curprev08:2508:25, 2 September 2023 Hws5mptalkcontribs 21,840 bytes−340 One instance of this incorrect claim already removed without challenge on 17dec21. Source attributes shell intercept to Seawolf, not Seadart, as do many other sources.undo
curprev21:5221:52, 17 December 2021 Mark83talkcontribs 21,178 bytes−162 Revert. Your reference talks about the Sea WOLF's capability against shells in tesing. Not Sea Dart. "The Seawolf was to provide close-in defense against low-flying aircraft and sea skimming missiles: this missile had demonstrated in tests its ability not only to carry out these tasks, but even to intercept shells at close range". Not the correct missile system in reference, no mention of 4.5" shells, and no verifiability of "extremely high performance". That's inferred/original researchundoTag: Undo