky that refused to rule on the status of the slaves unless they were parties to the lawsuit, and that Kentucky need not apply Indiana or Ohio law under which the three slaves would be considered freed.

Citation style

Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 the federal court structure at the time comprised District Courts, which had general trial jurisdiction; Circuit Courts, which had mixed trial and appellate (from the US District Courts) jurisdiction; and the United States Supreme Court, which had appellate jurisdiction over the federal District and Circuit courts—and for certain issues over state courts. The Supreme Court also had limited original jurisdiction (i.e., in which cases could be filed directly with the Supreme Court without first having been heard by a lower federal or state court). There were one or more federal District Courts and/or Circuit Courts in each state, territory, or other geographical region.

Bluebook citation style is used for case names, citations, and jurisdictions.

List of cases in 51 U.S. (10 How.)

Case Name Page and year Opinion of the Court Concurring opinion(s) Dissenting opinion(s) Lower court Disposition of case
Missouri v. Iowa 1 (1851) per curiam none none original jurisdiction state border decreed
Webster v. Cooper 54 (1850) Taney none none C.C.D. Me. remanded to divided lower court
Shelby v. Bacon 56 (1850) McLean none none C.C.E.D. Pa. remanded to divided lower court
McNulty v. Batty 72 (1851) Nelson none none Sup. Ct. Terr. Wis. writ of error abated
Preston v. Bracken 81 (1851) Nelson none none Sup. Ct. Terr. Wis. writ of error abated
Strader v. Graham 82 (1851) Taney McLean, Catron none Ky. dismissed for want of jurisdiction
Wilson v. Sanford 99 (1851) Taney none none C.C.D. La. dismissed for want of jurisdiction
Downs v. Kissam 102 (1850) McLean none none C.C.S.D. Miss. reversed
Hoyt v. United States 109 (1850) Nelson none none C.C.S.D.N.Y. affirmed
Ex parte Rhodes 144 (1851) Taney none none D. Tex. dismissal denied
Oldfield v. Marriott 146 (1851) Wayne none none C.C.D. Md. affirmed
Hallett v. Collins 174 (1850) Grier none none C.C.S.D. Ala. affirmed
Sears v. Eastburn 187 (1850) Taney none none C.C.S.D. Ala. reversed
Woodruff v. Trapnall 190 (1851) McLean none Grier Ark. reversed
Paup v. Drew 218 (1851) McLean Daniel, Nelson none Ark. affirmed
Trigg v. Drew 224 (1851) McLean none none Ark. affirmed
Greely v. Thompson 225 (1851) Woodbury none none C.C.D. Mass. affirmed
Maxwell v. Griswold 242 (1851) Woodbury none none C.C.S.D.N.Y. affirmed
Gilmer v. Poindexter 257 (1851) Daniel none none C.C.D. La. reversed
Barnard v. Adams 270 (1851) Grier none Daniel C.C.S.D.N.Y. affirmed
Henderson v. Tennessee 311 (1851) Taney none Woodbury Tenn. dismissed for want of jurisdiction
Stimpson v. Baltimore & S.R.R. Co. 329 (1850) Daniel none none C.C.D. Md. affirmed
Landes v. Brant 348 (1851) Catron none none C.C.D. Mo. affirmed
Philadelphia & W.R.R. Co. v. Maryland 376 (1851) Taney none none Md. affirmed
Baltimore & S.R.R. Co. v. Nesbit 395 (1851) Daniel none none Baltimore Cnty. Ct. affirmed
Butler v. Pennsylvania 402 (1851) Daniel none McLean Pa. affirmed
Washington, A. & G’town Steam Packet Co. v. Sickles 419 (1851) Grier none none C.C.D.C. reversed
United States v. Brooks 442 (1851) Wayne none none C.C.D. La. affirmed
Louisville Mfg. Co. v. Welch 461 (1851) Nelson none none C.C.D. La. reversed
Gayler v. Wilder I 477 (1851) Taney none McLean C.C.S.D.N.Y. affirmed
Gayler v. Wilder II 509 (1851) Taney none none C.C.S.D.N.Y. rehearing denied
Town of East Hartford v. Hartford Bridge Co. 511 (1851) Woodbury none none Conn. affirmed
Villalobos v. United States 541 (1851) Catron none none Super. Ct. E. Fla. affirmed
St. John v. Paine 557 (1851) Nelson none none C.C.S.D.N.Y. affirmed
Newton v. Stebbins 586 (1851) Nelson none Daniel C.C.S.D.N.Y. affirmed
United States v. D’Auterive 609 (1851) Daniel none none D. La. reversed
Robinson v. Minor 627 (1851) McLean none none C.C.S.D. Miss. affirmed

Notes and references

  1. ^ Lawson, Gary; Seidman, Guy (2001). "When Did the Constitution Become Law?". Notre Dame Law Review. 77: 1–37.
  • ^ Anne Ashmore, DATES OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS AND ARGUMENTS, Library, Supreme Court of the United States, 26 December 2018.
  • ^ "Supreme Court Research Guide". Georgetown Law Library. Retrieved April 7, 2021.
  • See also

    External links


    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_United_States_Supreme_Court_cases,_volume_51&oldid=1055462920"

    Categories: 
    Lists of United States Supreme Court cases by volume
    1850 in United States case law
    1851 in United States case law
    Hidden categories: 
    Pages using gadget WikiMiniAtlas
    Use American English from September 2020
    All Wikipedia articles written in American English
    Use mdy dates from March 2021
    Infobox mapframe without OSM relation ID on Wikidata
    Coordinates on Wikidata
    Pages using the Kartographer extension
     



    This page was last edited on 16 November 2021, at 00:46 (UTC).

    This version of the page has been revised. Besides normal editing, the reason for revision may have been that this version contains factual inaccuracies, vandalism, or material not compatible with the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License.



    Privacy policy

    About Wikipedia

    Disclaimers

    Contact Wikipedia

    Code of Conduct

    Developers

    Statistics

    Cookie statement

    Mobile view



    Wikimedia Foundation
    Powered by MediaWiki