m Added {{WikiProjectBannerShell}}, talk page general fixes & other cleanup per WP:TPL using AWB (11749)
|
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 3 WikiProject templates. Keep majority rating "C" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 2 same ratings as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Brazil}}, {{WikiProject Paraguay}}.
|
||
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|1=
{{WikiProject Brazil
{{WikiProject Paraguay
{{WikiProject Military history|class= Start|B-Class-1=no|B-Class-2=yes|B-Class-3=yes|B-Class-4=yes|B-Class-5=yes|South-American=yes}}
}}
{{Annual readership}}
== Where the battle took place ==
The battle ocurred on the La Plata River in Argentine waters, nothing to do with the place shown in the map. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/200.198.204.68|200.198.204.68]] ([[User talk:200.198.204.68|talk]]) 13:19, 10 January 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:That was another battle, in a different Riachuelo. [[User:DPdH|DPdH]] ([[User talk:DPdH|talk]]) 21:07, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
== Rangel ==
Line 55 ⟶ 47:
No, the article says 247 casualties, not 247 deads. There are other sources with the same number of casualties, but with 123 deads and 124 missing and wounded. see: http://www.reocities.com/Pentagon/Camp/2523/
== Lost ships ==
Is there a source listing the Paraguayan ships lost? Thanks, [[User:DPdH|DPdH]] ([[User talk:DPdH|talk]]) 21:15, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
|
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org
|
The battle ocurred on the La Plata River in Argentine waters, nothing to do with the place shown in the map. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.198.204.68 (talk) 13:19, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The Rangel is a mistake in the Brazilian sources. there was no such ship at the battle. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Vawarner2000 (talk • contribs) 00:01, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
In the article of battle of Riachuelo is said that the Brazilan Forces had 247 deaths, but i found a list that says that the Brazil had: mortos (portuguese for deads) feridos (portuguese for wounded)
Amazonas -> 13 Mortos e 13 Feridos
Belmonte -> 9 Mortos e 23 Feridos
Iguatemi -> 1 Morto e 6 Feridos
Jequitinhonha -> 8 Mortos e 33 Feridos
Parnaíba -> 33 Mortos e 29 Feridos
Beberibe -> 5 Mortos e 19 Feridos
Araguari -> 2 Mortos e 5 Feridos
Ipiranga -> 1 Morto e 6 Feridos
Mearim -> 2 Mortos e 8 Feridos
Total 74 deaths 142 Wounded
i think this should be changed right? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cypher3 (talk • contribs) 23:53, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No, the article says 247 casualties, not 247 deads. There are other sources with the same number of casualties, but with 123 deads and 124 missing and wounded. see: http://www.reocities.com/Pentagon/Camp/2523/
Is there a source listing the Paraguayan ships lost? Thanks, DPdH (talk) 21:15, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]