Restored revision 1041684985 by Ballinacurra Weston (talk)
|
|||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
This is a '''list of the 67 cases reported in volume 62 (21 How.) of ''[[United States Reports]]''''', decided by the [[Supreme Court of the United States]] from December 1858 to March 1859.<ref>Anne Ashmore, ''DATES OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS AND ARGUMENTS'', Library, Supreme Court of the United States, 26 December 2018.</ref> |
This is a '''list of the 67 cases reported in volume 62 (21 How.) of ''[[United States Reports]]''''', decided by the [[Supreme Court of the United States]] from December 1858 to March 1859.<ref>Anne Ashmore, ''DATES OF SUPREME COURT DECISIONS AND ARGUMENTS'', Library, Supreme Court of the United States, 26 December 2018.</ref> |
||
== Nominative reports == |
== Nominative reports == |
||
In 1874, the U.S. government created the ''United States Reports'', and retroactively numbered older privately-published [[Law report|case reports]] as part of the new series. As a result, cases appearing in volumes 1–90 of ''U.S. Reports'' have dual [[Case citation|citation forms]]; one for the volume number of ''U.S. Reports'', and one for the volume number of the reports named for the relevant reporter of decisions (these are called |
In 1874, the U.S. government created the ''United States Reports'', and retroactively numbered older privately-published [[Law report|case reports]] as part of the new series. As a result, cases appearing in volumes 1–90 of ''U.S. Reports'' have dual [[Case citation|citation forms]]; one for the volume number of ''U.S. Reports'', and one for the volume number of the reports named for the relevant reporter of decisions (these are called ”[[Nominate reports|nominative reports]]”). |
||
=== Benjamin Chew Howard === |
=== Benjamin Chew Howard === |
||
Starting with the 42nd volume of ''U.S. Reports'', the [[Reporter of Decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States]] was [[Benjamin Chew Howard]]. Howard was Reporter of Decisions from 1843 to 1860, covering volumes 42 through 65 of ''United States Reports'' which correspond to volumes 1 through 24 of his '' |
Starting with the 42nd volume of ''U.S. Reports'', the [[Reporter of Decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States]] was [[Benjamin Chew Howard]]. Howard was Reporter of Decisions from 1843 to 1860, covering volumes 42 through 65 of ''United States Reports'' which correspond to volumes 1 through 24 of his ''Howard’s Reports''. As such, the dual form of citation to, for example, '' New York v. Dibble'' is 62 U.S. (21 How.) 366 (1859). |
||
== Justices of the Supreme Court at the time of 62 U.S. (21 How.) == |
== Justices of the Supreme Court at the time of 62 U.S. (21 How.) == |
||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
{{see also|List of justices of the Supreme Court of the United States by court composition}} |
{{see also|List of justices of the Supreme Court of the United States by court composition}} |
||
{{see also|Taney Court}} |
{{see also|Taney Court}} |
||
The Supreme Court is established by [[Article Three of the United States Constitution|Article III, Section 1]] of the [[Constitution of the United States]], which says: |
The Supreme Court is established by [[Article Three of the United States Constitution|Article III, Section 1]] of the [[Constitution of the United States]], which says: ”The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court . . .”. The size of the Court is not specified; the Constitution leaves it to [[Congress of the United States|Congress]] to set the number of justices. Under the [[Judiciary Act of 1789]] Congress originally fixed the number of justices at six (one chief justice and five associate justices).<ref>{{cite web|url=https://guides.ll.georgetown.edu/supreme_court|title=Supreme Court Research Guide |access-date=7 April 2021 |publisher=Georgetown Law Library}}</ref> Since 1789 Congress has varied the size of the Court from six to [[Seventh Circuit Act of 1807|seven]], [[Eighth and Ninth Circuits Act of 1837|nine]], [[Tenth Circuit Act of 1863|ten]], and back to [[Judiciary Act of 1869|nine]] justices (always including one chief justice). When the cases in 62 U.S. (21 How.) were decided the Court comprised these nine members: |
||
{| class="wikitable sortable" |
{| class="wikitable sortable" |
||
|- |
|- |
||
Line 87: | Line 87: | ||
[[Bluebook]] citation style is used for case names, citations, and jurisdictions. |
[[Bluebook]] citation style is used for case names, citations, and jurisdictions. |
||
* |
* ”C.C.D.” = United States Circuit Court for the District of . . . |
||
** ''e.g.,'' |
** ''e.g.,''”C.C.D.N.J.” = United States Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey |
||
* |
* ”D.” = United States District Court for the District of . . . |
||
** ''e.g.,'' |
** ''e.g.,''”D. Mass.” = [[United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts]] |
||
* |
* ”E.” = Eastern; ”M.” = Middle; ”N.” = Northern; ”S.” = Southern; ”W.” = Western |
||
** ''e.g.,'' |
** ''e.g.,''”C.C.S.D.N.Y.” = United States Circuit Court for the Southern District of New York |
||
** ''e.g.,'' |
** ''e.g.,''”M.D. Ala.” = [[United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama]] |
||
* |
* ”Adm.” = [[Admiralty Court]] (a federal court) |
||
* |
* ”Ct. Cl.” = [[United States Court of Claims]] |
||
* |
* ”C.P.” = [[Court of Common Pleas]] (a state court) |
||
* The abbreviation of a state's name alone indicates the highest appellate court in that |
* The abbreviation of a state's name alone indicates the highest appellate court in that state’s judiciary at the time. |
||
** ''e.g.,'' |
** ''e.g.,''”Pa.” = [[Supreme Court of Pennsylvania]] |
||
** ''e.g.,'' |
** ''e.g.,''”Me.” = [[Supreme Judicial Court of Maine]] |
||
== List of cases in 62 U.S. (21 How.) == |
== List of cases in 62 U.S. (21 How.) == |
||
{| class="wikitable sortable" |
{| class="wikitable sortable" |
||
|- |
|- |
||
! scope="col" style="width: |
! scope="col" style="width: 350px;" | Case Name |
||
! scope="col" style="width: 75px;" | Page & year |
! scope="col" style="width: 75px;" | Page & year |
||
! scope="col" style="width: 10px;" | Opinion of the Court |
! scope="col" style="width: 10px;" | Opinion of the Court |
||
! scope="col" style="width: 10px;" | Concurring opinion(s) |
! scope="col" style="width: 10px;" | Concurring opinion(s) |
||
! scope="col" style="width: 125px;" | Dissenting opinion(s) |
! scope="col" style="width: 125px;" | Dissenting opinion(s) |
||
! scope="col" style="width: |
! scope="col" style="width: 133px;" | Lower court |
||
! scope="col" style="width: 250px;" | Disposition of case |
! scope="col" style="width: 250px;" | Disposition of case |
||
|- |
|- |
||
Line 128: | Line 128: | ||
| affirmed |
| affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Union |
| ''Union Ins. Co. v. Hoge'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/87191/union-ins-co-v-hoge/?q=%2262%20U.S.%2035%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1858&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1860&court=scotus 35 (1859)] |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/87191/union-ins-co-v-hoge/?q=%2262%20U.S.%2035%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1858&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1860&court=scotus 35 (1859)] |
||
| Nelson |
| Nelson |
||
Line 152: | Line 152: | ||
| dismissed for want of jurisdiction |
| dismissed for want of jurisdiction |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Rice v. [[Chicago Great Western Railway|Minnesota & |
| ''Rice v. [[Chicago Great Western Railway|Minnesota & Nw. R.R. Co.]]'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/87194/edmund-rice-in-error-v-the-minnesota-and-northwestern-railroad-company/?q=%2262%20U.S.%2082%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1858&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1860&court=scotus 82 (1858)] |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/87194/edmund-rice-in-error-v-the-minnesota-and-northwestern-railroad-company/?q=%2262%20U.S.%2082%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1858&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1860&court=scotus 82 (1858)] |
||
| Taney |
| Taney |
||
Line 168: | Line 168: | ||
| affirmed |
| affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Winans v. [[Erie Railroad| |
| ''Winans v. [[Erie Railroad|N.Y. & Erie R.R. Co.]]'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/87196/winans-v-new-york-erie-r-co/?q=%2262%20U.S.%2088%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1858&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1860&court=scotus 88 (1859)] |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/87196/winans-v-new-york-erie-r-co/?q=%2262%20U.S.%2088%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1858&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1860&court=scotus 88 (1859)] |
||
| Grier |
| Grier |
||
Line 232: | Line 232: | ||
| dismissed for want of jurisdiction |
| dismissed for want of jurisdiction |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''[[Philadelphia, Wilmington and Baltimore Railroad|Philadelphia, |
| ''[[Philadelphia, Wilmington and Baltimore Railroad|Philadelphia, W. & B.R.R. Co.]] v. Quigley'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/87204/philadelphia-w-br-co-v-quigley/?q=%2262%20U.S.%20202%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1858&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1860&court=scotus 202 (1859)] |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/87204/philadelphia-w-br-co-v-quigley/?q=%2262%20U.S.%20202%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1858&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1860&court=scotus 202 (1859)] |
||
| Campbell |
| Campbell |
||
Line 248: | Line 248: | ||
| affirmed |
| affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| '' |
| ''French’s Lessee v. Spencer'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/87206/lessee-of-french-and-wife-v-spencer/?q=%2262%20U.S.%20228%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1858&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1860&court=scotus 228 (1859)] |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/87206/lessee-of-french-and-wife-v-spencer/?q=%2262%20U.S.%20228%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1858&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1860&court=scotus 228 (1859)] |
||
| Catron |
| Catron |
||
Line 304: | Line 304: | ||
| affirmed |
| affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Doe ex rel. Dickins v. Mahana'' |
| ''Doe [[ex rel.]] Dickins v. Mahana'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/87213/dickins-lessee-v-mahana/?q=%2262%20U.S.%20276%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1858&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1860&court=scotus 276 (1859)] |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/87213/dickins-lessee-v-mahana/?q=%2262%20U.S.%20276%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1858&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1860&court=scotus 276 (1859)] |
||
| Catron |
| Catron |
||
Line 384: | Line 384: | ||
| affirmed |
| affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''[[New York (state)|New York]] ex rel. Cutler v. Dibble'' |
| ''[[New York (state)|New York]] [[ex rel.]] Cutler v. Dibble'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/87223/new-york-ex-rel-cutler-v-dibble/?q=%2262%20U.S.%20366%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1858&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1860&court=scotus 366 (1859)] |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/87223/new-york-ex-rel-cutler-v-dibble/?q=%2262%20U.S.%20366%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1858&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1860&court=scotus 366 (1859)] |
||
| Grier |
| Grier |
||
Line 392: | Line 392: | ||
| affirmed |
| affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''[[Collins Line| |
| ''[[Collins Line|N.Y. & Liverpool U.S. Mail S.S. Co.]] v. Rumball'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/87224/new-york-liverpool-united-states-mail-ss-co-v-rumball/?q=%2262%20U.S.%20372%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1858&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1860&court=scotus 372 (1859)] |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/87224/new-york-liverpool-united-states-mail-ss-co-v-rumball/?q=%2262%20U.S.%20372%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1858&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1860&court=scotus 372 (1859)] |
||
| Clifford |
| Clifford |
||
Line 496: | Line 496: | ||
| affirmed |
| affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Pearce v. [[Jeffersonville, Madison and Indianapolis Railroad|Madison & |
| ''Pearce v. [[Jeffersonville, Madison and Indianapolis Railroad|Madison & In’polis R.R. Co.]]'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/87236/pearce-v-madison-indianapolis-r-co/?q=%2262%20U.S.%20441%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1858&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1860&court=scotus 441 (1859)] |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/87236/pearce-v-madison-indianapolis-r-co/?q=%2262%20U.S.%20441%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1858&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1860&court=scotus 441 (1859)] |
||
| Campbell |
| Campbell |
||
Line 520: | Line 520: | ||
| reversed |
| reversed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Western |
| ''Western Tel. Co. v. Magnetic Tel. Co.'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/87239/western-telegraph-company-v-magnetic-telegraph-company/?q=%2262%20U.S.%20456%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1858&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1860&court=scotus 456 (1859)] |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/87239/western-telegraph-company-v-magnetic-telegraph-company/?q=%2262%20U.S.%20456%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1858&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1860&court=scotus 456 (1859)] |
||
| McLean |
| McLean |
||
Line 528: | Line 528: | ||
| affirmed |
| affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''Western |
| ''Western Tel. Co. v. Penniman'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/87240/western-telegraph-company-v-penniman/?q=%2262%20U.S.%20460%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1858&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1860&court=scotus 460 (1859)] |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/87240/western-telegraph-company-v-penniman/?q=%2262%20U.S.%20460%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1858&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1860&court=scotus 460 (1859)] |
||
| McLean |
| McLean |
||
Line 624: | Line 624: | ||
| affirmed |
| affirmed |
||
|- |
|- |
||
| ''White v. [[Fitchburg Railroad|Vermont & |
| ''White v. [[Fitchburg Railroad|Vermont & Mass. R.R. Co.]]'' |
||
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/87252/white-v-vermont-massachusetts-r-co/?q=%2262%20U.S.%20575%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1858&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1860&court=scotus 575 (1859)] |
| align="right"|[https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/87252/white-v-vermont-massachusetts-r-co/?q=%2262%20U.S.%20575%20%22&type=o&order_by=score%20desc&stat_Precedential=on&filed_after=01%2F01%2F1858&filed_before=01%2F01%2F1860&court=scotus 575 (1859)] |
||
| Nelson |
| Nelson |
Supreme Court of the United States | |
---|---|
![]() | |
![]() | |
38°53′26″N 77°00′16″W / 38.89056°N 77.00444°W / 38.89056; -77.00444 | |
Established | March 4, 1789; 235 years ago (1789-03-04)[1] |
Location | Washington, D.C. |
Coordinates | 38°53′26″N 77°00′16″W / 38.89056°N 77.00444°W / 38.89056; -77.00444 |
Composition method | Presidential nomination with Senate confirmation |
Authorized by | Constitution of the United States |
Judge term length | Life tenure |
Number of positions | 9 (by statute) |
Website | supremecourt |
Chief Justice of the United States | |
Currently | John Roberts |
Since | September 29, 2005; 18 years ago (2005-09-29) |
This article is part of a series on the |
Supreme Court of the United States |
---|
![]() |
The Court |
Current membership |
|
Lists of justices |
|
Court functionaries |
|
This is a list of the 67 cases reported in volume 62 (21 How.) of United States Reports, decided by the Supreme Court of the United States from December 1858 to March 1859.[2]
In 1874, the U.S. government created the United States Reports, and retroactively numbered older privately-published case reports as part of the new series. As a result, cases appearing in volumes 1–90 of U.S. Reports have dual citation forms; one for the volume number of U.S. Reports, and one for the volume number of the reports named for the relevant reporter of decisions (these are called ”nominative reports”).
Starting with the 42nd volume of U.S. Reports, the Reporter of Decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States was Benjamin Chew Howard. Howard was Reporter of Decisions from 1843 to 1860, covering volumes 42 through 65 of United States Reports which correspond to volumes 1 through 24 of his Howard’s Reports. As such, the dual form of citation to, for example, New York v. Dibble is 62 U.S. (21 How.) 366 (1859).
The Supreme Court is established by Article III, Section 1 of the Constitution of the United States, which says: ”The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court . . .”. The size of the Court is not specified; the Constitution leaves it to Congress to set the number of justices. Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 Congress originally fixed the number of justices at six (one chief justice and five associate justices).[3] Since 1789 Congress has varied the size of the Court from six to seven, nine, ten, and back to nine justices (always including one chief justice). When the cases in 62 U.S. (21 How.) were decided the Court comprised these nine members:
Portrait | Justice | Office | Home State | Succeeded | Date confirmed by the Senate (Vote) |
Tenure on Supreme Court |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Roger B. Taney | Chief Justice | Maryland | John Marshall | March 15, 1836 (29–15) |
March 28, 1836 – October 12, 1864 (Died) |
![]() |
John McLean | Associate Justice | Ohio | Robert Trimble | March 7, 1829 (Acclamation) |
January 11, 1830 – April 4, 1861 (Died) |
![]() |
James Moore Wayne | Associate Justice | Georgia | William Johnson | January 9, 1835 (Acclamation) |
January 14, 1835 – July 5, 1867 (Died) |
![]() |
John Catron | Associate Justice | Tennessee | newly-created seat | March 8, 1837 (28–15) |
May 1, 1837 – May 30, 1865 (Died) |
![]() |
Peter Vivian Daniel | Associate Justice | Virginia | Philip P. Barbour | March 2, 1841 (25–5) |
January 10, 1842 – May 31, 1860 (Died) |
![]() |
Samuel Nelson | Associate Justice | New York | Smith Thompson | February 14, 1845 (Acclamation) |
February 27, 1845 – November 28, 1872 (Retired) |
![]() |
Robert Cooper Grier | Associate Justice | Pennsylvania | Henry Baldwin | August 4, 1846 (Acclamation) |
August 10, 1846 – January 31, 1870 (Retired) |
![]() |
John Archibald Campbell | Associate Justice | Alabama | John McKinley | March 22, 1853 (Acclamation) |
April 11, 1853 – April 30, 1861 (Resigned) |
![]() |
Nathan Clifford | Associate Justice | Maine | Benjamin Robbins Curtis | January 12, 1858 (26–23) |
January 21, 1858 – July 25, 1881 (Died) |
Under the Judiciary Act of 1789 the federal court structure at the time comprised District Courts, which had general trial jurisdiction; Circuit Courts, which had mixed trial and appellate (from the US District Courts) jurisdiction; and the United States Supreme Court, which had appellate jurisdiction over the federal District and Circuit courts—and for certain issues over state courts. The Supreme Court also had limited original jurisdiction (i.e., in which cases could be filed directly with the Supreme Court without first having been heard by a lower federal or state court). There were one or more federal District Courts and/or Circuit Courts in each state, territory, or other geographical region.
Bluebook citation style is used for case names, citations, and jurisdictions.
Case Name | Page & year | Opinion of the Court | Concurring opinion(s) | Dissenting opinion(s) | Lower court | Disposition of case |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The Steamer Louisiana | 1 (1858) | Campbell | none | Daniel | C.C.D. Md. | affirmed |
The Propeller Niagara | 7 (1859) | Clifford | none | none | D. Wis. | affirmed |
Union Ins. Co. v. Hoge | 35 (1859) | Nelson | none | Daniel | C.C.N.D.N.Y. | affirmed |
Leggett v. Humphreys | 66 (1859) | Daniel | none | none | C.C.S.D. Miss. | affirmed |
Richmond v. City of MilwaukeeI | 80 (1859) | Taney | none | none | D. Wis. | dismissed for want of jurisdiction |
Rice v. Minnesota & Nw. R.R. Co. | 82 (1858) | Taney | none | none | Sup. Ct. Terr. Minn. | annulment of judgment denied |
Kelsey v. Forsyth | 85 (1858) | Taney | none | none | C.C.N.D. Ill. | affirmed |
Winans v. N.Y. & Erie R.R. Co. | 88 (1859) | Grier | none | Daniel | C.C.N.D.N.Y. | affirmed |
Pennsylvania v. Ravenel | 103 (1858) | Nelson | none | Daniel | C.C.E.D. Pa. | affirmed |
Covington Drawbridge Co. v. Shepherd | 112 (1858) | Catron | none | Daniel | C.C.D. Ind. | affirmed |
Livermore v. Jenckes | 126 (1859) | Wayne | none | none | C.C.S.D.N.Y. | affirmed |
Barreda v. Silsbee | 146 (1859) | Clifford | none | none | C.C.D. Md. | affirmed |
United States v. Sutter | 170 (1859) | Campbell | none | Clifford (in part) | N.D. Cal. | affirmed (part); reversed (part) |
The Ship John Fraser | 184 (1859) | Taney | none | Nelson, Grier, Clifford | C.C.D.S.C. | reversed |
Insurance Co. v. Mordecai | 195 (1859) | Taney | none | none | C.C.W.D. Va. | dismissed for want of jurisdiction |
Philadelphia, W. & B.R.R. Co. v. Quigley | 202 (1859) | Campbell | Daniel | none | C.C.D. Md. | reversed |
Campbell v. Boyreau | 223 (1859) | Taney | none | none | C.C.N.D. Cal. | affirmed |
French’s Lessee v. Spencer | 228 (1859) | Catron | none | none | C.C.D. Ind. | affirmed |
Smith v. Orton | 241 (1859) | Catron | none | none | D. Wis. | reversed |
Allen v. Newberry | 244 (1859) | Nelson | Daniel | none | D. Wis. | affirmed |
Maguire v. Card | 248 (1859) | Nelson | none | none | C.C.D. Cal. | reversed |
Charles Belcher & Co. v. Lawrason | 251 (1859) | Nelson | none | none | C.C.E.D. La. | affirmed |
Pemberton v. Lockett | 257 (1859) | Nelson | none | none | C.C.D.C. | reversed |
Poorman v. Woodward | 266 (1859) | Catron | none | none | C.C.S.D. Ohio | affirmed |
Doe ex rel. Dickins v. Mahana | 276 (1859) | Catron | none | none | C.C.S.D. Ohio | reversed |
Hill v. Smith | 283 (1859) | Grier | none | none | C.C.D. Ind. | reversed |
Ford v. Williams | 287 (1858) | Grier | none | none | C.C.D. Md. | reversed |
Lownsdale v. Parrish | 290 (1859) | Catron | none | none | Sup. Ct. Terr. Or. | dismissed |
Morehouse v. Phelps | 294 (1859) | Catron | none | none | Ill. | reversed |
Brown v. Huger | 305 (1859) | Daniel | none | none | C.C.W.D. Va. | affirmed |
Kendall v. Winsor | 322 (1859) | Daniel | none | none | C.C.D.R.I. | affirmed |
Thomas v. Lawson | 331 (1859) | Daniel | none | none | C.C.E.D. Ark. | affirmed |
McKinlay v. Morrish | 343 (1859) | Wayne | none | none | N.D. Cal. | affirmed |
United States v. City Bank | 356 (1859) | Wayne | none | none | C.C.S.D. Ohio | affirmed |
New York ex rel. Cutler v. Dibble | 366 (1859) | Grier | none | none | Sup. Ct. N.Y. | affirmed |
N.Y. & Liverpool U.S. Mail S.S. Co. v. Rumball | 372 (1859) | Clifford | none | none | C.C.S.D.N.Y. | affirmed |
Montgomery v. Anderson | 386 (1859) | Taney | none | none | C.C.D. Mo. | reversed |
Ballance v. Forsyth | 389 (1859) | Taney | none | none | C.C.N.D. Ill. | reinstatement of case denied |
Mason v. Gamble | 390 (1859) | Taney | none | none | C.C.D. Md. | dismissed for want of jurisdiction |
Richmond v. City of MilwaukeeII | 391 (1859) | Taney | none | none | D. Wis. | reinstatement of case denied |
Porter v. Foley | 393 (1859) | Taney | none | none | Ky. Ct. App. | dismissed for want of jurisdiction |
Martin v. Imhsen | 394 (1859) | Grier | none | none | C.C.E.D. La. | affirmed |
Combs v. Hodge | 397 (1859) | Campbell | none | none | C.C.D.C. | remanded to amend pleadings |
United States v. Nye | 408 (1859) | Campbell | none | none | N.D. Cal. | reversed |
United States v. Bassett | 412 (1859) | Campbell | none | none | N.D. Cal. | reversed |
White Water Valley Canal Co. v. Vallette | 414 (1859) | Campbell | none | none | C.C.D. Ind. | affirmed |
Easton v. Salisbury | 426 (1859) | McLean | none | none | Mo. | affirmed |
McCarty v. Roots | 432 (1859) | McLean | none | none | C.C.D. Ind. | affirmed |
Pearce v. Madison & In’polis R.R. Co. | 441 (1859) | Campbell | none | none | C.C.D. Ind. | affirmed |
United States v. Fossatt | 445 (1859) | Campbell | none | none | N.D. Cal. | dismissed |
Sturgis v. Clough | 451 (1859) | Grier | none | none | C.C.S.D.N.Y. | reversed |
Western Tel. Co. v. Magnetic Tel. Co. | 456 (1859) | McLean | none | none | C.C.D. Md. | affirmed |
Western Tel. Co. v. Penniman | 460 (1859) | McLean | none | none | C.C.D. Md. | affirmed |
Converse v. United States | 463 (1859) | Taney | none | Campbell | C.C.D. Mass. | reversed |
Fenn v. Holme | 481 (1859) | Daniel | none | none | C.C.D. Md. | reversed |
Clearwater v. Meredith | 489 (1859) | McLean | none | none | C.C.D. Ind. | reversed |
Lea v. Polk County Copper Co. | 493 (1859) | Catron | none | Daniel | C.C.E.D. Tenn. | affirmed |
Ableman v. Booth | 506 (1859) | Taney | none | none | Wis. | reversed (both cases) |
Rogers v. Law | 526 (1859) | McLean | none | none | C.C.D.C. | dismissed |
Brittan v. Barnaby | 527 (1859) | Wayne | none | Daniel | C.C.D. Cal. | reversed |
Knox County v. Aspinwall | 539 (1859) | Nelson | none | Daniel | C.C.D. Ind. | affirmed |
Knox County v. Wallace | 546 (1859) | Nelson | none | none | C.C.D. Ind. | affirmed |
Chamberlain v. Ward | 548 (1859) | Clifford | none | Daniel | C.C.S.D. Ohio | affirmed |
Ward v. Chamberlain | 572 (1859) | Clifford | none | none | C.C.S.D. Ohio | affirmed |
White v. Vermont & Mass. R.R. Co. | 575 (1859) | Nelson | none | none | C.C.D. Mass. | reversed |
Walker v. Smith | 579 (1859) | Grier | none | none | C.C.D.C. | affirmed |
Barber v. Barber | 582 (1859) | Wayne | none | Daniel | D. Wis. | affirmed |