curprev08:4908:49, 26 December 2022 Spidermariotalkcontribs 38,277 bytes−182 Attempt at clarifying the definition and making it more correct (“unlikely to have occurred […] by chance alone” made it sound like a posterior probability that chance alone produced the result i.e. that the null hypothesis is true, which is not what statistical significance means)undo
curprev20:5120:51, 5 May 2022 209.131.237.182talk 38,022 bytes+59 Attempt to clarify the sentence. The data are what make the result significant and the significance comes from the data being unlikely to have come from the statistical model of the chosen null hypothesis.undoTag: Reverted
curprev03:5903:59, 15 November 2021 Sweetkindsingertalkcontribs m37,797 bytes+26 Added the word "significance", in parallel construction, for clarity. In the original, the reader's first interpretation will be "statistical significance is not the same as research."undo
curprev15:1115:11, 20 September 2021 Citation bottalkcontribs 37,961 bytes−30 Add: s2cid, doi-access. Removed proxy/dead URL that duplicated identifier. Removed access-date with no URL. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Headbomb | Linked from Wikipedia:WikiProject_Academic_Journals/Journals_cited_by_Wikipedia/Sandbox | #UCB_webform_linked 559/1125undo
