Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Description  





2 Background  





3 Development history  



3.1  Hot-fire ground tests  





3.2  Test program accident  





3.3  Commencement of flight testing  





3.4  2014 change of engine  





3.5  PF04 malfunction  







4 Production  





5 See also  





6 References  





7 External links  














RocketMotorTwo: Difference between revisions






Deutsch
Português
 

Edit links
 









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Cite this page
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
Wikidata item
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 




Print/export  



















Appearance
   

 





Help
 

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


Browse history interactively
 Previous editNext edit 
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 42: Line 42:


==Production==

==Production==

The hybrid rocket motor and its oxidizer valve system were produced in SNC’s manufacturing facility in [[Poway, California]] in conjunction with Scaled Composites. In 2013, the Poway facility was reported to be "currently producing motors for both SpaceShipTwo and SNC’s own [[Dream Chaser]] orbital crew vehicle".<ref name=pa20130429sn/>

The HTPB hybrid rocket motor and its oxidizer valve system were produced in SNC’s manufacturing facility in [[Poway, California]] in conjunction with Scaled Composites. In 2013, the Poway facility was reported to be "currently producing motors for both SpaceShipTwo and SNC’s own [[Dream Chaser]] orbital crew vehicle".<ref name=pa20130429sn/>

SNC closed the Poway facility in late 2014.{{cn|date=October 2014}}

SNC closed the Poway facility in late 2014.{{cn|date=October 2014}}


The polyamide hybrid rocket motor is a modified version of the polybutadiene version, with different oxidizer valve arrangement. Most of the engine remains the same, but for changing the fuel cartridge from rubber to plastic fuel.<ref name=PressConference-20141031@5pmEDT/>



==See also==

==See also==


Revision as of 08:54, 2 November 2014

RocketMotorTwo is the first generation hybrid rocket engine that was under development for the Scaled Composites SpaceShipTwo suborbital spaceplanebySierra Nevada Corporation (SNC),[1] and was first ignited in flight during a SpaceShipTwo test launch in April 2013.[2][3] This engine design was subsequently flown in only two additional flight tests.[4]

SNC was a subcontractor to Scaled Composites through May 2014 when the program ended after Virgin Galactic elected to replace SNC's version of RocketMotorTwo powered by HTBD rubber fuel, with its own internally-developed hybrid motor for SpaceShipTwo.[4] The new RocketMotorTwo engine is a variant of the SNC basic design, powered by polyamide plastic fuel.[5]

Description

RocketMotorTwo is a hybrid rocket engine utilizing solid hydroxyl-terminated polybutadiene (HTPB) fuel and liquid nitrous oxide oxidizer – sometimes referred to as an N2O/HTPB motor[6][7] – providing 60,000 pounds-force (270 kN) of thrust. The design makes use of lessons learned during the development of the SpaceShipOne hybrid rocket motor.[8]

Background

As of March 2013, Sierra Nevada had performed over 300 hybrid rocket test firings. The company also developed the rocket engine for the first private spacecraft to reach space, SpaceShipOne, which won the Ansari X-Prize in 2004. Sierra Nevada is also developing a similar hybrid engine, the Dream Chaser rocket engine.[9]

Development history

Hot-fire ground tests

Scaled Composites performed a series of subscale rocket hot-firings between June 2005 and April 2009, before choosing a full-scale rocket motor design.[10] By December 2012, 21 full-scale hot-fire ground tests had been carried out on RocketMotorTwo.[10][11][12] On 20 June 2012, the first hot-fire test under the control of SpaceShipTwo's proprietary Rocket Motor Controller (RMC) was successfully conducted.[10]

Test program accident

On 26 July 2007, during the early rocket testing phase, an explosion occurred during a propellant flow test at the Mojave Air and Space Port. The test included filling the oxidizer tank with 4,500 kg (10,000 pounds) of nitrous oxide, followed by a 15-second cold flow injector test. Although the tests did not ignite the gas, three employees were killed and three injured, two critically and one seriously, by flying shrapnel.[13]

Commencement of flight testing

In July 2012, Virgin Galactic, the owner of VSS Enterprise – the first SpaceShipTwo spaceplane built – announced that RocketMotorTwo was fully qualified for powered flight, and that the ground test program was substantially complete.[14] SpaceShipTwo conducted its first gliding test flight with the engine fully installed in December 2012.[15] Additional ground rocket tests continued into March 2013 as the company prepared for powered test flights.[16]

VSS Enterprise conducted its first powered flight on 29 April 2013,[2] marking the first flight test of RocketMotorTwo. The test was a 16-second burn as planned, and was ignited at an altitude of 47,000 feet (14,000 m), shortly after Enterprise was released from its WhiteKnightTwo carrier aircraft and the pilots cross-checked data and verified stable control. The RM2 control system opened the main oxidizer valve and fired the igniters inside the fuel case. The burn was completed at an altitude of 55,000 feet (17,000 m), by which point Enterprise was supersonic, achieving Mach 1.2 (1,300 km/h; 790 mph). SNC stated after the test that "The rocket motor ignition went as planned, with the expected burn duration, [and] good engine performance."[3]

2014 change of engine

In May 2014, Virgin Galactic announced a change to the hybrid engine to be used in SpaceShipTwo, and took the development effort in-house, terminating the contract with Sierra Nevada and all development on the first-generation rocket engine.[4]

Rather than use rubber-based HTPB in the solid portion of the hybrid rocket motor—which had experienced serious engine stability issues on firings longer than approximately 20 seconds—the Virgin Galactic-developed SS2 hybrid rocket engine would now use thermoplastic polyamide (i.e., nylon) as the solid fuel component of the propellant. The plastic fuel was projected to have better performance (by several unspecified measures) and was expected to allow SpaceShipTwo to make flights to a higher altitude.[17][18][19]

As of May 2014, the new engine formulation had already completed full-duration burns of over 60 seconds in ground tests on an engine test stand.[18] However, four additional ground tests of the polyamide-fueled engine are anticipated before the SpaceShipTwo flight test could resume with the new-fuel rocket motor.[19]

PF04 malfunction

On 31 October 2014, the new polyamide engine fuel formulation was used in flight for the first time in the PF04 powered test flight of SpaceShipTwo. At 10:12am PDT, VSS Enterprise suffered an engine malfunction, and subsequently broke up in mid-flight. The inflight mishap resulted in the death of one test pilot and severe injuries to the other test pilot, and a total loss of the vehicle.[20][21][22]

Production

The HTPB hybrid rocket motor and its oxidizer valve system were produced in SNC’s manufacturing facility in Poway, California in conjunction with Scaled Composites. In 2013, the Poway facility was reported to be "currently producing motors for both SpaceShipTwo and SNC’s own Dream Chaser orbital crew vehicle".[3] SNC closed the Poway facility in late 2014.[citation needed]

The polyamide hybrid rocket motor is a modified version of the polybutadiene version, with different oxidizer valve arrangement. Most of the engine remains the same, but for changing the fuel cartridge from rubber to plastic fuel.[20]

See also

References

  1. ^ Leonard David. "Virgin Galactic Pushes Private Spaceship Envelope in Test Flights". Space.com. 10 June 2011. Retrieved 19 May 2013.
  • ^ a b "Sir Richard Branson's Virgin Galactic spaceship ignites engine in flight". BBC. 29 April 2013. Retrieved 29 April 2013.
  • ^ a b c Messier, Doug (29 April 2013). "SNC: Yeah, We Lit that Candle and it Worked, Baby!". Parabolic Arc. Retrieved 19 May 2013.
  • ^ a b c "SNC Statement in Response to Inquiries Regarding 10-31-14 Virgin Galactic SpaceShipTwo Incident". SNC Press Release. Sierra Nevada Corporation. 2014-10-31. Retrieved 2014-11-01.
  • ^ Doug Messier (24 May 2014). "Virgin Galactic Hails RocketMotorTwo Milestone". ParabolicArc.
  • ^ "Propulsion Systems: multiple-burn, green and low-cost" (PDF). Sierra Nevada. Retrieved 8 March 2013.
  • ^ "Safe Hybrid Rocket". Overview – Safety. Virgin Galactic. 2013. Retrieved 8 March 2013.
  • ^ "SpaceShipTwo performs first Rocket-Powered Flight". Spaceflight101.com. 29 April 2013. Retrieved 19 May 2013.
  • ^ "Propulsion Systems". Sierra Nevada Corporation. Retrieved 2012-12-09.
  • ^ a b c "RocketMotorTwo Hot-Fire Test Summaries". Scaled.com. 9 August 2012. Retrieved 10 December 2012.
  • ^ Lindsey, Clark (20 December 2012). "SpaceShipTwo rocket motor tests in Nov. and Dec". NewSpace Watch. Retrieved 22 December 2012. {{cite news}}: Unknown parameter |subscription= ignored (|url-access= suggested) (help)
  • ^ "Virgin Galactic successfully completes SpaceShipTwo glide flight test and rocket motor firing on same day". SpaceRef.com. 28 June 2012. Retrieved 19 May 2013.
  • ^ Abdollah, Tami and Silverstein, Stuart (27 July 2007). "Test Site Explosion Kills Three". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved 27 July 2007.
  • ^ Ruddick, Graham (11 July 2012). "Farnborough Airshow: Branson's Virgin Galactic 'spaceship' in UK debut". The Telegraph. Retrieved 13 July 2012.
  • ^ "SpaceShipTwo straps on its engine". NBC. 20 December 2012. Retrieved 20 December 2012.
  • ^ Richard Branson (5 March 2013). "This isn't sci-fi". Virgin.com. Retrieved 5 March 2013.
  • ^ Foust, Jeff (2014-05-24). "Virgin Galactic changes fuels as it prepares for its next round of test flights". NewSpace Journal. Retrieved 2014-05-25.
  • ^ a b Boyle, Alan (2014-05-23). "Virgin Galactic Makes a Switch in SpaceShipTwo's Rocket Motor". NBC News. Retrieved 2014-05-24.
  • ^ a b "New Fuel to Boost SpaceShip Two". Aviation Week. 2014-05-24. Retrieved 2014-05-27.
  • ^ a b Mojave Air and Space Port press conference on October 31, 2014, at 2:00 p.m. PDT — involving: the Spaceport, Sheriff's Department, County Fire Department, Scaled Composites, Virgin Galactic
  • ^ Mark Prigg, Chris Spargo, Lydia Warren, Kieran Corcoran (31 October 2014). "Moment Virgin Galactic spaceship exploded at 45,000ft". Daily Mail (London).{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  • ^ Ralph Ellis, Chelsea J. Carter, Jason Hanna, Brad Pechanec (1 November 2014). "Spaceplane Incident Sparks Investigation". WIBW 13 News Kansas.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  • External links


    Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=RocketMotorTwo&oldid=632116754"

    Categories: 
    Rocket engines
    Tier 1b program
    Hidden categories: 
    CS1 errors: unsupported parameter
    CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list
    Articles containing potentially dated statements from March 2013
    All articles containing potentially dated statements
    Articles to be expanded from April 2013
    All articles to be expanded
    Articles using small message boxes
    Articles containing potentially dated statements from May 2014
    All articles with unsourced statements
    Articles with unsourced statements from October 2014
     



    This page was last edited on 2 November 2014, at 08:54 (UTC).

    This version of the page has been revised. Besides normal editing, the reason for revision may have been that this version contains factual inaccuracies, vandalism, or material not compatible with the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License.



    Privacy policy

    About Wikipedia

    Disclaimers

    Contact Wikipedia

    Code of Conduct

    Developers

    Statistics

    Cookie statement

    Mobile view



    Wikimedia Foundation
    Powered by MediaWiki