curprev23:0823:08, 1 July 2021 86.83.56.115talk 6,222 bytes+1,734 and what's up with Maud? Some sources refer to her as Margaret..., and it is unencyclopaedic to refer to her by a familiar name ....Ah -Ha! restoring cites and cited info removed by Claire when she was citing her self-published booklet... rming redundant sectionsundo
curprev22:1022:10, 1 July 2021 86.83.56.115talk 5,050 bytes−518 →Background: Ridiculous: "would have", "may have", "might have been", "C20" = unencyclopaedic ... it all appears to derive from a self-published source, which cannot be cited... and Claire de Carle spells the English shire names wrong?undo