Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Proposed page move  
1 comment  




2 Explanation needed  
1 comment  




3 Is it really not a stub?  
2 comments  













Talk:Argument map




Page contents not supported in other languages.  









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 




Print/export  



















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 85.224.198.207 (talk)at14:19, 26 November 2007. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
(diff)  Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision  (diff)

Proposed page move

I propose that this page, currently at "Argument maps" should be move to "Argument map" to conform with WP naming conventions regarding plurals of nouns. The page cannot be moved by a non-administrative user because the redirect page Argument map has a history. Grumpyyoungman01 22:07, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Explanation needed

Someone needs to write something about how these "argument maps" are contructed and interpreted. They don't make any sense to me. 85.224.198.207 (talk) 14:19, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Is it really not a stub?

As the stub tag has been removed, I'll not add it unilaterally, but it's really an inadequate treatment of the subject.

Where did they come from? What is the history? Are there competing formats? Who developed this one? Is there a standard maintained by some professional organization? Are improvements planned?

How do you read it? How do you construct it? What are the strengths of this particular design? Its weaknesses? What are the differenced and similarities in the way one represents the main contention, premises, co-premises, objections, rebuttals and lemmas?

Who uses this? What professions are they? Has any group abandoned this in favor of another argument visualization scheme? Does this arrangement have any name other than the generic "Argument map"?

How is it used in teaching? In tackling wicked problems?

I hope you can see why I considered throwing a "stub" tag on this, (before I reviewed the edit history). Mdotley 18:54, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok so there is more to say about argument mapping, I am just not the person to say it. Thanks for the message. - Grumpyyoungman01 23:34, 31 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Argument_map&oldid=173891341"





This page was last edited on 26 November 2007, at 14:19 (UTC).

This version of the page has been revised. Besides normal editing, the reason for revision may have been that this version contains factual inaccuracies, vandalism, or material not compatible with the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License.



Privacy policy

About Wikipedia

Disclaimers

Contact Wikipedia

Code of Conduct

Developers

Statistics

Cookie statement

Mobile view



Wikimedia Foundation
Powered by MediaWiki