curprev15:3515:35, 9 July 2023 Deadeasytalkcontribs m49,839 bytes+12 The original wording suggests that because it is an engineering plastic it is also a transparent plastic - but not all engineering plastics are transparent. The change adds a bit of clarity.undo
curprev23:5423:54, 29 June 2023 73.94.165.171talk 49,740 bytes−707 The reference is terrible and the statement is nonsense - regular glass is compatible with human tissue. The issue is not tissue compatibility, it is fracturing behavior. Putting this strange statement back should require an additional source.undoTag: references removed