Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Origins  





2 English Non-Juring movement  



2.1  History  





2.2  Numbers and significance  







3 Irish Non-Juring movement  





4 Scottish Non Jurors and the Scottish Episcopal Church  





5 Non Jurors in North America  





6 Prominent Nonjurors  





7 Notes  





8 References  





9 Sources  





10 External links  














Nonjuring schism: Difference between revisions






Deutsch
Nederlands
Svenska
 

Edit links
 









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Cite this page
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
Wikidata item
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 





Help
 

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


Browse history interactively
 Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
Citation bot (talk | contribs)
5,028,307 edits
Add: s2cid. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Abductive | #UCB_webform 2114/3850
 
(21 intermediate revisions by 17 users not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:

{{Use dmy dates|date=April 2022}}

{{Use dmy dates|date=April 2022}}

{{Anglicanism}}

{{Anglicanism}}

The '''Nonjuring schism''' refers to a split in the [[State religion|established]] churches of England, Scotland and Ireland, following the deposition and exile of [[James II of England|James II and VII]] in the 1688 [[Glorious Revolution]]. As a condition of office, clergy were required to swear allegiance to the ruling monarch; for various reasons, some refused to take the oath to his successors [[William III of England|William III and II]] and [[Mary II of England|Mary II]]. These individuals were referred to as ''Non-juring'', from the Latin verb ''iūrō'', or ''jūrō'', meaning "to swear an oath".

The '''Nonjuring schism''' refers to a split in the [[State religion|established]] churches of [[Church of England|England]], [[Scottish Episcopal Church|Scotland]] and [[Church of Ireland|Ireland]], following the deposition and exile of [[James II of England|James II and VII]] in the 1688 [[Glorious Revolution]]. As a condition of office, clergy were required to swear allegiance to the ruling monarch; for various reasons, some refused to take the oath to his successors [[William III of England|William III and II]] and [[Mary II of England|Mary II]]. These individuals were referred to as ''Non-juring'', from the Latin verb ''iūrō'', or ''jūrō'', meaning "to swear an oath".



In the [[Church of England]], an estimated 2% of priests refused to swear allegiance in 1689, including nine [[bishop]]s. Ordinary clergy were allowed to keep their positions but after efforts to compromise failed, the six surviving bishops were removed in 1691. The schismatic Non-Juror Church was formed in 1693 when [[William Lloyd (bishop of Norwich)|Bishop Lloyd]] appointed his own bishops. His action was opposed by the majority of English Non-Jurors, who remained within the Church of England and are sometimes referred to as "crypto-Non-Jurors". Never large in numbers, the Non-Juror Church rapidly declined after 1715, although minor congregations remained in existence until the 1770s.

In the [[Church of England]], an estimated 2% of priests refused to swear allegiance in 1689, including nine [[bishop]]s. Ordinary clergy were allowed to keep their positions but after efforts to compromise failed, the six surviving bishops were removed in 1691. The schismatic Non-Juror Church was formed in 1693 when [[William Lloyd (bishop of Norwich)|Bishop Lloyd]] appointed his own bishops. His action was opposed by the majority of English Non-Jurors, who remained within the Church of England and are sometimes referred to as "crypto-Non-Jurors". Never large in numbers, the Non-Juror Church rapidly declined after 1715, although minor congregations remained in existence until the 1770s.



In Scotland, the 1690 religious settlement removed [[High Church]] practices, Episcopal bishops and restored a [[Presbyterian polity|Presbyterian]]-structured [[Church of Scotland]], popularly known as the kirk. Those [[Minister (Christianity)|ministers]] who refused to accept these changes were expelled, leading to a divide recognised by the [[Scottish Episcopalians Act 1711]], which created a separate [[Scottish Episcopal Church]]. When [[George I of Great Britain|George I]] became king in 1714, most Scottish Episcopalians refused to swear allegiance to the [[House of Hanover|Hanoverian]] regime, creating a split that lasted until the death of [[Charles Edward Stuart|Charles Stuart]] in 1788.

In Scotland, the 1690 religious settlement removed [[High Church]] practices and Episcopal bishops, and restored a [[Presbyterian polity|Presbyterian]]-structured [[Church of Scotland]], popularly known as the kirk. Those [[Minister (Christianity)|ministers]] who refused to accept these changes were expelled, leading to a divide recognised by the [[Scottish Episcopalians Act 1711]], which created a separate [[Scottish Episcopal Church]]. When [[George I of Great Britain|George I]] became king in 1714, most Scottish Episcopalians refused to swear allegiance to the [[House of Hanover|Hanoverian]] regime, creating a split that lasted until the death of [[Charles Edward Stuart|Charles Stuart]] in 1788.



The Non-Juring movement in the [[Church of Ireland]] was insignificant, although it produced the [[Jacobitism|Jacobite]] propagandist [[Charles Leslie (nonjuror)|Charles Leslie]]. The Episcopal church in North America was then part of the Church of England, but largely unaffected until after the [[American Revolution]] when the Scottish non-juror liturgy influenced that of the new [[Episcopal Church (United States)|U.S. Episcopal Church]].

The Non-Juring movement in the [[Church of Ireland]] was insignificant, although it produced the [[Jacobitism|Jacobite]] propagandist [[Charles Leslie (nonjuror)|Charles Leslie]]. The Episcopal church in North America was then part of the Church of England, but largely unaffected until after the [[American Revolution]] when the Scottish non-juror liturgy influenced that of the new [[Episcopal Church (United States)|U.S. Episcopal Church]].

Line 15: Line 15:

[[File:AcquittalSevenBishops.jpg|thumb|left|upright=0.8|The [[Seven Bishops]], June 1688; their acquittal was a key factor in the removal of [[James II of England|James]] but five became Non-Jurors out of conscience]]

[[File:AcquittalSevenBishops.jpg|thumb|left|upright=0.8|The [[Seven Bishops]], June 1688; their acquittal was a key factor in the removal of [[James II of England|James]] but five became Non-Jurors out of conscience]]



In modern usage, [[Presbyterian polity|Presbyterian]] and [[Episcopal polity|Episcopalian]] implies differences in both governance and doctrine but this was not the case in the 17th and 18th centuries. ''Episcopalian'' structures were governed by bishops, appointed by the monarch; ''Presbyterian'' implied rule by [[Elder (Christianity)|Elder]]s, nominated by congregations. In an era when "true religion" and "true government" were assumed to be the same thing, arguments over church governance and practice often reflected political differences, not simply religious ones.{{sfn|Wedgwood|1955|pp=93-94}}

In modern usage, [[Presbyterian polity|Presbyterian]] and [[Episcopal polity|Episcopalian]] implies differences in both governance and doctrine but this was not the case in the 17th and 18th centuries. ''Episcopalian'' structures were governed by bishops, appointed by the monarch; ''Presbyterian'' implied rule by [[Elder (Christianity)|Elder]]s, nominated by congregations. In an era when "true religion" and "true government" were assumed to be the same thing, arguments over church governance and practice often reflected political differences, not simply religious ones.{{sfn|Wedgwood|1955|pp=93–94}}



In 1688, all three [[State religion|established churches]] were Episcopalian in structure and [[Protestantism|Protestant]] in doctrine, but faced different challenges. In England, over 90% belonged to the [[Church of England]], while the majority of those excluded were [[Nonconformist (Protestantism)|Protestant Nonconformists]] who wanted to reverse the [[Act of Uniformity 1662]] and be allowed to rejoin the Church.{{Sfn|Miller|1978|pp=171–172}} In Ireland, over 75% of the population were Catholic, while the [[Church of Ireland]] was a minority even among Irish Protestants, the majority of whom were Nonconformists concentrated in [[Ulster]]. Nearly 98% of Scots were members of the [[Church of Scotland]], or kirk, far closer in doctrine to Irish Noncomformists than the Church of England and an organisational hybrid, with bishops presiding over Presbyterian structures.{{sfn|McDonald|1998|pp=75–76}}

In 1688, all three [[State religion|established churches]] were Episcopalian in structure and [[Protestantism|Protestant]] in doctrine, but faced different challenges. In England, over 90% belonged to the [[Church of England]], while the majority of those excluded were [[Nonconformist (Protestantism)|Protestant Nonconformists]] who wanted to reverse the [[Act of Uniformity 1662]] and be allowed to rejoin the Church.{{Sfn|Miller|1978|pp=171–172}} In Ireland, over 75% of the population were Catholic, while the [[Church of Ireland]] was a minority even among Irish Protestants, the majority of whom were Nonconformists concentrated in [[Ulster]]. Nearly 98% of Scots were members of the [[Church of Scotland]], or kirk, far closer in doctrine to Irish Nonconformists than the Church of England and an organisational hybrid, with bishops presiding over Presbyterian structures.{{sfn|McDonald|1998|pp=75–76}}



James became king in 1685 with widespread support in all three kingdoms but this changed when his policies seemed to move beyond tolerance for Catholicism and into an attack on the established church. The 1638 to 1652 [[Wars of the Three Kingdoms]] highlighted the dangers of religious division and moderates on both sides wanted to avoid a [[schism]]. Many supported James in 1685 from fear of civil war if he were bypassed; by 1688, it seemed only his deposition could prevent one.{{sfn|Wormsley|2015|p=189}} His prosecution of the [[Seven Bishops]] for seditious libel in June 1688 alienated the [[Tories (British political party)|Tories]] who formed his main English support base. Many viewed this as a violation of his coronation oath promising to maintain the primacy of the Church of England, making compliance with oaths a key issue.{{sfn|Harris|2007|pp=179–181}}

James became king in 1685 with widespread support in all three kingdoms but this changed when his policies seemed to move beyond tolerance for Catholicism and into an attack on the established church. The 1638 to 1652 [[Wars of the Three Kingdoms]] highlighted the dangers of religious division and moderates on both sides wanted to avoid a [[schism]]. Many supported James in 1685 from fear of civil war if he were bypassed; by 1688, it seemed only his deposition could prevent one.{{sfn|Wormsley|2015|p=189}} His prosecution of the [[Seven Bishops]] for seditious libel in June 1688 alienated the [[Tories (British political party)|Tories]] who formed his main English support base. Many viewed this as a violation of his coronation oath promising to maintain the primacy of the Church of England, making compliance with oaths a key issue.{{sfn|Harris|2007|pp=179–181}}

Line 23: Line 23:

==English Non-Juring movement==

==English Non-Juring movement==



"Non-Juror" generally means those who refused to take the [[Oaths of Allegiance and Supremacy Act 1688|Oath of Allegiance]] to the new monarchs, [[William III of England|William III]] and [[Mary II of England|Mary II]]. It includes "Non-Abjurors", those who refused to swear the [[Security of the Succession, etc. Act 1701|Oath of Abjuration]] in 1701 and 1714, requiring them to deny the Stuart claim.{{sfn|Ollard|1912|p=412}} Nine bishops became Non-Jurors, including the [[Archbishop of Canterbury]], [[William Sancroft]], along with five of the seven bishops prosecuted by James in June 1688.{{efn|Church of England bishops who became Non-Jurors; [[William Sancroft]], [[Thomas Ken]], [[John Lake (bishop)|John Lake]], [[Francis Turner (bishop)|Francis Turner]], [[Thomas White (bishop)|Thomas White]], [[Thomas Cartwright (bishop)|Thomas Cartwright]], [[Robert Frampton]], [[William Lloyd (bishop of Norwich)|William Lloyd]] and [[William Thomas (bishop)|William Thomas]]}} One study estimates that 339 members of the clergy became Non Jurors, around 2% of the total; of these, 80 subsequently conformed, offset by another 130 who refused the Oath of Abjuration in either 1701 or 1714. This ignores natural decline, so the actual number at any time would have been lower, while the majority were concentrated in areas like [[London]] and [[Newcastle upon Tyne|Newcastle]], implying large parts of England were untouched by the controversy.{{sfn|Walsh|1993|p=31}}

"Non-Juror" generally means those who refused to take the [[Oaths of Allegiance and Supremacy Act 1688|Oath of Allegiance]] to the new monarchs, [[William III of England|William III]] and [[Mary II of England|Mary II]]. It includes "Non-Abjurors", those who refused to swear the [[Security of the Succession, etc. Act 1701|Oath of Abjuration]] in 1701 and 1714, requiring them to deny the Stuart claim.{{sfn|Ollard|1912|p=412}} Nine bishops became Non-Jurors, including the [[Archbishop of Canterbury]], [[William Sancroft]], along with five of the seven bishops prosecuted by James in June 1688.{{efn|Church of England bishops who became Non-Jurors; [[William Sancroft]], [[Thomas Ken]], [[John Lake (bishop)|John Lake]], [[Francis Turner (bishop)|Francis Turner]], [[Thomas White (bishop)|Thomas White]], [[Thomas Cartwright (bishop)|Thomas Cartwright]], [[Robert Frampton]], [[William Lloyd (bishop of Norwich)|William Lloyd]] and [[William Thomas (bishop of Worcester)|William Thomas]]}} One study estimates that 339 members of the clergy became Non Jurors, around 2% of the total; of these, 80 subsequently conformed, offset by another 130 who refused the Oath of Abjuration in either 1701 or 1714. This ignores natural decline, so the actual number at any time would have been lower, while the majority were concentrated in areas like [[London]] and [[Newcastle upon Tyne|Newcastle]], implying large parts of England were untouched by the controversy.{{sfn|Walsh|1993|p=31}}



Identifying lay members is more complex, since only those holding a public office were required to swear. One source identifies a total of 584 clergy, schoolmasters and university dons as Non Jurors, but this almost certainly understates their numbers.{{sfn|Overton|1902|pp=467–496}} The reasons for non-compliance varied; some, like Bishop [[Thomas Ken]], considered themselves bound by their oath to James, but did not oppose the new government and continued to attend church services. Others argued the new regime was illegitimate, since divine right and inheritance meant kings could not be removed, the so-called "state point". A more fundamental issue was the 'church point', the belief Parliament had no right to intervene in ecclesiastical affairs, whether appointing or removing bishops and clergy, or changes to church policies.{{sfn|Hastings|1917|page=395}}

Identifying lay members is more complex, since only those holding a public office were required to swear. One source identifies a total of 584 clergy, schoolmasters and university dons as Non Jurors, but this almost certainly understates their numbers.{{sfn|Overton|1902|pp=467–496}} The reasons for non-compliance varied; some, like Bishop [[Thomas Ken]], considered themselves bound by their oath to James, but did not oppose the new government and continued to attend church services. Others argued the new regime was illegitimate, since divine right and inheritance meant kings could not be removed, the so-called "state point". A more fundamental issue was the 'church point', the belief Parliament had no right to intervene in ecclesiastical affairs, whether appointing or removing bishops and clergy, or changes to church policies.{{sfn|Hastings|1917|page=395}}

Line 32: Line 32:

Regular clergy were largely undisturbed and although the Non-Juring bishops were suspended in February 1690, William kept them in office as he tried to negotiate a compromise. When this failed, in May 1691 [[Parliament of England|Parliament]] appointed six new bishops, three of the original nine having since died. In May 1692, Sancroft delegated his powers to [[William Lloyd (bishop of Norwich)|Bishop Lloyd]], who in May 1693 appointed [[Thomas Wagstaffe]] (1645–1712) and [[George Hickes (divine)|George Hickes]] (1642–1715) as new Non-Juring bishops. Lloyd argued he simply wanted to establish the principle Parliament had no right to deprive or appoint bishops, but it created a formal schism; the vast majority remained within the established church, while Wagstaffe refused to exercise his powers.{{sfn|Mitchell|1937|p=205}}

Regular clergy were largely undisturbed and although the Non-Juring bishops were suspended in February 1690, William kept them in office as he tried to negotiate a compromise. When this failed, in May 1691 [[Parliament of England|Parliament]] appointed six new bishops, three of the original nine having since died. In May 1692, Sancroft delegated his powers to [[William Lloyd (bishop of Norwich)|Bishop Lloyd]], who in May 1693 appointed [[Thomas Wagstaffe]] (1645–1712) and [[George Hickes (divine)|George Hickes]] (1642–1715) as new Non-Juring bishops. Lloyd argued he simply wanted to establish the principle Parliament had no right to deprive or appoint bishops, but it created a formal schism; the vast majority remained within the established church, while Wagstaffe refused to exercise his powers.{{sfn|Mitchell|1937|p=205}}



Some prominent Non-Jurors returned to the church in 1710, including [[Henry Dodwell]] (1641–1711), and [[Robert Nelson (nonjuror)|Robert Nelson]] (1656–1715). Hickes, whose hardline views on divine right and the primacy of Stuart authority led to his appointment as [[Charles II of England|Charles II's]] chaplain in 1683, was the main driver behind the Non Juror church; it sharply declined after his death in 1715.{{sfn|Harmsen|2008}} The death of Thomas Wagstaffe in October 1712 left Hickes as the last surviving Non-Juring bishop. To ensure the survival of the church, Hickes and two bishops from the [[Scottish Episcopalian Church]], Archibald Campbell and James Gadderar, consecrated Jeremy Collier, Nathaniel Spinckes and Samuel Hawes as bishops in June 1713.{{sfn|Overton|1902|p=150}}

Some prominent Non-Jurors returned to the church in 1710, including [[Henry Dodwell]] (1641–1711), and [[Robert Nelson (nonjuror)|Robert Nelson]] (1656–1715). Hickes, whose hardline views on divine right and the primacy of Stuart authority led to his appointment as [[Charles II of England|Charles II's]] chaplain in 1683, was the main driver behind the Non Juror church; it sharply declined after his death in 1715.{{sfn|Harmsen|2008}} The death of Thomas Wagstaffe in October 1712 left Hickes as the last surviving Non-Juring bishop. To ensure the survival of the church, Hickes and two bishops from the [[Scottish Episcopalian Church]], Archibald Campbell and James Gadderar, consecrated [[Jeremy Collier]], [[Nathaniel Spinckes]] and [[Samuel Hawes]] as bishops in June 1713.{{sfn|Overton|1902|p=150}}



In 1719, the Non-Juring church split into "Usager" and "Non-Usager" factions, with both sides consecrating their own bishops. Effectively, Non-Usagers wanted an eventual reconciliation with the main Church of England, while Usagers wanted to restore traditional liturgies, including use of the long defunct 1549 [[Book of Common Prayer]].{{sfn|Mitchell|1937|p=207}} In 1716, the Usagers initiated discussions with the [[Greek Orthodox Church]] on union, which continued until 1725 before both sides admitted failure.{{sfn|Shukman|2006|pp=175–191}} Despite the two factions agreeing to re-unite in 1732, divisions continued with a Usager contingent led by Bishop Archibald Campbell and a small London-based Non-Usager grouping under Bishop John Blackbourne.{{sfn|Robb|2013}}

In 1719, the Non-Juring church split into "Usager" and "Non-Usager" factions, with both sides consecrating their own bishops. Effectively, Non-Usagers wanted an eventual reconciliation with the main Church of England, while Usagers wanted to restore traditional liturgies, including use of the [[Book of Common Prayer (1549)|1549 ''Book of Common Prayer'']].{{sfn|Mitchell|1937|p=207}} In 1716, the Usagers initiated discussions with the [[Greek Orthodox Church]] on union, which continued until 1725 before both sides admitted failure.{{sfn|Shukman|2006|pp=175–191}} Despite the two factions agreeing to re-unite in 1732, divisions continued with a Usager contingent led by Bishop Archibald Campbell and a small London-based Non-Usager grouping under Bishop John Blackbourne.{{sfn|Robb|2013}}



By the early 1740s, significant Non-Juring congregations were restricted to Newcastle, London and [[Manchester]].{{sfn|Yates|2017|p=18}} In 1741, Robert Gordon became the last regular Non-Juring bishop, his consecration being agreed by the ''de jure'' James III; he died in 1779 and his congregation in London was absorbed by the Scottish Episcopal church. This left a small congregation in [[Holborn]], which was strongly Jacobite and in 1788 refused to acknowledge George III, before disappearing in the 1790s. Bishop Campbell was succeeded by the Usager [[Thomas Deacon]], who led a separate group in Manchester known as the Orthodox British Church, or "OBC". It strayed further away from the Church of England, investigating primitive liturgies and insisting on no State control and was Jacobite in sympathy; several members, including three of Deacon's sons, joined the [[Manchester Regiment (Jacobite)|Manchester Regiment]] that participated in the [[Jacobite rising of 1745|1745 Rising]].{{Sfn|Robb|2021|p=?}} The OBC limped on into the early nineteenth century, but was wound up within a decade after the death of Bishop William Cartwright of Shrewsbury in 1799. There are suggestions elements of its theology resurfaced in the 1830s [[Oxford Movement]].{{sfn|Mitchell|1937|p=211}}

By the early 1740s, significant Non-Juring congregations were restricted to Newcastle, London and [[Manchester]].{{sfn|Yates|2017|p=18}} In 1741, Robert Gordon became the last regular Non-Juring bishop, his consecration being agreed by the ''de jure'' James III; he died in 1779 and his congregation in London was absorbed by the Scottish Episcopal church. This left a small congregation in [[Holborn]], which was strongly Jacobite and in 1788 refused to acknowledge George III, before disappearing in the 1790s. Bishop Campbell was succeeded by the Usager [[Thomas Deacon]], who led a separate group in Manchester known as the Orthodox British Church, or "OBC". It strayed further away from the Church of England, investigating primitive liturgies and insisting on no State control and was Jacobite in sympathy; several members, including three of Deacon's sons, joined the [[Manchester Regiment (Jacobite)|Manchester Regiment]] that participated in the [[Jacobite rising of 1745|1745 Rising]].{{Sfn|Robb|2021|p=?}} The OBC limped on into the early nineteenth century, but was wound up within a decade after the death of Bishop William Cartwright of Shrewsbury in 1799. There are suggestions elements of its theology resurfaced in the 1830s [[Oxford Movement]].{{sfn|Mitchell|1937|p=211}}

Line 43: Line 43:

[[File:Lady Betty.jpg|thumb|left|upright=0.8|[[Lady Elizabeth Hastings]], typical of the High Church Tories associated with the Non Jurors, whose influence was far greater than their numbers]]

[[File:Lady Betty.jpg|thumb|left|upright=0.8|[[Lady Elizabeth Hastings]], typical of the High Church Tories associated with the Non Jurors, whose influence was far greater than their numbers]]



As a result, Stuart Catholicism was an insuperable barrier to their restoration, although attempts were made to convert James and his successors; when [[Charles Edward Stuart|Prince Charles]] visited [[London]] in 1750, he was inducted into the Non-Juring church, probably by Bishop Robert Gordon.{{efn|He later returned to the Catholic church}}{{sfn|Robb |2013}} Despite their limited numbers, Non Juror clergy exercised significant influence over church policy. Many opposed post 1689 changes that moved the Church of England away from [[Laudian]] principles of authority, and allowed greater tolerance of different practices.{{sfn|Meza |1973|pp=63–65}} This led to demands for [[Convocation]], or church assembly, to have a greater say over policy; it is suggested this was a contest between a largely Tory, High Church clerical body, and [[Whigs (British political party)|Whig]] bishops. [[Francis Atterbury]], later associated with a [[Atterbury Plot|1722 Jacobite plot]], was a prominent supporter of Convocation, although not a Non Juror himself.{{sfn|Meza|1973|p=68}}

As a result, Stuart Catholicism was an insuperable barrier to their restoration, although attempts were made to convert James and his successors; when [[Charles Edward Stuart|Prince Charles]] visited [[London]] in 1750, he was inducted into the Non-Juring church, probably by Bishop Robert Gordon.{{efn|He later returned to the Catholic church}}{{sfn|Robb |2013}} Despite their limited numbers, Non Juror clergy exercised significant influence over church policy. Many opposed post 1689 changes that moved the Church of England away from [[Laudian]] principles of authority, and allowed greater tolerance of different practices.{{sfn|Meza |1973|pp=63–65}} This led to demands for [[Convocations of Canterbury and York|Convocation]], or church assembly, to have a greater say over policy; it is suggested this was a contest between a largely Tory, High Church clerical body, and [[Whigs (British political party)|Whig]] bishops. [[Francis Atterbury]], later associated with a [[Atterbury Plot|1722 Jacobite plot]], was a prominent supporter of Convocation, although not a Non Juror himself.{{sfn|Meza|1973|p=68}}



Outside politics, the Non Juror movement had an impact far greater than often appreciated, which continues today. Lady Elizabeth was part of a network of wealthy High Church philanthropists, linked by Non-Jurors like Robert Nelson, who supported measures intended to eliminate 'un-Christian behaviour', including the conversion of Catholics and Nonconformists. In 1698, this group established the [[Society for the Propagation of Christian Knowledge]], or SPCK, followed in 1701 by the [[United Society Partners in the Gospel|Society for the Propagation of the Gospel in Foreign Parts]], or SPG, which are still in existence. Other members included [[Joseph Smith (academic)|Joseph Smith]], renowned for converting English Catholics; in 1701, the SPG sent [[George Keith (missionary)|George Keith]] to [[Province of New Jersey|New Jersey]] to do the same with [[Quakers]].{{sfn|Duncan|1973|p=239}}

Outside politics, the Non Juror movement had an impact far greater than often appreciated, which continues today. Lady Elizabeth was part of a network of wealthy High Church philanthropists, linked by Non-Jurors like Robert Nelson, who supported measures intended to eliminate 'un-Christian behaviour', such as the conversion of Catholics and Nonconformists. In 1698, they established the [[Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge]], or SPCK, followed in 1701 by the [[United Society Partners in the Gospel|Society for the Propagation of the Gospel in Foreign Parts]], or SPG, which are still in existence. Its members included academics like [[Joseph Smith (academic)|Joseph Smith]], who was a close advisor to Lady Elizabeth, and was well known for converting English Catholics.{{sfn|Laurence|2010|p=203}} In 1701, the SPG sent [[George Keith (missionary)|George Keith]] to [[Province of New Jersey|New Jersey]], charged with converting [[Quakers]].{{sfn|Duncan|1973|p=239}}



Some later became early advocates of [[Methodism]], which began as a reform movement within the Church of England. One of these was Lady Elizabeth Hastings' daughter-in-law, [[Selina Hastings, Countess of Huntingdon|Selina Hastings]] (1707–1791), founder of the evangelical Methodist sect known as the [[Countess of Huntingdon's Connexion]].{{sfn|Schlenther|2008}} Methodists were often accused of Jacobitism, because they rejected existing structures and practices; conversely, many "Jacobite" demonstrations during the 1730s were led by Tories hostile to the [[Welsh Methodist revival]].{{sfn|Monod|1993|pp=197–199}} Although associated with social conservatism, crypto Non-Jurors included [[Mary Astell]] (1666–1731), an educationalist sometimes called the first English feminist.{{sfn|Livingstone|1998|p=87}} Daughter of a wealthy, upper-class Non-Juror merchant, in 1709, she set up a girls' school in [[Chelsea, London]]. Supported by the SPCK, Nelson, Dodwell, Lady Elizabeth and [[Lady Catherine Jones]], it is thought to be the first in England with an all-women Board of Governors.{{sfn|Scott|1983|p=100}}

Some later became early advocates of [[Methodism]], which began as a reform movement within the Church of England. One of these was Lady Elizabeth Hastings' daughter-in-law, [[Selina Hastings, Countess of Huntingdon|Selina Hastings]] (1707–1791), founder of the [[Christian revival|evangelical]] Methodist sect known as the [[Countess of Huntingdon's Connexion]].{{sfn|Schlenther|2008}} Methodists were often accused of Jacobitism, because they rejected existing structures and practices; conversely, many "Jacobite" demonstrations during the 1730s were led by Tories hostile to the [[Welsh Methodist revival]].{{sfn|Monod|1993|pp=197–199}} Although associated with social conservatism, crypto Non-Jurors included [[Mary Astell]] (1666–1731), an educationalist sometimes called the first English feminist.{{sfn|Livingstone|1998|p=87}} Daughter of a wealthy, upper-class Non-Juror merchant, in 1709, she set up a girls' school in [[Chelsea, London]]. Supported by the SPCK, Nelson, Dodwell, Lady Elizabeth and [[Lady Catherine Jones]], it is thought to be the first in England with an all-women Board of Governors.{{sfn|Scott|1983|p=100}}



==Irish Non-Juring movement==

==Irish Non-Juring movement==

Line 53: Line 53:

The [[Church of Ireland]] was a minority, even among Irish Protestants, and during the 1689 [[Patriot Parliament|Parliament]] called by James, four bishops sat in the [[Irish House of Lords|Lords]], with [[Anthony Dopping|Anthony Dopping, Bishop of Meath]] acting as leader of the opposition.{{sfn|Moody|Martin|Byrne|2009|p=489}} Non Juror Henry Dodwell was born and educated in Ireland, but spent his career in England, making [[William Sheridan (Bishop of Kilmore and Ardagh)|William Sheridan, Bishop of Kilmore and Ardagh]] the most significant Irish Non Juror. Son of a Catholic convert, he lost office as a result, and later died in poverty in London. Only a handful of Irish clergy followed his example, the most notable being [[Jacobitism|Jacobite]] propagandist [[Charles Leslie (nonjuror)|Charles Leslie]].{{sfn |Higgins|2014|p=78}}

The [[Church of Ireland]] was a minority, even among Irish Protestants, and during the 1689 [[Patriot Parliament|Parliament]] called by James, four bishops sat in the [[Irish House of Lords|Lords]], with [[Anthony Dopping|Anthony Dopping, Bishop of Meath]] acting as leader of the opposition.{{sfn|Moody|Martin|Byrne|2009|p=489}} Non Juror Henry Dodwell was born and educated in Ireland, but spent his career in England, making [[William Sheridan (Bishop of Kilmore and Ardagh)|William Sheridan, Bishop of Kilmore and Ardagh]] the most significant Irish Non Juror. Son of a Catholic convert, he lost office as a result, and later died in poverty in London. Only a handful of Irish clergy followed his example, the most notable being [[Jacobitism|Jacobite]] propagandist [[Charles Leslie (nonjuror)|Charles Leslie]].{{sfn |Higgins|2014|p=78}}



As in England, many sympathised with aspects of Non Juror policy; [[John Pooley|John Pooley, Bishop of Raphoe]], avoided taking the Oath of Abjuration until 1710, while [[William Palliser (bishop)|Bishop Palliser]] was a long time correspondent of Dodwell and Non Juror historian Thomas Smith. [[Thomas Lindsay (bishop)|Bishop Lindsay]], later [[Archbishop of Armagh (Church of Ireland)|Archbishop of Armagh]], was a close friend of [[Atterbury Plot|Jacobite plotter]] Francis Atterbury, and himself accused of Jacobitism in 1714. However, most of these links appear to have been driven by friendship, rather than political belief.{{sfn|Doyle|1997|pp=32–34}}

As in England, many sympathised with aspects of Non Juror policy; [[John Pooley|John Pooley, Bishop of Raphoe]], avoided taking the Oath of Abjuration until 1710, while [[William Palliser (bishop)|Bishop Palliser]] was a long time correspondent of Dodwell and Non Juror historian [[Thomas Lindsay (bishop)|Thomas Smith. Bishop Lindsay]], later [[Archbishop of Armagh (Church of Ireland)|Archbishop of Armagh]], was a close friend of [[Atterbury Plot|Jacobite plotter]] Francis Atterbury, and himself accused of Jacobitism in 1714. However, most of these links appear to have been driven by friendship, rather than political belief.{{sfn|Doyle|1997|pp=32–34}}



==Scottish Non Jurors and the Scottish Episcopal Church==

==Scottish Non Jurors and the Scottish Episcopal Church==

Line 62: Line 62:

As in England, many remained in place; Michael Fraser served as minister of Daviot and Dunlichty continuously from 1673 to 1726, despite being evicted in 1694 and joining both the [[Jacobite rising of 1715|1715]] and [[Jacobite rising of 1719|1719]] Risings.{{sfn|Lenman|1980|p=56}} Moderates within the kirk facilitated the readmission of deprived ministers; from 1690 to 1693, 70 of the 200 returned after taking the Oath of Allegiance, plus another 116 after the 1695 Act of Toleration. In 1702, a contemporary estimated 200 of 796 parishes were held by Episcopalian ministers, but the numbers above suggest many were not Non Jurors.{{sfn|Frace |2008|p=361}}

As in England, many remained in place; Michael Fraser served as minister of Daviot and Dunlichty continuously from 1673 to 1726, despite being evicted in 1694 and joining both the [[Jacobite rising of 1715|1715]] and [[Jacobite rising of 1719|1719]] Risings.{{sfn|Lenman|1980|p=56}} Moderates within the kirk facilitated the readmission of deprived ministers; from 1690 to 1693, 70 of the 200 returned after taking the Oath of Allegiance, plus another 116 after the 1695 Act of Toleration. In 1702, a contemporary estimated 200 of 796 parishes were held by Episcopalian ministers, but the numbers above suggest many were not Non Jurors.{{sfn|Frace |2008|p=361}}



Before 1690, differences were largely about governance, but as they dwindled in numbers, Scottish Episcopalians increasingly focused on doctrine. They saw the [[Acts of Union 1707|1707 Union]] as an opportunity to regain power via a unified British church, and began using English liturgy to help this process.{{sfn|Stephen|2013|p=294}} The 1711 [[Scottish Episcopalians Act 1711|Scottish Episcopalians Act]] gave a legal basis for the [[Scottish Episcopal Church]], while the 1712 Toleration Act provided legal protection for use of the [[Book of Common Prayer]], whose rejection in 1637 sparked the [[Bishops' Wars]].{{sfn|Dickinson|2006|p=268}}

Before 1690, differences were largely about governance, but as they dwindled in numbers, Scottish Episcopalians increasingly focused on doctrine. They saw the [[Acts of Union 1707|1707 Union]] as an opportunity to regain power via a unified British church, and began using English liturgy to help this process.{{sfn|Stephen|2013|p=294}} The [[Scottish Episcopalians Act 1711]] ([[10 Ann.]] c. 10) gave a legal basis for the [[Scottish Episcopal Church]], while the [[Toleration Act 1711]] ([[10 Ann.]] c. 6) provided legal protection for use of the [[Book of Common Prayer]], whose rejection in 1637 sparked the [[Bishops' Wars]].{{sfn|Dickinson|2006|p=268}}



When [[George I of Great Britain|George I]] succeeded [[Anne, Queen of Great Britain|Queen Anne]] in 1714, the church split into a majority Non-Juror element and [[Qualified Chapel]]s, those willing to swear allegiance to the Hanoverian regime.{{sfn|Bertie|2000|p=649}} Non-Juring Episcopalianism became a mark of Jacobite commitment and a high percentage of both Lowlanders and Highlanders who participated in the 1745 Rising came from this element of Scottish society.{{sfn|Szechi|Sankey|2001|p=97}}

When [[George I of Great Britain|George I]] succeeded [[Anne, Queen of Great Britain|Queen Anne]] in 1714, the church split into a majority Non-Juror element and [[Qualified Chapel]]s, those willing to swear allegiance to the Hanoverian regime.{{sfn|Bertie|2000|p=649}} Non-Juring Episcopalianism became a mark of Jacobite commitment and a high percentage of both Lowlanders and Highlanders who participated in the 1745 Rising came from this element of Scottish society.{{sfn|Szechi|Sankey|2001|p=97}}



Post 1745, many Non-Juror meeting houses were closed or destroyed, and further restrictions placed on their clergy and congregants. When Prince Charles died in 1788, he was succeeded by his brother [[Henry Benedict Stuart|Henry]], a [[Cardinal (Catholic Church)|Catholic Cardinal]], and the Episcopal Church now swore allegiance to [[George III of the United Kingdom|George III]], ending the schism with the Qualified Chapels, although the Qualified Chapel in [[Montrose, Angus|Montrose]] remained independent until 1920.

Post 1745, many Non-Juror meeting houses were closed or destroyed, and further restrictions placed on their clergy and congregants. When Prince Charles died in 1788, he was succeeded by his brother [[Henry Benedict Stuart|Henry]], a [[Cardinal (Catholic Church)|Catholic Cardinal]], and the Episcopal Church now swore allegiance to [[George III of the United Kingdom|George III]], ending the schism with the Qualified Chapels, although the Qualified Chapel in [[Montrose, Angus|Montrose]] remained independent until 1920.

{{sfn|Bertie|2000|p=649}} In 1788 Bishop Charles Rose of Dunblane, and one presbyter, James Brown of Montrose, refused to acknowledge George III and his family, forming a breakaway nonjuring church based in Edinburgh that acknowledged Henry Stuart. However, the church finally ended in 1808 with the death of their last clergyman Donald Macintosh, a noted Gaelic scholar. When the penal laws were finally lifted in 1792, the Church had fewer than 15,000 members, less than one percent of the Scottish population.{{sfn|Dickinson|2006|p=268}} Today, the Scottish Episcopal Church is sometimes [[pejorative]]ly referred to as the "English Kirk".<ref>{{cite web|author=Published on Friday 4 April 2008 15:08 |url=http://www.lanarkgazette.co.uk/news/local-headlines/we_re_not_english_kirk_1_375144 |title=We're NOT English Kirk! - Local Headlines |publisher=Lanark Gazette |date=2008-04-04 |access-date=2012-08-13}}</ref><ref>{{cite news| url=http://news.scotsman.com/anglicanchurch/Church-fury-over-historic-mistakes.2792848.jp | location=Edinburgh | work=The Scotsman | first=Murdo | last=Macleod | title=Church fury over historic mistakes on 'English kirk' | date=16 July 2006}}</ref>

{{sfn|Bertie|2000|p=649}} In 1788 Bishop Charles Rose of Dunblane, and one presbyter, James Brown of Montrose, refused to acknowledge George III and his family, forming a breakaway nonjuring church based in Edinburgh that acknowledged Henry Stuart. However, the church finally ended in 1808 with the death of their last clergyman Donald Macintosh, a noted Gaelic scholar. When the penal laws were finally lifted in 1792, the Church had fewer than 15,000 members, less than one percent of the Scottish population.{{sfn|Dickinson|2006|p=268}} Today, the Scottish Episcopal Church is sometimes [[pejorative]]ly referred to as the "English Kirk".<ref>{{cite web|author=Published on Friday 4 April 2008 15:08 |url=http://www.lanarkgazette.co.uk/news/local-headlines/we_re_not_english_kirk_1_375144 |title=We're NOT English Kirk! Local Headlines |publisher=Lanark Gazette |date=2008-04-04 |access-date=2012-08-13}}</ref><ref>{{cite news| url=http://news.scotsman.com/anglicanchurch/Church-fury-over-historic-mistakes.2792848.jp | location=Edinburgh | work=The Scotsman | first=Murdo | last=Macleod | title=Church fury over historic mistakes on 'English kirk' | date=16 July 2006}}</ref>



==Non Jurors in North America==

==Non Jurors in North America==

Line 88: Line 88:

* [[Hilkiah Bedford]] (1663–1724), chaplain to Bishop Ken, author of ''Vindication of the Church of England'' (1710)

* [[Hilkiah Bedford]] (1663–1724), chaplain to Bishop Ken, author of ''Vindication of the Church of England'' (1710)

* John Blackbourne (1681–1741), Non-Usager Bishop

* John Blackbourne (1681–1741), Non-Usager Bishop

* Charles Booth (d. c. 1810), last consecrated irregular Non-juring bishop

* Charles Booth (d. c. 1810), last consecrated irregular nonjuring bishop

* [[William Bowyer (printer)|William Bowyer]] the Younger (1699–1777), "the learned printer"

* [[William Bowyer (printer)|William Bowyer]] the Younger (1699–1777), "the learned printer"

* [[Thomas Brett (nonjuror)|Thomas Brett]] (1667–1743), of Spring Garden, liturgical scholar, Nonjuring bishop

* [[Thomas Brett (nonjuror)|Thomas Brett]] (1667–1743), of Spring Garden, liturgical scholar, Nonjuring bishop

Line 103: Line 103:

* Robert Gordon (1703–1779), last bishop in the regular Nonjuring succession. Also called Gordoun.

* Robert Gordon (1703–1779), last bishop in the regular Nonjuring succession. Also called Gordoun.

* [[Lady Elizabeth Hastings]] (1682–1739); philanthropist, early supporter of [[Methodism]]

* [[Lady Elizabeth Hastings]] (1682–1739); philanthropist, early supporter of [[Methodism]]

* [[Thomas_Hearne_(antiquarian)|Thomas Hearne]] (1678 – 1735), antiquarian and diarist

* [[Thomas_Hearne_(antiquarian)|Thomas Hearne]] (1678–1735), antiquarian and diarist

* [[Charles Jennens]] (1700–73), librettist for [[Messiah (Handel)|Handel's ''Messiah'']], [[Saul (Handel)|S''aul'']], ''[[Belshazzar (Handel)|Belshazzar]],'' and other oratorios

* [[Charles Jennens]] (1700–73), librettist for [[Messiah (Handel)|Handel's ''Messiah'']], [[Saul (Handel)|S''aul'']], ''[[Belshazzar (Handel)|Belshazzar]],'' and other oratorios

* [[William Law]] (1686–1761)

* [[Charles Leslie (nonjuror)|Charles Leslie]] (1650–1721), Jacobite propagandist, author of ''The Rehearsal'' and ''Short and Easy Method with the Deists''

* [[Charles Leslie (nonjuror)|Charles Leslie]] (1650–1721), Jacobite propagandist, author of ''The Rehearsal'' and ''Short and Easy Method with the Deists''

* [[Robert Nelson (nonjuror)|Robert Nelson]] (1656–1715), founding member of the [[Society for the Propagation of Christian Knowledge]];

* [[Robert Nelson (nonjuror)|Robert Nelson]] (1656–1715), founding member of the [[Society for the Propagation of Christian Knowledge]];

Line 124: Line 125:


==Sources==

==Sources==

* {{cite book |editor-last1=Bertie|editor-first1=David M |title=Scottish Episcopal Clergy 1689-2000 |date=2000 |publisher=T & T Clark |isbn=978-0567087461}}

* {{cite book |editor-last1=Bertie|editor-first1=David M |title=Scottish Episcopal Clergy 1689–2000 |date=2000 |publisher=T & T Clark |isbn=978-0567087461}}

* {{cite odnb |id=28400|last1=Cornwall |first1=Robert D |title=Wagstaffe, Thomas (1645 |date=2008}}

* {{cite odnb |id=28400|last1=Cornwall |first1=Robert D |title=Wagstaffe, Thomas (1645 |date=2008}}

* {{cite odnb |id=29031|last1=Cornwall |first1=Robert |title=Welton, Richard (1671/1672-1726)|date=2004}}

* {{cite odnb |id=29031|last1=Cornwall |first1=Robert |title=Welton, Richard (1671/1672-1726)|date=2004}}

* {{cite journal |last1=Doyle |first1=Thomas |title=Jacobitism, Catholicism and the Irish Protestant Elite, 1700-1710 |journal=Eighteenth-Century Ireland / Iris an Dá Chultúr |date=1997 |volume=12 |pages=28–59 |jstor=30071383}}

* {{cite journal |last1=Doyle |first1=Thomas |title=Jacobitism, Catholicism and the Irish Protestant Elite, 1700–1710 |journal=Eighteenth-Century Ireland / Iris an Dá Chultúr |date=1997 |volume=12 |pages=28–59 |doi=10.3828/eci.1997.4 |jstor=30071383|s2cid=256147597 }}

* {{cite journal |last1=Duncan |first1=Robert William |title=A Study of the Ministry of John Talbot in New Jersey, 1702-1727: On 'Great Ripeness' Much Dedication, and Regrettable Failure |journal=Historical Magazine of the Protestant Episcopal Church |date=1973 |volume=42 |issue=3 |pages=233–256 |jstor=42973381}}

* {{cite journal |last1=Duncan |first1=Robert William |title=A Study of the Ministry of John Talbot in New Jersey, 1702-1727: On 'Great Ripeness' Much Dedication, and Regrettable Failure |journal=Historical Magazine of the Protestant Episcopal Church |date=1973 |volume=42 |issue=3 |pages=233–256 |jstor=42973381}}

* {{cite book|editor-last1=Dickinson|editor-first1=HT |title=Eighteenth Century Britain (Blackwell Companions to British History)|date=2006|publisher=John Wiley & Sons|isbn=1405149639}}

* {{cite book|editor-last1=Dickinson|editor-first1=HT |title=Eighteenth Century Britain (Blackwell Companions to British History)|date=2006|publisher=John Wiley & Sons|isbn=1405149639}}

* {{cite journal |last1=Flaningam |first1=John |title=The Occasional Conformity Controversy: Ideology and Party Politics, 1697-1711 |journal=Journal of British Studies |date=1977 |volume=17 |issue=1|pages=38–62 |doi=10.1086/385711 |s2cid=143833517 }}

* {{cite journal |last1=Flaningam |first1=John |title=The Occasional Conformity Controversy: Ideology and Party Politics, 1697-1711 |journal=Journal of British Studies |date=1977 |volume=17 |issue=1|pages=38–62 |doi=10.1086/385711 |s2cid=143833517 }}

* {{cite journal |last1=Frace |first1=Ryan K |title=Religious Toleration in the Wake of Revolution: Scotland on the Eve of Enlightenment (1688–1710s) |journal=History |date=2008 |volume=93 |issue=3 |pages=355–375 |doi=10.1111/j.1468-229X.2008.00429.x |jstor=24428394}}

* {{cite journal |last1=Frace |first1=Ryan K |title=Religious Toleration in the Wake of Revolution: Scotland on the Eve of Enlightenment (1688–1710s) |journal=History |date=2008 |volume=93 |issue=3 |pages=355–375 |doi=10.1111/j.1468-229X.2008.00429.x |jstor=24428394|doi-access=free }}

* {{cite odnb |id=13203|last1=Harmsen |first1=Theodor |title=Hickes, George (1642–1715)|date=2008}}

* {{cite odnb |id=13203|last1=Harmsen |first1=Theodor |title=Hickes, George (1642–1715)|date=2008}}

* {{cite book|last1=Harris|first1=Tim|title=Revolution; the Great Crisis of the British Monarchy 1685-1720|date=2007|publisher=Penguin|isbn=978-0141016528}}

* {{cite book|last1=Harris|first1=Tim|title=Revolution; the Great Crisis of the British Monarchy 1685–1720|date=2007|publisher=Penguin|isbn=978-0141016528}}

* {{cite book |last1=Hastings |first1=James |title=Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics; Volume IX |date=1917 |publisher=T & T Clark }}

* {{cite book |last1=Hastings |first1=James |title=Encyclopedia of Religion and Ethics; Volume IX |date=1917 |publisher=T & T Clark }}

* {{cite book |last1=Higgins|first1=Ian|editor-last1=MacInnes|editor-first1=Alan |editor-last2=Graham|editor-first2=Lesley|editor-last3=German|editor-first3=Kieran|title=Jonathan Swift's Memoirs of a Jacobite in ''Living with Jacobitism, 1690–1788: The Three Kingdoms and Beyond'' |date=2014 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1848934702}}

* {{cite book |last1=Higgins|first1=Ian|editor-last1=MacInnes|editor-first1=Alan |editor-last2=Graham|editor-first2=Lesley|editor-last3=German|editor-first3=Kieran|title=Jonathan Swift's Memoirs of a Jacobite in ''Living with Jacobitism, 1690–1788: The Three Kingdoms and Beyond'' |date=2014 |publisher=Routledge |isbn=978-1848934702}}

* {{cite journal |last1=Laurence |first1=Anne |title=Lady Betty Hastings (1682–1739): godly patron |journal=Women's History Review |date=2010 |volume=19 |issue=2 |pages=201–213 |doi=10.1080/09612021003633911|s2cid=145687985 |url=http://oro.open.ac.uk/21766/2/LaurenceWHR.pdf }}

* {{cite book |last1=Lenman |first1=Bruce |title=The Jacobite Risings in Britain 1689–1746 |date=1980 |publisher=Methuen Publishing |isbn=978-0413396501 }}

* {{cite book |last1=Lenman |first1=Bruce |title=The Jacobite Risings in Britain 1689–1746 |date=1980 |publisher=Methuen Publishing |isbn=978-0413396501 }}

* {{cite book |author-last=Livingstone|author-first= Neil |editor-last=Yun|editor-first= Lee Too |title=Pedagogy and Power: Rhetorics of Classical Learning |date=1998 |publisher=CUP |isbn=978-0521594356}}

* {{cite book |author-last=Livingstone|author-first= Neil |editor-last=Yun|editor-first= Lee Too |title=Pedagogy and Power: Rhetorics of Classical Learning |date=1998 |publisher=CUP |isbn=978-0521594356}}

Line 154: Line 156:

* {{cite odnb |id=105934|last1=Robb |first1=Steven |title=Gordon, Robert (1703-1779) |date=2013}}

* {{cite odnb |id=105934|last1=Robb |first1=Steven |title=Gordon, Robert (1703-1779) |date=2013}}

* {{cite journal|last1=Robb |first1=Steven |title=Bishop Cartwright of Shrewsbury and the Orthodox British Church|journal=Transactions of the Shropshire Archaeological and Historical Society|volume=96|year=2021}}

* {{cite journal|last1=Robb |first1=Steven |title=Bishop Cartwright of Shrewsbury and the Orthodox British Church|journal=Transactions of the Shropshire Archaeological and Historical Society|volume=96|year=2021}}

* {{cite odnb |id=12582|last1=Schlenther |first1=Boyd Stanley |title=Hastings [née Shirley], Selina, countess of Huntingdon (1707-1791) |date=2008}}

* {{cite odnb |id=12582|last1=Schlenther |first1=Boyd Stanley |title=Hastings [née Shirley], Selina, countess of Huntingdon (1707–1791) |date=2008}}

* {{cite journal |last1=Scott |first1=Beatrice |title=Lady Elizabeth Hastings |journal=The Yorkshire Archaeological Journal |date=1983 |volume=55 }}

* {{cite journal |last1=Scott |first1=Beatrice |title=Lady Elizabeth Hastings |journal=The Yorkshire Archaeological Journal |date=1983 |volume=55 }}

* {{Cite book|last=Shukman|first=Ann|editor-last=Doll|editor-first=Peter|title=The Non-Jurors, Peter the Great, and the Eastern Patriarchs in "Anglicanism and Orthodoxy: 300 Years after the Greek College in Oxford"|year=2006|publisher=Peter Lang|isbn=978-3039105809}}

* {{Cite book|last=Shukman|first=Ann|editor-last=Doll|editor-first=Peter|title=The Non-Jurors, Peter the Great, and the Eastern Patriarchs in "Anglicanism and Orthodoxy: 300 Years after the Greek College in Oxford"|year=2006|publisher=Peter Lang|isbn=978-3039105809}}

* {{cite journal |last1=Simms |first1=J.G |title=The Bishops' Banishment Act of 1697 (9 Will. III, C. 1) |journal=Irish Historical Studies |date=1970 |volume=17 |issue=66|pages=185–199 |doi=10.1017/S0021121400111381 |s2cid=191800775 }}

* {{cite journal |last1=Simms |first1=J.G |title=The Bishops' Banishment Act of 1697 (9 Will. III, C. 1) |journal=Irish Historical Studies |date=1970 |volume=17 |issue=66|pages=185–199 |doi=10.1017/S0021121400111381 |s2cid=191800775 }}

* {{cite book |last1=Stephen |first1=Jeffrey |title=Defending the Revolution: The Church of Scotland 1689–1716 |date=2013 |publisher=Ashgate |isbn=978-1409401346 }}

* {{cite book |last1=Stephen |first1=Jeffrey |title=Defending the Revolution: The Church of Scotland 1689–1716 |date=2013 |publisher=Ashgate |isbn=978-1409401346 }}

* {{cite journal|last1=Szechi|first1=Daniel|last2=Sankey|first2=Margaret|title=Elite Culture and the Decline of Scottish Jacobitism 1716-1745|journal=Past & Present|date=November 2001|volume=173}}

* {{cite journal|last1=Szechi|first1=Daniel|last2=Sankey|first2=Margaret|title=Elite Culture and the Decline of Scottish Jacobitism 1716-1745|journal=Past & Present|date=November 2001|issue=173}}

* {{cite book |last1=Szechi |first1=Daniel |title=1715: The Great Jacobite Rebellion |date=2006 |publisher=Yale University Press |isbn=978-0300111002 }}

* {{cite book |last1=Szechi |first1=Daniel |title=1715: The Great Jacobite Rebellion |date=2006 |publisher=Yale University Press |isbn=978-0300111002 }}

* {{cite journal |last1=Walker |first1=Peter |title=The Bishop Controversy, the Imperial Crisis, and Religious Radicalism in New England, 1763-74 |journal=New England Quarterly |date=2017 |volume=XC |issue=3}}

* {{cite journal |last1=Walker |first1=Peter |title=The Bishop Controversy, the Imperial Crisis, and Religious Radicalism in New England, 1763-74 |journal=New England Quarterly |date=2017 |volume=XC |issue=3}}


Latest revision as of 09:49, 23 June 2024

The Nonjuring schism refers to a split in the established churches of England, Scotland and Ireland, following the deposition and exile of James II and VII in the 1688 Glorious Revolution. As a condition of office, clergy were required to swear allegiance to the ruling monarch; for various reasons, some refused to take the oath to his successors William III and II and Mary II. These individuals were referred to as Non-juring, from the Latin verb iūrō, or jūrō, meaning "to swear an oath".

In the Church of England, an estimated 2% of priests refused to swear allegiance in 1689, including nine bishops. Ordinary clergy were allowed to keep their positions but after efforts to compromise failed, the six surviving bishops were removed in 1691. The schismatic Non-Juror Church was formed in 1693 when Bishop Lloyd appointed his own bishops. His action was opposed by the majority of English Non-Jurors, who remained within the Church of England and are sometimes referred to as "crypto-Non-Jurors". Never large in numbers, the Non-Juror Church rapidly declined after 1715, although minor congregations remained in existence until the 1770s.

In Scotland, the 1690 religious settlement removed High Church practices and Episcopal bishops, and restored a Presbyterian-structured Church of Scotland, popularly known as the kirk. Those ministers who refused to accept these changes were expelled, leading to a divide recognised by the Scottish Episcopalians Act 1711, which created a separate Scottish Episcopal Church. When George I became king in 1714, most Scottish Episcopalians refused to swear allegiance to the Hanoverian regime, creating a split that lasted until the death of Charles Stuart in 1788.

The Non-Juring movement in the Church of Ireland was insignificant, although it produced the Jacobite propagandist Charles Leslie. The Episcopal church in North America was then part of the Church of England, but largely unaffected until after the American Revolution when the Scottish non-juror liturgy influenced that of the new U.S. Episcopal Church.

Origins[edit]

The Seven Bishops, June 1688; their acquittal was a key factor in the removal of James but five became Non-Jurors out of conscience

In modern usage, Presbyterian and Episcopalian implies differences in both governance and doctrine but this was not the case in the 17th and 18th centuries. Episcopalian structures were governed by bishops, appointed by the monarch; Presbyterian implied rule by Elders, nominated by congregations. In an era when "true religion" and "true government" were assumed to be the same thing, arguments over church governance and practice often reflected political differences, not simply religious ones.[1]

In 1688, all three established churches were Episcopalian in structure and Protestant in doctrine, but faced different challenges. In England, over 90% belonged to the Church of England, while the majority of those excluded were Protestant Nonconformists who wanted to reverse the Act of Uniformity 1662 and be allowed to rejoin the Church.[2] In Ireland, over 75% of the population were Catholic, while the Church of Ireland was a minority even among Irish Protestants, the majority of whom were Nonconformists concentrated in Ulster. Nearly 98% of Scots were members of the Church of Scotland, or kirk, far closer in doctrine to Irish Nonconformists than the Church of England and an organisational hybrid, with bishops presiding over Presbyterian structures.[3]

James became king in 1685 with widespread support in all three kingdoms but this changed when his policies seemed to move beyond tolerance for Catholicism and into an attack on the established church. The 1638 to 1652 Wars of the Three Kingdoms highlighted the dangers of religious division and moderates on both sides wanted to avoid a schism. Many supported James in 1685 from fear of civil war if he were bypassed; by 1688, it seemed only his deposition could prevent one.[4] His prosecution of the Seven Bishops for seditious libel in June 1688 alienated the Tories who formed his main English support base. Many viewed this as a violation of his coronation oath promising to maintain the primacy of the Church of England, making compliance with oaths a key issue.[5]

English Non-Juring movement[edit]

"Non-Juror" generally means those who refused to take the Oath of Allegiance to the new monarchs, William III and Mary II. It includes "Non-Abjurors", those who refused to swear the Oath of Abjuration in 1701 and 1714, requiring them to deny the Stuart claim.[6] Nine bishops became Non-Jurors, including the Archbishop of Canterbury, William Sancroft, along with five of the seven bishops prosecuted by James in June 1688.[a] One study estimates that 339 members of the clergy became Non Jurors, around 2% of the total; of these, 80 subsequently conformed, offset by another 130 who refused the Oath of Abjuration in either 1701 or 1714. This ignores natural decline, so the actual number at any time would have been lower, while the majority were concentrated in areas like London and Newcastle, implying large parts of England were untouched by the controversy.[7]

Identifying lay members is more complex, since only those holding a public office were required to swear. One source identifies a total of 584 clergy, schoolmasters and university dons as Non Jurors, but this almost certainly understates their numbers.[8] The reasons for non-compliance varied; some, like Bishop Thomas Ken, considered themselves bound by their oath to James, but did not oppose the new government and continued to attend church services. Others argued the new regime was illegitimate, since divine right and inheritance meant kings could not be removed, the so-called "state point". A more fundamental issue was the 'church point', the belief Parliament had no right to intervene in ecclesiastical affairs, whether appointing or removing bishops and clergy, or changes to church policies.[9]

History[edit]

Non Juror bishop George Hickes (1642–1715), the driving force behind the schismatic Non Juror church

Regular clergy were largely undisturbed and although the Non-Juring bishops were suspended in February 1690, William kept them in office as he tried to negotiate a compromise. When this failed, in May 1691 Parliament appointed six new bishops, three of the original nine having since died. In May 1692, Sancroft delegated his powers to Bishop Lloyd, who in May 1693 appointed Thomas Wagstaffe (1645–1712) and George Hickes (1642–1715) as new Non-Juring bishops. Lloyd argued he simply wanted to establish the principle Parliament had no right to deprive or appoint bishops, but it created a formal schism; the vast majority remained within the established church, while Wagstaffe refused to exercise his powers.[10]

Some prominent Non-Jurors returned to the church in 1710, including Henry Dodwell (1641–1711), and Robert Nelson (1656–1715). Hickes, whose hardline views on divine right and the primacy of Stuart authority led to his appointment as Charles II's chaplain in 1683, was the main driver behind the Non Juror church; it sharply declined after his death in 1715.[11] The death of Thomas Wagstaffe in October 1712 left Hickes as the last surviving Non-Juring bishop. To ensure the survival of the church, Hickes and two bishops from the Scottish Episcopalian Church, Archibald Campbell and James Gadderar, consecrated Jeremy Collier, Nathaniel Spinckes and Samuel Hawes as bishops in June 1713.[12]

In 1719, the Non-Juring church split into "Usager" and "Non-Usager" factions, with both sides consecrating their own bishops. Effectively, Non-Usagers wanted an eventual reconciliation with the main Church of England, while Usagers wanted to restore traditional liturgies, including use of the 1549 Book of Common Prayer.[13] In 1716, the Usagers initiated discussions with the Greek Orthodox Church on union, which continued until 1725 before both sides admitted failure.[14] Despite the two factions agreeing to re-unite in 1732, divisions continued with a Usager contingent led by Bishop Archibald Campbell and a small London-based Non-Usager grouping under Bishop John Blackbourne.[15]

By the early 1740s, significant Non-Juring congregations were restricted to Newcastle, London and Manchester.[16] In 1741, Robert Gordon became the last regular Non-Juring bishop, his consecration being agreed by the de jure James III; he died in 1779 and his congregation in London was absorbed by the Scottish Episcopal church. This left a small congregation in Holborn, which was strongly Jacobite and in 1788 refused to acknowledge George III, before disappearing in the 1790s. Bishop Campbell was succeeded by the Usager Thomas Deacon, who led a separate group in Manchester known as the Orthodox British Church, or "OBC". It strayed further away from the Church of England, investigating primitive liturgies and insisting on no State control and was Jacobite in sympathy; several members, including three of Deacon's sons, joined the Manchester Regiment that participated in the 1745 Rising.[17] The OBC limped on into the early nineteenth century, but was wound up within a decade after the death of Bishop William Cartwright of Shrewsbury in 1799. There are suggestions elements of its theology resurfaced in the 1830s Oxford Movement.[18]

Numbers and significance[edit]

Membership of the schismatic church was initially confined to clerics, then later expanded into the lay population. Largely restricted to urban areas, its congregations continually shifted, making it difficult to assess numbers; it is suggested these were negligible, certainly fewer than Catholics, who were around 1% of the population.[19] Many more were so-called 'crypto-Non Jurors', those who remained with the established church after 1693, but shared some Non Juror concerns; while sympathetic to the Stuarts, only a few were active Jacobites. Typical of this High Church, Tory group was Lady Elizabeth Hastings, daughter of the Earl of Huntingdon, a Stuart loyalist. Their support was based on the 'church point', and they opposed measures seen as diminishing the primacy of the Church of England. These included the 1689 Toleration Act, and 'occasional conformity', allowing Catholics and Nonconformists limited freedom of worship.[20]

Lady Elizabeth Hastings, typical of the High Church Tories associated with the Non Jurors, whose influence was far greater than their numbers

As a result, Stuart Catholicism was an insuperable barrier to their restoration, although attempts were made to convert James and his successors; when Prince Charles visited London in 1750, he was inducted into the Non-Juring church, probably by Bishop Robert Gordon.[b][15] Despite their limited numbers, Non Juror clergy exercised significant influence over church policy. Many opposed post 1689 changes that moved the Church of England away from Laudian principles of authority, and allowed greater tolerance of different practices.[21] This led to demands for Convocation, or church assembly, to have a greater say over policy; it is suggested this was a contest between a largely Tory, High Church clerical body, and Whig bishops. Francis Atterbury, later associated with a 1722 Jacobite plot, was a prominent supporter of Convocation, although not a Non Juror himself.[22]

Outside politics, the Non Juror movement had an impact far greater than often appreciated, which continues today. Lady Elizabeth was part of a network of wealthy High Church philanthropists, linked by Non-Jurors like Robert Nelson, who supported measures intended to eliminate 'un-Christian behaviour', such as the conversion of Catholics and Nonconformists. In 1698, they established the Society for Promoting Christian Knowledge, or SPCK, followed in 1701 by the Society for the Propagation of the Gospel in Foreign Parts, or SPG, which are still in existence. Its members included academics like Joseph Smith, who was a close advisor to Lady Elizabeth, and was well known for converting English Catholics.[23] In 1701, the SPG sent George KeithtoNew Jersey, charged with converting Quakers.[24]

Some later became early advocates of Methodism, which began as a reform movement within the Church of England. One of these was Lady Elizabeth Hastings' daughter-in-law, Selina Hastings (1707–1791), founder of the evangelical Methodist sect known as the Countess of Huntingdon's Connexion.[25] Methodists were often accused of Jacobitism, because they rejected existing structures and practices; conversely, many "Jacobite" demonstrations during the 1730s were led by Tories hostile to the Welsh Methodist revival.[26] Although associated with social conservatism, crypto Non-Jurors included Mary Astell (1666–1731), an educationalist sometimes called the first English feminist.[27] Daughter of a wealthy, upper-class Non-Juror merchant, in 1709, she set up a girls' school in Chelsea, London. Supported by the SPCK, Nelson, Dodwell, Lady Elizabeth and Lady Catherine Jones, it is thought to be the first in England with an all-women Board of Governors.[28]

Irish Non-Juring movement[edit]

The Church of Ireland was a minority, even among Irish Protestants, and during the 1689 Parliament called by James, four bishops sat in the Lords, with Anthony Dopping, Bishop of Meath acting as leader of the opposition.[29] Non Juror Henry Dodwell was born and educated in Ireland, but spent his career in England, making William Sheridan, Bishop of Kilmore and Ardagh the most significant Irish Non Juror. Son of a Catholic convert, he lost office as a result, and later died in poverty in London. Only a handful of Irish clergy followed his example, the most notable being Jacobite propagandist Charles Leslie.[30]

As in England, many sympathised with aspects of Non Juror policy; John Pooley, Bishop of Raphoe, avoided taking the Oath of Abjuration until 1710, while Bishop Palliser was a long time correspondent of Dodwell and Non Juror historian Thomas Smith. Bishop Lindsay, later Archbishop of Armagh, was a close friend of Jacobite plotter Francis Atterbury, and himself accused of Jacobitism in 1714. However, most of these links appear to have been driven by friendship, rather than political belief.[31]

Scottish Non Jurors and the Scottish Episcopal Church[edit]

Charles Stuart; after his death in 1788, the Scottish Episcopal Church ended the schism by taking the Oath to George III

English Non Juring was largely a split within Episcopalianism, but this was not the case in Scotland, where the religious conflicts of the 17th century normalised the eviction of defeated opponents. In 1688, Scots were divided roughly equally into Presbyterians and Episcopalians, the latter concentrated in the Highlands, Banffshire, Perthshire, Angus and Aberdeenshire. The 1690 General Assembly of the Church of Scotland abolished bishops and expelled 200 ministers who refused to accept these changes.[32]

As in England, many remained in place; Michael Fraser served as minister of Daviot and Dunlichty continuously from 1673 to 1726, despite being evicted in 1694 and joining both the 1715 and 1719 Risings.[33] Moderates within the kirk facilitated the readmission of deprived ministers; from 1690 to 1693, 70 of the 200 returned after taking the Oath of Allegiance, plus another 116 after the 1695 Act of Toleration. In 1702, a contemporary estimated 200 of 796 parishes were held by Episcopalian ministers, but the numbers above suggest many were not Non Jurors.[34]

Before 1690, differences were largely about governance, but as they dwindled in numbers, Scottish Episcopalians increasingly focused on doctrine. They saw the 1707 Union as an opportunity to regain power via a unified British church, and began using English liturgy to help this process.[35] The Scottish Episcopalians Act 1711 (10 Ann. c. 10) gave a legal basis for the Scottish Episcopal Church, while the Toleration Act 1711 (10 Ann. c. 6) provided legal protection for use of the Book of Common Prayer, whose rejection in 1637 sparked the Bishops' Wars.[36]

When George I succeeded Queen Anne in 1714, the church split into a majority Non-Juror element and Qualified Chapels, those willing to swear allegiance to the Hanoverian regime.[37] Non-Juring Episcopalianism became a mark of Jacobite commitment and a high percentage of both Lowlanders and Highlanders who participated in the 1745 Rising came from this element of Scottish society.[38]

Post 1745, many Non-Juror meeting houses were closed or destroyed, and further restrictions placed on their clergy and congregants. When Prince Charles died in 1788, he was succeeded by his brother Henry, a Catholic Cardinal, and the Episcopal Church now swore allegiance to George III, ending the schism with the Qualified Chapels, although the Qualified Chapel in Montrose remained independent until 1920. [37] In 1788 Bishop Charles Rose of Dunblane, and one presbyter, James Brown of Montrose, refused to acknowledge George III and his family, forming a breakaway nonjuring church based in Edinburgh that acknowledged Henry Stuart. However, the church finally ended in 1808 with the death of their last clergyman Donald Macintosh, a noted Gaelic scholar. When the penal laws were finally lifted in 1792, the Church had fewer than 15,000 members, less than one percent of the Scottish population.[36] Today, the Scottish Episcopal Church is sometimes pejoratively referred to as the "English Kirk".[39][40]

Non Jurors in North America[edit]

William White, appointed Episcopalian bishop of Pennsylvania in 1787

The political conflicts of the 1688 Glorious Revolution were reflected to a lesser degree in British North America and the Caribbean. The proximity of Catholic New France meant limited sympathy for James; in 1700, New York banned Catholic priests from the state. However, Virginia removed several Non Jurors from office in 1691.[41]

Richard Welton became a Non Juror in 1714, losing his parish in Whitechapel as a result; in 1724, he was ordained a bishop by Non-Usager Ralph Taylor, and moved to North America. He replaced John Urmiston as RectorofChrist Church, Philadelphia; Urmiston demanded he be reinstated, and the dispute drew in John Talbot, rector of St. Mary's Episcopal Church, Burlington, New Jersey since April 1704.[42]

Episcopalian ministers were in short supply in North America, one reason being delays caused by the need for London to approve appointments; between 1712 and 1720, Talbot presented numerous petitions requesting the appointment of a bishop.[43] On a visit to England in 1722, Taylor made him a Non Juror bishop, and when Pennsylvania Governor Sir William Keith informed the church authorities, Talbot and Welton were suspended. Talbot remained in North America, where he died in 1727; Welton returned to England in 1726, dying shortly afterwards in Portugal.[44]

Failure to establish a colonial episcopate was partly due to opposition by American Nonconformists; combined with the activities of the SPG, they viewed it as an attempt to impose a state church. In 1815, John Adams claimed a key element in mobilising popular support for the 1773 American Revolution was the "apprehension of Episcopacy”.[45]

After the outbreak of the Revolution, many Episcopal ministers remained loyal to the London government, and were removed. In Pennsylvania, most supported the Patriots, including William White, who set out principles establishing the American Episcopal Church. These were accepted by all the states, apart from Connecticut, which insisted each state must be controlled by its own bishop.[46]

Connecticut sent Loyalist Samuel Seabury to England to be made a bishop, but since he could not take the required Oath of Allegiance to George III, he was consecrated instead by the Scottish church in November 1784. Concerned at the prospect of another schism, Parliament agreed to waive the oath, and on 4 February 1787, White was consecrated Bishop of Pennsylvania by the Archbishop of Canterbury.[46]

Prominent Nonjurors[edit]

Notes[edit]

  • ^ He later returned to the Catholic church
  • References[edit]

    1. ^ Wedgwood 1955, pp. 93–94.
  • ^ Miller 1978, pp. 171–172.
  • ^ McDonald 1998, pp. 75–76.
  • ^ Wormsley 2015, p. 189.
  • ^ Harris 2007, pp. 179–181.
  • ^ Ollard 1912, p. 412.
  • ^ Walsh 1993, p. 31.
  • ^ Overton 1902, pp. 467–496.
  • ^ Hastings 1917, p. 395.
  • ^ Mitchell 1937, p. 205.
  • ^ Harmsen 2008.
  • ^ Overton 1902, p. 150.
  • ^ Mitchell 1937, p. 207.
  • ^ Shukman 2006, pp. 175–191.
  • ^ a b Robb 2013.
  • ^ Yates 2017, p. 18.
  • ^ Robb 2021, p. ?.
  • ^ Mitchell 1937, p. 211.
  • ^ Szechi 2006, p. 54.
  • ^ Flaningam 1977, pp. 39–41.
  • ^ Meza 1973, pp. 63–65.
  • ^ Meza 1973, p. 68.
  • ^ Laurence 2010, p. 203.
  • ^ Duncan 1973, p. 239.
  • ^ Schlenther 2008.
  • ^ Monod 1993, pp. 197–199.
  • ^ Livingstone 1998, p. 87.
  • ^ Scott 1983, p. 100.
  • ^ Moody, Martin & Byrne 2009, p. 489.
  • ^ Higgins 2014, p. 78.
  • ^ Doyle 1997, pp. 32–34.
  • ^ Lynch 1992, p. 300.
  • ^ Lenman 1980, p. 56.
  • ^ Frace 2008, p. 361.
  • ^ Stephen 2013, p. 294.
  • ^ a b Dickinson 2006, p. 268.
  • ^ a b Bertie 2000, p. 649.
  • ^ Szechi & Sankey 2001, p. 97.
  • ^ Published on Friday 4 April 2008 15:08 (4 April 2008). "We're NOT English Kirk! – Local Headlines". Lanark Gazette. Retrieved 13 August 2012.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  • ^ Macleod, Murdo (16 July 2006). "Church fury over historic mistakes on 'English kirk'". The Scotsman. Edinburgh.
  • ^ Parrish 2013, p. 47.
  • ^ Duncan 1973, p. 241.
  • ^ Duncan 1973, pp. 250–252.
  • ^ Cornwall 2004.
  • ^ Walker 2017, pp. 306–308.
  • ^ a b Mills 2004.
  • Sources[edit]

    External links[edit]


    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Nonjuring_schism&oldid=1230542575"

    Categories: 
    Anglicanism
    History of the Church of England
    History of the British Isles
    Schisms in Christianity
    Nonjurors of the Glorious Revolution
    Jacobitism
    James II of England
    Glorious Revolution
    Oaths of allegiance
    Hidden categories: 
    CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list
    Articles with short description
    Short description is different from Wikidata
    Use dmy dates from April 2022
    Wikipedia articles incorporating a citation from the ODNB
    Pages using cite ODNB with id parameter
    CS1 errors: generic name
    CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list
    Articles with J9U identifiers
    Articles with LCCN identifiers
     



    This page was last edited on 23 June 2024, at 09:49 (UTC).

    Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



    Privacy policy

    About Wikipedia

    Disclaimers

    Contact Wikipedia

    Code of Conduct

    Developers

    Statistics

    Cookie statement

    Mobile view



    Wikimedia Foundation
    Powered by MediaWiki