Contents

Talk:2009 Dusky Sound earthquake: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 21:43, 7 June 2024

2009 Dusky Sound earthquake is currently an Earth sciences good article nominee. Nominated by ―Panamitsu (talk) at 04:51, 5 June 2024 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria. Further reviews are welcome from any editor who has not contributed significantly to this article (or nominated it), and can be added to the review page, but the decision whether or not to list the article as a good article should be left to the first reviewer. Short description: Earthquake in New Zealand

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the 2009 Dusky Sound earthquake article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

It is requested that an imageorphotographof2009 Dusky Sound earthquakebeincluded in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search ToolorOpenverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

A fact from 2009 Dusky Sound earthquake appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 23 July 2009 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that New Zealand moved 30 centimetres (12 in) closer to Australia during a recent 7.8 magnitude earthquake? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2009/July. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/2009 Dusky Sound earthquake.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

New Zealand Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Earthquakes Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Earthquakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of earthquakes, seismology, plate tectonics, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EarthquakesWikipedia:WikiProject EarthquakesTemplate:WikiProject EarthquakesWikiProject Earthquakes articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Blimey. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Satirical Platypus (talk • contribs) 02:51, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

There were tsunami warnings and evacuations for Australia, but as there were no tsunami and the earthquake did not 'quake' Australia, should it really be listed as one of the countries affected? Adabow (talk) 10:03, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think we need a section on aftershocks. This data could be summarised, either verbally or as a graph and/or map. See 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake's section for an example. Adabow (talk) 10:06, 13 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This was not the "largest New Zealand earthquake", etc, but the "strongest", surely! Also, it was not a "magnitude 7.8 earthquake" but an earthquake of magnitude 7.8 on the Moment magnitude scale. There are other scales.203.184.41.226 (talk) 07:33, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The request to rename this article to 2009 Dusky Sound earthquake has been carried out. If the page title has consensus, be sure to close this discussion using {{subst:RM top|'''page moved'''.}} and {{subst:RM bottom}} and remove the {{Requested move/dated|…}} tag, or replace it with the {{subst:Requested move/end|…}} tag.

2009 Fiordland earthquake → 2009 Dusky Sound earthquake – 2009 Dusky Sound earthquake appears to be the common name.

Looking at Google Scholar:

• "2009 Dusky Sound earthquake" has 51 results
• "2009 Fiordland earthquake" has 21 results

GeoNet uses Dusky Sound

Media appears to be split between the two. ―Panamitsu (talk) 22:31, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

By the seventh day of opening this proposal you could just move to the new title (or ask at WP:RM) per WP:SILENCE. Given the low-profile of the topic and absence of discussions, I don't forsee any strong oppositions. It'll make the GA nomination smoother unless the reviewer decides to pitch in, Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 05:02, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support - earthquake seems to be more commonly referred to as the Dusky Sound earthquake than Fiordland more broadly. Turnagra (talk) 21:43, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]