curprev07:4307:43, 3 April 2024 Sira Asperatalkcontribs 85,353 bytes−1,228 I do not agree. The text gives ample and repeated space to an absolutely minority hypothesis put forward by someone who is not a historian, has not studied history and has no academic importance on the topic and that, in essence, he has made extraordinary claims without adequately substantiating them. In essence, I do not consider it a reliable source if without countersources demonstrating that it has been taken into consideration by the academic debate.undoTags: Manual revertRevertedVisual editMobile editMobile web editAdvanced mobile edit