Contents

Talk:Belphegor: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 01:39, 31 October 2013

The contents of the Belphegor in popular culture page were merged into Belphegor on 29 January 2010. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

Occultopedia

Much of the material has been copied from the Occultopedia. It should be reworded. 163.1.159.21 13:48, 31 January 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, not much thought has been given to the content of the article in the Occultopedia itself. There are typos and grammatical mistakes. I don't understand why his sacrificial offering being excrement is offered as a reason for his being difficult to conjure. Since excrement is a readily available material and easily acquired, I would have thought this counted towards making him easier - albeit unpleasant - to conjure. 163.1.159.21 13:54, 31 January 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't there also some kind of metal band called Belphegor? http://www.belphegor.at/ perhaps they should have some mention somewhere? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.227.132.150 (talk) 23:58, 14 June 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a simbol or something that represents Belphegor I found this http://belphegor.sanguinis.net/themes/belph/images/title.jpg picture at that webcomic but I'm uncertain of its origin. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Belphegor 666 (talk • contribs) 17:40, 6 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

>Should there be a link to Belphegor's mother, Necessity? :) njh 04:55, 4 September 2005 (UTC)<[reply]

Oops, admittedly I am not too interested in the Crowley - Magick line of thought. But I pray you where would I find out more about the the myth, or about Belphegor and Necessity.

Hmmm not a trace it seems in Mircea Eliade's history of religious ideas (Geschichte der religiösen Ideen). Just checked the index.

But concerning Belphegor Zappa came immediately to mind and thus: Necessity.

Nessecity is the Mother of Invention.

n'est pas?

LeaNder 16:29, 7 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

There are 2 bands named Belfegore. One was a band from 1984 that would be considered alternative metal (New Wave similar sound to the Cult). Their basic one hit wonder is available through amazon on a compilation called Retro Active 4... funny enough the one song they are fameous for is called "All that I wanted" and it really seems to follow along with the bands name. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.70.233.14 (talk) 17:14, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL Addhoc 18:23, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that the External Links section leads to a webcomic and an artist's painting, both little known. Isn't there a rule against such promotion? I think a link to some website about Ars Goetia or some such work might be more appropriate.Squidvillanueva (talk) 15:16, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Has Belphegor ever been mentioned in any translation/version of the Christian Bible? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.181.168.245 (talk) 09:45, 25 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I propose a merge of Belphegor in popular culture into Belphegor. Neither this article nor the "in popular culture" list, which was split (diff) from this article in December 2008, is long enough to require splitting (3 KB and 4 KB, respectively) and the amount and depth of content does not seem to necessitate separate treatment of the topics. Comments?

I would like to leave the discussion open (and the merge tags on the articles) for 3–5 days in order to allow ample opportunity for interested editors to comment. Thank you, –Black Falcon ^(talk) 07:56, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Done –Black Falcon ^(talk) 02:49, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stumpled upon this page http://www.neatorama.com/2012/03/15/belphegors-prime/ which talks about Belphegor's Prime:

Belphegor's Prime is a prime number - you know, a number greater than 1 that cannot be wholly divided by any other number besides 1 and itself.

But it's not just any prime number. For one, it's a palindromic prime number. Then, there's the 666 hiding among the zeroes:''

1000000000000066600000000000001

Curious if this is worthy of inclusion. 81.110.63.250 (talk) 01:26, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well anyone who wants to include it can cite this article (2nd para from bottom), which although not the best might be acceptable in proving its existence and thus helping to establish notability. --84.92.56.128 (talk) 01:39, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]