Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Introduction  





2 Basic operating mechanism  



2.1  Glow discharge  





2.2  Types of reactors  





2.3  Physical process characteristics  





2.4  Kinetics  







3 Synthetic routes  





4 Common monomers/polymers  



4.1  Monomers  





4.2  Polymers  







5 General characteristics of plasma polymers  





6 Advantages and disadvantages  





7 Applications  





8 References  














Plasma polymerization: Difference between revisions






Deutsch
فارسی

 

Edit links
 









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Cite this page
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
Wikidata item
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 
















Appearance
   

 





Help
 

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


Browse history interactively
 Previous edit
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
RohanBari (talk | contribs)
3 edits
improved grammar
 
(45 intermediate revisions by 32 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:

{{Use dmy dates|date=November 2020}}

'''Plasma polymerization''' (or '''glow discharge polymerization''') uses [[plasma sources]] to generate a [[gas discharge]] that provides energy to activate or [[fragmentation (chemistry)|fragment]] [[gaseous]] or liquid [[monomer]], often containing a [[vinyl]] group, in order to initiate [[polymerization]]. [[Polymers]] formed from this technique are generally highly branched and highly [[cross-linked]], and adhere to solid surfaces well. The biggest advantage to this process is that polymers can be directly attached to a desired surface while the chains are growing, which reduces steps necessary for other [[coating]] processes such as [[grafting]]. This is very useful for pinhole-free coatings of 100 [[picometers]] to 1 micrometre thickness with [[solvent]] [[insoluble]] polymers.<ref name=Glow>{{cite journal|last=Yasuda|first=H.|title=Glow Discharge Polymerization|journal=Journal of Polymer Science: Macromolecular Reviews|year=1981|volume=16|issue=1|doi=10.1002/pol.1981.230160104}}</ref>

'''Plasma polymerization''' (or '''glow discharge polymerization''') uses [[plasma sources]] to generate a [[gas discharge]] that provides energy to activate or [[fragmentation (chemistry)|fragment]] [[gaseous]] or liquid [[monomer]], often containing a [[vinyl group]], in order to initiate [[polymerization]]. [[Polymers]] formed from this technique are generally highly branched and highly [[cross-linked]], and adhere to solid surfaces well. The biggest advantage to this process is that polymers can be directly attached to a desired surface while the chains are growing, which reduces steps necessary for other [[coating]] processes such as [[grafting]]. This is very useful for pinhole-free coatings of 100 [[picometers]] to 1-micrometer thickness with [[solvent]] [[insoluble]] polymers.<ref name=Glow>{{cite journal|last=Yasuda|first=H.|title=Glow Discharge Polymerization|journal=Journal of Polymer Science: Macromolecular Reviews|date=1981|volume=16|issue=1|doi=10.1002/pol.1981.230160104|pages=199–293}}</ref>



==Introduction==

==Introduction==

In as early as the 1870s “polymers” formed by this process were known, but these polymers were initially thought of as undesirable [[byproducts]] associated with [[electric discharge]], with little attention being given to their properties.<ref name=Glow /> It was not until the 1960s that the properties of these polymers where found to be useful.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Goodman|first=J|title=The formation of thin polymer films in the gas discharge|journal=Journal of Polymer Science|year=1960|volume=44|issue=144|pages=551–552|doi=10.1002/pol.1960.1204414428|bibcode = 1960JPoSc..44..551G }}</ref> It was found that flawless thin polymeric coatings could be formed on [[metals]], although for very thin films (<10mm) this has recently been shown to be an oversimplification.<ref>.Michelmore, P. Martinek, V. Sah, R.D. Short, K.Vasilev, Plasma Processes Polym., 2011,8, 367-372 DOI: 10.1002/ppap.201000140</ref><ref>Rodney T. Chen, Benjamin W. Muir,Lars Thomsen, Anton Tadich, Bruce C. C. Cowie, Georgina K. Such, Almar Postma,Keith M. McLean, and Frank Caruso, New Insights into the Substrate Plasma Polymer Interface, J Phys Chem B., 2011, 115, 6495–6502 dx.doi.org/10.1021/jp200864k</ref> By selecting the monomer type and the [[energy density]] per monomer, known as the Yasuda parameter, the [[chemical composition]] and structure of the resulting [[thin film]] can be varied with a wide range. These films are usually [[inert]], [[adhesive]], and have low [[dielectric constant]]s.<ref name=Glow /> Some common monomers polymerized by this method include styrene, ethylene, methacrylate and pyridine, just to name a few. The 1970s brought about many advances in plasma polymerization, including the polymerization of many different types of monomers. The mechanisms of deposition however were largely ignored until more recently. Since this time most attention devoted to plasma polymerization has been in the fields of coatings, but since it is difficult to control polymer structure, it has limited applications.

In as early as the 1870s "polymers" formed by this process were known, but these polymers were initially thought of as undesirable [[byproducts]] associated with [[electric discharge]], with little attention being given to their properties.<ref name=Glow /> It was not until the 1960s that the properties of these polymers were found to be useful.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Goodman|first=J|title=The formation of thin polymer films in the gas discharge|journal=Journal of Polymer Science|date=1960|volume=44|issue=144|pages=551–552|doi=10.1002/pol.1960.1204414428|bibcode = 1960JPoSc..44..551G }}</ref> It was found that flawless thin polymeric coatings could be formed on [[metals]], although for very thin films (<10nm) this has recently been shown to be an oversimplification.<ref>{{cite journal | doi = 10.1002/ppap.201000140| title = Surface Morphology in the Early Stages of Plasma Polymer Film Growth from Amine-Containing Monomers| journal = Plasma Processes and Polymers| volume =8| issue = 5| pages = 367| year = 2011| last1 = Michelmore| first1 = Andrew| last2 = Martinek| first2 = Petr| last3 = Sah| first3 = Vasu| last4 = Short| first4 = Robert D| last5 = Vasilev| first5 = Krasimir}}</ref><ref>{{cite journal | doi = 10.1021/jp200864k| pmid = 21542588| title = New Insights into the Substrate–Plasma Polymer Interface| journal = The Journal of Physical Chemistry B| volume = 115| issue = 20| pages = 6495–502| year = 2011| last1 = Chen| first1 = Rodney T| last2 = Muir| first2 = Benjamin W| last3 = Thomsen| first3 = Lars| last4 = Tadich| first4 = Anton| last5 = Cowie| first5 = Bruce C. C| last6 = Such| first6 = Georgina K| last7 = Postma| first7 = Almar| last8 = McLean| first8 = Keith M| last9 = Caruso| first9 = Frank}}</ref> By selecting the monomer type and the [[energy density]] per monomer, known as the Yasuda parameter, the [[chemical composition]] and structure of the resulting [[thin film]] can be varied with a wide range. These films are usually [[Chemically inert|inert]], [[adhesive]], and have low [[dielectric constant]]s.<ref name=Glow /> Some common monomers polymerized by this method include styrene, ethylene, methacrylate, and pyridine, just to name a few. The 1970s brought about many advances in plasma polymerization, including the polymerization of many different types of monomers. The mechanisms of deposition however were largely ignored until more recently. Since this time most attention devoted to plasma polymerization has been in the fields of coatings, but since it is difficult to control polymer structure, it has limited applications.



==Basic operating mechanism==

==Basic operating mechanism==

[[File:Glow Discharge apparatus color.png|thumb|300px|right|Figure 1. Schematic representation of basic internal electrode glow discharge polymerization apparatus.]]

[[File:Glow Discharge apparatus color.png|thumb|300px|right|Figure 1. Schematic representation of basic internal electrode glow discharge polymerization apparatus]]



===Glow discharge===

===Glow discharge===

Plasma consists of a mixture of electrons, ions, radicals, neutrals and photons.<ref>A.Michelmore, D.A. Steele, J.D. Whittle, J.W. Bradley, R.D. Short, Nanoscale DepositionofChemically Functionalised Films via Plasma Polymerisation. RSC Advances, 2013,3, 13540. DOI: 10.1039/c3ra41563e [http://www.unisa.edu.au/Global/ITEE/MAWSON%20INSTITUTE/Plasma_RSCAdv_2013_3_13450-13557.pdf]</ref> Some of these species are in local thermodynamic equilibrium, while others are not. Even for simple gases like argon this mixture can be complex. For plasmas of organic monomers, the complexity can rapidly increase as some components of the plasma fragment, while others interact and form larger species. [[Glow discharge]] is a technique in polymerization which forms [[free electrons]] which gain energy from an [[electric field]], and then lose energy through [[collision]]s with neutral [[molecule]]s in the [[gas phase]]. This leads to many chemically reactive species, which then lead to a plasma polymerization reaction.<ref name=Shen>{{cite book|last=Shen|first=Mitchel|title=Plasma Polymerization|year=1979|publisher=American Chemical Society|location=Washington D.C.|isbn=0-8412-0510-8|coauthors=Alexis T. Bell}}</ref> The electric discharge process for plasma polymerization is the “low-temperature plasma” method, because higher temperatures cause [[Chemical decomposition|degradation]]. These plasmas are formed by a [[direct current]], [[alternating current]] or [[radio frequency]] generator.<ref name=Yasuda>{{cite book|last=Yasuda|first=H,|title=Plasma Polymerization|year=1985|publisher=Academic Press, Inc.|location=Orlando, Fl|isbn=0-12-768760-2}}</ref>

Plasma consists of a mixture of electrons, ions, radicals, neutrals, and photons.<ref>{{cite journal | doi = 10.1039/c3ra41563e | title = Nanoscale depositionofchemically functionalized films via plasma polymerization | journal = RSC Advances | volume =3 | issue = 33 | pages = 13540 | year = 2013 | last1 = Michelmore | first1 = Andrew | last2 = Steele | first2 = David A | last3 = Whittle | first3 = Jason D | last4 = Bradley | first4 = James W | last5 = Short | first5 = Robert D }}</ref> Some of these species are in local thermodynamic equilibrium, while others are not. Even for simple gases like argon, this mixture can be complex. For plasmas of organic monomers, the complexity can rapidly increase as some components of the plasma fragment, while others interact and form larger species. [[Glow discharge]] is a technique in polymerization which forms [[Free particle|free electrons]] which gain energy from an [[electric field]], and then lose energy through [[collision]]s with neutral [[molecule]]s in the [[gas phase]]. This leads to many chemically reactive species, which then leads to a plasma polymerization reaction.<ref name=Shen>{{cite book|last=Shen|first=Mitchel|title=Plasma Polymerization|date=1979|publisher=American Chemical Society|location=Washington D.C.|isbn=978-0-8412-0510-9|author2=Alexis T. Bell }}</ref> The electric discharge process for plasma polymerization is the "low-temperature plasma" method because higher temperatures cause [[Chemical decomposition|degradation]]. These plasmas are formed by a [[direct current]], [[alternating current]] or [[radio frequency]] generator.<ref name=Yasuda>{{cite book|last=Yasuda|first=H.|title=Plasma Polymerization|date=1985|publisher=Academic Press, Inc.|location=Orlando, Fl|isbn=978-0-12-768760-5}}</ref>



===Types of reactors===

===Types of reactors===

There are a few designs for apparatus used in plasma polymerization, one of which is the Bell (static type), in which monomer gas is put into the reaction chamber, but does not flow through the chamber. It comes in and polymerizes without removal. This type of [[Chemical reactor|reactor]] is shown in Figure 1.<ref name=Westwood>{{cite journal|last=Westwood|first=A.R.|title=Glow Discharge Polymerization-I Rates and Mechanisms of Polymer Formation|journal=European Polymer Journal|date=March 1971|volume=7|pages=363–375|doi=10.1016/0014-3057(71)90007-3}}</ref> This reactor has internal [[electrode]]s, and polymerization generally takes place on the [[cathode]] side. All devices contain the [[thermostat]]ic bath, which is used to regulate temperature, and a vacuum to regulate pressure.<ref name=Shen />

There are a few designs for apparatus used in plasma polymerization, one of which is the Bell (static type), in which monomer gas is put into the reaction chamber, but does not flow through the chamber. It comes in and polymerizes without removal. This type of [[Chemical reactor|reactor]] is shown in Figure 1.<ref name=Westwood>{{cite journal|last=Westwood|first=A.R.|title=Glow Discharge Polymerization-I Rates and Mechanisms of Polymer Formation|journal=European Polymer Journal|date=March 1971|volume=7|issue=4|pages=363–375|doi=10.1016/0014-3057(71)90007-3}}</ref> This reactor has internal [[electrode]]s, and polymerization commonly takes place on the [[cathode]] side. All devices contain the [[thermostat]]ic bath, which is used to regulate temperature, and a vacuum to regulate pressure.<ref name=Shen />



Operation: The monomer gas comes into the Bell type reactor as a gaseous species, and then is put into the plasma state by the electrodes, in which the plasma may consist of [[radical (chemistry)|radical]]s, [[anions]] and [[cations]]. These monomers are then polymerized on the cathode surface, or some other surface placed in the apparatus by different mechanisms of which details are discussed below. The deposited polymers then [[wave propagation|propagate]] off the surface and form growing chains with seemingly uniform consistency.

Operation: The monomer gas comes into the Bell-type reactor as a gaseous species, and then is put into the plasma state by the electrodes, in which the plasma may consist of [[radical (chemistry)|radical]]s, [[anions]] and [[cations]]. These monomers are then polymerized on the cathode surface, or some other surface placed in the apparatus by different mechanisms of which details are discussed below. The deposited polymers then [[wave propagation|propagate]] off the surface and form growing chains with seemingly uniform consistency.



Another popular reactor type is the flow through reactor ([[continuous flow reactor]]), which also has internal electrodes, but this reactor allows monomer gas to flow through the reaction chamber as its name implies, which should give a more even coating for polymer film deposition.<ref name=Yasuda /> It has the advantage that more monomer keeps flowing into the reactor in order to deposit more polymer. It has the disadvantage of forming what is called “tail flame, which is when polymerization extends into the vacuum line.

Another popular reactor type is the flow-through reactor ([[continuous flow reactor]]), which also has internal electrodes, but this reactor allows monomer gas to flow through the reaction chamber as its name implies, which should give a more even coating for polymer film deposition.<ref name=Yasuda /> It has the advantage that more monomer keeps flowing into the reactor to deposit more polymer. It has the disadvantage of forming what is called "tail flame", which is when polymerization extends into the vacuum line.



A third popular type of reactor is the electrodeless.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Yasuda|first=H.|coauthors=Lamaze, C. E.|title=Polymerization of styrene in an electrodeless glow discharge|journal=Journal of Applied Polymer Science|year=1971|volume=15|issue=9|pages=2277–2292|doi=10.1002/app.1971.070150918|accessdate=20 March 2011}}</ref> This uses an RF coil wrapped around the glass apparatus, which then uses a radio frequency generator to form the plasma inside of the housing without the use of direct electrodes. The polymer can then be deposited as it is pushed through this RF coil toward the vacuum end of the apparatus. This has the advantage of not having polymer building up on the electrode surface, which is desirable when polymerizing onto other surfaces.

A third popular type of reactor is the electrodeless.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Yasuda|first=H.|author2=Lamaze, C. E. |title=Polymerization of styrene in an electrodeless glow discharge|journal=Journal of Applied Polymer Science|date=1971|volume=15|issue=9|pages=2277–2292|doi=10.1002/app.1971.070150918}}<!--|accessdate=20 March 2011--></ref> This uses an RF coil wrapped around the glass apparatus, which then uses a radio frequency generator to form the plasma inside of the housing without the use of direct electrodes (see [[Inductively coupled plasma|Inductively Coupled Plasma]]). The polymer can then be deposited as it is pushed through this RF coil toward the vacuum end of the apparatus. This has the advantage of not having polymer building up on the electrode surface, which is desirable when polymerizing onto other surfaces.



A fourth type of system growing in popularity is the [[atmospheric-pressure plasma]] system, which is useful for depositing thin polymer films.<ref name=atm>{{cite journal|last=Noeske|first=M|title=Plasma jet treatment of five polymers at atmospheric pressure: surface modifications and the relevance for adhesion|journal=International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives|year=2004|volume=24|issue=2|pages=171–177|doi=10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2003.09.006}}</ref> This system bypasses the requirements for special hardware involving vacuums, which then makes it favorable for integrated industrial use. It has been shown that that polymers formed at atmospheric-pressure can have similar properties for coatings as those found in the low-pressure systems.

A fourth type of system growing in popularity is the [[atmospheric-pressure plasma]] system, which is useful for depositing thin polymer films.<ref name=atm>{{cite journal|last=Noeske|first=M|title=Plasma jet treatment of five polymers at atmospheric pressure: surface modifications and the relevance for adhesion|journal=International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives|date=2004|volume=24|issue=2|pages=171–177|doi=10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2003.09.006}}</ref> This system bypasses the requirements for special hardware involving vacuums, which then makes it favorable for integrated industrial use. It has been shown that polymers formed at atmospheric pressure can have similar properties for coatings as those found in low-pressure systems.{{citation needed|reason=It has been found where? atmospheric vs low-pressure comparison|date=July 2015}}



===Physical process characteristics===

===Physical process characteristics===

The formation ofa plasma for polymerization depends on many of the following. An [[electron]] energy of 1–10 eV is required, with electron densities of 10<sup>9</sup> to 10<sup>12</sup> per cubic centimeter, in order to form the desired plasma state. The formation of a low-temperature plasma is important; the electron temperatures are not equal to the gas temperatures and have a ratio of T<sub>e</sub>/T<sub>g</sub> of 10 to 100, so that this process can occur at near [[ambient temperature]]s, which is advantageous because polymers degrade at high temperatures, so if a high-temperature plasma was used the polymers would degrade after formation or would never be formed.<ref name=Shen /> This entails [[non-equilibrium]] plasmas, which means that charged monomer species have more kinetic energy than neutral monomer species, and cause the transfer of energy to a substrate instead of an uncharged monomer.

The formation of plasma for polymerization depends on many of the following. An [[electron]] energy of 1–10 eV is required, with electron densities of 10<sup>9</sup> to 10<sup>12</sup> per cubic centimeter, to form the desired plasma state. The formation of a low-temperature plasma is important; the electron temperatures are not equal to the gas temperatures and have a ratio of T<sub>e</sub>/T<sub>g</sub> of 10 to 100, so that this process can occur at near [[ambient temperature]]s, which is advantageous because polymers degrade at high temperatures, so if a high-temperature plasma was used the polymers would degrade after formation or would never be formed.<ref name=Shen /> This entails [[non-equilibrium]] plasmas, which means that charged monomer species have more kinetic energy than neutral monomer species, and cause the transfer of energy to a substrate instead of an uncharged monomer.



===Kinetics===

===Kinetics===

The [[kinetic]] rate of these reactions depends mostly on the monomer gas, which must be either gaseous or vaporized. However, other parameters are also important as well, such as [[Power (physics)|power]], [[pressure]], [[flow rate]], [[frequency]], electrode gap and reactor configuration.<ref name=Shen /> Low flow rates usually only depend on the amount of reactive species present for polymerization, whereas high flow rates depend on the amount of time that is spent in the reactor. Therefore, the maximum rate of polymerization is somewhere in the middle.

The [[kinetic theory of gases|kinetic]] rate of these reactions depends mostly on the monomer gas, which must be either gaseous or vaporized. However, other parameters are also important as well, such as [[Power (physics)|power]], [[pressure]], [[Flow measurement|flow rate]], [[frequency]], electrode gap, and reactor configuration.<ref name=Shen /> Low flow rates usually only depend on the number of reactive species present for polymerization, whereas high flow rates depend on the amount of time that is spent in the reactor. Therefore, the maximum rate of polymerization is somewhere in the middle.



The fastest reactions tend to be in the order of [[Triple bond|triple-bonded]] > [[Double bond|double-bonded]] > [[single bond]]ed molecules, and also lower molecular weight molecules are faster than higher ones. So [[acetylene]] is faster than [[ethylene]], and ethylene is faster than [[propene]], etc.<ref name=Shen /> The molecular weight factor in polymer deposition is dependent on the monomer flow rate, in which a higher molecular weight monomer typically near 200 g/mol needs a much higher flow rate of 15{{e|4}} g/cm<sup>2</sup>, whereas lower molecular weights around 50 g/mol require a flow rate of only 5{{e|4}} g/cm<sup>2</sup>.<ref name=Glow /> A heavy monomer therefore needs a faster flow, and would likely lead to increased pressures, decreasing polymerization rates.

The fastest reactions tend to be in the order of [[Triple bond|triple-bonded]] > [[Double bond|double-bonded]] > [[single bond]]ed molecules, and also lower molecular weight molecules are faster than higher ones. So [[acetylene]] is faster than [[ethylene]], and ethylene is faster than [[propene]], etc.<ref name=Shen /> The molecular weight factor in polymer deposition is dependent on the monomer flow rate, in which a higher molecular weight monomer typically near 200 g/mol needs a much higher flow rate of 15{{e|4}} g/cm<sup>2</sup>, whereas lower molecular weights around 50 g/mol require a flow rate of only 5{{e|4}} g/cm<sup>2</sup>.<ref name=Glow /> A heavy monomer, therefore, needs a faster flow, and would likely lead to increased pressures, decreasing polymerization rates.



Increased pressure tends to decrease polymerization rates reducing uniformity of deposition since uniformity is controlled by constant pressure. This is a reason that high-pressure plasma or [[atmospheric-pressure plasma]]s are not usually used in favor of low-pressure systems.At pressures greater than 1 [[torr]], [[oligomers]] are formed on the electrode surface, and the monomers also on the surface can dissolve them to get a low [[degree of polymerization]] forming an [[oily]] substance. At low pressures, the reactive surfaces are low in monomer and facilitate growing high [[molecular weight]] polymers.

Increased pressure tends to decrease polymerization rates reducing uniformity of deposition since uniformity is controlled by constant pressure. This is a reason that high-pressure plasma or [[atmospheric-pressure plasma]]s are not usually used in favor of low-pressure systems. At pressures greater than 1 [[torr]], [[oligomers]] is formed on the electrode surface, and the monomers also on the surface can dissolve them to get a low [[degree of polymerization]] forming an [[oily]] substance. At low pressures, the reactive surfaces are low in monomer and facilitate the growth of high [[molecular weight]] polymers.



The rate of polymerization depends on input power, until power [[saturation current|saturation]] occurs and the rate becomes independent of it.<ref name=Shen /> A narrower electrode gap also tends to increase polymerization rates because a higher [[electron density]] per unit area is formed. Polymerization rates also depend on the type of apparatus used for the process. In general, increasing the frequency of alternating current glow discharge up to about 5&nbsp;kHz increases the rate due to the formation of more free radicals. After this frequency, inertial effects of colliding monomers inhibit polymerization. This forms the first plateau for polymerization frequencies. A second maximum in frequency occurs at 6&nbsp;MHz, where side reactions are overcome again and the reaction occurs through free radicals [[diffusion|diffuse]]d from plasma to the electrodes, at which point a second plateau is obtained.<ref name=Shen /> These parameters differ slightly for each monomer and must be optimized in-situ.

The rate of polymerization depends on input power, until power [[saturation current|saturation]] occurs and the rate becomes independent of it.<ref name=Shen /> A narrower electrode gap also tends to increase polymerization rates because a higher [[electron density]] per unit area is formed. Polymerization rates also depend on the type of apparatus used for the process. In general, increasing the frequency of alternating current glow discharge up to about 5&nbsp;kHz increases the rate due to the formation of more free radicals. After this frequency, the inertial effects of colliding monomers inhibit polymerization. This forms the first plateau for polymerization frequencies. A second maximum in frequency occurs at 6&nbsp; MHz, where side reactions are overcome again and the reaction occurs through free radicals [[diffusion|diffuse]]d from plasma to the electrodes, at which point a second plateau is obtained.<ref name=Shen /> These parameters differ slightly for each monomer and must be optimized in-situ.



==Synthetic routes==

==Synthetic routes==

[[File:Image of Competitive Ablation Polymerization Scheme for Glow Discharge.png|thumb|350px|left|Figure 2. Schematic of plasma polymerization process possibilities, w/blue representing dominant pathway.]]

[[File:Image of Competitive Ablation Polymerization Scheme for Glow Discharge.png|thumb|350px|left|Figure 2. Schematic of plasma polymerization process possibilities, w/blue representing dominant pathway.]]

Plasma contains many species such as ions, free radicals and electrons, so it is important to look at what contributes to the polymerization process most.<ref name=Shen /> The first suggested process by Westwood et al. was that of a [[cationic polymerization]], since in a direct current system polymerization occurs mainly on the cathode.<ref name=Shen /> However, more investigation has led to the belief that the mechanism is more of a [[radical polymerization]] process, since radicals tend to be trapped in the films, and termination can be overcome by reinitiation of oligomers.<ref name=Yasuda /> Other kinetic studies also appear to support this theory.<ref name=Shen />

Plasma contains many species such as ions, free radicals, and electrons, so it is important to look at what contributes to the polymerization process most.<ref name=Shen /> The first suggested process by Westwood et al. was that of a [[cationic polymerization]] since in a direct current system polymerization occurs mainly on the cathode.<ref name=Shen /> However, more investigation has led to the belief that the mechanism is more of a [[radical polymerization]] process, since radicals tend to be trapped in the films, and termination can be overcome by reinitiation of oligomers.<ref name=Yasuda /> Other kinetic studies also appear to support this theory.<ref name=Shen />



However since the mid 1990’s a number of papers focusing on the formation of highly functionalized plasma polymers have postulated a more significant role for cations, particularly where the plasma sheath is collosionless.<ref>Williams, K. L.; Martin, I. T.; Fisher, E. R. On the Importance of Ions and Ion−Molecule Reactions to Plasma-Surface Interface Reactions. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2002, 13, 518</ref><ref>Michelmore, A.; Bryant, P.M.; Steele, D.A.; Vasilev, K.; Bradley, J.W.; Short, R.D., Role of Positive Ions in Determining the Deposition Rate and Film Chemistry of Continuous Wave Hexamethyl Disiloxane Plasmas, Langmuir, 2011, 27, 11943-11950

However, since the mid-1990s several papers focusing on the formation of highly functionalized plasma polymers have postulated a more significant role for cations, particularly where the plasma sheath is collisionless.<ref>Williams, K. L.; Martin, I. T.; Fisher, E. R. On the Importance of Ions and Ion−Molecule Reactions to Plasma-Surface Interface Reactions. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2002, 13, 518</ref><ref>Michelmore, A.; Bryant, P.M.; Steele, D.A.; Vasilev, K.; Bradley, J.W.; Short, R.D., Role of Positive Ions in Determining the Deposition Rate and Film Chemistry of Continuous Wave Hexamethyl Disiloxane Plasmas, Langmuir, 2011, 27, 11943-11950

</ref> The assumption that the plasma ion density is low and consequently the ion flux to surfaces is low has been challenged, pointing out that ion flux is determined according to the Bohm sheath criterion ie. ion flux is proportional to the square root of the electron temperature and not RT.<ref>Bohm, D. In The Characteristics of Electrical Discharges in Magnetic Fields; Guthrie, A., Wakerling, R. K., Eds.; McGraw Hill: New York and London, 1949</ref>

</ref> The assumption that the plasma ion density is low and consequently the ion flux to surfaces is low has been challenged, pointing out that ion flux is determined according to the Bohm sheath criterion i.e. ion flux is proportional to the square root of the electron temperature and not RT.<ref>Bohm, D. In The Characteristics of Electrical Discharges in Magnetic Fields; Guthrie, A., Wakerling, R. K., Eds.; McGraw Hill: New York and London, 1949</ref>



In polymerization, both gas phase and surface reactions occur, but mechanism differs between high and low frequencies. At high frequencies it occurs in reactive intermediates, whereas at low frequencies polymerization happens mainly on surfaces. As polymerization occurs, the pressure inside the chamber decreases in a closed system, since gas phase monomers go to solid polymers. An example diagram of the ways that polymerization can take place is shown in Figure 2, wherein the most abundant pathway is shown in blue with double arrows, with side pathways shown in black. The [[ablation]] occurs by gas formation during polymerization. Polymerization has two pathways, either the plasma state or plasma induced processes, which both lead to deposited polymer.<ref name=Yasuda />

In polymerization, both gas phase and surface reactions occur, but the mechanism differs between high and low frequencies. At high frequencies, it occurs in reactive intermediates, whereas at low frequencies polymerization happens mainly on surfaces. As polymerization occurs, the pressure inside the chamber decreases in a closed system, since gas-phase monomers go to solid polymers. An example diagram of the ways that polymerization can take place is shown in Figure 2, wherein the most abundant pathway is shown in blue with double arrows, with side pathways shown in black. The [[ablation]] occurs by gas formation during polymerization. Polymerization has two pathways, either the plasma state or plasma-induced processes, which both lead to the deposited polymer.<ref name=Yasuda />



Polymers can be deposited on many substrates other than the electrode surfaces, such as [[glass]], other organic polymers or metals, when either a surface is placed in front of the electrodes, or placed in the middle between them. The ability for them to build off of electrode surfaces is likely to be an electrostatic interaction, while on other surfaces covalent attachment is possible.

Polymers can be deposited on many substrates other than the electrode surfaces, such as [[glass]], other organic polymers, or metals, when either a surface is placed in front of the electrodes, or placed in the middle between them. The ability for them to build off of electrode surfaces is likely to be an electrostatic interaction, while on other surfaces covalent attachment is possible.



Polymerization is likely to take place through either ionic and/or radical processes which are initiated by plasma formed from the glow discharge.<ref name=Glow /> The classic view presented by Yasuda <ref>Yasuda, H.; Lamaze, C. E. (1971). "Polymerization of styrene in an electrodeless glow discharge". Journal of Applied Polymer Science 15 (9): 2277–2292. doi:10.1002/app.1971.070150918</ref> based upon thermal initiation of parylene polymerization is that there are many propagating species present at any given time as shown in Figure 3. This figure shows two different pathways by which the polymerization may take place. [[File:Plasma step growth.png|thumb|400px|right|Figure 3. Schematic representation of bicyclic step-growth mechanism of plasma polymerization.]]The first pathway is a monofunctionalization process, bears resemblance to a standard free radical polymerization mechanism (M•)- although with the caveat that the reactive species may be ionic and not necessarily radical. The second pathway refers to a difunctional mechanism, which by example may contain a cationic and a radical propagating center on the same monomer (•M•). A consequence is that 'polymer' can grow in multiple directions by multiple pathways off one species, such as a surface or other monomer. This possibility let Yasuda to term the mechanism as a very rapid [[step-growth polymerization]].<ref name=Yasuda /> In the diagram, M<sub>x</sub> refers to the original monomer molecule or any of many dissociation products such as [[chlorine]], [[fluorine]] and [[hydrogen]]. The M• species refers to those that are activated and capable of participating in reactions to form new [[covalent bond]]s. The •M• species refers to an activated difunctional monomer species. The subscripts i, j, and k show the sizes of the different species involved. Even though radicals represent the activated species, any ion or radical could be used in the polymerization.<ref name=Yasuda /> As can be seen here, plasma polymerization is a very complex process, with many parameters effecting everything from rate to chain length.

Polymerization is likely to take place through either ionic and/or radical processes which are initiated by plasma formed from the glow discharge.<ref name=Glow /> The classic view presented by Yasuda<ref>{{cite journal | doi = 10.1002/app.1971.070150918| title = Polymerization of styrene in an electrodeless glow discharge| journal = Journal of Applied Polymer Science| volume =15| issue =9| pages = 2277| year = 1971| last1 = Yasuda| first1 = H| last2 = Lamaze| first2 = C. E}}</ref> based upon thermal initiation of Parylene polymerization is that there are many propagating species present at any given time as shown in Figure 3. This figure shows two different pathways by which the polymerization may take place. [[File:Plasma step growth.png|thumb|400px|right|Figure 3. Schematic representation of the bicyclic step-growth mechanism of plasma polymerization.]]The first pathway is a monofunctionalization process, which bears resemblance to a standard free radical polymerization mechanism (M•)- although with the caveat that the reactive species may be ionic and not necessarily radical. The second pathway refers to a difunctional mechanism, which for example may contain a cationic and a radical propagating center on the same monomer (•M•). A consequence is that 'polymer' can grow in multiple directions by multiple pathways off one species, such as a surface or other monomer. This possibility let Yasuda to term the mechanism as a very rapid [[step-growth polymerization]].<ref name=Yasuda /> In the diagram, M<sub>x</sub> refers to the original monomer molecule or any of many dissociation products such as [[chlorine]], [[fluorine]] and [[hydrogen]]. The M• species refers to those that are activated and capable of participating in reactions to form new [[covalent bond]]s. The •M• species refers to an activated difunctional monomer species. The subscripts i, j, and k show the sizes of the different species involved. Even though radicals represent the activated species, any ion or radical could be used in the polymerization.<ref name=Yasuda /> As can be seen here, plasma polymerization is a very complex process, with many parameters affecting everything from rate to chain length.



Selection, or the favouring of one particular pathway can be achieved by altering the plasma parameters. For example, pulsed plasma with selected monomers appears to favour much more regular polymer structures and it has been postulated these grow by a mechanism akin to (radical) chain growth in the plasma off-time.<ref>Beyer, D.; Knoll, W.; Ringsdorf, H.; Wang, J.-H.; Timmons, R. B.; Sluka, P. Reduced Protein Adsorption on Plastics via Direct Plasma Deposition of Triethylene Glycol Monoallyl Ether. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 1997, 36, 181.)</ref>

Selection or the favoring of one particular pathway can be achieved by altering the plasma parameters. For example, pulsed plasma with selected monomers appears to favor much more regular polymer structures and it has been postulated these grow by a mechanism akin to (radical) chain growth in the plasma off-time.<ref>Beyer, D.; Knoll, W.; Ringsdorf, H.; Wang, J.-H.; Timmons, R. B.; Sluka, P. Reduced Protein Adsorption on Plastics via Direct Plasma Deposition of Triethylene Glycol Monoallyl Ether. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 1997, 36, 181.</ref>



==Common monomers/polymers==

==Common monomers/polymers==

{|class="wikitable" align="right"

{| class="wiki table" style="float:right;"

|+ Common monomers

|+ Common monomers

|-

|-

Line 58: Line 59:

|[[File:Thiophen.svg|35px|center]]

|[[File:Thiophen.svg|35px|center]]

|-

|-

|1,7-Octadiene<ref>{{cite journal|last=Akhavan|first=Behnam|coauthors=et al|title=Evolution of Hydrophobicity in Plasma Polymerised 1,7-Octadiene Films|journal=Plasma Processes and Polymers|date=1 October 2013|doi=10.1002/ppap.201300055}}</ref>

|1,7-Octadiene<ref>{{cite journal|last=Akhavan|first=Behnam|display-authors=etal |title=Evolution of Hydrophobicity in Plasma Polymerised 1,7-Octadiene Films|journal=Plasma Processes and Polymers|date=1 October 2013|doi=10.1002/ppap.201300055|volume=10|issue=11|pages=1018–1029}}</ref>

|[[File:1,7-octadieen.png|80px|center]]

|[[File:1,7-Octadiene.svg|80px|center]]

|-

|-

|[[Pyridine]]

|[[Pyridine]]

Line 76: Line 77:

|[[File:Acetylene-2D.svg|75px|center]]

|[[File:Acetylene-2D.svg|75px|center]]

|-

|-

|2-Methyloxazoline<ref name="ReferenceA">{{cite journal|last1=Ramiasa|first1=M. N.|last2=Cavallaro|first2=A. A.|last3=Mierczynska|first3=A.|last4=Christo|first4=S. N.|last5=Gleadle|first5=J. M.|last6=Hayball|first6=J. D.|last7=Vasilev|first7=K.|title=Plasma polymerized polyoxazoline thin films for biomedical applications|journal=Chem. Commun.|date=2015|volume=51|issue=20|pages=4279–4282|doi=10.1039/C5CC00260E|pmid=25673366}}</ref><ref name="ReferenceB">{{cite journal|last1=Macgregor-Ramiasa|first1=Melanie N.|last2=Cavallaro|first2=Alex A.|last3=Vasilev|first3=Krasimir|title=Properties and reactivity of polyoxazoline plasma polymer films|journal=J. Mater. Chem. B|date=2015|volume=3|issue=30|pages=6327–6337|doi=10.1039/C5TB00901D|pmid=32262751}}</ref>

|2-Methyloxazoline

|[[File:2-Methyloxazoline Monomer.png|55px|center]]

|[[File:2-Methyloxazoline Monomer.png|55px|center]]

|-

|-

Line 84: Line 85:


===Monomers===

===Monomers===

As can be seen in the monomer table, many simple monomers are readily polymerized by this method, but most must be smaller [[ionizable]] species because they have to be able to go into the plasma state. Though monomers with multiple bonds polymerize readily, it is not a necessary requirement, as ethane, [[silicones]] and many others polymerize also.

As can be seen in the monomer table, many simple monomers are readily polymerized by this method, but most must be smaller [[ionizable]] species because they have to be able to go into the plasma state. Though monomers with multiple bonds polymerize readily, it is not a requirement, as ethane, [[silicones]] and many others polymerize also.

There are also other stipulations that exist. Yasuda et al. studied 28 monomers and found that those containing [[aromatic]] groups, [[silicon]], [[olefin]]ic group or [[nitrogen]] (NH, NH<sub>2</sub>, CN) were readily polymerizable, while those containing [[oxygen]], [[halides]], [[aliphatic]] hydrocarbons and [[cyclic hydrocarbons]] where decomposed more readily.<ref name=Yasuda /> The latter compounds have more ablation or side reactions present, which inhibit stable polymer formation. It is also possible to incorporate N<sub>2</sub>, H<sub>2</sub>O, and CO into copolymers of [[styrene]].

Other stipulations exist. Yasuda et al. studied 28 monomers and found that those containing [[aromatic]] groups, [[silicon]], [[olefin]]ic group or [[nitrogen]] (NH, NH<sub>2</sub>, CN) were readily polymerizable, while those containing [[oxygen]], [[halides]], [[aliphatic]] hydrocarbons and [[cyclic hydrocarbons]] were decomposed more readily.<ref name=Yasuda /> The latter compounds have more ablation or side reactions present, which inhibit stable polymer formation. It is also possible to incorporate N<sub>2</sub>, H<sub>2</sub>O, and CO into copolymers of [[styrene]].



Plasma polymers can be thought of as a type of graft polymers since they are grown off of a [[Substrate (materials science)|substrate]]. These polymers are known to form nearly uniform surface deposition, which is one of their desirable properties. Polymers formed from this process often cross-link and form branches due to the multiple propagating species present in the plasma. This often leads to very [[insoluble]] polymers, which gives an advantage to this process, since ''hyperbranched polymers'' can be deposited directly without solvent.

Plasma polymers can be thought of as a type of graft polymer since they are grown off of a [[Substrate (materials science)|substrate]]. These polymers are known to form nearly uniform surface deposition, which is one of their desirable properties. Polymers formed from this process often cross-link and form branches due to the multiple propagating species present in the plasma. This often leads to very [[insoluble]] polymers, which gives an advantage to this process, since ''hyperbranched polymers'' can be deposited directly without solvent.



===Polymers===

===Polymers===

Common polymers include: [[polythiophene]],<ref>{{cite web|last=Dinescu|first=G|title=Polythiophene thin films deposited in various RF plasma polymerization configurations|url=http://www.ispc-conference.org/ispcproc/papers/602.pdf|publisher=International Symposium on Plasma Chemistry|accessdate=19 March 2011}}</ref> polyhexafluoropropylene,<ref>{{cite journal|last=Chen|first=R|coauthors=Gorelik, V. Silverstein, M.S.|title=Plasma polymerization of hexafluoropropylene: Film deposition and structure|journal=Journal of Applied Polymer Science|year=1995|volume=56|issue=5|pages=615–623|doi=10.1002/app.1995.070560510}}</ref> polytetramethyltin,<ref>{{cite journal|last=Kny|first=Erich|coauthors=Levenson, L.L.; James, W.J.|title=Organotini Polymers Formed by Glow-Discharge Polymerization|journal=Journal of Physical Chemistry|year=1980|volume=84|pages=1635–1638|doi=10.1021/j100449a039}}</ref> polyhexamethyldisiloxane,<ref>{{cite web|last=Gaur|first=S.|first=G. |last=Vergason|title=Plasma Polymerization: For Industrial Production|url=http://www.vergason.com/pdf/Plasma_Polymerization.pdf|publisher=Vergason Technology|accessdate=19 March 2011}}</ref> polytetramethyldisiloxane, polypyridine, polyfuran, and poly-2-methyloxazoline.

Common polymers include: [[polythiophene]],<ref>{{cite web|last=Dinescu|first=G|title=Polythiophene thin films deposited in various RF plasma polymerization configurations|url=http://www.ispc-conference.org/ispcproc/papers/602.pdf|publisher=International Symposium on Plasma Chemistry|accessdate=19 March 2011}}</ref> polyhexafluoropropylene,<ref>{{cite journal|last=Chen|first=R|author2=Gorelik, V. |author3=Silverstein, M.S.|title=Plasma polymerization of hexafluoropropylene: Film deposition and structure|journal=Journal of Applied Polymer Science|date=1995|volume=56|issue=5|pages=615–623|doi=10.1002/app.1995.070560510}}</ref> polytetramethyltin,<ref>{{cite journal|last=Kny|first=Erich|author2=Levenson, L.L. |author3=James, W.J. |title=Organotini Polymers Formed by Glow-Discharge Polymerization|journal=Journal of Physical Chemistry|date=1980|volume=84|issue=12|pages=1635–1638|doi=10.1021/j100449a039}}</ref> polyhexamethyldisiloxane,<ref>{{cite web|last=Plasma Etch|title=Plasma Polymerization|url=http://www.plasmaetch.com/plasma-polymerization.php|publisher=Plasma Etch|accessdate=20 September 2015}}</ref> polytetramethyldisiloxane, polypyridine, [[polyfuran]], and poly-2-methyloxazoline.<ref name="ReferenceA"/><ref name="ReferenceB"/>



The following are listed in order of decreasing rate of polymerization: [[polystyrene]], polymethyl styrene, polycyclopentadiene, [[polyacrylate]], polyethyl acrylate, [[polymethyl methacrylate]], [[polyvinyl acetate]], [[polyisoprene]], [[polyisobutene]], and [[polyethylene]].<ref>{{cite journal|last=Williams|first=T.|coauthors=Hayes, M.W.|title=Polymerization in a Glow Discharge|journal=Nature|year=1966|volume=209|pages=769|doi=10.1038/209769a0|issue=5025|bibcode = 1966Natur.209..769W }}</ref>

The following are listed in order of decreasing rate of polymerization: [[polystyrene]], polymethyl styrene, polycyclopentadiene, [[polyacrylate]], polymethyl acrylate, [[polymethyl methacrylate]], [[polyvinyl acetate]], [[polyisoprene]], [[polyisobutene]], and [[polyethylene]].<ref>{{cite journal|last=Williams|first=T.|author2=Hayes, M.W. |title=Polymerization in a Glow Discharge|journal=Nature|date=1966|volume=209|pages=769–773|doi=10.1038/209769a0|issue=5025|bibcode = 1966Natur.209..769W |s2cid=4285812}}</ref>



Nearly all polymers created by this method have excellent appearance, are clear, and are significantly cross-linked. Linear polymers are not formed readily by plasma polymerization methods based on propagating species. Many other polymers could be formed by this method.

Nearly all polymers created by this method have excellent appearance, are clear, and are significantly cross-linked. Linear polymers are not formed readily by plasma polymerization methods based on propagating species. Many other polymers could be formed by this method.



==General characteristics of plasma polymers==

==General characteristics of plasma polymers==

The properties of plasma polymers differ greatly from those of conventional polymers. While both types are dependent on the chemical properties of the monomer, the properties of plasma polymers depend more greatly on the design of the reactor and the chemical and physical characteristics of the substrate on which the plasma polymer is deposited.<ref name=Yasuda /> The location within the reactor where the deposition occurs also has an effect on the resultant polymer's properties.<ref name=Gaur>{{cite web|last=Gaur|first=S.|title=Plasma Polymerization:Theory and Practice|url=http://www.vergason.com/pdf/Plasma_Polymerization_Theory.pdf|publisher=Vergason Technology, Inc.|accessdate=9 February 2011|coauthors=G. Vergason}}</ref> In fact by using plasma polymerization with a single monomer and varying the reactor, substrate, etc. a variety of polymers, each having different physical and chemical properties, can be prepared.<ref name=Yasuda /> The large dependence of the polymer features on these factors make it difficult to assign a set of basic characteristics, but a few common properties that set plasma polymers apart from conventional polymers do exist.

The properties of plasma polymers differ greatly from those of conventional polymers. While both types are dependent on the chemical properties of the monomer, the properties of plasma polymers depend more greatly on the design of the reactor and the chemical and physical characteristics of the substrate on which the plasma polymer is deposited.<ref name=Yasuda /> The location within the reactor where the deposition occurs also affects the resultant polymer's properties. In fact, by using plasma polymerization with a single monomer and varying the reactor, substrate, etc. a variety of polymers, each having different physical and chemical properties, can be prepared.<ref name=Yasuda /> The large dependence of the polymer features on these factors makes it difficult to assign a set of basic characteristics, but a few common properties that set plasma polymers apart from conventional polymers do exist.



[[File:Plasma Polymer Ethylene Film.png|thumb|450px|right|Figure 4. Hypothesized model of plasma-polymerized ethylene film.]]

[[File:Plasma Polymer Ethylene Film.png|thumb|450px|right|Figure 4. Hypothesized model of plasma-polymerized ethylene film.]]

The most significant difference between conventional polymers and plasma polymers is that plasma polymers do not contain regular repeating units. Due to the number of different propagating species present at any one time as discussed above, the resultant polymer chains are highly-branched and are randomly terminated with a high degree of cross-linking.<ref name=Zang>{{cite book|last=Zang|first=Z.|title=Surface Modification by Plasma Polymerization and Application of Plasma Polymers as Biomaterials|year=2003|publisher=Johanneses Gutenberg University of Mainz|url=http://www.mpip-mainz.mpg.de/knoll/publications/thesis/zhang_2003.pdf}}</ref> An example of a proposed structure for plasma polymerized ethylene demonstrating a large extend of cross-linking and branching is shown in Figure 4.

The most significant difference between conventional polymers and plasma polymers is that plasma polymers do not contain regular repeating units. Due to the number of different propagating species present at any one time as discussed above, the resultant polymer chains are highly branched and are randomly terminated with a high degree of cross-linking.<ref name=Zang>{{cite book|last=Zang|first=Z.|title=Surface Modification by Plasma Polymerization and Application of Plasma Polymers as Biomaterials|date=2003|publisher=Johanneses Gutenberg University of Mainz|url=http://www.mpip-mainz.mpg.de/knoll/publications/thesis/zhang_2003.pdf}}</ref> An example of a proposed structure for plasma polymerized ethylene demonstrating a large extend of cross-linking and branching is shown in Figure 4.



All plasma polymers contain free radicals as well. The amount of free radicals present varies between polymers and is dependent on the chemical structure of the monomer. Because the formation of the trapped free radicals is tied to the growth mechanism of the plasma polymers, the overall properties of the polymers directly correlate to the number of free radicals.<ref name=Gaur />

All plasma polymers contain free radicals as well. The amount of free radicals present varies between polymers and is dependent on the chemical structure of the monomer. Because the formation of the trapped free radicals is tied to the growth mechanism of the plasma polymers, the overall properties of the polymers directly correlate to the number of free radicals.<ref name="Plasma Etch">{{cite web|title=Plasma Polymerization|date=2015|url=http://www.plasmaetch.com/plasma-polymerization.php}}</ref>



Plasma polymers also containan internal stress. If a thick layer (e.g. 1&nbsp;µm) of a plasma polymer is deposited on a glass slide, the plasma polymer will buckle and frequently crack. The curling is attributed to an internal stress formed in the plasma polymer during the polymer deposition. The degree of curling is dependent on the monomer as well as the conditions of the plasma polymerization.<ref name=Yasuda />

Plasma polymers also contain internal stress. If a thick layer (e.g. 1&nbsp;µm) of a plasma polymer is deposited on a glass slide, the plasma polymer will buckle and frequently crack. The curling is attributed to an internal stress formed in the plasma polymer during the polymer deposition. The degree of curling is dependent on the monomer as well as the conditions of the plasma polymerization.<ref name=Yasuda />



Most plasma polymers are insoluble and infusible.<ref name=Yasuda /> These properties are due to the large amount of cross-linking in the polymers, previously discussed. Consequently the kinetic path length for these polymers must be sufficiently long, so these properties can be controlled to a point.<ref name=Yasuda />

Most plasma polymers are insoluble and infusible.<ref name=Yasuda /> These properties are due to the large amount of cross-linking in the polymers, previously discussed. Consequently, the kinetic path length for these polymers must be sufficiently long, so these properties can be controlled to a point.<ref name=Yasuda />



The permeabilities of plasma polymers also differ greatly from those of conventional polymers. Because of the absence of large-scale segmental mobility and the high degree of cross-linking within the polymers, the permeation of small molecules does not strictly follow the typical mechanisms of “solution-diffusion” or molecular-level sieve for such small permeants. Really the permeability characteristics of plasma polymers falls between these two ideal cases.<ref name=Yasuda />

The permeabilities of plasma polymers also differ greatly from those of conventional polymers. Because of the absence of large-scale segmental mobility and the high degree of cross-linking within the polymers, the permeation of small molecules does not strictly follow the typical mechanisms of "solution-diffusion" or molecular-level sieve for such small permeants. The permeability characteristics of plasma polymers fall between these two ideal cases.<ref name=Yasuda />



A final common characteristic of plasma polymers is the adhesion ability. The specifics of the adhesion ability for a given plasma polymer, such as thickness and characteristics of the surface layer, again are particular for a given plasma polymer and few generalizations can be made.<ref name=Yasuda />

A final common characteristic of plasma polymers is the adhesion ability. The specifics of the adhesion ability for a given plasma polymer, such as thickness and characteristics of the surface layer, again are particular for a given plasma polymer and few generalizations can be made.<ref name=Yasuda />



==Advantages and disadvantages==

==Advantages and disadvantages==

Plasma polymerization offers a number of advantages over other polymerization methods and in general. The most significant advantage of plasma polymerization is its ability to produce polymer films of organic compounds that do not polymerize under normal chemical polymerization conditions.<ref name=Gaur /> Nearly all monomers, even saturated [[hydrocarbons]] and organic compounds without a polymerizable structure such as a double bond, can be polymerized with this technique.<ref name=Zang />

Plasma polymerization offers several advantages over other polymerization methods in general. The most significant advantage of plasma polymerization is its ability to produce polymer films of organic compounds that do not polymerize under normal chemical polymerization conditions. Nearly all monomers, even saturated [[hydrocarbons]] and organic compounds without a polymerizable structure such as a double bond, can be polymerized with this technique.<ref name=Zang />



A second advantage is the ease of application of the polymers as coatings versus conventional coating processes. While coating a substrate with conventional polymers requires a number of steps, plasma polymerization accomplishes all these in essentially a single step.<ref name=Glow /> This leads to a cleaner and ‘greener’ synthesis and coating process, since no solvent is needed during the polymer preparation and no cleaning of the resultant polymer is needed either. Another ‘green’ aspect of the synthesis is that no initiator is needed for the polymer preparation since reusable electrodes cause the reaction to proceed. The resultant polymer coatings also have a number of advantages over typical coatings. These advantages include being nearly pinhole free, highly dense, and that the thickness of the coating can easily be varied.<ref name=VanOs>{{cite book|last=Van Os|first=M.|title=Surface Modification by Plasma Polymerization: Film Deposition, Tailoring of Surface Properties, and Biocompatibility|year=2000|publisher=University of Twente, Enschede|location=The Netherlands|url=http://doc.utwente.nl/9575/1/t0000021.pdf}}</ref>

A second advantage is the ease of application of the polymers as coatings versus conventional coating processes. While coating a substrate with conventional polymers requires several steps, plasma polymerization accomplishes all these in essentially a single step.<ref name=Glow /> This leads to a cleaner and 'greener' synthesis and coating process since no solvent is needed during the polymer preparation and no cleaning of the resultant polymer is needed either. Another 'green' aspect of the synthesis is that no initiator is needed for the polymer preparation since reusable electrodes cause the reaction to proceed. The resultant polymer coatings also have several advantages over typical coatings. These advantages include being nearly pinhole-free, highly dense, and the thickness of the coating can easily be varied.<ref name=VanOs>{{cite book|last=Van Os|first=M.|title=Surface Modification by Plasma Polymerization: Film Deposition, Tailoring of Surface Properties, and Biocompatibility|date=2000|publisher=University of Twente, Enschede|location=The Netherlands|url=http://doc.utwente.nl/9575/1/t0000021.pdf}}</ref>



There are also a number of disadvantages relating to plasma polymerization versus conventional methods. The most significant disadvantage is the high cost of the process. A vacuum system is required for the polymerization, significantly increasing the set up price.<ref name=VanOs />

There are also several disadvantages relating to plasma polymerization versus conventional methods. The most significant disadvantage is the high cost of the process. A vacuum system is required for the polymerization, significantly increasing the set-up price.<ref name=VanOs />



Another disadvantage is due to the complexity of plasma processes. Because of the complexity it is not easy to achievea good control over the chemical composition of the surface after modification. The influence of process parameters on the chemical composition of the resultant polymer means it can take a long time to determine the optimal conditions.<ref name=VanOs /> The complexity of the process also makes it impossible to theorize what the resultant polymer will look like, unlike conventional polymers which can be easily determined based on the monomer.

Another disadvantage is due to the complexity of plasma processes. Because of the complexity, it is not easy to achieve good control over the chemical composition of the surface after modification. The influence of process parameters on the chemical composition of the resultant polymer means it can take a long time to determine the optimal conditions.<ref name=VanOs /> The complexity of the process also makes it impossible to theorize what the resultant polymer will look like, unlike conventional polymers which can be easily determined based on the monomer.



==Applications==

==Applications==



The advantages offered by plasma polymerization have resulted in substantial research on the applications of these polymers. The vastly different chemical and mechanical properties offered by polymers formed with plasma polymerization means they can be applied to countless different systems. Applications ranging from adhesion, [[composite material]]s, protective coatings, [[printing]], [[membranes]], biomedical applications, water purification and so on have all been studied.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Akhavan|first=Behnam|coauthors=et al.|title=Hydrophobic Plasma Polymer Coated Silica Particles for Petroleum Hydrocarbon Removal|journal=ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces|date=November 2013|volume=5|issue=17|pages=8563–8571|doi=10.1021/am4020154|url=http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/am4020154}}</ref>

The advantages offered by plasma polymerization have resulted in substantial research on the applications of these polymers. The vastly different chemical and mechanical properties offered by polymers formed with plasma polymerization means they can be applied to countless different systems. Applications ranging from adhesion, [[composite material]]s, protective coatings, [[printing]], [[membrane]]s, biomedical applications, water purification, and so on have all been studied.<ref>{{cite journal|last=Akhavan|first=Behnam|display-authors=etal |title=Hydrophobic Plasma Polymer Coated Silica Particles for Petroleum Hydrocarbon Removal|journal=ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces|date=November 2013|volume=5|issue=17|pages=8563–8571|doi=10.1021/am4020154|pmid=23942510}}</ref>



Of particular interest since the 1980s has been the deposition of functionalized plasma polymer films. For example, functionalized films are used as a means of improving biocompatibility for biological implants6 and for producing super-hydrophobic coatings.They have also been extensively employed in biomaterials for cell attachment, protein binding andas anti-fouling surfaces. Through the use of low power and pressure plasma, high functional retention can be achieved which has led to substantial improvements in the biocompatibility of some products, a simple example being the development of extended wear contact lenses. Due to these successes, the huge potential of functional plasma polymers is slowly being realised by workers in previously unrelated fields such as water treatment and wound management.Emerging technologies such as nanopatterning, 3D scaffolds, micro-channel coating and microencapsulation are now also utilizing functionalized plasma polymers, areas for which traditional polymers are often unsuitable

Of particular interest since the 1980s has been the deposition of functionalized plasma polymer films. For example, functionalized films are used as a means of improving biocompatibility for biological implants6 and for producing super-hydrophobic coatings. They have also been extensively employed in biomaterials for cell attachment, protein binding, and anti-fouling surfaces. Through the use of low-power and pressure plasma, high functional retention can be achieved which has led to substantial improvements in the biocompatibility of some products, a simple example being the development of extended-wear contact lenses. Due to these successes, the huge potential of functional plasma polymers is slowly being realized by workers in previously unrelated fields such as water treatment and wound management. Emerging technologies such as nanopatterning, 3D scaffolds, micro-channel coating, and microencapsulation are now also utilizing functionalized plasma polymers, areas for which traditional polymers are often unsuitable



A significant area of research has been on the use of plasma polymer films as [[permeation]] membranes. The permeability characteristics of plasma polymers deposited on porous substrates are different than usual polymer films. The characteristics depend on the deposition and polymerization mechanism.<ref name=Inagaki>{{cite book|last=Inagaki|first=N.|title=Plasma surface modification and plasma polymerization|year=1996|publisher=Technomic Pub. Co.|location=Lancaster, Pa.|isbn=1-56676-337-1}}</ref> Plasma polymers as membranes for separation of oxygen and nitrogen, ethanol and water, and water vapor permeation have all been studied.<ref name=Inagaki /> The application of plasma polymerized thin films as [[reverse osmosis]] membranes has received considerable attention as well. Yasuda et al. have shown membranes prepared with plasma polymerization made from nitrogen containing monomers can yield up to 98% salt rejection with a [[flux]] of 6.4 gallons/ft<sup>2</sup> a day.<ref name=Yasuda /> Further research has shown that varying the monomers of the membrane offer other properties as well, such as chlorine resistance.<ref name=Yasuda />

A significant area of research has been on the use of plasma polymer films as [[permeation]] membranes. The permeability characteristics of plasma polymers deposited on porous substrates are different than usual polymer films. The characteristics depend on the deposition and polymerization mechanism.<ref name=Inagaki>{{cite book|last=Inagaki|first=N.|title=Plasma surface modification and plasma polymerization|date=1996|publisher=Technomic Pub. Co.|location=Lancaster, Pa.|isbn=978-1-56676-337-0}}</ref> Plasma polymers as membranes for separation of oxygen and nitrogen, ethanol and water, and water vapor permeation have all been studied.<ref name=Inagaki /> The application of plasma polymerized thin films as [[reverse osmosis]] membranes has received considerable attention as well. Yasuda et al. have shown membranes prepared with plasma polymerization made from nitrogen-containing monomers can yield up to 98% salt rejection with a [[flux]] of 6.4 gallons/ft<sup>2</sup> a day.<ref name=Yasuda /> Further research has shown that varying the monomers of the membrane offers other properties as well, such as chlorine resistance.<ref name=Yasuda />



Plasma-polymerized films have also found electrical applications. Given that plasma polymers frequently contain many [[Chemical polarity|polar]] groups, which form when the radicals react with oxygen in air during the polymerization process, the plasma polymers were expected to be good dielectric materials in thin film form.<ref name=Inagaki /> Studies have shown that the plasma polymers generally do in fact have a higher dielectric property. Some plasma polymers have been applied as chemical sensory devices due to their electrical properties. Plasma polymers have been studied as chemical sensory devices for humidity, propane, and carbon dioxide amongst others. Thus far issues with instability against aging and humidity have limited their commercial applications.<ref name=Inagaki />

Plasma-polymerized films have also found electrical applications. Given that plasma polymers frequently contain many [[Chemical polarity|polar]] groups, which form when the radicals react with oxygen in the air during the polymerization process, the plasma polymers were expected to be good dielectric materials in thin film form.<ref name=Inagaki /> Studies have shown that plasma polymers generally do have a higher dielectric property. Some plasma polymers have been applied as chemical sensory devices due to their electrical properties. Plasma polymers have been studied as chemical sensory devices for humidity, propane, and carbon dioxide amongst others. Thus far issues with instability against aging and humidity have limited their commercial applications.<ref name=Inagaki />



The application of plasma polymers as coatings has also been studied. Plasma polymers formed from [[tetramethoxysilane]] have been studied as protective coatings and have shown to increase the hardness of [[polyethylene]] and [[polycarbonate]].<ref name=Inagaki /> The use of plasma polymers to coat [[plastic]] [[lens (optics)|lens]]es is increasing in popularity. Plasma depositions are able to easily coat curved materials witha good uniformity, such as those of [[bifocals]]. The different plasma polymers used can be not only scratch resistant, but also [[hydrophobic]] leading to anti-fogging effects.<ref>{{cite web|last=Koller|first=Albert|title=The PPV Plasma Polymerization System: A New Technology for Functional Coatings on Plastics|url=http://134.147.148.178/ispcdocs/ispc11/content/11/11-1005.pdf|publisher=Balzers Ltd|accessdate=17 March 2011}}</ref>

The application of plasma polymers as coatings has also been studied. Plasma polymers formed from [[tetramethoxysilane]] have been studied as protective coatings and have been shown to increase the hardness of [[polyethylene]] and [[polycarbonate]].<ref name=Inagaki /> The use of plasma polymers to coat [[plastic]] [[lens (optics)|lens]]es is increasing in popularity. Plasma depositions can easily coat curved materials with good uniformity, such as those of [[bifocals]]. The different plasma polymers used can be not only scratch resistant but also [[hydrophobic]] leading to anti-fogging effects.<ref>{{cite web|last=Koller|first=Albert|title=The PPV Plasma Polymerization System: A New Technology for Functional Coatings on Plastics|url=http://134.147.148.178/ispcdocs/ispc11/content/11/11-1005.pdf|publisher=Balzers Ltd|accessdate=17 March 2011}}</ref>

Plasma polymer surfaces with tunable wettability and reversibly switchable pH-responsiveness have shown promising prospects due to their unique property in applications, such as drug delivery, biomaterial engineering, oil/water separation processes, sensors, and biofuel cells.<ref>{{cite journal | doi = 10.1002/ppap.201700053| title = Tunable wettability and pH-responsiveness of plasma copolymers of acrylic acid and octafluorocyclobutane| journal = Plasma Processes and Polymers| volume = 14| issue = 10| pages = 1700053| year = 2017| last1 = Muzammil| first1 = Iqbal| last2 = Li| first2 = Yupeng| last3 = Lei| first3 = Mingkai| s2cid = 104161308}}</ref>



==References==

==References==

{{Reflist|30em}}

{{Reflist|30em}}

{{Use dmy dates|date=June 2011}}



[[Category:Chemical processes]]

[[Category:Chemical processes]]


Latest revision as of 05:00, 10 July 2023

Plasma polymerization (orglow discharge polymerization) uses plasma sources to generate a gas discharge that provides energy to activate or fragment gaseous or liquid monomer, often containing a vinyl group, in order to initiate polymerization. Polymers formed from this technique are generally highly branched and highly cross-linked, and adhere to solid surfaces well. The biggest advantage to this process is that polymers can be directly attached to a desired surface while the chains are growing, which reduces steps necessary for other coating processes such as grafting. This is very useful for pinhole-free coatings of 100 picometers to 1-micrometer thickness with solvent insoluble polymers.[1]

Introduction[edit]

In as early as the 1870s "polymers" formed by this process were known, but these polymers were initially thought of as undesirable byproducts associated with electric discharge, with little attention being given to their properties.[1] It was not until the 1960s that the properties of these polymers were found to be useful.[2] It was found that flawless thin polymeric coatings could be formed on metals, although for very thin films (<10nm) this has recently been shown to be an oversimplification.[3][4] By selecting the monomer type and the energy density per monomer, known as the Yasuda parameter, the chemical composition and structure of the resulting thin film can be varied with a wide range. These films are usually inert, adhesive, and have low dielectric constants.[1] Some common monomers polymerized by this method include styrene, ethylene, methacrylate, and pyridine, just to name a few. The 1970s brought about many advances in plasma polymerization, including the polymerization of many different types of monomers. The mechanisms of deposition however were largely ignored until more recently. Since this time most attention devoted to plasma polymerization has been in the fields of coatings, but since it is difficult to control polymer structure, it has limited applications.

Basic operating mechanism[edit]

Figure 1. Schematic representation of basic internal electrode glow discharge polymerization apparatus

Glow discharge[edit]

Plasma consists of a mixture of electrons, ions, radicals, neutrals, and photons.[5] Some of these species are in local thermodynamic equilibrium, while others are not. Even for simple gases like argon, this mixture can be complex. For plasmas of organic monomers, the complexity can rapidly increase as some components of the plasma fragment, while others interact and form larger species. Glow discharge is a technique in polymerization which forms free electrons which gain energy from an electric field, and then lose energy through collisions with neutral molecules in the gas phase. This leads to many chemically reactive species, which then leads to a plasma polymerization reaction.[6] The electric discharge process for plasma polymerization is the "low-temperature plasma" method because higher temperatures cause degradation. These plasmas are formed by a direct current, alternating currentorradio frequency generator.[7]

Types of reactors[edit]

There are a few designs for apparatus used in plasma polymerization, one of which is the Bell (static type), in which monomer gas is put into the reaction chamber, but does not flow through the chamber. It comes in and polymerizes without removal. This type of reactor is shown in Figure 1.[8] This reactor has internal electrodes, and polymerization commonly takes place on the cathode side. All devices contain the thermostatic bath, which is used to regulate temperature, and a vacuum to regulate pressure.[6]

Operation: The monomer gas comes into the Bell-type reactor as a gaseous species, and then is put into the plasma state by the electrodes, in which the plasma may consist of radicals, anions and cations. These monomers are then polymerized on the cathode surface, or some other surface placed in the apparatus by different mechanisms of which details are discussed below. The deposited polymers then propagate off the surface and form growing chains with seemingly uniform consistency.

Another popular reactor type is the flow-through reactor (continuous flow reactor), which also has internal electrodes, but this reactor allows monomer gas to flow through the reaction chamber as its name implies, which should give a more even coating for polymer film deposition.[7] It has the advantage that more monomer keeps flowing into the reactor to deposit more polymer. It has the disadvantage of forming what is called "tail flame", which is when polymerization extends into the vacuum line.

A third popular type of reactor is the electrodeless.[9] This uses an RF coil wrapped around the glass apparatus, which then uses a radio frequency generator to form the plasma inside of the housing without the use of direct electrodes (see Inductively Coupled Plasma). The polymer can then be deposited as it is pushed through this RF coil toward the vacuum end of the apparatus. This has the advantage of not having polymer building up on the electrode surface, which is desirable when polymerizing onto other surfaces.

A fourth type of system growing in popularity is the atmospheric-pressure plasma system, which is useful for depositing thin polymer films.[10] This system bypasses the requirements for special hardware involving vacuums, which then makes it favorable for integrated industrial use. It has been shown that polymers formed at atmospheric pressure can have similar properties for coatings as those found in low-pressure systems.[citation needed]

Physical process characteristics[edit]

The formation of plasma for polymerization depends on many of the following. An electron energy of 1–10 eV is required, with electron densities of 109 to 1012 per cubic centimeter, to form the desired plasma state. The formation of a low-temperature plasma is important; the electron temperatures are not equal to the gas temperatures and have a ratio of Te/Tg of 10 to 100, so that this process can occur at near ambient temperatures, which is advantageous because polymers degrade at high temperatures, so if a high-temperature plasma was used the polymers would degrade after formation or would never be formed.[6] This entails non-equilibrium plasmas, which means that charged monomer species have more kinetic energy than neutral monomer species, and cause the transfer of energy to a substrate instead of an uncharged monomer.

Kinetics[edit]

The kinetic rate of these reactions depends mostly on the monomer gas, which must be either gaseous or vaporized. However, other parameters are also important as well, such as power, pressure, flow rate, frequency, electrode gap, and reactor configuration.[6] Low flow rates usually only depend on the number of reactive species present for polymerization, whereas high flow rates depend on the amount of time that is spent in the reactor. Therefore, the maximum rate of polymerization is somewhere in the middle.

The fastest reactions tend to be in the order of triple-bonded > double-bonded > single bonded molecules, and also lower molecular weight molecules are faster than higher ones. So acetylene is faster than ethylene, and ethylene is faster than propene, etc.[6] The molecular weight factor in polymer deposition is dependent on the monomer flow rate, in which a higher molecular weight monomer typically near 200 g/mol needs a much higher flow rate of 15×104 g/cm2, whereas lower molecular weights around 50 g/mol require a flow rate of only 5×104 g/cm2.[1] A heavy monomer, therefore, needs a faster flow, and would likely lead to increased pressures, decreasing polymerization rates.

Increased pressure tends to decrease polymerization rates reducing uniformity of deposition since uniformity is controlled by constant pressure. This is a reason that high-pressure plasma or atmospheric-pressure plasmas are not usually used in favor of low-pressure systems. At pressures greater than 1 torr, oligomers is formed on the electrode surface, and the monomers also on the surface can dissolve them to get a low degree of polymerization forming an oily substance. At low pressures, the reactive surfaces are low in monomer and facilitate the growth of high molecular weight polymers.

The rate of polymerization depends on input power, until power saturation occurs and the rate becomes independent of it.[6] A narrower electrode gap also tends to increase polymerization rates because a higher electron density per unit area is formed. Polymerization rates also depend on the type of apparatus used for the process. In general, increasing the frequency of alternating current glow discharge up to about 5 kHz increases the rate due to the formation of more free radicals. After this frequency, the inertial effects of colliding monomers inhibit polymerization. This forms the first plateau for polymerization frequencies. A second maximum in frequency occurs at 6  MHz, where side reactions are overcome again and the reaction occurs through free radicals diffused from plasma to the electrodes, at which point a second plateau is obtained.[6] These parameters differ slightly for each monomer and must be optimized in-situ.

Synthetic routes[edit]

Figure 2. Schematic of plasma polymerization process possibilities, w/blue representing dominant pathway.

Plasma contains many species such as ions, free radicals, and electrons, so it is important to look at what contributes to the polymerization process most.[6] The first suggested process by Westwood et al. was that of a cationic polymerization since in a direct current system polymerization occurs mainly on the cathode.[6] However, more investigation has led to the belief that the mechanism is more of a radical polymerization process, since radicals tend to be trapped in the films, and termination can be overcome by reinitiation of oligomers.[7] Other kinetic studies also appear to support this theory.[6]

However, since the mid-1990s several papers focusing on the formation of highly functionalized plasma polymers have postulated a more significant role for cations, particularly where the plasma sheath is collisionless.[11][12] The assumption that the plasma ion density is low and consequently the ion flux to surfaces is low has been challenged, pointing out that ion flux is determined according to the Bohm sheath criterion i.e. ion flux is proportional to the square root of the electron temperature and not RT.[13]

In polymerization, both gas phase and surface reactions occur, but the mechanism differs between high and low frequencies. At high frequencies, it occurs in reactive intermediates, whereas at low frequencies polymerization happens mainly on surfaces. As polymerization occurs, the pressure inside the chamber decreases in a closed system, since gas-phase monomers go to solid polymers. An example diagram of the ways that polymerization can take place is shown in Figure 2, wherein the most abundant pathway is shown in blue with double arrows, with side pathways shown in black. The ablation occurs by gas formation during polymerization. Polymerization has two pathways, either the plasma state or plasma-induced processes, which both lead to the deposited polymer.[7]

Polymers can be deposited on many substrates other than the electrode surfaces, such as glass, other organic polymers, or metals, when either a surface is placed in front of the electrodes, or placed in the middle between them. The ability for them to build off of electrode surfaces is likely to be an electrostatic interaction, while on other surfaces covalent attachment is possible.

Polymerization is likely to take place through either ionic and/or radical processes which are initiated by plasma formed from the glow discharge.[1] The classic view presented by Yasuda[14] based upon thermal initiation of Parylene polymerization is that there are many propagating species present at any given time as shown in Figure 3. This figure shows two different pathways by which the polymerization may take place.

Figure 3. Schematic representation of the bicyclic step-growth mechanism of plasma polymerization.

The first pathway is a monofunctionalization process, which bears resemblance to a standard free radical polymerization mechanism (M•)- although with the caveat that the reactive species may be ionic and not necessarily radical. The second pathway refers to a difunctional mechanism, which for example may contain a cationic and a radical propagating center on the same monomer (•M•). A consequence is that 'polymer' can grow in multiple directions by multiple pathways off one species, such as a surface or other monomer. This possibility let Yasuda to term the mechanism as a very rapid step-growth polymerization.[7] In the diagram, Mx refers to the original monomer molecule or any of many dissociation products such as chlorine, fluorine and hydrogen. The M• species refers to those that are activated and capable of participating in reactions to form new covalent bonds. The •M• species refers to an activated difunctional monomer species. The subscripts i, j, and k show the sizes of the different species involved. Even though radicals represent the activated species, any ion or radical could be used in the polymerization.[7] As can be seen here, plasma polymerization is a very complex process, with many parameters affecting everything from rate to chain length.

Selection or the favoring of one particular pathway can be achieved by altering the plasma parameters. For example, pulsed plasma with selected monomers appears to favor much more regular polymer structures and it has been postulated these grow by a mechanism akin to (radical) chain growth in the plasma off-time.[15]

Common monomers/polymers[edit]

Common monomers
Name Structure
Thiophene
1,7-Octadiene[16]
Pyridine
Acrylonitrile
Furan
Styrene
Acetylene
2-Methyloxazoline[17][18]
Tetramethyldisiloxane

Monomers[edit]

As can be seen in the monomer table, many simple monomers are readily polymerized by this method, but most must be smaller ionizable species because they have to be able to go into the plasma state. Though monomers with multiple bonds polymerize readily, it is not a requirement, as ethane, silicones and many others polymerize also. Other stipulations exist. Yasuda et al. studied 28 monomers and found that those containing aromatic groups, silicon, olefinic group or nitrogen (NH, NH2, CN) were readily polymerizable, while those containing oxygen, halides, aliphatic hydrocarbons and cyclic hydrocarbons were decomposed more readily.[7] The latter compounds have more ablation or side reactions present, which inhibit stable polymer formation. It is also possible to incorporate N2, H2O, and CO into copolymers of styrene.

Plasma polymers can be thought of as a type of graft polymer since they are grown off of a substrate. These polymers are known to form nearly uniform surface deposition, which is one of their desirable properties. Polymers formed from this process often cross-link and form branches due to the multiple propagating species present in the plasma. This often leads to very insoluble polymers, which gives an advantage to this process, since hyperbranched polymers can be deposited directly without solvent.

Polymers[edit]

Common polymers include: polythiophene,[19] polyhexafluoropropylene,[20] polytetramethyltin,[21] polyhexamethyldisiloxane,[22] polytetramethyldisiloxane, polypyridine, polyfuran, and poly-2-methyloxazoline.[17][18]

The following are listed in order of decreasing rate of polymerization: polystyrene, polymethyl styrene, polycyclopentadiene, polyacrylate, polymethyl acrylate, polymethyl methacrylate, polyvinyl acetate, polyisoprene, polyisobutene, and polyethylene.[23]

Nearly all polymers created by this method have excellent appearance, are clear, and are significantly cross-linked. Linear polymers are not formed readily by plasma polymerization methods based on propagating species. Many other polymers could be formed by this method.

General characteristics of plasma polymers[edit]

The properties of plasma polymers differ greatly from those of conventional polymers. While both types are dependent on the chemical properties of the monomer, the properties of plasma polymers depend more greatly on the design of the reactor and the chemical and physical characteristics of the substrate on which the plasma polymer is deposited.[7] The location within the reactor where the deposition occurs also affects the resultant polymer's properties. In fact, by using plasma polymerization with a single monomer and varying the reactor, substrate, etc. a variety of polymers, each having different physical and chemical properties, can be prepared.[7] The large dependence of the polymer features on these factors makes it difficult to assign a set of basic characteristics, but a few common properties that set plasma polymers apart from conventional polymers do exist.

Figure 4. Hypothesized model of plasma-polymerized ethylene film.

The most significant difference between conventional polymers and plasma polymers is that plasma polymers do not contain regular repeating units. Due to the number of different propagating species present at any one time as discussed above, the resultant polymer chains are highly branched and are randomly terminated with a high degree of cross-linking.[24] An example of a proposed structure for plasma polymerized ethylene demonstrating a large extend of cross-linking and branching is shown in Figure 4.

All plasma polymers contain free radicals as well. The amount of free radicals present varies between polymers and is dependent on the chemical structure of the monomer. Because the formation of the trapped free radicals is tied to the growth mechanism of the plasma polymers, the overall properties of the polymers directly correlate to the number of free radicals.[25]

Plasma polymers also contain internal stress. If a thick layer (e.g. 1 µm) of a plasma polymer is deposited on a glass slide, the plasma polymer will buckle and frequently crack. The curling is attributed to an internal stress formed in the plasma polymer during the polymer deposition. The degree of curling is dependent on the monomer as well as the conditions of the plasma polymerization.[7]

Most plasma polymers are insoluble and infusible.[7] These properties are due to the large amount of cross-linking in the polymers, previously discussed. Consequently, the kinetic path length for these polymers must be sufficiently long, so these properties can be controlled to a point.[7]

The permeabilities of plasma polymers also differ greatly from those of conventional polymers. Because of the absence of large-scale segmental mobility and the high degree of cross-linking within the polymers, the permeation of small molecules does not strictly follow the typical mechanisms of "solution-diffusion" or molecular-level sieve for such small permeants. The permeability characteristics of plasma polymers fall between these two ideal cases.[7]

A final common characteristic of plasma polymers is the adhesion ability. The specifics of the adhesion ability for a given plasma polymer, such as thickness and characteristics of the surface layer, again are particular for a given plasma polymer and few generalizations can be made.[7]

Advantages and disadvantages[edit]

Plasma polymerization offers several advantages over other polymerization methods in general. The most significant advantage of plasma polymerization is its ability to produce polymer films of organic compounds that do not polymerize under normal chemical polymerization conditions. Nearly all monomers, even saturated hydrocarbons and organic compounds without a polymerizable structure such as a double bond, can be polymerized with this technique.[24]

A second advantage is the ease of application of the polymers as coatings versus conventional coating processes. While coating a substrate with conventional polymers requires several steps, plasma polymerization accomplishes all these in essentially a single step.[1] This leads to a cleaner and 'greener' synthesis and coating process since no solvent is needed during the polymer preparation and no cleaning of the resultant polymer is needed either. Another 'green' aspect of the synthesis is that no initiator is needed for the polymer preparation since reusable electrodes cause the reaction to proceed. The resultant polymer coatings also have several advantages over typical coatings. These advantages include being nearly pinhole-free, highly dense, and the thickness of the coating can easily be varied.[26]

There are also several disadvantages relating to plasma polymerization versus conventional methods. The most significant disadvantage is the high cost of the process. A vacuum system is required for the polymerization, significantly increasing the set-up price.[26]

Another disadvantage is due to the complexity of plasma processes. Because of the complexity, it is not easy to achieve good control over the chemical composition of the surface after modification. The influence of process parameters on the chemical composition of the resultant polymer means it can take a long time to determine the optimal conditions.[26] The complexity of the process also makes it impossible to theorize what the resultant polymer will look like, unlike conventional polymers which can be easily determined based on the monomer.

Applications[edit]

The advantages offered by plasma polymerization have resulted in substantial research on the applications of these polymers. The vastly different chemical and mechanical properties offered by polymers formed with plasma polymerization means they can be applied to countless different systems. Applications ranging from adhesion, composite materials, protective coatings, printing, membranes, biomedical applications, water purification, and so on have all been studied.[27]

Of particular interest since the 1980s has been the deposition of functionalized plasma polymer films. For example, functionalized films are used as a means of improving biocompatibility for biological implants6 and for producing super-hydrophobic coatings. They have also been extensively employed in biomaterials for cell attachment, protein binding, and anti-fouling surfaces. Through the use of low-power and pressure plasma, high functional retention can be achieved which has led to substantial improvements in the biocompatibility of some products, a simple example being the development of extended-wear contact lenses. Due to these successes, the huge potential of functional plasma polymers is slowly being realized by workers in previously unrelated fields such as water treatment and wound management. Emerging technologies such as nanopatterning, 3D scaffolds, micro-channel coating, and microencapsulation are now also utilizing functionalized plasma polymers, areas for which traditional polymers are often unsuitable

A significant area of research has been on the use of plasma polymer films as permeation membranes. The permeability characteristics of plasma polymers deposited on porous substrates are different than usual polymer films. The characteristics depend on the deposition and polymerization mechanism.[28] Plasma polymers as membranes for separation of oxygen and nitrogen, ethanol and water, and water vapor permeation have all been studied.[28] The application of plasma polymerized thin films as reverse osmosis membranes has received considerable attention as well. Yasuda et al. have shown membranes prepared with plasma polymerization made from nitrogen-containing monomers can yield up to 98% salt rejection with a flux of 6.4 gallons/ft2 a day.[7] Further research has shown that varying the monomers of the membrane offers other properties as well, such as chlorine resistance.[7]

Plasma-polymerized films have also found electrical applications. Given that plasma polymers frequently contain many polar groups, which form when the radicals react with oxygen in the air during the polymerization process, the plasma polymers were expected to be good dielectric materials in thin film form.[28] Studies have shown that plasma polymers generally do have a higher dielectric property. Some plasma polymers have been applied as chemical sensory devices due to their electrical properties. Plasma polymers have been studied as chemical sensory devices for humidity, propane, and carbon dioxide amongst others. Thus far issues with instability against aging and humidity have limited their commercial applications.[28]

The application of plasma polymers as coatings has also been studied. Plasma polymers formed from tetramethoxysilane have been studied as protective coatings and have been shown to increase the hardness of polyethylene and polycarbonate.[28] The use of plasma polymers to coat plastic lenses is increasing in popularity. Plasma depositions can easily coat curved materials with good uniformity, such as those of bifocals. The different plasma polymers used can be not only scratch resistant but also hydrophobic leading to anti-fogging effects.[29] Plasma polymer surfaces with tunable wettability and reversibly switchable pH-responsiveness have shown promising prospects due to their unique property in applications, such as drug delivery, biomaterial engineering, oil/water separation processes, sensors, and biofuel cells.[30]

References[edit]

  1. ^ a b c d e f Yasuda, H. (1981). "Glow Discharge Polymerization". Journal of Polymer Science: Macromolecular Reviews. 16 (1): 199–293. doi:10.1002/pol.1981.230160104.
  • ^ Goodman, J (1960). "The formation of thin polymer films in the gas discharge". Journal of Polymer Science. 44 (144): 551–552. Bibcode:1960JPoSc..44..551G. doi:10.1002/pol.1960.1204414428.
  • ^ Michelmore, Andrew; Martinek, Petr; Sah, Vasu; Short, Robert D; Vasilev, Krasimir (2011). "Surface Morphology in the Early Stages of Plasma Polymer Film Growth from Amine-Containing Monomers". Plasma Processes and Polymers. 8 (5): 367. doi:10.1002/ppap.201000140.
  • ^ Chen, Rodney T; Muir, Benjamin W; Thomsen, Lars; Tadich, Anton; Cowie, Bruce C. C; Such, Georgina K; Postma, Almar; McLean, Keith M; Caruso, Frank (2011). "New Insights into the Substrate–Plasma Polymer Interface". The Journal of Physical Chemistry B. 115 (20): 6495–502. doi:10.1021/jp200864k. PMID 21542588.
  • ^ Michelmore, Andrew; Steele, David A; Whittle, Jason D; Bradley, James W; Short, Robert D (2013). "Nanoscale deposition of chemically functionalized films via plasma polymerization". RSC Advances. 3 (33): 13540. doi:10.1039/c3ra41563e.
  • ^ a b c d e f g h i j Shen, Mitchel; Alexis T. Bell (1979). Plasma Polymerization. Washington D.C.: American Chemical Society. ISBN 978-0-8412-0510-9.
  • ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p Yasuda, H. (1985). Plasma Polymerization. Orlando, Fl: Academic Press, Inc. ISBN 978-0-12-768760-5.
  • ^ Westwood, A.R. (March 1971). "Glow Discharge Polymerization-I Rates and Mechanisms of Polymer Formation". European Polymer Journal. 7 (4): 363–375. doi:10.1016/0014-3057(71)90007-3.
  • ^ Yasuda, H.; Lamaze, C. E. (1971). "Polymerization of styrene in an electrodeless glow discharge". Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 15 (9): 2277–2292. doi:10.1002/app.1971.070150918.
  • ^ Noeske, M (2004). "Plasma jet treatment of five polymers at atmospheric pressure: surface modifications and the relevance for adhesion". International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives. 24 (2): 171–177. doi:10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2003.09.006.
  • ^ Williams, K. L.; Martin, I. T.; Fisher, E. R. On the Importance of Ions and Ion−Molecule Reactions to Plasma-Surface Interface Reactions. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2002, 13, 518
  • ^ Michelmore, A.; Bryant, P.M.; Steele, D.A.; Vasilev, K.; Bradley, J.W.; Short, R.D., Role of Positive Ions in Determining the Deposition Rate and Film Chemistry of Continuous Wave Hexamethyl Disiloxane Plasmas, Langmuir, 2011, 27, 11943-11950
  • ^ Bohm, D. In The Characteristics of Electrical Discharges in Magnetic Fields; Guthrie, A., Wakerling, R. K., Eds.; McGraw Hill: New York and London, 1949
  • ^ Yasuda, H; Lamaze, C. E (1971). "Polymerization of styrene in an electrodeless glow discharge". Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 15 (9): 2277. doi:10.1002/app.1971.070150918.
  • ^ Beyer, D.; Knoll, W.; Ringsdorf, H.; Wang, J.-H.; Timmons, R. B.; Sluka, P. Reduced Protein Adsorption on Plastics via Direct Plasma Deposition of Triethylene Glycol Monoallyl Ether. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 1997, 36, 181.
  • ^ Akhavan, Behnam; et al. (1 October 2013). "Evolution of Hydrophobicity in Plasma Polymerised 1,7-Octadiene Films". Plasma Processes and Polymers. 10 (11): 1018–1029. doi:10.1002/ppap.201300055.
  • ^ a b Ramiasa, M. N.; Cavallaro, A. A.; Mierczynska, A.; Christo, S. N.; Gleadle, J. M.; Hayball, J. D.; Vasilev, K. (2015). "Plasma polymerized polyoxazoline thin films for biomedical applications". Chem. Commun. 51 (20): 4279–4282. doi:10.1039/C5CC00260E. PMID 25673366.
  • ^ a b Macgregor-Ramiasa, Melanie N.; Cavallaro, Alex A.; Vasilev, Krasimir (2015). "Properties and reactivity of polyoxazoline plasma polymer films". J. Mater. Chem. B. 3 (30): 6327–6337. doi:10.1039/C5TB00901D. PMID 32262751.
  • ^ Dinescu, G. "Polythiophene thin films deposited in various RF plasma polymerization configurations" (PDF). International Symposium on Plasma Chemistry. Retrieved 19 March 2011.
  • ^ Chen, R; Gorelik, V.; Silverstein, M.S. (1995). "Plasma polymerization of hexafluoropropylene: Film deposition and structure". Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 56 (5): 615–623. doi:10.1002/app.1995.070560510.
  • ^ Kny, Erich; Levenson, L.L.; James, W.J. (1980). "Organotini Polymers Formed by Glow-Discharge Polymerization". Journal of Physical Chemistry. 84 (12): 1635–1638. doi:10.1021/j100449a039.
  • ^ Plasma Etch. "Plasma Polymerization". Plasma Etch. Retrieved 20 September 2015.
  • ^ Williams, T.; Hayes, M.W. (1966). "Polymerization in a Glow Discharge". Nature. 209 (5025): 769–773. Bibcode:1966Natur.209..769W. doi:10.1038/209769a0. S2CID 4285812.
  • ^ a b Zang, Z. (2003). Surface Modification by Plasma Polymerization and Application of Plasma Polymers as Biomaterials (PDF). Johanneses Gutenberg University of Mainz.
  • ^ "Plasma Polymerization". 2015.
  • ^ a b c Van Os, M. (2000). Surface Modification by Plasma Polymerization: Film Deposition, Tailoring of Surface Properties, and Biocompatibility (PDF). The Netherlands: University of Twente, Enschede.
  • ^ Akhavan, Behnam; et al. (November 2013). "Hydrophobic Plasma Polymer Coated Silica Particles for Petroleum Hydrocarbon Removal". ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 5 (17): 8563–8571. doi:10.1021/am4020154. PMID 23942510.
  • ^ a b c d e Inagaki, N. (1996). Plasma surface modification and plasma polymerization. Lancaster, Pa.: Technomic Pub. Co. ISBN 978-1-56676-337-0.
  • ^ Koller, Albert. "The PPV Plasma Polymerization System: A New Technology for Functional Coatings on Plastics" (PDF). Balzers Ltd. Retrieved 17 March 2011.
  • ^ Muzammil, Iqbal; Li, Yupeng; Lei, Mingkai (2017). "Tunable wettability and pH-responsiveness of plasma copolymers of acrylic acid and octafluorocyclobutane". Plasma Processes and Polymers. 14 (10): 1700053. doi:10.1002/ppap.201700053. S2CID 104161308.

  • Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Plasma_polymerization&oldid=1164627510"

    Categories: 
    Chemical processes
    Plasma processing
    Polymerization reactions
    Chemical vapor deposition
    Hidden categories: 
    Use dmy dates from November 2020
    All articles with unsourced statements
    Articles with unsourced statements from July 2015
     



    This page was last edited on 10 July 2023, at 05:00 (UTC).

    Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 4.0; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.



    Privacy policy

    About Wikipedia

    Disclaimers

    Contact Wikipedia

    Code of Conduct

    Developers

    Statistics

    Cookie statement

    Mobile view



    Wikimedia Foundation
    Powered by MediaWiki