Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Etymology  





2 Usage  





3 See also  





4 References  





5 External links  














Recto and verso: Difference between revisions






العربية
Bikol Central
Català
Dansk
Español
Bahasa Indonesia
Italiano
Nederlands
Norsk bokmål
Polski
Shqip
Svenska
Українська

 

Edit links
 









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Cite this page
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
Wikidata item
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 




Print/export  







In other projects  



Wikimedia Commons
 
















Appearance
   

 





Help
 

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


Browse history interactively
 Previous editNext edit 
Content deleted Content added
Bluelinking 1 books for verifiability.) #IABot (v2.1alpha3
→‎Usage: Verso and Recto were in the wrong order
Line 19: Line 19:

Lyons (2011) argues that the term ''rectum'' "right, correct, proper" for the front side of the leaf derives from the use of [[papyrus]] in Late Antiquity, as a different grain ran across each side, and only one side was suitable to be written on, so that usually papyrus would carry writing only on the "correct", smooth side (and just in exceptional cases would there be writing on the reverse side of the leaf).<ref>Martyn Lyons (2011). ''Books A Living History''. Getty Publications. p. 21. {{ISBN|9781606060834}}.</ref><!--is this original speculation due to Lyons or does he have some kind of basis for that? I.e. is there any evidence of ''rectum'' used of a papyrus page in Late or Classical Latin? If so, it is not mentioned in Lewis & Short.-->

Lyons (2011) argues that the term ''rectum'' "right, correct, proper" for the front side of the leaf derives from the use of [[papyrus]] in Late Antiquity, as a different grain ran across each side, and only one side was suitable to be written on, so that usually papyrus would carry writing only on the "correct", smooth side (and just in exceptional cases would there be writing on the reverse side of the leaf).<ref>Martyn Lyons (2011). ''Books A Living History''. Getty Publications. p. 21. {{ISBN|9781606060834}}.</ref><!--is this original speculation due to Lyons or does he have some kind of basis for that? I.e. is there any evidence of ''rectum'' used of a papyrus page in Late or Classical Latin? If so, it is not mentioned in Lewis & Short.-->



The terms "recto" and "verso" are also used in the codiology of manuscripts written in right-to-left scripts, like [[Syriac alphabet|Syriac]], [[Arabic alphabet|Arabic]] and [[Hebrew alphabet|Hebrew]]. However, as these scripts are written in the other direction to the scripts witnessed in European codices, the recto page is to the left while the verso is to the right. The reading order of each folio remains first recto, then verso regardless of writing direction.

The terms "recto" and "verso" are also used in the codiology of manuscripts written in right-to-left scripts, like [[Syriac alphabet|Syriac]], [[Arabic alphabet|Arabic]] and [[Hebrew alphabet|Hebrew]]. However, as these scripts are written in the other direction to the scripts witnessed in European codices, the recto page is to the left while the verso is to the right. The reading order of each folio remains first verso, then recto regardless of writing direction.



The terms are carried over into printing; ''recto-verso''<ref>''Recto verso'' is an expression in [[French language|French]] that means "two sides of a sheet or page". In Flanders the term recto verso is also used to indicate two-sided printing. Duplex printers are referred to as recto verso printers.</ref> is the norm for printed books but was an important advantage of the [[printing press]] over the much older Asian [[woodblock printing]] method, which printed by rubbing from behind the page being printed, and so could only print on one side of a piece of paper. The distinction between recto and verso can be convenient in the [[annotation]] of scholarly books, particularly in [[bilingual edition]] translations.

The terms are carried over into printing; ''recto-verso''<ref>''Recto verso'' is an expression in [[French language|French]] that means "two sides of a sheet or page". In Flanders the term recto verso is also used to indicate two-sided printing. Duplex printers are referred to as recto verso printers.</ref> is the norm for printed books but was an important advantage of the [[printing press]] over the much older Asian [[woodblock printing]] method, which printed by rubbing from behind the page being printed, and so could only print on one side of a piece of paper. The distinction between recto and verso can be convenient in the [[annotation]] of scholarly books, particularly in [[bilingual edition]] translations.


Revision as of 01:18, 17 January 2020

Left-to-right language books (for example in English)
Right-to-left language books (vertical Japanese, Arabic, or Hebrew)

Recto and verso are respectively, the text written or printed on the "right" or "front" side and on the "back" side of a leaf of paper in a bound item such as a codex, book, broadsheet, or pamphlet.

Etymology

The terms are shortened from Latin rectō foliō and versō foliō, translating to "on the right side of the leaf" and "on the back side of the leaf". The two opposite pages themselves are called folium rectum and folium versum in Latin,[1] and the ablative recto, verso already imply that the text on the page (and not the physical page itself) are referred to.

Usage

Incodicology, each physical sheet (folium, abbreviated fol.orf.) of a manuscript is numbered and the sides are referred to as rectum and folium versum, abbreviated as r and v respectively. Editions of manuscripts will thus mark the position of text in the original manuscript in the form fol. 1r, sometimes with the r and v in superscript, as in 1r, or with a superscript o indicating the ablative recto, verso, as in 1ro.[2] This terminology has been standard since the beginnings of modern codicology in the 17th century.

Lyons (2011) argues that the term rectum "right, correct, proper" for the front side of the leaf derives from the use of papyrus in Late Antiquity, as a different grain ran across each side, and only one side was suitable to be written on, so that usually papyrus would carry writing only on the "correct", smooth side (and just in exceptional cases would there be writing on the reverse side of the leaf).[3]

The terms "recto" and "verso" are also used in the codiology of manuscripts written in right-to-left scripts, like Syriac, Arabic and Hebrew. However, as these scripts are written in the other direction to the scripts witnessed in European codices, the recto page is to the left while the verso is to the right. The reading order of each folio remains first verso, then recto regardless of writing direction.

The terms are carried over into printing; recto-verso[4] is the norm for printed books but was an important advantage of the printing press over the much older Asian woodblock printing method, which printed by rubbing from behind the page being printed, and so could only print on one side of a piece of paper. The distinction between recto and verso can be convenient in the annotation of scholarly books, particularly in bilingual edition translations.

The "recto" and "verso" terms can also be employed for the front and back of a one-sheet artwork, particularly in drawing. A recto-verso drawing is a sheet with drawings on both sides, for example in a sketchbook—although usually in these cases there is no obvious primary side. Some works are planned to exploit being on two sides of the same piece of paper, but usually the works are not intended to be considered together. Paper was relatively expensive in the past; indeed good drawing paper still is much more expensive than normal paper.

By book publishing convention, the first page of a book, and sometimes of each section and chapter of a book, is a recto page,[5] and hence all recto pages will have odd numbers and all verso pages will have even numbers.[6][7]

In many early printed books or incunables and still in some 16th-century books (e.g. João de Barros's Décadas da Ásia), it is the folia ("leaves") rather than the pages, that are numbered. Thus each folium carries a consecutive number on its recto side, while on the verso side there is no number.[8] This was also very common in e.g. internal company reports in the 20th century, before double-sided printers became commonplace in offices.

See also

References

  1. ^ e.g. Quibus carminibus finitur totum primum folium versum (rectum vacat) voluminis "These poems finish the full back page (the front is blank) of the first leaf of the volume" [Giovanni Battista Audiffredi], Catalogus historico-criticus Romanarum editionum saeculi XV (1783), p. 225.
  • ^ e.g. Roberts, Longinus on the Sublime: The Greek Text Edited After the Paris Manuscript (2011), 170; Wijngaards, The Ordained Women Deacons of the Church's First Millennium (2012), 232; etc. Tylus, Manuscrits français de la collection berlinoise disponibles à la Bibliothèque Jagellonne de Cracovie (XVIe-XIXe siècles) (2010)[1]
  • ^ Martyn Lyons (2011). Books A Living History. Getty Publications. p. 21. ISBN 9781606060834.
  • ^ Recto verso is an expression in French that means "two sides of a sheet or page". In Flanders the term recto verso is also used to indicate two-sided printing. Duplex printers are referred to as recto verso printers.
  • ^ Drake, Paul (2007). "The Basic Elements and Order of a Book". You Ought to Write All That Down. Heritage Books. p. 1. ISBN 978-0-7884-0989-9.
  • ^ Gilad, Suzanne (2007). Copyediting & Proofreading For Dummies. For Dummies. p. 209. ISBN 9780470121719.
  • ^ Merriam–Webster, Inc. (1998). Merriam-Webster's Manual for Writers and Editors. Merriam–Webster. pp. 337. ISBN 9780877796220.
  • ^ See e.g. a modern reprint of the 3rd Década (1563): Ásia de João de Barros: Dos feitos que os Portugueses fizeram no descobrimento e conquista dos mares e terras do Oriente. Tercera Década. Imprensa Nacional – Casa da Moeda, 1992.
  • External links


    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Recto_and_verso&oldid=936156692"

    Categories: 
    Printing
    Book design
    Book terminology
    Papyrus
     



    This page was last edited on 17 January 2020, at 01:18 (UTC).

    This version of the page has been revised. Besides normal editing, the reason for revision may have been that this version contains factual inaccuracies, vandalism, or material not compatible with the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License.



    Privacy policy

    About Wikipedia

    Disclaimers

    Contact Wikipedia

    Code of Conduct

    Developers

    Statistics

    Cookie statement

    Mobile view



    Wikimedia Foundation
    Powered by MediaWiki