|
|
||
Line 444: | Line 444: | ||
:Ron's probably right but we should wait until McLaren or the FIA confirm the claim. After all, Dennis was just mentioning it. The decision could still be reverted - <font color="Black">[[User:Linczone|'''Linczone''']]</font><sup><font color="Olive">[[User talk:Linczone|''Talk'']]</font></sup><sup><font color="Olive">/</font></sup><sup><font color="Olive">[[User:Linczone/watchlist|''Watch'']]</font></sup> 16:55, 9 January 2008 (UTC) |
:Ron's probably right but we should wait until McLaren or the FIA confirm the claim. After all, Dennis was just mentioning it. The decision could still be reverted - <font color="Black">[[User:Linczone|'''Linczone''']]</font><sup><font color="Olive">[[User talk:Linczone|''Talk'']]</font></sup><sup><font color="Olive">/</font></sup><sup><font color="Olive">[[User:Linczone/watchlist|''Watch'']]</font></sup> 16:55, 9 January 2008 (UTC) |
||
McLaren has confirmed their number indeed is 23. Their test car in Spain sports #23. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2008 Formula One World Championship article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies |
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1 |
![]() | Formula One Start‑class | |||||||||
|
Now that it has been decided to keep the 2007 Formula One season article, it is important to keep the information contained within future season pages respectable. I have removed M Schumacher from the Toyota driver line up on the 2007 page. This is complete and utter speculation. I would suggest we apply the following guidelines to this article and similar speculative articles in relation to F1:-
1) If information is confirmed by a team, driver or the FIA then it should obviuosly be included. e.g. Alonso to McLaren in 2007
2) If information is strongly hinted by those invloved and backed up with a large amount of media writing but yet to be confirmed, it should be added but with a * (* = to be confirmed) and references (and links where possible) given.
3) If information has sufficient back-up i.e. respected media strongly suggest it to be true, then it can be added but with a ** (** = Strongly speculated) and references (and links where possible) given.
4) If information is mere speculation in media and general gossip, then it should NOT be added to the article but discussed on this talk page with references (and links where possible) given.
Feedback/comments please. MonkeyMumford 19:21, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I was just wondering when would the 2008 season not be concidered as a future event. Would it be now, that is 2008, when the FIA realese driver numbers or when the first car his the melborne track on friday prctice?Busubi (talk) 09:38, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
At the first Grand Prix it will change to being a current event Madraykin86 (talk) 11:14, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I was not aware that Renault had left the GPMA. Could you please supply a source to the story? I was aware the Renault are going to be considering their position in F1 every year from now on, but I never knew they had abandoned the GPMA. Manipe 15:04, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
http://www.formula-1.updatesport.com/news/article/1139743296/formula_one/F1headlines/Renault-to-break-GPMA-ranks/view.html and Pat Symonds quotes in F1 Racing Magazine March 06 "We Have Come To A Decision about the GPMA And that is we are signing up to Bernie's Agreement"
Sorry to be picky but I can't find the Pat Symonds quote in this months (March) F1 Racing. Could you provide more info and a page number? This is quite significant and I have not seen it mentioned anywhere else. The link you posted was incorrect. This is the correct one http://formula-1.updatesport.com/news/article/1139743296/formula_one/F1headlines/Renault-to-break-GPMA-ranks/view.html . This article is just pure speculation from Briatore. I haved changed the article back until Renault confirm. Also removed Honda and Toyota speculation. To my feeling, there is no point putting in speculation to these articles. It changes so quickly that we would spend our time updating content rather than improving quality.MonkeyMumford 20:43, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
What does MoU mean in the heading for the GPMA teams? Manipe 19:41, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry, it means Memorandum of Understanding. MonkeyMumford 17:34, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
With 2006 over and 2007 on its way, how long until we begin at the very least a preliminary drivers/team chart? We already know some contracts in place that extend into and through 2008. The359 19:23, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Team Constructor Chassis Engine Tyre No Driver Test driver(s) ING Renault F1 Team
Renault R28* Renault B TBA TBA TBA Scuderia Ferrari Marlboro
Ferrari TBA Ferrari B Kimi Räikkönen [1]
Luca Badoer [1]
Felipe Massa [1]
Vodafone McLaren Mercedes
McLaren MP4-23* Mercedes B TBA TBA TBA Honda Racing F1 Team
Honda RA108* Honda B Jenson Button [2]
TBA TBA BMW Sauber F1 Team
BMW Sauber F1.08* BMW B Nick Heidfeld [3]
TBA TBA Panasonic Toyota Racing
Toyota TF108* Toyota B Jarno Trulli [4]
TBA TBA Red Bull Racing
Red Bull TBA Renault [5] B TBA TBA TBA AT&T WilliamsF1 Team
Williams TBA Toyota [6] B TBA TBA TBA Scuderia Toro Rosso
Toro Rosso TBA TBA B TBA TBA TBA Spyker F1
Spyker TBA TBA B TBA TBA TBA Super Aguri F1
Super Aguri TBA Honda B TBA TBA TBA Prodrive [7]
Prodrive TBA TBA B TBA TBA TBA
To bring this up again, there SHOULD be some sort of drivers chart on this page since there is confirmed contracts in place that go through 2008, so we do know some drivers and even sponsors and engine packages. However no one seems to have been able to gather the proper information that will allow us to build a factual chart (and not that assumed one that some anonymous person keeps adding). The359 19:10, 14 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
RIPped 01:43, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Why is Heidfeld on this list? He hasn't signed a contract for 2008 with anyone yet. Sausageman 00:28, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Can anyone tell me why Giedo Van Der Garde is listed as a Spyker Driver when nothing was said ever about Sutil's teammate 99.247.17.188 —Preceding comment was added at 15:56, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Here isVan Der Garde's website He seems to think he's apart of spyker. Busubi 21:22, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
For Super Aguri 2008 Driver line up As a big Super Aguri Fan I can say without doubt that Sato and Davidson are not Confirmed for next year. The refferance in place is not official ie: super Aguri or the Official F1 or FIA websites. Busubi 21:23, 23 October 2007 (UTC
Kaz Nakajima confirmed for Williams 2008 drive Nakajima confirmed for 2008 so I will put Nakajima alongside Rosberg in WilliamsRIPped
Is it a bit too early to include Fisichella as a driver for Force India? I know there's a reference to AutoMoto365.com but there's been no official confirmation as of yet. Sausageman (talk) 11:26, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The Official Formula 1 Website has published the FIA's confirmed list of drivers for 2008. I have now updated the Super Aguri section. davepusey (talk) 16:11, 07 January 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.105.148.180 (talk) [reply]
If a driver goes testing for a team does that make them a test driver? For example Sam Bird tested for Williams on tuesday. Now as far as i'm aware there has been no anouncement that he's on the books as a test driver for them but he has tested. What does everybody else think? Busubi 19:16, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I seem to remember that when the FIA announced that Prodrive was the 12th team for 2008, that at they same time they also named all the teams that had officially applied. The article currently only lists 4 of the better known ones, but it might be nice if we had the complete list? The359 01:23, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
There's more teams (some genuine entries, and some rumours added by contributors here) named at the Future of Formula One article, but it wasn't the FIA that named them, but F1Racing. (The FIA didn't because it would have showed how little serious interest there was.)--Don Speekingleesh 21:09, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I think it's far too early to begin assuming on the race schedule, especially since you are placing in races that wish to be on the schedule but may not be, as well as assuming not only the order of all races, but also the order of where these 2 new races would go.
I think the drivers chart, shown above, is a far better concern for this article then trying to guess the schedule. The359 15:09, 13 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
2008 F1 season make
It seems a bit silly to me including the race numbers only for Prodrive. Especially considering they're (a) unreferenced and (b) caveated. (Note that I understand that the other team's numbers are dependent on the outcome of the 2007 championships). I recommend we leave all the numbers blank (or "TBA") until we know them all for certain. DH85868993 00:53, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I agree, especially with the message talking about the numbers if the champion was to move teams. Eddie6705 02:05, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
As well as the possibility of having cars 1 & 2 (ala Arrows in '97), in the event that another team withdraw from the 2008 Season, Prodrive will move up two numbers on the grid. Anyway, wouldn't the last team in the entry list have cars 23 & 24 not 24 & 25? Whatever, if unreferenced and challenged (as this is) the guideline is it stays out of the article. AlexJ 22:08, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
My arse are Rosberg and Alonso confirmed with Williams and McLaren for next season. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 82.70.161.157 (talk) 13:08, August 21, 2007 (UTC)
Alonso has a contract for next year, whether he stays or not is another issue.--Don Speekingleesh 21:09, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Hamilton's not likely to go to prodrive. But every new team would get 24 & 25. If you check teams like Mastercard Lola, BAR and Pacific they all took the last numbers as they were new teams.Pattav2 06:35, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Prodrives numbers should be put down as 24 & 25. Because if we get it wrong, its not our fault. That template at the top of the page says that information may CHANGE as the event progresses.Pattav2 13:01, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Difference is, BAR, Lola, etc, didn't come in a year after someone was excluded. If by some chance Alosno/Hamilton do fail to win the championship, I wouldn#t put it past Moseley to make them higher #s than prodive. Until the official entry list is published with numbers, leave em all blank. mattbuck 13:56, 26 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
See i was right all along about the numbers.Pattav2 08:32, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Spyker was bought by Indian busnessman Vijay Mallya. Ive edited the spyker team part and put Indian flag and TBA. OK? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.180.29.63 (talk) 12:09, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This is a quote from the official F1 site: Spyker’s new owners intend to change the team’s name to Force India for the 2008 season, it was revealed on Saturday. Indian businessman Vijay Mallya and Dutch entrepreneur Michiel Mol bought out the Silverstone-based squad earlier this month.
The new title, which is expected to be approved by the FIA next week, reflects Mallya’s previously declared aim of bringing an Indian flavour to the former Jordan team, which has undergone three ownership changes in the past two years.
“Having an Indian-owned Formula One team on the grid was something that was considered completely out of reach before,” Mallya told news agency Reuters. “This reflects the new India and new economic prosperity.”
The team’s new logo is also expected to include the Indian national flag within its design.
Spyker planning to become Force India for 2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Busubi (talk • contribs) 07:02, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The FIA have confimed the name change to Force India. As there is no mention of re registering as an Indian team, maybe the dutch flag should be put back next to the name.Busubi 16:17, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Because somebody was brainless enough to put Alonso as being confirmed for next year I have removed him because it isn't. Whoever did that is stupid and probably Alonso-obsessive and wanting to defy people into thinking he's driving there next year. 82.69.113.6 13:45, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The BBC Sport site is reporting that mclaren will announce Alonso's future in the team in early November. Busubi 21:31, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Neither current McLaren drivers confirmed for 2008 season, a word from Alonso's Manager is not guaranteed his seat, while offered a huge salary does not mean Hamilton will be stay. Also McLaren not officially announced the 2008 lineup, so why it can be put Alonso/Hamilton on the 2008 list? --Aleenf1 00:00, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Shouldn't McLaren have the numbers 3 and 4 for the 2008 season? i think it is done by the last season's driver's championship. this is why Fisichella is 3 in 2007 and Alonso was 1. so i think McLaren should have 3 and 4 for 2008. Kimi will be 1, Massa 2 etc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wbnd8000 (talk • contribs) 10:26, 22 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I agree wait, but i'm sure the numbers go in constructors championship order and not drivers except for 1 and 2 because the world champion has number 1 regardless. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Busubi (talk • contribs) 07:10, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I have added the numbers to the Ferrari. The number of Raikkonen should be #1, with no exception. Although he would not drive for Ferrari, he would still have the #1 car. So the Ferraris would get the number. However, at McLaren, Prodrive and ex-Spyker's case, I would not willing to give any number, because those teams' number still have to be confirmed. I think it would be a better decision. Raymond Giggs 09:26, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I think a few people are confused with car numbers. Since 1996 car numbers have been determined by there constructor finsh last season. EG Sauber came fourth in constructors in 2001 therefore they are numbers 7 & 8 for the next season. If a team ends up being confirmed to race for next year but end up going bankrupt, folding etc before the season EG Prost, the numbers do not change. Pattav2 06:48, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Should the 2008 car numbers be added onto the driver pages yet? There are a lot that can be filled in now if so due to driver confirmations and constructor standings from 2007. Tombag 23:28, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
whoops. sorry didn't notice that the numbers column was intentionally left out :) - oahiyeel talk 13:21, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Since Adrian Sutil appears in the drivers' table for 2008, despite the fact that he is in with a chance of landing the seat at McLaren, why is Heikki Kovalainen not in the table alongside Renault, since he too holds a contract for 2008? Surely if Sutil appears with FIndia, then Kova should appear with Renault?? Manipe 23:20, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
There is nothing"set in stone" Chassis being enclosed although Mark Webber; in his position as director of the GPDA has suggested that Cockpit safety is paramount [1]. I therefore suggest that it go under a separate section until concrete rule changes occur.Thelostlibertine (talk) 08:52, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Michael Schumacher, employed by Ferrari, as he is still a works Ferrari driver, FiA Super-license in-hand, this unique exception should be denoted in your Official Test Driver component, as such. That he can go to Fiorano, just snap his fingers, Ferrari will roll out an F2007 for him, anytime he likes, he should be shown as an official test driver in Ferrari's stable. Or, a special circumstance should be preserved, in a separate column, earmarked bay all drivers having tested for a particular F1 team, that season - asj.
Doornbos is currently listed on the drivers table as keeping his test seat at Red Bull for 2008, even though I can't read Dutch this is certainly what the citation suggests. However I was wondering what could be made of this: Doornbos in talks with BMW Sauber.
On that site a source is listed which is also a Dutch site, I was wondering if a Dutch speaker could read both the citation website and the BMW source site and say which seems to be more accurate. If this second article is true then that means that he does not have a 2008 contract with Red Bull and should be taken off the table.
Cheers! Tombag (talk) 16:29, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
In the drivers' table, Super Aguri are shown to have no drivers for 2008, whereas at the foot of the page, Sato and Davidson have been retained. Which is the case? --80.4.6.146 (talk) 17:20, 14 December 2007 (UTC)db1987db[reply]
Davidson and Sato are official ... the team just hasn't announced it. They are official drivers for 08 though and both have contracts. If we are waiting for official confirmation a few of the drivers that are currently on the list shouldn't be...I say we add them now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Peter-27 (talk • contribs) 17:07, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I still think we should add them now, as we know they are official team drivers for 2008. They or the team doesn't have to say anything to the media. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Peter-27 (talk • contribs) 00:16, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Just to let Everyone know, we are not adding Takuma SatoorAnthony Davidson until Super Aguri confirm them despite the fact they are on the FIA Entry List. The reason being according to Super Aguri no contracts have been signed. Although it is their intentions to keep the 2007 drivers, they can not sign them until arrangments are made with the sponsors. Please do not add them until their contracts are signed and SA announce it. Thanks - LinczoneTalk/Watch 15:10, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Formula1.com has confirmed Davidson and Sato driving for Super Aguri.
Why does the Driver changes say Fisichella has a seat with Force India, the site automoto365.com is a site run by the company of nicolas todt (jean's son) though he might be a reliable source of information at Ferrari elsewhere it isn't too sure. can anyone clarify this for me RIPped (talk) 14:27, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
recently there have been many additions of car numbers to the table at the bottom of the page. As per previous discussions, the numbers would not be put until the FIA announces the car numbers. Should the numbers remain? or be removed? - oahiyeel talk 07:35, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Since the FIA entry list is not final, Ron Dennis' comment that LH would be in car 23 is the more reliable source after all it's Dennis that gets to decide which McLaren carries which number. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.84.15.237 (talk) 13:11, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
McLaren has confirmed their number indeed is 23. Their test car in Spain sports #23.
{{cite news}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors=
(help)
{{cite news}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors=
(help)
{{cite news}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors=
(help)
{{cite news}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors=
(help)
{{cite news}}
: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors=
(help)