|
m Archiving 1 discussion(s) to Talk:ʻOumuamua/Archive 5) (bot
|
→New study on why Hydrogen Iceberg doesn't work: new section
|
||
| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
[https://www.npr.org/2023/03/22/1164814086/scientists-think-they-know-why-interstellar-object-oumuamua-moved-so-strangely Scientists think they know why interstellar object 'Oumuamua moved so strangely] -- [[User:Beland|Beland]] ([[User talk:Beland|talk]]) 21:27, 22 March 2023 (UTC) |
[https://www.npr.org/2023/03/22/1164814086/scientists-think-they-know-why-interstellar-object-oumuamua-moved-so-strangely Scientists think they know why interstellar object 'Oumuamua moved so strangely] -- [[User:Beland|Beland]] ([[User talk:Beland|talk]]) 21:27, 22 March 2023 (UTC) |
||
== New study on why Hydrogen Iceberg doesn't work == |
|||
https://avi-loeb.medium.com/oumuamua-was-not-a-hydrogen-water-iceberg-1dd2f7a6107f Looks like the hydrogen theory is bust, so to my knowledge it looks like pretty much every proposed explanation for what this thing was has been shot down. — '''''<small>[[User:Insertcleverphrasehere|Insertcleverphrasehere]]<sup>([[User talk:Insertcleverphrasehere|or here]])<small><sub>([[Special:contributions/Insertcleverphrasehere|or here)]]<sup>([[WP:NPP|or here]])</sup></sub></small></sup></small>''''' 19:39, 21 June 2023 (UTC) |
|||
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the ʻOumuamua article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 14 days  |
 | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | A news item involving ʻOumuamua was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 20 November 2017. |  |
 | This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org
|
 | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on October 19, 2020 and October 19, 2022. |
|
| |||||
|
|||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
While not stressed, the article still has too much emphasis on this - there are probably less than 5 astrophysicists who give even the slightest credence to this guff. I recommend reducing it to the briefest of mentions and removing it from the lede. 50.111.29.1 (talk) 14:26, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
:I went to review it and there was a very clear, concise description that a small number of astrophysicists may think its is extra terrestrial. Which I think is fair. MaximusEditor (talk) 19:50, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Scientists think they know why interstellar object 'Oumuamua moved so strangely -- Beland (talk) 21:27, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
https://avi-loeb.medium.com/oumuamua-was-not-a-hydrogen-water-iceberg-1dd2f7a6107f Looks like the hydrogen theory is bust, so to my knowledge it looks like pretty much every proposed explanation for what this thing was has been shot down. — Insertcleverphrasehere(or here)(or here)(or here) 19:39, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
