Jump to content
 







Main menu
   


Navigation  



Main page
Contents
Current events
Random article
About Wikipedia
Contact us
Donate
 




Contribute  



Help
Learn to edit
Community portal
Recent changes
Upload file
 








Search  

































Create account

Log in
 









Create account
 Log in
 




Pages for logged out editors learn more  



Contributions
Talk
 



















Contents

   



(Top)
 


1 Anarchists should not be listed as supporting national autarky  
2 comments  




2 External links modified  
1 comment  




3 Prussianism  
1 comment  




4 Affirming the consequent?  
1 comment  













Talk:Autarky




Page contents not supported in other languages.  









Article
Talk
 

















Read
Edit
View history
 








Tools
   


Actions  



Read
Edit
View history
 




General  



What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Get shortened URL
Download QR code
 




Print/export  



Download as PDF
Printable version
 




Print/export  



















Appearance
   

 






From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 


This is an old revision of this page, as edited by ClueBot III (talk | contribs)at20:07, 12 July 2020 (Archiving 1 discussion to Talk:Autarky/Archives/2017. (BOT)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
(diff)  Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision  (diff)

Anarchists should not be listed as supporting national autarky

Anarchists are opposed to nationalism, so it makes no sense for them to be listed as supporting national autarky. http://www.infoshop.org/AnarchistFAQSectionD6 2001:268:C0C0:64C8:DCD9:1643:DA1F:2 (talk) 02:06, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There really should be a part about the current consensus, virtually no modern economists think Autarky leads to what you would call good outcomes. The only schools of thought that support protectionism are extreme fringe ones. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.74.158.114 (talk) 15:31, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Autarky. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:28, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Prussianism

Perhaps there should be a section devoted to Prussianism, as influenced by 17th century Teutonic order, 18th century guilds and cartelization, as implemented and promoted by n 19th century actors such as Baron von Stein, Otto von Bismark, Johannes Fichte, Friedrich List, etc., and as picked up in the 20th century by people such as Spengler and the Strassers.

24.47.1.165 (talk) 22:04, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Affirming the consequent?

The article states: "Nazi Germany under economics minister Hjalmar Schacht claimed to strive for self-sufficiency but pursued major international trade, albeit under a different system, to escape the terms of the Treaty of Versailles, satisfy business elites and prepare for genocide."

Some historians (no references off-hand sorry) claim that the phrase "Final Solution to the Jewish Question" meant expulsion of all Jews from continental Europe until the early stages of the war; thus describing autarchic policies in the 1930s as preparation for genocide seems to presume/assume that they were *designed* for that outcome but only in retrospect [indeed a slight majority of German Jews emigrated between 1933 and 1939, this would also undercut the notion that genocide was planned from the beginning, after all, how are you going to kill people if you let them flee to other countries {which may or may not come under your control}?]).Historian932 (talk) 17:22, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Autarky&oldid=967360466"

Categories: 
C-Class Economics articles
Mid-importance Economics articles
WikiProject Economics articles
C-Class politics articles
Mid-importance politics articles
WikiProject Politics articles
C-Class Trade articles
Mid-importance Trade articles
WikiProject Trade articles
Hidden category: 
Pages using WikiProject banner shell without a project-independent quality rating
 



This page was last edited on 12 July 2020, at 20:07 (UTC).

This version of the page has been revised. Besides normal editing, the reason for revision may have been that this version contains factual inaccuracies, vandalism, or material not compatible with the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License.



Privacy policy

About Wikipedia

Disclaimers

Contact Wikipedia

Code of Conduct

Developers

Statistics

Cookie statement

Mobile view



Wikimedia Foundation
Powered by MediaWiki